No

@mrprofessor4199 prophecies of the approaching Judgment Day, the coming of the Mahdi, the return of the prophet Jesus and many other predictions

Binnen 1 minuut een leugen? Als je eens voor een keer goed had geluisterd met jouw oren ipv jouw achterwerk hoorde je dat de persoon in de video slechts de verzen/profetie aan het voorlezen is en verdeeld in 3 categorieën. Waar zegt Yasir Qadhi (niet Yasr Qadhi) dat het niet kan bevestigd worden dat de Profeet een afstammeling is van Ishmaël? En al zou hij het zeggen, niemand boeit dat. De klassikale en normatieve visie binnen de Soennitische Orthodoxie is dat de Profeet wél afstamt van Ishmaël. U-bocht die alleen moslims accepteren? Als je eens verder had geluisterd dan had je gehoord dat de persoon in de video duidelijk vermeld dat hij ook dezelfde interpretatieve methodiek of "u-bocht" zoals jij het noemt, gebruikt als de joden en auteurs van het Nieuw-Testament waardoor hij wel de mogelijkheid kan laten zien dat het gaat over de Profeet volgens die benadering. Dus als jij daar een probleem mee hebt, dan heb jij ook een probleem met hoe het Nieuw-Testament omgaat met passages vanuit het Oud-Testament. Volgende keer eerst goed leren luisteren, dan pas reageren zodat je jezelf niet voorschut zet.

You must not know your own scripture because Ishmael pbuh accordind to your bible is the father of the Arabs of Arabia lol learn your scriptures before you come for ours

Decendant of Ishmael and a women from Jurhum, clearly an Ishmaelites

Where is the trinity in the bible 😂😂

Where did Jesus said: "i'am your God"

@@ismailalmaghriby3714 kalimatullahi

@@omarmassoud6275 Allah, kalimatullah,ruh Quddus... moolah

@@kingazroy1875 ruh qudus is the name of angel gabriel, and kalimathhu means jesus was created by direct word of god not through natural birth, nothing about trinity here 😂😂

You need also be critical st your religion and you will see😮

You need also be critical at your religion of christianity and you will see😮

@@ismailalmaghriby3714 I do criticize some Christian practices, which are hypocritical.

@@therighteousrighthand like the early christians?

