Jill Stein gets an A+ for identifying the problem, and an F for figuring out how to fix it.
@yabangeedamat19078 күн бұрын
Zachary Foster is a great scholar, but unfortunatelly very underrated. Props for inviting him!
@truegrit206012 күн бұрын
No, you were correct the first time "assuming you win."🤔
@muhammadjalil722013 күн бұрын
May ALLAH ALMIGHTY Bless our beloved Palestinians, n guide us 2 sirat e mustqeem.
@synapsetrucking958413 күн бұрын
I am voting for Jill for sure
@pauldiffenderfer16 күн бұрын
God bless Jill Stein !!!
@zigzag3333317 күн бұрын
Votes for her ❤
@Asher-y7v18 күн бұрын
My name is Ashira-
@gigigarcia369118 күн бұрын
What a beautiful moment about Jill and Cornell. I’m voting for Jill who ever she brings along because of all her views and how graciously she talks about her opponents! She’s the best!!! .
@kellidoty119 күн бұрын
Yay! Just joined JillStein2024 campaign!!!!
@amalbaydoun477619 күн бұрын
Loved this !
@smljnsn6520 күн бұрын
Stein 2024!!
@thezingerschoir28 күн бұрын
If the Palestinians said that they are willing to live peacefully with their Israeli neighbors, and they prove it by stopping to try to terrorize and murder Jews every chance they get, they change the way they educate their children to hate jews, rip up their constitutions with the main focus is getting rid of the state of Israel, they will have control, sovereignty and autonomy.
@danburnsmusic28 күн бұрын
#joinjill
@crosby_Ай бұрын
Excellent interview. Thanks so much. Dr Stein is so generous to share her personal background with us. Loved what she had to say about working in the food service industry. The Eleanor Roosevelt discussion was a treat.
@LetkharableАй бұрын
Never heard of your show but always appreciate media willing to break the third party blackout. Great interview, I subscribed!
@joeavery6344Ай бұрын
🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮. Sounds like Shiite
@keltonjeter7603Ай бұрын
💚🌻💚
@beam-kitty8425Ай бұрын
Go Jill!❤️
@keltonjeter7603Ай бұрын
Jill💚🌻
@weneedcriticalthinkingАй бұрын
Jill is ghosted from the pentagon controlled algorithm because she is good not evil. Thank you for propagating good.
@spyninja2805Ай бұрын
What the heck
@attackofthewindmillsАй бұрын
About the question about who to vote for and whether or not you are helping the other win. Who do you vote for? Who you like. Who compels you. Example: If you say I will not vote 3rd party because it will help Trump win. That would be false. What you did was make the contest much easier for them. You have mathematically made it easier. Before I explain that i want to point out 2 or 3 scenarios. Scenario 1: The election will be close. Scenario 2: Limited voting pool 3: Large turnout but 2 choices and a close race. A race in which there is a blowout isnt relevant. A blowout is rare. What they call a landslide is really a large margin of victory. A landslide merely means that the other side has no vote to overcome the other side and their is not a vote pool to draw upon. The Trump/Clinton race was scenario 3. The millenials came out to vote. The race was close. Here is the math. Trump and Biden are neck and neck. Lets say they have equal numbers. A voter decides to abandon Biden. His or her single vote takes away 1 vote from Biden. Lets put a small number in the pool. Because percentages isnt number or quantity then a loss by Biden doesnt mean Trump is 50percent vs Biden 49%. Its Trump with yes a majority but we arent looking at that. We are looking at difference. Trump doesnt have 50% to Biden 49% Its Trump at greater than 53 % and Biden is 47%. When you are going to vote you have taken one vote from Hillary (I didnt mean Biden). Now Trump has gained 1 vote without earning it. You voted but your vote did count but Trump got a vote without giving you anything in return. Trump has created the lesser of two evils argument. That benefits him because he doesnt have to change policy. This is what they want. So what happens when there is a third party? Answer: Clinton loss one vote, Trump gain zero votes because there was a there was a third party the voter can dump their vote. The third party DENIES the other side (Trump) your vote. Again, Trump would like your vote but he needs to earn it. Things get even better if it were a close race. Trump really needs your vote. The third party is actually more difficult for Trump. The voter now has the power to give Trump a victory or a loss. So its more accurate to say the third party takes away the losing teams vote. It didnt contribute to Trump. In other words, Trump didnt gain a vote. since it is a close race, he needs to change his policy to take away a vote going to a third party. Parties want only 2 sides because they merely run on the opposite position from the opponent. A three party race that is close means Trump has to really shape his policy to gain your vote. A 2 party race just makes it easier for either side to win. The truth is Clinton loss your vote. Now we understand that they say your vote doesnt count because you helped Trump due to being the spoiler. When it was Clinton who was at fault. This dangerous third party is why the use the lesser of two evils rebuttal. Scenari 1 and 2 was not the Trump /Clinton scenario because voters didnt turn out. Its a race to bring out voters on election day. A third party spoils both parties. It hurts the not benefits the other side. Scenario 2 means both party just needs to fire up their base. Now you have the status quo. Its the same with a close race. Again the 3rd party doesnt benefit either party. So if I want a 2 party system to make it easier to win then I will encourage a duopoly and its no wonder they criticize a third party. Not only does your vote hurt both sides it causes them to court your vote and so now you have influence. Also your vote is not significant to either party if you wont turn out. you dont exist. However they will expect you on election day therefore they must address you. It gets messy. So the third party merely introduces another choice and that hurts either party. So I can go on but that third partu throws a wench to both parties. Trump had to make a strong case. The bottom line is its not a race or a contest. Your vote is one less vote for one party but the other party has benefited two times over. If you want one party to win you basically dont want a third party. If you vote for choice then a third party will benefit you because both parties only will you be counted but both parties must court your vote. So in the end, its extremely important to go vote. It doesnt move a party if they can write you off. This is the reason they dont want to encourage the millenials by mentioning them ect. So cast the ballot. Next you have to vote according to your choice. it makes it very difficult for them to see the path to victory. Again, third parties benefit the voter but hurt both parties and not one party makes sense?
