GROUCHY betrayed Napoleon and was bought by the gold of the Rothschilds.
@flashgordon6670Күн бұрын
Thanks I learned a lot about mid 18th Century warfare. The French defence was far too strong, the Allies were uncoordinated and careless. The French got the upper hand on both flanks and inevitably, were able to counter attack in the centre. The Allies needed to put more in the woods, win their right flank and neutralise the French cannon positions. Also exploit the gap in the French right of centre, in between the village fortress and the French cannon battery. An Allies column attack there, instead of their broad line attack, would’ve caused disarray and panicked the French. The Allies could then exploit the opportunity, to attack on the other side of the village, to neutralise the other cannons facing the centre. Simultaneously making the centre push, to pin down the French line, or force them to withdraw, as they did so. Then the Allies could’ve supported their centre on both flanks and minimised their casualties from the French guns. This would’ve prevented the French organising their general counter attack and enveloping the British square column. The Allies also didn’t deploy their cavalry at all. They should’ve been used to support and assist the flank attacks, to maximise the chaos for the French and prevent them regrouping to counter the Allies flank attacks. This way the British would’ve had a lot more left to give and been able to press onwards, instead of going defensive and finally retreating. Also the Allies/British pulling back their cannon line was the stupidest blunder of all. They should’ve been used to blast the Frenchie’s second line, to protect a possible retreat and as a rallying point for a retreat. This was a very strange battle, almost as if the Allied commander knew they were going to lose from the start. Literally every move the Allies made was absurd. Even asking the French to shoot first was insane. The French knew they had the longer term advantage. That’s why they told the British to shoot first and King Louis XV didn’t withdraw. “A scene like Againcourt.” - Not really, they had longbows at Againcourt, not muskets.
@alexandercormack6818Күн бұрын
11th of Foot later the Devonshire Regiment have the Malplaquet battle honour on their colours . I served in the Devonshire and Dorset Regiment.
@konst80humКүн бұрын
Excellent as always. Love the period artwork.
@konst80hum3 күн бұрын
Great content! Thanks
@dominiquehennequin11923 күн бұрын
Your map is not correct, Lille, Tournai and Leuze are on the same line; whereas on the map you are using Tournai is much further downstream on the Escaut.
@NobleKorhedron3 күн бұрын
Why is he describing the French skirmishers as "tireurs"; shouldn't they be known as "voltigeurs"...?
@FieldMarshalYT3 күн бұрын
Voltigeurs, Tirailleurs, and Chasseurs are different classes of light infanttry.
@NobleKorhedron3 күн бұрын
Just to clarify, @@FieldMarshalYT, why is the term "chasseur" used? Are chasseurs not usually cavalry?
@FieldMarshalYT3 күн бұрын
@@NobleKorhedron As someone on my Discord explained it: Chasseurs were the light infantry counterpart of the fusilier. They formed the basic companies of a Légère(Light Infantry) regiment. (There were also Chasseur Cavalry) Voltiguers were the specialist light infantry company of French Infantry Battalions. Their heavy infantry counterparts were Carabiniers(Légère) and Grenadiers(Ligne). Tirailleurs is a term for light infantry, and some tirailleur regiments outside the garde performed as Light Infantry, but the Tirailleurs of the Young Guard were not just Tirailleurs, but Tirailleurs-Grenadiers, and they served as Napoleon’s Shock Troops during his later campaigns.
@NobleKorhedron3 күн бұрын
So if #Chasseurs were the counterparts to #Fusiliers,@@FieldMarshalYT, does that mean that a given counterpart, e.g. Chasseur, would also receive the weapon of their counterpart - i.e. a Fusil VS a Musket...?
@FieldMarshalYT3 күн бұрын
@@NobleKorhedron As far as I'm aware, the difference was in doctrine, not weaponry.
@chrisgacek80894 күн бұрын
This was an EXCELLENT presentation.
@rhysnichols86084 күн бұрын
I’m a Napoleonic era guy but I’ve been watching your Spanish succession series and other early 18th century videos and I find it really interesting how the warfare changed across this century
@JohnPaulHatterTheSecond5 күн бұрын
This is so well done
@JonniePolyester6 күн бұрын
Really enjoyed watching alongside Andrew Robert’s Napoleon biography
@mattl2k66 күн бұрын
This is fantastic content mate. You've clearly taken heavy inspiration from the Epic History TV channel and improved upon it. Subscribed, hope to see more!
@TheManFromWaco6 күн бұрын
If you think in terms of dynasties, the War of the Spanish Succession was a massive win for Louis XIV. The Spanish branch of the Bourbons has kept their throne up to the present day (albeit in a purely ceremonial role under a constitutional monarchy and with plenty of hiccups along the way). The main Bourbon branch in France... didn't fare so well. Of course, he was at least partially responsible for the political and economic conditions that set France up for revolution at the end of the century, so maybe not so clear-cut a dynastic win after all. As to whether *France* won or lost, that's an entirely different matter. I once heard the end of the conflict described as "The great powers of Europe had fought for a decade to achieve a peace settlement which looked almost identical to something any number of diplomats could have drawn up in 1700: Bourbon control over the Spanish throne in exchange for territorial concessions and a prohibition on ever uniting the two monarchies". (I'm 95% sure it's from Charles Spencer's "Blenheim: Battle For Europe").
