Love leaning in on these teachings from time to time again Thanks

Watched this 2 years ago and watching again still so good

Garbage. Doesn't resonate with me in the least. Very patronizing.

Ecclesiastes 9:5 For the living know that they shall die: but the dead know not ANYTHING, neither have they any more a reward; for the memory of them is forgotten. 6 Also their love, and their hatred, and their envy, is now perished; neither have they any more a portion for ever in any thing that is done under the sun. The soul without the spirit, which returns to God, and the body returns to dust, is dead in the grave (according to the Bible) This is the FIRST death. What does Jesus call this first death? Luke 8:52 “And all wept, and bewailed her: but he said, Weep not; she is not dead, but SLEEPETH.” Matthew 9:24 He said unto them, Give place: for the maid is not dead, but SLEEPETH. And they laughed him to scorn. 1 Thessalonians 4:13 13 But I would not have you to be ignorant, brethren, concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not, even as others which have no hope. 14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which SLEEP in Jesus will God bring with him. 15 For this we say unto you by the word of the Lord, that we which are alive and remain unto the coming of the Lord shall not prevent them which are asleep. 16 For the Lord himself shall descend from heaven with a shout, with the voice of the archangel, and with the trump of God: and the dead in Christ shall rise first: Deuteronomy 31:16 16 And the Lord said unto Moses, Behold, thou shalt SLEEP with thy fathers; and this people will rise up, and go a whoring after the gods of the strangers of the land, whither they go to be among them, and will forsake me, and break my covenant which I have made with them. Daniel 12:2 2 And many of them that SLEEP in the dust of the earth shall awake, some to everlasting life, and some to shame and everlasting contempt. What did Jesus call those dead in the grave ? John 11:11-15 11 These things said he: and after that he saith unto them, Our friend Lazarus SLEEPETH; but I go, that I may awake him out of SLEEP. 12 Then said his disciples, Lord, if he sleep, he shall do well. 13 Howbeit Jesus spake of his DEATH: but they thought that he had spoken of taking of rest in sleep. 14 Then said Jesus unto them plainly, Lazarus is DEAD. And according to the Bible, we KNOW that the story Jesus told about Lazarus and the Rich Man is a PARABLE Matthew 13:33 34 All these things spake Jesus unto the multitude in parables; and without a parable SPAKE HE NOT unto them: 35 That it might be fulfilled which was spoken by the prophet, saying, I will open my mouth in parables; I will utter things which have been kept secret from the foundation of the world.

The soul is the union of the spirit, the breath of God, and the body, creating a "living soul". According to the Bible, when we die, the spirit, the breath of life returns to God who gave it, and the body returns to dust. "The soul that sinneth it shall die" "fear not who can destroy the body, fear who can destroy the body and soul in hell". The soul can die. Jesus called the first death "sleep". The second death is annihilation. I would not say the soul is asleep, it is simply not a "living soul" but has died the first death. The second death is the permanent destruction of the soul. And there is no consciousness in the grave or in the lake of fire - according to the Bible "the dead know not anything". And the soul and even hell itself is cast into the lake of fire and destroyed.

The soul is the union of the spirit, the breath of God, and the body, creating a "living soul". According to the Bible, when we die, the spirit, the breath of life returns to God who gave it, and the body returns to dust. "The soul that sinneth it shall die" "fear not who can destroy the body, fear who can destroy the body and soul in hell". The soul can die. Jesus called the first death "sleep". The second death is annihilation. I would not say the soul is asleep, it is simply not a "living soul" but has died the first death. The second death is the permanent destruction of the soul. And there is no consciousness in the grave or in the lake of fire - according to the Bible "the dead know not anything". And the soul and even hell itself is cast into the lake of fire and destroyed.

God is present EVEN in hell. Psalm 139:8 8 If I ascend into heaven, You are there; If I make my bed in [a]hell, behold, You are there.

Term I would use is “free will” for describing the choice. In the nuances of words. I would say an Arminian is not doing anything to be saved, that is Jesus’ work. But rather accepting the gift or rejecting the gift.

You can rethink anything. That doesn't make it right. Rev 14 9-11 explicitly says that he'll is eternal torment. Never ending suffering.

I am happy to hear your explanation on end time and rapture. This does help me in what i always felt was how the Lord would like us understand. Thank you and God bless.