@attackofthewindmillsАй бұрын
One last thing. A two party system seeks (mathematically) to create an equilibrium. Its very difficult for it to operate with an equilibrium or a stability. Or a strong base. A multi party system seeks to volatility. Thats the natural progression of three or more competing forces. If you want to be sure you will win, if you seek stability you have 2 choices. Thats optimal for the political situation. So the natural metrics are polls and people having long term guarantee employment in Congress. When you add 3 or more parties it immediately makes things very volatile. Polls no longer predict a winner. Instead polls only help them develop a platform only for that election cycle. This is why you see the Democrat campaign managers get hot tempered because they cannot develop solid battle lines, This is why you see Trump have erratic and competing messages. He is merely trying to fit in the potential mix. Neither party has it in the bag. You cannot calm a volatile environment you can only be consistent. In fact the more consistently progressive and non status quo the party the more they have an advantage. So having three or more parties makes it volatile and very uncomfortable to campaign managers and control “freaks”. It is exactly the environment that you want if you want things to be evolving every election cycle and what I mean is every election cycle must be able to have parties meet the future and the party that cannot (status quo) is by necessity have the chance of extinction. So if you like the status quo (if you are looking it as a contest then go ahead it is valid to say 3 parties isnt a good idea- for you. If you want change and you want to force the status quo to adapt then have 3 parties. Three party elections also create nice competition between elections as the reverberations last through the years between so they can try to anticipate the next cycle. The best thing is to be honest, look to encourage voting overall and be ok with the volatility and unpredictable aspect. Also be ready to win
@beam-kitty8425Ай бұрын
That was a wonderful interview, I am so impressed with Dr. Stein. I’m donating everything I can.❤
@ERM..na1036Ай бұрын
The best defence is offense Try to keep up, 🎉🎉🎉🎉
@bl7406Ай бұрын
#JillStein2024 💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚💚
@edwardabdelnour532Ай бұрын
I agree that Palestine is not what people in the west deme it but the struggles of an African American is completely different than that of a Palestinian. Two separate struggles
@arh9068Ай бұрын
I am not going to watch this video, I'm just here to comment about an ad I saw for your channel. In it, you said you can't arrest a child because it tells them that their parents can't protect them and causes trauma. That is ridiculous, if a child has done something that warrants being arrested, the parents have already failed them, they're likely already experiencing trauma and their best chance at a normal life is probably going to be removing them from their terrible parents custody.
@xCGTOWxАй бұрын
This is dumb as fuck.
@markmontgomery9200Ай бұрын
Wow I’m shocked another transgender supporting hamas
@r3tr0_r3dux_2Ай бұрын
Looks like she hasnt slept in days
@codusw2039Ай бұрын
I miss clicked
@VintageSurgeonsGeneralАй бұрын
She is an amazing pioneer for equal rights
@mt655Ай бұрын
What’s your only fans your a cougar
@hahaha0085Ай бұрын
I saw the ad, I subscribed
@GregAndlerАй бұрын
Perhaps we are a predator country from the begining. That is all we know.
@GregAndlerАй бұрын
You..truth teller.real courage..hero...from u.s. army combat veteran..1967...1968..vietnam.
@merlenelson4894Ай бұрын
How much apartheid or it's equivalent is there inside Israel? How many jewish people have lived in Gaza since 2006? Odd...
@mrmarksmen2771Ай бұрын
They kinda got kicked out and had everything stolen from them at gun point
@freehaiti8942 ай бұрын
This woman has inspired me to keep believing in and fighting for our daycare in Haiti. Daycares make parent's lives easier and helps families stay together; thus supporting local culture and democracy.
@ronaldmanlulo81032 ай бұрын
😅
@user-eg6vh9cs9q2 ай бұрын
Ha Ha bidens a braindead fool
@konradkanuckle59202 ай бұрын
What drivel!
@defauluse55242 ай бұрын
I know a filthy democrat when I see one. This guy has issues
@WilliamGarcia-ym8mq2 ай бұрын
Now your seeing what trump stands for he has made deals with authoritarian regimes and governments to start acting up during this election year! This is why he’s been saying I can stop these wars in one day! Open your eyes people he knew he didn’t have a chance to win but he’s still bilking his flock! Where’s the 10 million dollars that trump didn’t spend in 2020
@jeffhathaway65152 ай бұрын
Wrong. She’s clearly out of her mind. Just another talking head.
@mdlincoln77792 ай бұрын
He's a meat puppet. We all know this.
@suttonea762 ай бұрын
Extremist? Nice try liberal clown
@e.c-s86112 ай бұрын
You are cherry picking you facts. GET HONEST!! If you get the protection you ought to tell the truth!!
@pyhead99162 ай бұрын
Trump is the only president to achieve peace in the Middle East! His positions are only "extreme" if you're stupid.