68.1-7 Kathir - Ibn Al Kathirن(Nun), is like Allah's saying,ص(Sad), and Allah's saying,ق(Qaf), and similar to them from the individual letters that appear at the beginning of Qur'anic chapters. This has been dis- cussed at length previously and there is no need to repeat it here.The Explanation of the Pen ConcerningAllah's statement,وَالْقَلَمِ(By the pen) The apparent meaning is that this refers to the actual pen that is used to write. This is like Allah's saying,اقْرَأْ وَرَبُّكَ الاٌّكْرَمُ - الَّذِى عَلَّمَ بِالْقَلَمِ - عَلَّمَ الإِنسَـنَ مَا لَمْ يَعْلَمْ(Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous. Who has taught by the pen. He has taught man that which he knew not.) (96:3-5) Therefore, this statement is Allah's swearing and alerting His creatures to what He has favored them with by teaching them the skill of writing, through which knowledge is attained. Thus, Allah continues by saying,وَمَا يَسْطُرُونَ(and by what they Yastur.) Ibn `Abbas, Mujahid and Qatadah all said that this means, "what they write.'' As-Suddi said, "The angels and the deeds of the servants they record.'' Others said, "Rather, what is meant here is the pen which Allah caused to write the decree when He wrote the decrees of all creation, and this took place fifty-thousand years before He created the heavens and the earth.'' For this, they present Hadiths that have been reported about the Pen. Ibn Abi Hatim recorded from Al-Walid bin `Ubadah bin As-Samit that he said, "My father called for me when he was dying and he said to me: `Verily, I heard the Messenger of Allah say,«إِنَّ أَوَّلَ مَا خَلَقَ اللهُ الْقَلَمُ فَقَالَ لَهُ: اكْتُبْ، قَالَ: يَا رَبِّ وَمَا أَكْتُبُ؟ قَالَ: اكْتُبِ الْقَدَرَ وَمَا هُوَ كَائِنٌ إِلَى الْأَبَد»(Verily, the first of what Allah created was the Pen, and He said to it: "Write.'' The Pen said: "O my Lord, what shall I write'' He said: "Write the decree and whatever will throughout eternity.'')'' This Hadith has been recorded by Imam Ahmad through various routes of transmission. At-Tirmidhi also recorded it from a Hadith of Abu Dawud At-Tayalisi and he (At-Tirmidhi) said about it, "Hasan Sahih, Gharib.''Swearing by the Pen refers to the Greatness of the ProphetAllah says,مَآ أَنتَ بِنِعْمَةِ رَبِّكَ بِمَجْنُونٍ(You, by the grace of your Lord, are not insane.) meaning -- and all praise is due to Allah -- `you are not crazy as the ignorant among your people claim. They are those who deny the guidance and the clear truth that you have come with. Therefore, they attribute madness to you because of it.'وَإِنَّ لَكَ لاّجْراً غَيْرَ مَمْنُونٍ(And verily, for you will be reward that is not Mamnun.) meaning, `for you is the great reward, and abundant blessings which will never be cut off or perish, because you conveyed the Message of your Lord to creation, and you were patient with their abuse.' The meaning of:غَيْرُ مَمْنُونٍ(not Mamnun) is that it will not be cut off. This is similar to Allah's statement,عَطَآءً غَيْرَ مَجْذُوذٍ(a gift without an end.) (11:108) and His statement,فَلَهُمْ أَجْرٌ غَيْرُ مَمْنُونٍ(Then they shall have a reward without end.) (95:6) Mujahid said,غَيْرُ مَمْنُونٍ(Without Mamnun) means "Without reckoning.'' And this refers back to what we have said before.The Explanation of the Statement: "Verily, You are on an Exalted Character.''Concerning Allah's statement,وَإِنَّكَ لَعَلَى خُلُقٍ عَظِيمٍ(And verily, you are on an exalted (standard of) character.) Al-`Awfi reported from Ibn `Abbas, "Verily, you are on a great religion, and it is Islam.'' Likewise said Mujahid, Abu Malik, As-Suddi and Ar-Rabi` bin Anas. Ad-Dahhak and Ibn Zayd also said this. Sa`id bin Abi `Arubah reported from Qatadah that he said concerning Allah's statement,وَإِنَّكَ لَعَلَى خُلُقٍ عَظِيمٍ(And verily, you are on an exalted (standard of) character.) "It has been mentioned to us that Sa`d bin Hisham asked `A'ishah about the character of the Messenger of Allah, so she replied: `Have you not read the Qur'an' Sa`d said: `Of course.' Then she said: `Verily, the character of the Messenger of Allah was the Qur'an.''' `Abdur-Razzaq recorded similar to this and Imam Muslim recorded it in his Sahih on the authority of Qatadah in its full length. This means that he would act according to the commands and the prohibition in the Qur'an. His nature and character were patterned according to the Qur'an, and he abandoned his natural disposition (i.e., the carnal nature). So whatever the Qur'an commanded, he did it, and whatever it forbade, he avoided it.

68.1-7 Kathir - Ibn Al Kathirن(Nun), is like Allah's saying,ص(Sad), and Allah's saying,ق(Qaf), and similar to them from the individual letters that appear at the beginning of Qur'anic chapters. This has been dis- cussed at length previously and there is no need to repeat it here.The Explanation of the Pen ConcerningAllah's statement,وَالْقَلَمِ(By the pen) The apparent meaning is that this refers to the actual pen that is used to write. This is like Allah's saying,اقْرَأْ وَرَبُّكَ الاٌّكْرَمُ - الَّذِى عَلَّمَ بِالْقَلَمِ - عَلَّمَ الإِنسَـنَ مَا لَمْ يَعْلَمْ(Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous. Who has taught by the pen. He has taught man that which he knew not.) (96:3-5) Therefore, this statement is Allah's swearing and alerting His creatures to what He has favored them with by teaching them the skill of writing, through which knowledge is attained.