Where can I hear the full massage?

I've always wondered, why believe anything in the Bible? Everything in it can be explained by people making up stories and then the church perpetuating these stories as truth. This way of explaining the Bible works for all other religions. You've got martyrs of Islam and miracles in Islam. I doubt any Christian thinks the martyrs of Islam died for the truth of Islam or that Mohammad really split the moon (A miracle). There isn't any good evidence for the Bible. The Bible is a bunch of claims propped up by an organization that made more claims we can't back.

Where is the full clip or video?

Isa (Name of Jesus) peace be upon him is a prophet/messenger and not a God. No one die for your sins, you have to make good deeds self. You should know about last and final testament, book, scripture, the holy Quran.

Father Georges Lemaître in 1927 conceptualized the Big Bang Theory

@drchipbennett I checked the suggested website, I was not able to find the handout. Would you mind providing the direct link to the handout? I would really be appreciative.

AUDIENCE RELEVANCE IS KEY.

Thank you Michael

Wow, my GOD you are awesome!

I think my heart is going to explode. God is amazing!!!!!!

Kamal seriously makes me want to puke

i love you frank but dont be so sure the stars are that far away. also the "photos" are digitalized, colorized, and absolutely not real.

13:47 Isn’t Kenneth Gentry’s Doctoral thesis on the dating of Revelation also a good scholarly resource?

Life is came from outer space. From the sixth planet of the Hoth system.

"What is god like". Great another theistic production where someone discusses something they could not possibly have the answer to . And the sheeple with believe him. Isn't atheism fantastic.....

Are not the two witnesses the law & the prophets? Revelation is the revealing of Jesus. Blessings

This guy is clearly a calvanist or leans that way.

No evidence at all about the resurection only what talkers up the front with their names in big letters behind them push you to believe fast talking salesmen sheep hurders its really sad that the gullible fall for these churches

Since Donald Trump said; "I am not in need of any forgiveness." Why is Trump worshipped by so many millions of Christians?

A note to the readers. Let me know what you think after the articles below, if the articles remain posted that is?

Just mistskie. Yes, actuslly is was blasophomy to call your self SON OF GOD with jewesh leaders . Look again

John 1:1 It is in John 1:1 that the nature of the Logos (the Word) is explicitly stated. The first verse of John, as translated in the King James Version, reads: “In the beginning was the Word [ho logos], and the Word was with God [ton theon, accusative case of ho theos], and the Word was God [theos]” (John 1:1). In the Greek this is: En arche en ho logos, kai ho logos en pros ton theon, kai theos en ho logos. The Greek sentence ends with the crucial words: kai theos en ho logos (“and god was the Word”). We are concerned here with the Greek noun theos (“god”) written without the definite article. This contrasts with the first mentioning of this noun expressed by ton theon, the accusative case of ho theos (“the God”), i.e., the noun theos preceded by the definite article ho. In this verse, reference is made to God and the Logos, not to three beings. When John 1:1 refers to the Word as “god,” there is really no basis for concluding that he is the second person of a triune deity. This is evident from the Greek text, where, as we have just seen, the definite article ho appears before the first mention of God in the sentence, but is omitted before the second. The presence of the definite article before the noun suggests an identity, a personality, whereas its absence merely suggests a quality about someone. In the New Testament, the definite article usually precedes the noun theos when it denotes the one-and-only God. Since the Greek definite article is omitted before the second mention of theos, no proof for the existence of a triune deity can be accurately adduced from this verse. The omission of the definite article before the second mention of theos causes the word theos to act merely as an adjective that describes the nature of the Word. It thus serves as a predicate adjective rather than as a predicate noun.21 For this reason, some translators render John 1:1 as “the word was deity” or “was divine.” This is quite different from the trinitarian view that the Word was God and was identical with God. If the Word was toward God, or with God, or for God, it is impossible to say that it was God. If it was God, it could stand in no relationship to God. The author of John is expressing his belief that Jesus, the Word, was not “the God” but “a god.” It should not be considered unusual that a New Testament author refers to Jesus as a “god” since he is considered to be the supernatural agent that is the decisive link between God and His creation. The term “god” is applied even to the evil angel Satan, “the god of this world” (2 Corinthians 4:4). Indeed, Paul says: “there are many gods and many lords but for us there is but one God, the Father, . . . and one Lord, Jesus Christ” (1 Corinthians 8:5-6). Since referring to Jesus as a god would not make him, in any way, part of the one-and-only God, the proper translation of John 1:1 should be: “In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with [literally “toward”] God, and the Word was a god.” There is no reason to assume that the need for a definite article is understood from the context in order to be able to translate the end of the verse as, “and the Word was [the] God.” John means that the god mentioned here was not the only god, i.e., a supernatural being. 21 Maximillian Zerwick, Biblical Greek, Rome: Scripta Ponificii Instituti Biblici, 1963, p. 55, par. 171; p. 57, par. 176.

