Mc feer son

Ok, what was worse than MacPherson? I remember when they were all the rage

Mac fear son

I do not thing the struts version provide space saving. The shock tower required is taking engine bay space reducing the available width and creating serious engine access issues.

В субару никогда не было двухрычажки, по прежнему это это автомобили с одной из лучшей управляемостью и комфортом, ах да, ещё и надёжностью.

Can you buy a ECM already programmed from the factory?

My 5th generation Civic had double wishbone suspension. The combination of ride and handling was sublime.

with struts the wheels are interconnected? um no.. its not a straight axle lol, they are independent of each other.

Stop using an AI voice for your video!! I can't stand AI voiced videos. Down voted!

Doesn't mention multi-link at all then. Mind you unless something is seriously wrong most cars feel the same to me.

I like the one that comes with thw car I can afford.

When McP struts first came into consumer cars, ca. 1978 (?), I found that they had to be stiffer because their dynamic range was smaller. In other words, if you allowed a McP to travel as far as a dbl wishbone, you loose alignment at the outer ranges of the travel. Consequently, stiffness was added to prevent the system from "bottoming out", thus jarring the car and its inhabitants to pieces. Subsequently, younger buyers were propagandized into buying the cheaper, stiffer suspensions. The older dbl wishbone was a softer, smoother ride which has its place in the market, particularly with today's decaying roads.

The existence of a “MacPherson” suspension suggests the existence of a “PCPherson” suspension.

Good of both

DWB! Like in the GT3 with a manual ;-D

Well this video is a waste of time

He's wrong about the tendency to roll. That's entirely down to the spring strength of each type of suspension. MacPherson strut are no more likely to roll on a bend than double-wishbone. But I prefer double wishbone.

I have Audi A4 b8 2.0Q (double wishbone) and BMW 330ix F30 (McPherson) - BMW has much more handling in full stock suspension. Audi has sports Bilstein B6 shock absorbers but it still far from BMW handling due to wrong wiight distribution.

I found the difference handling-wise by experience. I got my first cars about 20 yrs ago, and one was McPherson (Toyota Vios/Vitz) and the other was double-wishbone(Mitsubishi Galant), but I didnt know that at that time. The difference in handling on twisty roads was night and day. I owned the Toyota first, so I was used to being careful when driving on twisty roads because the back would sway out. When I got the Galant several months later, and drove on the same twisty road, I was amazed that I could go faster without any body roll. Years later I realized it was the Galant's suspension that caused the big difference in handling. Also years later, I found out the Miata has double wishbone and coupled with the perfect weight distribution, no wonder many enthusiasts swear by it.

Многорычажка от ауди топ.

kyosho mini-z ma-010 suspension

So many incorrect statements in this video. Change job, man...

Left this video the moment I heard "Macreson".

"Super McPherson" is very good. (Renault Sport "double axis front suspension" and Ford "RevoKnuckle") Since 2004 with Renault Mégane II RS.

McPherson Easy AND unexpensive? Un which universe?

why nothing about electro hydraulic? efficient and responsive...

Yeah, it was a very informative and technically sound presentation. Full compliments to the creative team.

Turns out when i lowered my 4th prelude the rear wheels actually cambered AND toed in, due to the toe arm design. Didnt know the rear toed in while cornering pretty genius design

Does this work on rubber tires?

2:37 That's a double wishbone!

Mac fur son strut

MCDONALDS RICERLET.

I have a video of a mc pherson completely ripping out

Upper and lower control arm, is that double wishbone setting?

MacPhersons strut easy DIY, easy maintenance & cheaper. Good for bad road.

for the driving pleasure and fun, I'll choose the double wishbone! :)

1989-2000 Civics are Double Wishbone 1987-2000 Corollas are Mcpherson

ERROR The images shown at the beginning of the section on MacPherson struts (2:17) and in the summary 4:26) are NOT a MachPherson strut It too is a double A-arm suspension, only it is showing the rear suspension (no steering linkage and orientation resembling semi trailing arm) instead of the front suspension. You'll note that unlike a MacPherson strut, the coil spring and shock absorber are NOT locating members, but is separated from the wheel hub/spindle

There are reasonable mcPherson versions: the one from E90 BMW with 2 lower arms and the one from Megane 2 RS with double axis.

My F250 has leafs front and back, with beefy sway bars, and it corners great. But bumps and washboard? Not so good.Get a good kidney belt.

mak FEAR son.

OMG, I could not listen to this! You are talking about automotive suspension designs, pros and cons, etc., but you are too ignorant to figure out how to pronounce "MacPherson" correctly?! Jesus, WTF? Is it that difficult to Google it? Thumbs down just for your stupidity!

Good job getting a coked-up Morgan Freeman to do the voiceover!

Good to know. What about Torsion beam / Twist beam suspension which are common for cheap, budget cars?

i like suspension

what kinda suspension system were used in 60s 70s or 80s American comfortable cars?

MacPherson strut cons: all of them Double wishbone cons: none.

In my own opinion, Double Wishbone is for added regidity than McPherson strut.

It all comes down to personal preferences.

For a slow and small city car Macpherson is enough. As reliability, stability and security requirements grow, Wishbone is preferred.