Design in Art EXPLAINED
14:56
7 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@selishady2307
@selishady2307 2 күн бұрын
yes yes 100%
@Theohaessler
@Theohaessler 2 күн бұрын
So he slurps, but does he owe you guys anything?
@speggeri90
@speggeri90 6 күн бұрын
People vote with their feet and wallet. Look where people go on their holidays.
@microwavecoffee
@microwavecoffee 6 күн бұрын
His work feels so achievable and unachievable at the same time. He's truly a genius.
@Sahlofolin542
@Sahlofolin542 7 күн бұрын
Also I love this song❤ like my 6th favorite form the drugs
@Sahlofolin542
@Sahlofolin542 7 күн бұрын
That’s pretty cool!
@rsa4510
@rsa4510 9 күн бұрын
This is a wonderful video, I really leaned a lot. A small suggestion, as screen space is so important, I don't think having the distraction of your head moving in the corner of the screen adds much. Could be that others really like this approach, so take it with a grain of salt. Thank you for the time it took to make this video.
@rikzwambag1030
@rikzwambag1030 10 күн бұрын
Very interesting listen, but lots of very biased points and suggesting they don't teach proportions anymore seems a bit silly
@michael.diamant
@michael.diamant 7 күн бұрын
maybe they do. But where do we see this in the architcture?
@rikzwambag1030
@rikzwambag1030 6 күн бұрын
@@michael.diamant everywhere
@RROO-qy8je
@RROO-qy8je 10 күн бұрын
The main reasons people want to remain at Modernist architecture are: Going back in time to previous architecture sounds dumb. Going back in time has never been done in history and it shouldnt be done. Going back isnt an option which means we gotta think of something different. But the only current architecture style we have is modernism. So people wanna see it just because it signifies evolution and progress. So just because we only have modernist architecture they want it no matter how ugly and soulless it is. What we need to do is create something new the same way everyone has been doing throughout history. Take the previous architecture, use the classical proportions and add onto it with new buildings techniques or materials. Art Nouveau and Art Deco for example were a good modern continuation of the previous styles because it used iron and steel which were new materials. Modernist architecture was never a continuation of previous architecture. It was something completely new that used no proportions or rules. They basically reinvented the wheel and made it worse which no one asked for.
@michael.diamant
@michael.diamant 7 күн бұрын
Wasn't the Renaissance about that? And modernism is not progress but degress so lets take a step back. Just like we take a step back and acknowledge that bikes and mass transit is is good and that whole foods are better than processed we can do it with archtiecture. It is the classical framework we seek not individual styles.
@RROO-qy8je
@RROO-qy8je 6 күн бұрын
@@michael.diamant I do agree with that but what i dont agree with is remaining at that. Sure a great start would be to go back, relearn everything and get used to building like that again. But in the end our goal shouldnt be to just go back and remain at that. Our main focus should be more on trying to figure out where to go next from where we left off.
@michael.diamant
@michael.diamant 3 күн бұрын
@@RROO-qy8je yes we use the classical framework and continue from there.
@MinutemenMInutemen-zi7sy
@MinutemenMInutemen-zi7sy 11 күн бұрын
4 mins and 38 seconds in and you've lost me... your slurping and coughing is the equivalent of someone running their finger nails down a black board.
@jewman1493
@jewman1493 11 күн бұрын
Very true…
@michael.diamant
@michael.diamant 7 күн бұрын
Unfortunately. But change is coming everywhere.
@ericp1625
@ericp1625 11 күн бұрын
Same BS is happening in the art world.
@RROO-qy8je
@RROO-qy8je 10 күн бұрын
Yeah but at least the majority of people are aware its ugly.
@michael.diamant
@michael.diamant 7 күн бұрын
It is infected by the same relativist modernist ideology.
@wardkerr2456
@wardkerr2456 12 күн бұрын
It seems collage art courses have not changed much in thirty years. We did not have as strong a focus on hating our own culture then, but the past was still considered dead. I see art as a form of communication. It is more subtle that literature, drawing on a shared codex of form and image. The language of art has been built over centuries. It seems extremely foolish to throw it away.
@maria-giulianalatini1724
@maria-giulianalatini1724 12 күн бұрын
The difference is you're an artist. They're mostly illustrators. Or crafters. And the lookers (us, we, the public) are progressively less used to looking at beautiful things or listening to beautiful music or eating delicious food. It's snowballing. Luckily my children grew up in Italy and one became an artist (MFA) and the other a chef, (now a consultant for high end events). In the States the cultural impoverishment is rampant.