@godardvanreede86064 күн бұрын
I think it is fair to say that France lost. They didn't get anything out of the war while doing many consessions. The dynasty change in Spain didn't mean that much when Spain was hostile to France anyway in the aftermath of the WoSS. And they were allowed to because the Maritime powers were indifferent to it after the death of Joseph I in 1711.
@DuncanMcintyre-jk3qb6 күн бұрын
Yep 👍
@JelMain7 күн бұрын
Bloody AI voiceover. Most of the lesser placenames are mispronounced. If you can't even set the field correctly, why should we believe anything else? Lill-le, for example. Dauphin, Campbell, names too.
@FieldMarshalYT7 күн бұрын
Not an AI, just an amateur narrator who didn’t have any idea what he was doing back then
@JelMain7 күн бұрын
@@FieldMarshalYT Made exactly the same mispronunciation time after time after time. Not an amateur. ie I don't buy it - why would you release such crap, then, coming back to my basic point, it's untrustworthy. You don't even mention the Commanders' facedown over the honour of receiving the first volley, only resolved when those expected to actually do so staged a preemptive strike.
@FieldMarshalYT7 күн бұрын
Because I didn’t realize I was pronouncing them wrong? Which is a valid criticism, but not reflective on more recent content. Also, that part you mentioned between the Guards of both sides is in the video.
@mrsupremegascon2 күн бұрын
Bloody AI comment. Uber toxic, completely out of touch with the subject and totally irrelevant. Why would you write such crap.
@vincnetjones30377 күн бұрын
Cadogan... pronounced Caddugen. 😃
@kolerick8 күн бұрын
I like the parallel/reflection with the Antique king Pyrrhus saying "another such victory will see us undone" and this from Claude de Villars "another such defeat will see our enemies undone" (paraphrasing)
@chourtout8 күн бұрын
Stds turn out to be more dangerous for Vendôme than the allies
@jacquesstuartberwick32359 күн бұрын
It would be great to have a french version with the royalist french point of view. Thi war was imposed on Louis XIV who wanted to avoid it. If the allied had been less hard with France and Spain in their peace conditions the war would had be finished by 1708... Hopefully we won a stalemate ! Vive le Roy !
@jacquesstuartberwick32359 күн бұрын
No he loose this battle and was very affected by it.
@FieldMarshalYT9 күн бұрын
@@jacquesstuartberwick3235 huh
@joelqp19 күн бұрын
Subtitles suck!
@ArthurWright-uv4ww10 күн бұрын
Nice to see it visibly acted out
@angloaust157510 күн бұрын
Troubles with the french again Later it was the germans with The americans in between 1776 and 1812 not to forget the spanish armada Jesus was right when he said I havent come to bring peace to the world wars and rumours of wars!
@Kacer9928111 күн бұрын
His Grace returned from the wars today and did pleasure me twice in his top boots - attrib Marlborough’s wife
@srj607able11 күн бұрын
Thank you. Merci.
@adventuresinhistoryland550111 күн бұрын
Hi, I drew the picture you used in your thumbnail, just wanted you to know if you ever want to ask to use some of my art this account is where to find me.
@FieldMarshalYT11 күн бұрын
I will be sure to. I’ll give credit in the description
@adventuresinhistoryland550111 күн бұрын
@@FieldMarshalYT many thanks. The full image is also available to you if you want.
@carrickrichards245711 күн бұрын
The most peculiar of alliances! The 'Pragmatic army' is a euphemism for irrational. The British Hanoverian Kings were certainly competent but it was a shame European attitudes were not more enlightened. Especially in America values were evolving and nationalism had become more sophisticated and, thanks partly to Thomas Paine (1736-1809), populist.
@adrianbell604112 күн бұрын
Dissappointing that even common British names (EG. Camp-bell for Campbell.) were badly butchered. I get that Europe is more varied with names & languages etc but it was hard to follow who, what & where were being discussed with such haphazard pronunciations. I feel it also shows a level of disrespect.
@xaviertarre827912 күн бұрын
Donec Perficiam ("we shall strive, until we achieve")
@vice-grip12 күн бұрын
Major incursion!
@TenOrbital12 күн бұрын
Odd how you try and pronounce French names but not others. You can search pronunciation, you know.
@sumazdar13 күн бұрын
dziękuję
@sumazdar13 күн бұрын
dziękuję
@sumazdar13 күн бұрын
thx
@janboen363013 күн бұрын
Background sound is too loud and makes listening more difficult, certainly for older listeners.
@waynemcauliffe-fv5yf13 күн бұрын
The buggers liked a wig
@UAuaUAuaUA14 күн бұрын
Congratulations! I think I have been waiting for decades for such a well researched history of the Battle of Quatre Bras,
@larrousseyves940814 күн бұрын
Nice video but the music is too loud. Makes it hard to watch.
@Jormunheim14 күн бұрын
The regimental names being applied to the icons really is a good touch! Excellent video from your smaller channel!