So women are incapable of leading or protecting? Women don't make things? And it's because women can't fight men unless they sneak up on them? This is evolution? Yeah, I'm not following your logic.

​@theblackponderer They interesting thing is they don't need too women are born with Value, you see it with men preferring women over men when it comes to trustworthiness & women get preferential Treatment a random a homeless man isn't going to get that.

@@elongatedmanforever1252 www.marketplace.org/shows/marketplace-morning-report/women-pay-more-for-health-care-it-adds-up

You say there are no "Palestinian" people, yet, there are 14.3 million people in the world today that identify as Palestinian... So, those people are lying..?

@@theblackponderer Yes Yasser Arrafat the Egyptian created the "Palestinian" national identidty in the 1960's with the help of the soviets. Before that no one referred to themselves as Palestinian. People in the British mandate of Palestine referred to themselves as Arabs, Jews, Armenian etc etc That is why there are no historic "Palestinian" persons. Can you name me one "Palestinians" king, Writer, or historical person? I cant. The Palestinians claim that Jesus was Palestinian but read Matthew 2 in the new testament and he writes that he was born in Bethlehem, Judea in the land of Israel.

@@kavkazip I think your focus may be placed on the wrong issue. I believe this is called a strawman argument. I'm using the name Palestinian to refer to indigenous/native peoples who have been displaced out of their land and/or are being oppressed and exploited by the State of Israel. Whatever the history, what is true now is that Israel exists as a state power by the displacement and exploitation of people. Maintaining power by exploiting, displacing and oppressing people is wrong. It vastly contributes to the cycle of violence that has existed in the Middle East throughout the decades.

This is a poor way to frame this issue; I’d recommend reading Rashid Khalidi’s book on the emergence of the Palestinian national identity. Nationality as we understand it today is a creation of the moderns; so of course there would be no Palestinian identity under the Ottomans, per se, but there’s substantial evidence of an emerging national consciousness in the late 19th century and early 20th centuries among Arabs living in present-day Palestine. Certainly early Palestinian nationalism was wrapped up in larger Pan-Arab movements, and was forged mostly in response to colonialism, but none of this discounts its validity as a national identity, nor does it erase the fact that many thousands of Arabs located in present day Palestine, who possessed close cultural and institutional ties to one another, were displaced or killed, with these previous institutional ties being destroyed in the process. The existence of a clearly defined Palestinian nation or explicitly Palestinian culture doesn’t erase the fact of Palestinian displacement, nor does it invalidate the later developments of Palestinian national consciousness.

@@Manfred-nj8vz I respectfully disagree.

Don't you think the world would be better if we didn't kill each other when we rage? We don't have to be slaves to our egos. We can manage resources in such a way that everyone has what they need. Don't you have a desire to do and be better?

​@@theblackponderer Yes but I believe in the patriarchy But one that's evolved where Both genders can flourish.

@@elongatedmanforever1252 But the way patriarchy works is one gender flourishing by preventing other genders from flourishing. Patriarchy functions by one gender dominating over other genders, where all others are subordinated by a dominate one. The very definition of patriarchy prevents equal flourishing.

@@theblackponderer The interesting thing about It, is that only a tiny portion Of men rule above women and most men are incapable Of doing certain things at all & are poor.

@@theblackponderer That's really not what it is at all Because most men are prevented From flourishing and only a few On the top get great outcomes & That can be taken away from Easily by other men.

I don't know, the People's Republic of China's economy is the world's largest economy by GDP at purchasing power parity, the second-largest economy by nominal GDP, and the second-wealthiest country, albeit ranking poorly in measures of democracy, human rights and religious freedom. I mean, one could argue that human rights and democracy in America is suffering too, so kinda the same...

I am indeed interested in nonviolent communication. I've participated in several seminars and workshops on the subject.

Anybody can read Hegel. It's just like going to the gym for the first time. Hard at first but gets doable over time 👍🏾

@@theblackponderer Finished last week, I think im a Hegelian now. Thanks for the motivation! 👌

You are the 50th person in the comment section to point that out.

Thanks for watching!