You mentioned the JEHOVAHS WITNESSE translate John 1:1as a god. TO YOUR DIDAGREEMENT. HOWEVER. CAN YOU EXPLAIN YOUR STANCE TO OTHER TRANSLATORS, FOR EXAMPLE The Koine Greek language had a definite article (“the”), but it did not have an indefinite article (“a” or “an”). So when a predicate noun is not preceded by the definite article, it may be indefinite, depending on the context. ➔ The Journal of Biblical Literature says that expressions “with an anarthrous [no article] predicate preceding the verb, are primarily qualitative in meaning.” As the Journal notes, this indicates that the lo′gos can be likened to a god. It also says of John 1:1: “The qualitative force of the predicate is so prominent that the noun [the·os′] cannot be regarded as definite.” ➔ Joseph Henry Thayer, a theologian and scholar who worked on the American Standard Version, stated simply: “The Logos was divine, not the divine Being himself.” ➔ And Jesuit John L. McKenzie wrote in his Dictionary of the Bible: “Jn 1:1 should rigorously be translated . . . ‘the word was a divine being.’” ➢ 1808: “and the word was a god.” The New Testament in an Improved Version, Upon the Basis of Archbishop Newcome’s New Translation: With a Corrected Text. ➢ 1864: “and a god was the word.” The Emphatic Diaglott, interlinear reading, by Benjamin Wilson. ➢ 1928: “and the Word was a divine being.” La Bible du Centenaire, L’Evangile selon Jean, by Maurice Goguel. ➢ 1935: “and the Word was divine.” The Bible-An American Translation, by J. M. P. Smith and E. J. Goodspeed. ➢ 1946: “and of a divine kind was the Word.” Das Neue Testament, by Ludwig Thimme. ➢ 1950: “and the Word was a god.” New World Translation of the Christian Greek Scriptures. ➢ 1958: “and the Word was a God.” The New Testament, by James L. Tomanek. ➢ 1975: “and a god (or, of a divine kind) was the Word.” Das Evangelium nach Johannes, by Siegfried Schulz. ➢ 1978: “and godlike kind was the Logos.” Das Evangelium nach Johann

First. Get one issue out of the way. MANY MANY MANY SCHOlORS AND RESRARCHERS REJECT THE TRINITY. YET YOU SINGLE OUT JW. A FACT YOU MUST FACE,, THE TRUTH ABOUT TRINITY IS SLOWY BEING EXPOSED FOR WHAT IT IS. THE TRANSLATION OF " A GOD " HAS BEEN USED SINCE TRANSLATING BEGAN. FIRST, YOU CONVIENTLY OVERLOOOK tm" the Word was with THE GOD.. ( TON THEON) LATE ( IN C) YOU CLAIM JESUS WAS GOD. WHY ,WHY DIDNT THE WRITER JUST SAY " JESUS WAS " THE GOD" AS HE STATED EARLIER. BUT , BUT THE WRITER USED " THEOS" TO " DESCRIBE" JESUS " . JESUS IS TRULY WITH GOD IN A UNIQUE RELATIONSHIP. ITS CALLED FATHER AND SON!! NOTHING ABOUT " COINCIDENTAL / CONCENTRIC BEINGS. JESUS WAS WITH HIS FATHER AT THE BEGINING OF CREATION OF ALL THINGS FATHERS DONT CREATE THEIR SONS! FATHERS BEGET THEIR SONS. THE FATHER JEHOVAH " CREATED" A LL THING. ALL THING WERE " MADE" THROUGH AND BY MEANS OF JESUS THE SON AND THE MASTER WORKER. PLEASE RESEARCH , CREATE VS MAKE,