68.1-7 Kathir - Ibn Al Kathirن(Nun), is like Allah's saying,ص(Sad), and Allah's saying,ق(Qaf), and similar to them from the individual letters that appear at the beginning of Qur'anic chapters. This has been dis- cussed at length previously and there is no need to repeat it here.The Explanation of the Pen ConcerningAllah's statement,وَالْقَلَمِ(By the pen) The apparent meaning is that this refers to the actual pen that is used to write. This is like Allah's saying,اقْرَأْ وَرَبُّكَ الاٌّكْرَمُ - الَّذِى عَلَّمَ بِالْقَلَمِ - عَلَّمَ الإِنسَـنَ مَا لَمْ يَعْلَمْ(Read! And your Lord is the Most Generous. Who has taught by the pen. He has taught man that which he knew not.) (96:3-5) Therefore, this statement is Allah's swearing and alerting His creatures to what He has favored them with by teaching them the skill of writing, through which knowledge is attained.

So you can lie how you want, but the truth can't be destroyed.

It doesn’t need to be a primate. If read literally, any shape would imply limitation. As in, G’od would have an organ with a form, for the purpose of seeing. It could also give rise to the problem of G’od having parts and being divisible if read literally in a careless manner… Not that they should have changed it though. It’s absurd what they’ve done…

Bro 😂😂😂

Does the guy know Arabic? I highly doubt so

Wa Feekum Baarak Allaah akhi please make Duaa for me if you can

"As a human participates in humanity, he himself isn't humanity" -- this actually proves Ali's point. A human participates in humanity in the predicative sense, just as someone who achieves/undergoes Theosis also participates in the divine in the predicative sense. For us, this leads to the conclusion that humanity can be attributed to us in the predicative sense, which is why we are humans -- just as, according to your logic, divinity can be attributed in the predicative sense to people who achieve/undergo Theosis, and thus they have become gods.

@@DawahCollective We in a way do become gods, not multiple first principles, though.

What do you mean with "First Priciple"?

What do you mean with "First Priciple"?

@@DawahCollective basically the Neoplatonic One, which would be God.