I'll check it out 👍🏾

Those books are already on my list of future reads 👍

Yeah, music was too loud. That was a technical error on my end. Someone mentioned it late in the stream and I turned it down.

I can hear it fine also music is subjective it was an ok backdrop imo who among us haven't struggled with technical issues?

Overall I loved your point of view, it was a great video and I really appreciated it

@@emmyfreudenrich4646 Interestingly, light itself experiences no time as it moves, according to Einstein's equations. So when light moves from one point to another, its experience is an instantaneous change in space. So when considering light itself as an observer, observing itself, its speed is not constant relative to other observers not moving at its speed.

@@theblackponderer Its an interesting limit to analyze. There has been a lot of talk in physics about how to think about this, and the general perspective among who I talk to is to not consider light or anything moving at the speed of light as a valid reference frame. This sounds like an ad-hoc justification (and it somewhat is) but it has reasonable mathematical backing. There is something lost in translation from math to human interpretation that makes it difficult to think about light as we would ourselves. The math is extremely well formulated and is proven to be extremely accurate in its predictions. While light doesn't experience what we call "proper time" we can track an analog variable called an "affine parameter" that is useful in calculations, but difficult to interpret. The difficulty in interpreting relativity (and also quantum mechanics) in comparison to the extremely well formulated mathematical theory has led to a "shut up and calculate" culture in physics when people bring up interpretations. This mindset certainly has served its use and is still extremely fruitful. In day-to-day physics and in creating useful devices we don't care about the metaphysics of what is happening; the math predicts the outcome and that's all we need. In my daily life at work I don't think about the philosophy, I am more worried about whether the vacuum pump on my glovebox is working or whether I coded a simulation correctly. However, as Einstein himself showed, when given deep thought metaphysics can lead to revolutions in physics. However, this is outrageously difficult to do. The difficulty in creating metaphysical theories that are useful for creating physical theories has made me personally somewhat frustrated with metaphysics. The metaphysics that doesn't have to deal with physics just doesn't interest me, and the metaphysics of physics (kind of a silly phrase) is so outrageously hard you need a literal Einstein to make sense of it. This is why I usually stick to more political philosophy, and feminist and queer theory in my personal reading.

@@emmyfreudenrich4646 I'm actually of the opinion that there is a clear line between physics and metaphysics. Physics is a science, so it needs to be verified by experimental data. Theoretical physics that cannot be experientially verified is metaphysics in my opinion. So subjects like string theory and theoretical physics related to higher dimensions of space, a lot of that stuff seems to be metaphysics to me. Unless an experiment can be designed to check the validity of the theory, to me that's metaphysics, which is philosophy. I do however think metaphysics has value, for sure, but I also think it's important to make that distinction. When we consider light as an observer, I do think that is more of a philosophical consideration than a physics based one. So I do think from a physics point of view, it is valid to discount light as an observer. But philosophically, what does it mean for a particle to experience no time, what are the implications of considering particles as observers? Does this infer any significant conclusions about reality? These are interesting questions that may have more metaphysical meaning than physical.

Thanks for watching! Yeah, my videos are more like book teasers or trailers than reviews. So in that vein I don't drop any spoilers.

Unpaid labor is definitely an exploitation women continuously experience 😞

When you're ready to have a critical discussion about why you think it's nonsense, I will be here.

Bruh, I volunteer as a Planned Parenthood patient escort. My daughter received life saving medicine from Planned Parenthood. Sanger's eugenics no longer guide Planned Parenthood. Don't get it twisted. Associations can change over time. And some associations don't actually exist. For example, Social Darwinism is a misinterpretation and co-optation of Darwin's scientific research. You got to work on your distinctions.

@@theblackponderer Margret Sanger would so proud of you ending the great sickness that was brought over to the new world.

@@RobertLoyed Pretty sure she'd be rolling in her grave at the current state of Planned Parenthood.

I wish KZfaq would flag these ignorant comments. Then more critical, deeper discussion can occur about these kinds of issues, rather these one dimensional hot takes which dumb down societal knowledge. This commenter is proof!