John 1:1. Jw curosity kzfaq.info/get/bejne/kJmFi7aXncXTiGQ.html&si=mevkyElCi1yQhnkB Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

Did John mean “God” or “a god”? The criticism about this phrase usually gives the impression that the translation “a god” in John 1:1c is something exclusive of JWs, almost a fancy of ours, while in fact, there are other translations that understand this part of the verse in a similar way; for example: "and the Word was a god."--THE NEW TESTAMENT IN AN IMPROVED VERSION (1808) (As shown in the picture above.) "The Word was a God."--THE NEW TESTAMENT IN GREEK AND ENGLISH by Abner Kneeland (1822) "as a god the Command was."--A LITERAL TRANSLATION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT by Herman Heinfetter (1863) "And (a) God was the word"--THE COPTIC VERSION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT by George William Homer (1911) "the Word was a God"-- THE NEW TESTAMENT OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS ANOINTED by James L. Tomanec (1958) "and a god was the Logos"--DAS EVANGELIUM NACH JOHANNES By Jurgen Becker (1979) So, a curious thing about this oft presented criticism is that it completely ignores the fact that competent Greek translators had translated John 1:1 the way the Witness translators did long before Jehovah’s Witnesses of modern times even came into existence. But let’s focus on the Greek text and its translation: In Koine Greek there isn’t an indefinite article, it doesn’t exist. So, whereas “God” (in nominative) is written “HO THEOS” (with definite article), “a god” is written “THEOS” (with no article). John 1:1c says: “THEOS EN HO LOGOS”. So, the way to translate this, using the same word order, should be: “A god was the Word”. Since the subject is the second element, in natural English it should be “The Word was a god.”

Coptic kione jn 1 1 inthenameofwhowhat.blogspot.com/2008/05/early-coptic-translation-and-john-11c.html?m=1#:~:text=The%20Coptic%20text%20of%20John,with%20%5Bthe%5D%20God.%E2%80%9D Yahoo Mail: Search, Organize, Conquer

Did John mean “God” or “a god”? The criticism about this phrase usually gives the impression that the translation “a god” in John 1:1c is something exclusive of JWs, almost a fancy of ours, while in fact, there are other translations that understand this part of the verse in a similar way; for example: "and the Word was a god."--THE NEW TESTAMENT IN AN IMPROVED VERSION (1808) (As shown in the picture above.) "The Word was a God."--THE NEW TESTAMENT IN GREEK AND ENGLISH by Abner Kneeland (1822) "as a god the Command was."--A LITERAL TRANSLATION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT by Herman Heinfetter (1863) "And (a) God was the word"--THE COPTIC VERSION OF THE NEW TESTAMENT by George William Homer (1911) "the Word was a God"-- THE NEW TESTAMENT OF OUR LORD AND SAVIOR JESUS ANOINTED by James L. Tomanec (1958) "and a god was the Logos"--DAS EVANGELIUM NACH JOHANNES By Jurgen Becker (1979) So, a curious thing about this oft presented criticism is that it completely ignores the fact that competent Greek translators had translated John 1:1 the way the Witness translators did long before Jehovah’s Witnesses of modern times even came into existence. But let’s focus on the Greek text and its translation: In Koine Greek there isn’t an indefinite article, it doesn’t exist. So, whereas “God” (in nominative) is written “HO THEOS” (with definite article), “a god” is written “THEOS” (with no article). John 1:1c says: “THEOS EN HO LOGOS”. So, the way to translate this, using the same word order, should be: “A god was the Word”. Since the subject is the second element, in natural English it should be “The Word was a god.”

Sort of pathetic that Frank's evidence for an almighty being is so far-fetched. I cannot imagine that any thinking peerson would be swayed by such nonsense.

