This was very special. Thanks so much for hosting this event!

I bet u someone will comment, "stop using bts for views."

Fascinating, would love to hear him on ganymede

Nice fellow! But why do they slide in these useless comments obstructing the view and leave them for a whole minute?? An do we have to look at his talking head ALL the time,albeit in the lower corner?! Very amateurish,it could have been such agreat video!

What a well done presentation. *Thank you!*

Just love da Vinci - superb;- kzfaq.info/get/bejne/gM17f9Njt7vHiWw.html

💖💖

💖💖

💖

💖💖

Very interesting! Thx 👍👋

Delightful presentation! OMG! Victor Coons was obviously the “role model” for Tom Hanks in The DaVinci Code!

Just had an astonishing realization. On the minute 15 there is a segment about Mona Lisa (Louvre) hands being painted after transfer from a drawing! While nothing wrong with the transfer technique the lecturer missed an important point. Transfer from the drawing is used to save time and effort when painter is working of the large and complicated painting or fresco, and often doing so in awkward body position. Signs of Leonardo doing a transfer from the drawing on the "normal" sized painting means a very different thing - copying. Even if Leonardo was not sure how to paint hands of Mona Lisa and did some preliminary drawings, he, as an experienced painter, would just paint from looking at the drawing rather than doing a cumbersome transfer. According to my theory shown in the video below, Leonardo was copying most things except the face from earlier, Isleworth Mona Lisa. Ironically while Isleworth Mona Lisa is also a copy from the other, contemporaneous, but now lost painting, it might have traces of transfer, but might not have them at all - Leonardo was younger and could have rely on visual guidance rather than cumbersome transfer technique, and, at the time, did not have an objective for the copy to be so exact in details as Louvre Mona Lisa in relation to the Isleworth Mona Lisa! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/pZmGhdt3l8rJd6c.html

Awesome video! I’ve gained so much insight I wasn’t aware of! Thank you 🙂

Interesting! And given the number of views, very very underrated!! Lots to learn from this lecture and the enthusiasm rubs off! Thank you 😊

As if you need a chemist to follow a recipe. Only in liberal universities would one need a chemist to follow a tried and proven millenia old recipe.

Why don't you guys ever show the art of and discuss the art of the people whom were famous during the renaissance. Yes, Michaelangelo and Leo, but also Artemisia Gentilesci, Sofonisba, Patula Nelli, Lavinia Fontana, Fede Galizia, etc etc etc. These women are far far far more interesting, talented, skilled than Michaelangelo, Leonardo and Raphael. For they weren't allowed to learn or study art and yet, they were now famous and more sought after during their lifetime than any male artist of the renaissance. The ONLY reason Michaelangelo painted the Sistine was because he got caught stealing from the pope. He had two choices, paint or prison.

Interesting and very informative lekture. I love to draw and have always done so and still do. And I have always ben very curious abort differentiere styles and techniques and Wayne of drawing from Classica to somatic, intuitive and Munch more. I have the deep femling that. drawing is a kind of embodied observing- seeing-feeling-touching-xperiencing - knowing- expressing. It is a basic practice of relating deeply into the process of an embodied knowledge 😊🎶🩶🎵

To supplement your information on the making of linen (flax) paper, here is a link to Magnoliapaper.com in Oakland, CA,. Founder and Director Don Farnsworth is re-creating 16th-century, Renaissance Style paper from linen and hemp. www.magnoliaeditions.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/09/Renaissance-ppr-texture_Ry_DF-Hot4-NS-Maxedit-Sept22.pdf

A very interesting lecture --and one which made clear to me at least , that these artists ,first, spent years learning how to use the tools and materiels -- and developing the skills needed-- to create their art . It was not their "Imagination and creativity " alone, that made them great artists -- but that ,combined with their great craftsmanship . Something many modern "artists" , I suspect, do not appreciate.

🎊 ᑭяỖｍｏ𝓼𝐦

¡Maravilloso!

i love art

Fascinating

21:48 part ll

Those aren't pin pricks... those are flakes of charcoal from the rub tracing. Nice !@#$ing try though. I'm months (maybe less) from exposing this "Renaissance" art for what it really is; Plagiarism of God; in which the Vatican takes credit for; in an attempt at covering up creation. Pin pricks? How about a demonstration? Otherwise it's just a theory. I know it's BS.; people will believe anything. I can show you what charcoal looks like when it's used to trace an image off of stone. @13:02 It looks like what this video is calling pin pricks. Your time is coming to an end... I !@#$ing swear, you'll know my name, you'll know it was me, I will show you the truth. - DaeM

@19:54 How about the image was traced (rubbed over with charcoal), then drawn in and highlighted, THEN grid lines were drawn over the image?

It's rare to find such informative and interesting art videos here on YT. Thanks!

this is so cool thanks

SO exciting to see the exploration of materials and THE SCIENCE of art given its due. FINALLY!!! ,Beautifully done here. Thank you so much!

Very good evening

‘To pretend, I actually do the thing: I have therefore only pretended to pretend.’ kzfaq.info3n3-r8s4zXE?feature=share

we wrote book on renaissance art from 1600s that features american natives from southeastern usa. would appreciate you take time to check them out . ive uploaded a video format of the book on my ytpage.

thanks for the video. I have a painting of him from 1571, signed in antwerpis. very interesting information. here in germany is no expert for the painter.

Great job on the Split Oak forest!

Thanks very much, very interesting