@maria-giulianalatini1724
@maria-giulianalatini1724 12 күн бұрын
Also tons of glare and kind of careless filming. I'm sure you're very knowledgeable but you have to tighten up the presentation. It's extremely distracting, sorry.
@JasonDeville-fi4dh
@JasonDeville-fi4dh 13 күн бұрын
You are great I love your insight and how you do what you love
@JasonDeville-fi4dh
@JasonDeville-fi4dh 13 күн бұрын
Painting looks bad. What is the guy doing was he walking on the wall like spiderman? The feet aren't even walking on anything looks so bad
@JasonDeville-fi4dh
@JasonDeville-fi4dh 13 күн бұрын
So the guy walked on the wall with his feet sticking to it like spiderman, then he stepped off it. He walks on his tip toes and his top toe is passed the step which doesn't even look like a step and he seems to be floating on his tip toes. It looks good when the painting stops and is cut off at his shins. The feet look so rediculous it really bothers me actually
@JasonDeville-fi4dh
@JasonDeville-fi4dh 13 күн бұрын
If I hired him to do this I'd be so mad at him. I'd make him redo it. He should have just made him floating off the ground it would look less weird. It's like he had the background painted a year before and then added the guy in after that without even trying to integrate him into the scene. It's like imagine a perfect painting, except the main subjects elbow is bending the wrong way or something. It's like he messed this entire thing with the stance of the man. The rear foot is doing what? And do you carry a 120 pound woman on your tip toe or flat foot? This is messed up the painter did a huge blunder he should be shamed for this how did he even release this to the public.
@JasonDeville-fi4dh
@JasonDeville-fi4dh 13 күн бұрын
Looks even more obvious when u have it zoomed out. Looks like he belongs on a slope or a hill. Like he's standing on an invisible hill. I don't know man I can't keep my eyes away from his feet it ruined it I can't even finish the video it bothers me that much
@JasonDeville-fi4dh
@JasonDeville-fi4dh 13 күн бұрын
But can you do it with the proper hand drawing?
@tom17a1
@tom17a1 14 күн бұрын
Chad, you are very wise, so few get everything correct on youtube! I agree with everything you say. Pasini is great, I do wonder about his oils. I read he uses clove oil-which is informative...
@barbiebeckford2988
@barbiebeckford2988 15 күн бұрын
Great stuff thank you.
@Handotr
@Handotr 16 күн бұрын
Fascinating. Thanks for
@StefanMarjoram
@StefanMarjoram 17 күн бұрын
What an amazing drawing. There’s so much clever and interesting stuff going on in there. Thanks for highlighting it and your thoughts on it. I need to go and stare at it some more :)
@teacup3133
@teacup3133 19 күн бұрын
Very interesting and helpful.
@guymartin7253
@guymartin7253 21 күн бұрын
Heya! This is a bit of a modernist perspective, something I would consider to be slightly outdated. I do agree that when considering technique there is art that is more successful and less successful (not "better" or "worse"), however to dismiss works the form of which detaches from the accepted successful tropes of art as of less value is to shun the reason for which they choose to do so, whether that be sociopolitical or personal. When looking at art that catches you off-guard, that appears unorthodox or 'ugly', the correct next step is to ask why that step may have been taken, to trust that the art was made as a reaction that may be valuable, even if to the outsider it must be contextualized with a plaque. After all, all art is made as a response to the world, to reinforce or break down our perceptions. The true indicator of an artwork's value is its efficacy of its portrayal of the artists' convictions! The world is changing and we're exposed to much larger volumes of art than before, some more effective than others, but that has not made it ugly, we just have to update the way we interact with it.
@hudiscool4186
@hudiscool4186 22 күн бұрын
That was interesting but i stopped not even half way this slurping throat noises is disgusting! Respect your wiewers please!
@gregscottcampbell
@gregscottcampbell 24 күн бұрын
Great Info! I actually enjoyed the laid back slurping! F the system
@bozoclown2098
@bozoclown2098 24 күн бұрын
The original size is ?
@davegreen1104
@davegreen1104 26 күн бұрын
Unwatchable
@ningjing1113
@ningjing1113 26 күн бұрын
the value has to be correct, and the shape needs to be accurate enough, then it will blend when you back up, otherwise it will still fall apart. people often talk about 'techniques' but overlook the basic drawing skill, the ability to see and render value and shape accurately. this is why the classical training spent years having students drawing casts in charcoal. if you can't draw well, there is no technique can help you make a good painting.