Real gifted teacher. Beautifully explained. Praise the Lord and thank you for these classes Dr. Bennet

Remember that the church is the body of Christ, and the Kingdom of God is in our hearts as his body.❤

The important question to ask is "what is God?" If you know the answer everything else will be easy to answer. If we try to define God as a superbeing that somehow resembles human beings ie like a father or king, with human emotions, with the same human image and likeness, then that would be an insult to God's infinite greatness, it's a deep disrespect to the point of mockery. This is probably the reason why people couldn't agree among themselves if God exists or doesn't exist, they're talking about the wrong god/s. It is a well known fact that energy cannot be created or destroyed, It has no beginning and ending, it is present everywhere from a quark to the entire universe and can transform into matter. God is the Sum of Energies/ Experiences/ Everything (SOE) which can be described as the One Energy. Nothing could be greater than that. God is omnipotent - ALL powerful, omniscient - ALL knowing and omnipresent - present everywhere at ALL times. This can only happen if God is all ALL/ EVERYTHING. The universe cannot possibly expand because energy cannot be created. It's our ability to see farther that expands. I believe this theory of expansion will be proven inacurate. Is it not possible that the reason galaxies move further is because of an unknown force? It's either our universe has no boundaries or it is contained inside a bigger universe together with an infinite number of universes and so on and so forth. If we can grasp the concept of infinity, we would have a better understanding of what God is. In the beginning (probably the beginning of our observable universe) was the Word and the Word is God. In other words God is anything that can be described in words. The word God means good while Devil = evil. Everything that happens whether it is perceived as good or evil is of God's own doing because God is EVERYTHING which means something good will ALWAYS come out from it since God = Good. Without the words negative, wrong and bad the words positive, right and good won't exist. If we don't know sadness, we won't know what happines is. Solutions always come after problems. Without the negative electrical charged electron there won't be life. Without death we won't be able to see the value of life. It's a constant reminder that we should do something great with our lives. Death is not entirely a bad thing, it's just a new life transformed; energy will never cease to exist. God is definitely good. Failure motivates us to become a better person especially if we believe that God = good. The transformation from a simple cell to complex beings such as humans, through trial and error which took a very long time is definitely a good thing. Evolution came about because of chance and things got better when matter had the option to choose. If energy is movement it's just natural that it can transform into another form of movement such as the living cell with the initial options positive or negative and basically as naive as a rock. With infinite possibilities and time anything is possible with God's infinite greatness. The transformation from energy to man is one of them which I believe signifies the importance of Christ's teachings. I don't think God is perfect because obviously we are not perfect. I believe the purpose of God's existence is to become better and greater, from nothing to something until God reaches perfection as that is the logical direction. Nothing was ever created only transformed from the basic unit of existence which is Energy. For me Energy also means "InnerG" or Inner God. As part of the One Energy, we are part of God ourselves or God is inside us. Even non living things and animals are part of God but as humans we are capable of realizing the God in us. Praying to God is just like talking to your inner self which is connected to everything else. We should always thank God for allowing and choosing us to be part of God's existence and tell God what we can do for God instead of saying what God can do for us, and carry out our purpose of existences which is to get better and greater. Saying "thank you God for providing me with all I need to become better and greater", "I always think and do what's right" or any mantra that'll make you a better person, repeatedly, as often as you can in your mind, or verbally if you can, until it becomes automatic and forces you to forget and eliminate negative thoughts and actions, will be a tremendous help in your quest to become the best you can be. Consuming only natural food and water, fasting and adequate physical movement play an important role in maintaining optimal health which would aid you to perform your best. Doing your best in everything you do, (ie from folding a shirt to programming micro robots to repair a single DNA strand), as much as you can will train you to be the best you can ever be. Philippians 2:13 13 for it is God who works in you, both to will and to work for his good pleasure. 13 For God is working in you, giving you the desire and the power to do what pleases him. 13 That energy is God's energy, an energy deep within you, God himself willing and working at what will give him the most pleasure. We should be reminded that whatever we do is God's doing. If we all believe that, we would be able to do great things. As part of an infinitely great God we are infinitely great ourselves. With infinite possibilities, I won't be surprised if there are superbeings that can live thousands of years if not forever and can travel as fast as energy can travel because that's where we're going. Human nature consists of problems that are progressively being solved using variables to make an equation perfect. I believe heaven is a state where God's existence is perfect although it's not permanent and an end goal by itself. There is only one God, everything included. Whoever is reading this I want you to know that I love you so much, please constantly seek and be reminded of the God or the good in you as much as you can. Religion tends to disunite us because of the different beliefs and gods. Let's all unite and believe in one God, the God/ good within us. Spread the GOOD/ GOD news by being the best you can be.

