I think more non engine is more important than pilica, not that pilica is bad

Thats exactly the problem. If u banish steeds and then they DO nibiru you, you have steeds banished instead of pengu and u r fucked

Troll detected

Rage bait

I suppose so, then instead u get 2 canna searches and call dark

thank you, yes i think protos is better overall

theres a video on my chanel

I'm sorry its a recording mistake, i would have to re-record

@@siwski666 It is a bummer but it doesn't make a difference with following along since you're explaining everything so nicely, no worries!

@@leolyo7 thank you

@@siwski666 Keep up the good work. I appreciate the combos

the banshee was popped by protos calling fire and the 2 monsters left were made into ip

I only cut her to have more non-engine (15)

sadly i don't have the source, you can tag me on discord tho ill send it to you

I don't think its needed

@@siwski666 ive been testing it, its so good with colossus, you can link climb without using s:p to banish banshee in gy, so you can keep s:p for endboard

@@juanmanuelabregu1083 i dont play colossus, and if i played colossus i would have even less space to play cross sheep, but if you like it you can keep it! i only worry that whatever you cut for it might be useful more often

We talked a bunch and quite possibly forgot 😂

No it was normal summon paidra

I recommend Hold Protos, then kill their entire board turn 3 (or turn 2 if you went 2nd)

TYSM for comment and nice words. Even S:P does not work, because if they see S:P, they will immediatelly drop veiler / imperm / mourner on Protos and won't wait for his activation. I don't know any way to ensure Protos. But if they saved this for Protos, at least your other combo went uninterrupted and this should be enough to win.

@@siwski666 Thanks a bunch for the reply! It is exactly as you said, unless we go over our head to by some miracle protect Protos, we should still have enough in theory. That being said, I believe I found a slight naming mistake with the combos and that being that the elder + brick combo is not the same if the brick is a pettle/leo or a winda since at the kimunfalco + canahawk + brick point, you would need to change the sequence so as to summon a tamer otherwise you're out of them, and in the combo here in the video we summoned a rampengu, implying that if we were to do the same in a hand where the brick is only a beast we'd be left with three beasts and no way to get a search there. Was this a mishap perchance or am I missing something?

@@leolyo7 Yes you are correct, the naming is bad and one category is not covered by this video, yes

what do u mean by that

absolutely right, thank you

it's possible, not sure what is ultimately better tho.

You haven't misheard, I'm just showing possibilities. I said that if the board is unkillable, you might want to go for S:P. Otherwise just skip the S:P, and do unicorn + access and atk for game

i dont know yet, regarding tier 1 decks i only tested vs melodius. its okay matchup since we easily FTK them lol

nice idea but i dont think it would really work well

First of all TYSM for watching and commenting. Absolutely agree, punish for being greedy is game loss. Its gambling. I would like to gamble that people will Nib at mid point. Because I want the strongest possible board (and dont want to play Apo in ED lol no space). And it is also meta dependant (if Nib is not played g1.....) Knightmare Unicorn allows for my pet line which is lara -> revive falco -> Unicorn -> Accesscode for ultimate destruction, thats why i have hard time cutting those

@siwski666 I agree, the extra deck is super tight and I also had to cut Corridor and Colossus, and Unicorn does feel really good to climb into Accesscode. I think my go-to play right now is still the "greedy" line because the threat of Apo/Gaia is probably enough for most players to drop the Nib, but it can change as the new format plays out. Having the SBT Lara still in grave is also pretty huge, which you lose with the safe lines.

Noble knight shield barrer

It searches Rampengu, so basically another version of it. Its a little optimization, cause it banishes itself which makes Nemeses cards life

​@@TidJoshis it better then another repenggu or nah?

the pattern you're looking for probably is whether or not you've started the combo with elder. if you did, then you did NOT search elder. These lines you should keep the remaining tamer. therefore your line will probably be: reirautari add canna, canna eff banish apelio, use remaining tamer and canna to get search. (you needed the remaining tamer to combo with canna) if your line did not start with elder, then you would probably search elder. then you can use the remaining tamer to make reirautari, because it has probably been SSed already anyway. then your line will be: reirautari add canna, NS elder, NS canna, canna eff -> apelio, then get 1 search and tagout into elder + apelio (you did not need any tamers to combo with canna, because you had elder)

It requires a Pyro. Our Apelio is pyro.😊

Thanks . My Mistake.I thougt you need a Fire Monster.

the deck is not finished. gold sarco is exactly as you say, like a cannahawk effect if normal canna gets negated. it could be played

Also with Etele plus brick, does the combo change if the brick is a spiritual beast monster?

@@JojosASMR i think it does yea

i haven't checked these...

Well for colossus you literally just go for Flag -> Corridor -> Colossus, no thinking involved

Regarding link spoder, please check the Nibiru video on the channel. I'll see if inclusion of Nemeses makes the nibiru lines any better. (Im replying from my other channel) Yes the add steeds line under droll is AFAIK the only thing u can do under droll so, not very interesting imo.

Hi, I have just checked the elder + canna + shifter line. The Protos line is available, you can even call FIRE if you want.