@martintierney5397
@martintierney5397 26 күн бұрын
Too many fukn ads
@MatinaRose
@MatinaRose 27 күн бұрын
Great video and so timely for me! I am working on a painting composition and it didn't feel right. I'm taking this info and applying it there.
@MatinaRose
@MatinaRose 27 күн бұрын
I went to art school years ago and they never covered this as well as you just did. Thanks
@SockMonkeyofcourse
@SockMonkeyofcourse 27 күн бұрын
From a voice-over artist, and a master instructor, drink water only before recording. Be aware of coughing and throat clearing. Do not do this at all. Edit it out if you cannot control it. The content seems to be sound, but you'll lose subs if you don't clean up and be ready before you record. It makes the viewer feel like you don't care if your product is not attractive and professional. And if you don't care, you lose all credibility, and thus a chance for increased viewership. Take this as an opportunity to improve. That's how it is intended.
@HoradrimBR
@HoradrimBR 28 күн бұрын
Details could be a good thing if they are part of the narrative of the work. The triptychs of Bosch, while not hyperrealistic, are abundant with details that make sense on the work.
@patrickmcdaniel8123
@patrickmcdaniel8123 28 күн бұрын
SAD
@sr.c4255
@sr.c4255 29 күн бұрын
How many layers a painting needs?
@frogelephant841
@frogelephant841 17 күн бұрын
It kind of depends. But if you seek knowledge similar to the painting on the short, I highly recommend to research about the wet-on-wet technique.
@andrewlillo8618
@andrewlillo8618 Ай бұрын
Drink your fucking coffe later distusting, gross, annoying
@flyingteacup8369
@flyingteacup8369 Ай бұрын
Cool
@ash-zc2he
@ash-zc2he Ай бұрын
Simon Pasini's paintings are pulchritudinous! This is really helpful! Thanks! I liked your paintings as well!
@3-DMonkey
@3-DMonkey Ай бұрын
That varnish made it for me at the end
@MFDOOOOM
@MFDOOOOM Ай бұрын
Good music taste, great painting too
@MFDOOOOM
@MFDOOOOM Ай бұрын
Please recommend some resources for painting beginner, coz you clearly know your shit :)
@mcrumph
@mcrumph Ай бұрын
Frankly, I prefer the longer videos. More time to let your ideas expand.
@maymccollum2461
@maymccollum2461 Ай бұрын
I think shape design is as much a tool as color or value or edges. I totally agree that a bottom-heavy shape is subconsciously more comfortable and pleasing for the viewer, which is a super valuable asset to most artists as a common goal for art is to be visually pleasing! However, the use or dis-use of proper shape design can be a super effective tool for increasing the work's pathos and emotional resonance. So while the Girl With the Pearl Earring evokes a sense of calm and stability with its use of shape language, I think the lion den painting is just as valid for its use of turning shape language on its head to create a sense of unease. The painting's setting is supposed to evoke a sense of unease and anxiety and having the main figure's (with such strong body language and expressions) shape go against what the viewer would find comforting totally increases the pathos of the painting. It almost looks like he's about to float away! Same thing with the JSS dancing figure, she looks as if she's on the line between floating or toppling! Goya's Black Paintings would have way weaker emotional appeal if he had used a more standard and pleasant color pallet, I think the same sentiment could be applied to shape language as well.
@BumboyWillynut
@BumboyWillynut Ай бұрын
Un real ❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️
@4516shawn
@4516shawn Ай бұрын
Stop drin whatever, its way anoying
@DenisPombriant-hp8of
@DenisPombriant-hp8of Ай бұрын
rude! Slurping is a no no and you should not need to be told
@DayTripperrr
@DayTripperrr Ай бұрын
Andrew Jackson is easy S tier it’s the most iconic
@jamlane
@jamlane Ай бұрын
I always appreciate a video where someone is trying to unlock how someone like Sargent actually executed his paintings. Thank you for taking the time to make this video!
@wardkerr2456
@wardkerr2456 Ай бұрын
Good advice. I have recently come to understand that more careful initial renderings, and breaking the canvass into two tones with blocking saves me hours of correcting missteps. I burned a lot of daylight figuring that out. Your video on edges also has me thinking. Thank you for posting.