Always I'm proud of you my son ❤

You want to find Planet 9 - follow ʻOumuamua.. But remember - our little bug eyed buddies don't want us to find their home-world after what happened last time...

Thanks for sharing it to the internet

Well, that was clear as mud... man this complicated stuff. I love it.

Very helpful

It must flip the video horizontally I guess so that the writing is “re-flipped” to look correct.

you're amazing! thank you

It's still PLUTO to me.

Macquarie Uni PHYS1510 Skill 3 Pre Lab questions and answers: 1. Where is the ON button on the Rigol DS1052E? a. On the right side of the top panel, b. On the left side of the top panel, c. In the middle of the left side panel, d. In the middle of the back panel. 2. Which of these can an oscilloscope do that a digital multimeter can’t do? a. Show us voltages that vary rapidly with time. b. Measure DC voltage. c. Measure AC voltage. d. Nothing. 3. When you press the CH1 button the first time, a. The CH1 menu appears, b. The CH2 menu appears, c. Nothing unless a signal is connected to CH1, d. The CH1 menu disappears. 4. What does the small 1 in an arrow at the side of the screen show? a. The lowest voltage of the CH1 signal b. The highest voltage of the CH1 signal c. The zero voltage of the CH1 signal d. The zero voltage of the CH2 signal. 5. The voltage scale is displayed in what area of the screen? a. Top left b. Top right c. Bottom right d. Bottom left 6. The control to change the number of seconds per division displayed is a. The smaller dial at the top of the VERTICAL section of the user interface b. The larger dial at the bottom of the HORIZONTAL section of the user interface c. The smaller dial at the top of the HORIZONTAL section of the user interface d. The larger dial at the bottom of the VERTICAL section of the user interface 7. If you’re not sure what voltage and time scales your signal requires, you can get a good first estimate by pressing the a. Run/Stop button b. Auto button c. Measure button d. Utility button Answers: 1a,2a,3a,4c,5d,6d,7b

P r o m o S M 😬

P R O M O S M

Have you guys read Philip K Dick?

General Relativity predicts dilation, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Neil deGrasse Tyson recently spoke about this. Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. It's the original and correct explanation for why we cannot see light from the galactic center. Einstein is known to have repeatedly said that singularities are not possible. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc. It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. This means that there is no valid XYZ coordinate we can attribute to it, you can't point your finger at something that is smeared through spacetime. More precisely, everywhere you point is equally valid. In other words that mass is all around us. Sound familiar? This is the explanation for abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies. The "missing mass" is dilated mass. This explains why very low mass galaxies like NGC 1052-DF2, all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal. There was clarity in astronomy before television and movies began to popularize singularities in the 1960's

Dark matter is dilated mass. General Relativity predicts dilation, not singularities. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" Einstein wrote - "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Time dilation is just one aspect of dilation, it's not just time that gets dilated. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. It's the original and correct explanation for why we cannot see light from the galactic center. It can be inferred mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. Sound familiar? This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies, the " missing mass" is dilated mass. Dilation does not occur in galaxies with low mass in their centers. To date, 6 very low mass galaxies have been confirmed to show no signs of dark matter. This also explains why all planets and all binary stars have normal rotation rates, not 3 times normal. There was clarity in astronomy before television and movies popularized singularities starting in the 1960's. Einstein is known to have repeatedly said that they cannot exist. Nobody believed in them when he was alive including Plank, Bohr, Schrodinger, Dirac, Heisenberg, Feynman etc.

Iiìiiiiiìiiiìiiiiìiiììiiì7

Let's name the planet 9 as Yugoth (as in Howard Lovecraft 's book). It can be scary, but it worth this name

Thanks for the info; I have just finished the setup of the skywatcher dob 8". All I await now is a clear night!

Is that sience? They have no Idea about energy structures....

Planet 9 is the best kept secret. it's not going to be announced until you feel and see it.

Does time-space has its own polarity?

¿lo posible, en el infinito, torna en necesario - por ej.: alcanzar toda disminución entrópica del cosmos (estados físicos extremadamente improbables) desde cualquier otro estado físico (teorema del mono infinito) -? repositoriodeconfusiones-comentarios.blogspot.com/2018/03/planteos-respectos-de-algunas.html#PITN

I have no education in astrophysics so all I could understand was these ionised particles sound a little like dusty plasma. How are they different? With mention of clouds, are we talking about Kordylewski clouds between earth and moon? Speed of light and light itself, plasma being majority of sun's contents... Some easy understanding would be appreciated, thanks!

So Planet 9. In its design, is it believed to be a rocky planet, or gas giant?

Well done.👏

牛逼的介绍

This video shows again that scientists have a huge problem. They know a lot about a little. Astronomers don't know that planet X or 9 is known in human history for hundreds of thousands of years. It is depicted on cylinder seals, it has a symbol that we find worldwide on rocks, statues and artifacts. Its orbit is recorded in several ways. We find warnings for this planet that causes disasters on our planet when it is approaching our sun and the other planets at a very high speed. It must have a strong magnetic field. And it is inhabited. And we know in which direction to look for it. It is seen with the naked eye from the earth just before our era. Nonsense? No, ancient knowledge that is available for everyone who is searching for it. And my guess: LL Pegasi is planet 9. Skip the label 'dying star' and research it again. It will be moving very slowly in the direction of our solar system. It will come nearer for the next 1500+ years. This is "what I know about Nibiru".

“aaaAAAAA”

not clear

Thanks for sharing this awesome Colloquium!

Very interesting.

Good talk

Amazing work!

For a guy that say that error bars are very important and then shows none on his slides, that's embarrassing

Sure would be nice to have more Kips in my life

Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE). This CLEARLY explains what is E=MC2 AND F=MA ON BALANCE. What is E=MC2 IS dimensionally consistent. What is GRAVITY IS, ON BALANCE, an INTERACTION that cannot be shielded or blocked. Consider TIME AND time dilation ON BALANCE, as the stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches the revolution. A given PLANET (including what is THE EARTH) sweeps out equal area in equal TIME, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity (ON/IN BALANCE); AS TIME IS NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual ON/IN BALANCE. Great. By Frank Martin DiMeglio

To put it in simpler terms, one passing star is not going to affect the orbits of this many objects to the degree that it has. It takes multiple orbits to achieve the degree of disturbance observed. There are many lines of evidence are supporting a massive object in the outer reaches of the solar system. It explains too many unusual anomalies quite simply to be a phantom. If we aren't seeing it in the infrared studies that have been done to date, then then favors it being a lower mass object on a more eccentric orbit, like a super-earth around 5 earth masses in size.

No offense but kip in the thumbnail looks like he is sticking out his tongue 😜.

I'm asking this halfway in so forgive me if it is covered later, but are any of our constraints on dark matter sensitive to the IMF? If low mass stars are described as "hidden mass," then surely we have an intelligent way to disentangle this from the mass we explain as dark matter?

Planet 9 pulls us.not push away.to find it.look on the outer side of the sky lol

Child groomers

Other guys are saying that the speed-of-light vs speed-of-gravity is much less, about 7-partsin-10-to-15. What is correct, from other sources.

Ooh but what if their are multiple planets

This is so fascinating. Thank you. Didn't a star enter the Oort cloud not that long ago?

Very interesting talk. Beautiful presentation thank you.

I have nothing but complete respect for professor Thorne. He can explain gravity better than any other physicist I've ever listened to. (I just wish he would quit asking me that same question all the time. (wink,wink.) LOL :)