The narrative of Joseph, as detailed in the Torah, is a compelling story with elements that resonate through various religious traditions. However, interpreting Joseph's story as a direct prophecy of Jesus Christ’s life is a viewpoint specific to certain Christian theological interpretations and is not universally accepted. This scholarly rebunk addresses various aspects of the provided text by incorporating perspectives from biblical scholarship and religious studies. ### Historical Context and Authorship The story of Joseph is found in the Book of Genesis, traditionally attributed to Moses. However, modern biblical scholarship, as articulated by Richard Elliott Friedman and others, often views these texts as products of multiple authors over centuries, a theory known as the Documentary Hypothesis (Friedman, "Who Wrote the Bible?"). This hypothesis identifies sources such as J (Yahwist), E (Elohist), P (Priestly), and D (Deuteronomist) as contributors to the Pentateuch, including the Joseph narrative. Therefore, the narrative's primary purpose was to explain the Israelites' presence in Egypt and to convey themes of divine providence and personal integrity (Sarna, "Understanding Genesis"). ### Interpretations of Joseph’s Story In Judaism, the story of Joseph is viewed through lenses emphasizing themes like familial reconciliation and divine providence. For instance, Nahum Sarna in "Understanding Genesis" highlights Joseph's rise from slavery to power as evidence of divine intervention and moral virtue. In Islam, Joseph (Yusuf) is also a prophet, and his story in the Quran focuses on his patience, virtue, and unwavering faith in God during trials (Ayoub, "The Qur'an and Its Interpreters"). ### Jesus and Fulfillment of Prophecy The Christian New Testament includes passages where Jesus refers to fulfilling the Law and the Prophets. Scholars such as N.T. Wright argue that Jesus' statements about fulfillment should be understood within the context of first-century Jewish expectations and the broader narrative of Israel's history (Wright, "The New Testament and the People of God"). For instance, in Matthew 5:17, Jesus says, "Do not think that I came to destroy the Law or the Prophets. I did not come to destroy but to fulfill." The idea that Moses wrote about Jesus is a theological interpretation within Christianity. Jewish and Islamic traditions do not support this view, seeing Moses' writings as focused on their own religious contexts and figures. E.P. Sanders in "The Historical Figure of Jesus" emphasizes that Jesus' mission was understood within the Jewish eschatological framework rather than being a fulfillment of specific Old Testament prophecies as later interpreted by Christian theology. ### Similarities and Typology Parallels between Joseph and Jesus, such as being beloved sons, betrayal, false accusations, and ultimate exaltation, are interpretative and typological rather than explicit prophecies. Typology, as explained by G.K. Beale, involves seeing Old Testament figures and events as prefigurations of New Testament realities (Beale, "Handbook on the New Testament Use of the Old Testament"). For example, the betrayal of Joseph by his brothers (Genesis 37:28) is seen as a typological foreshadowing of Jesus' betrayal by Judas (Matthew 26:14-16). ### Prophecies and Fulfillments The text cites Zechariah 12:10, which Christian scholars interpret as a prophecy about Jesus: "They will look on me, the one they have pierced." However, Jewish interpretations, such as those by Rashi, see this verse differently, often as a reference to the collective suffering and redemption of Israel rather than an individual messianic figure (Rashi's Commentary on the Prophets). This highlights the divergent interpretations between religious traditions. ### Broader Perspective Different religious traditions interpret these stories in ways that support their theological frameworks. Christians, following scholars like Raymond E. Brown, see Jesus as the fulfillment of Old Testament prophecies, interpreting stories like Joseph's typologically to prefigure Jesus' life and mission (Brown, "The Birth of the Messiah"). In contrast, Jewish and Islamic traditions have their own interpretations that do not point to Jesus in this manner. For instance, John J. Collins in "Introduction to the Hebrew Bible" underscores the importance of understanding these narratives within their original religious and historical contexts, avoiding anachronistic readings that impose later theological developments onto ancient texts. In conclusion, while the story of Joseph has elements that some Christians believe prefigure the life of Jesus, this interpretation is specific to Christian theology. Recognizing and respecting the distinct interpretations and beliefs of Judaism and Islam regarding these sacred texts enhances our understanding of their broader religious significance.

@@DawahCollective You need a lot of explanation trying to debunk the explanation of the story of Joseph. Try to find a prophecy about Muhammad that has as many similarities as between Joseph and Jesus. And as I said, one important aspect in this explanation is not fulfilled yet. That is when Yeshua reveals Himself to His brothers and tells them that they meant evil against Him; but God meant it for good to save many people for eternal life. If this happens during our lifetime, let it be a sign to you.

@IamTimOtheus As you know, we don't usually respond to comments, but I thought this time, why not. Respond substantively instead of with "if" scenarios...

@@DawahCollective appreciate that

@@IamTimOtheus Muhammad (pbuh) own uncle and tribesmen went against him. He had been boycotted in mecca. But he grew power in medina. Finally his tribesmen submitted to him but he forgave. Yes I can draw parallels if I wanted to. Just let youtube translate it: وأخرج البيهقي في «الدلائل» عن أبي هريرة أن رسول الله صلى الله عليه وسلم لما فتح مكة طاف بالبيت وصلى ركعتين ثم أتى الكعبة فأخذ بعضادتي الباب فقال : ماذا تقولون وماذا تظنون قالوا : نقول ابن أخ ، وابن عم حليم رحيم فقال : أقول كما قال يوسف ( لا تثريب عليكم اليوم يغفر الله لكم وهو أرحم الراحمين ) فخرجوا كأنما نشروا من القبور فدخلوا في الإسلام

Wa Gairan Djazak 😊