Im a Christian.. a believer of jesus .. but i dont believe in revelation phropecy about 2nd comming.. about 666... even jesus didn't mention about 2nd coming about 666... believe the son of god not by a human like elijah

Powerful!! Praise God

There is no Trinity. So many lies.

Trust needs to be given to the God of Jesus who raised him from the dead. Nothing will change until the one true GOD is worshipped. Not a man.

The guy answeing the questions to needs to look into Michael Heisers work.... And study the old testament a little better... The other gods do exisit they are angels that were put over the nations. Deuteronomy 32, psalm 82

In the depths of one of the most serious conversation regarding the pending martyrdom of the Apostles Christ was both trying to console them and warn them of their fate. In doing so, Christ warns them that as the Sabbath keepers called Christ Satan and persecuted and murdered Christ, the Apostles too would be called Satan and be persecuted as well as murdered. And it is here, that Christ most consoles them saying that when those wicked murder the Apostles, NOT TO FEAR, because, while they KILL THE BODY, *THEY CANNOT KILL THE SOUL* . It is ONLY the body being killed not their soul which live after the death of the body. Thus Christ says in Mt. 10:16-28. 16 “Behold, I send you forth as sheep in the midst of wolves. Be ye therefore wise as serpents and harmless as doves. 17 But beware of men, for they will deliver you up to the councils, and *they will scourge you in their synagogues, (notice where they are BEATEN, in the Jewish Synagogue, by the Sabbath keepers) Christ says the Sabbath keepers " Mt. 23:34 "..behold, *I send unto YOU prophets, and wise men* , and scribes: and *of them YOU shall kill and crucify;* and of them shall YOU scourge in *your* synagogues, and *persecute them from city to city* : (Rev. 17vs 6) Back to Mt. 10:18 and ye shall be brought before governors and kings for My sake, for a testimony against them and the Gentiles. 19 But when they deliver you up, take no thought how or what ye shall speak, for it shall be given you in that same hour what ye shall speak. 20 For it is not ye that speak, but the Spirit of your Father who speaketh in you. 21 And the brother shall deliver up the brother to death, and the father the child; and the children shall rise up against their parents and cause them to be put to death. 22 And ye shall be hated by all men for My name’s sake, but he that endureth to the end shall be saved. 23 But when they persecute you in this city, flee ye into another; for verily I say unto you, ye shall not have gone through the cities of Israel till the Son of Man be come. 24 “The disciple is not above his master, nor the servant above his lord. 25 It is enough for the disciple that he be as his master, and the servant as his lord. If they have called the master of the house Beelzebub, how much more shall they call them of his household! ( *the Church* ). 26 Fear them not therefore, for there is nothing covered that shall not be revealed, and hid that shall not be known. 27 What I tell you in darkness, that speak ye in light; and what ye hear in the ear, that *preach ye upon the housetops.* 28 And fear NOT them that KILL the BODY, *BUT ARE NOT ABLE TO KILLL THE SOUL;* but rather fear Him that is able to destroy both soul and body in hell. *Please read carefully the words of Christ to his apostles in verse 27. The apostles were to PREACH THESE VERY WORDS "UPON THE HOUSETOPS" . And, the words are clearly that they that kill the body *CANNOT BE KILL SOUL* The Adventists and JWs alike both preach that the wicked CAN KILL BOTH BODY AND SOUL as do the Atheists. Thus, when St. Stephen the Sabbath keepers gnashed their teeth on St. Stephen like a bunch of rabid wolves and then stoned him, St. Stephen said in Acts 7:59 And they stoned Stephen as he called upon God and said, “Lord Jesus, receive my spirit!”, for he had been well taught the words of Christ, that those KILL THE BODY *CANNOT KILL THE SOUL* Contrary to Ellen G. White the false prophet. The same promises are made to those who are in TORMENTED this LIFE while others are arrogant and selfish, those who suffer are "comforted," in paradise at death, while those who are at comfort in this life, will be tormented IN HADES. (Luke 16:19-31) The Adventists hate these teachings because they are truth and come from Christ. *The Adventist wish to take every consolation from the poor and suffering and the hope of comfort and paradise away from the Christian, and let them die as do Atheists.*

But why are you yelling?? Get a microphone pastor .....

Binding of moses law...Now one has to accept Jesus into their heart compliments the fulfillment of the law in your heart because from heart proceed all issues of life