Isn't the simple answer to all of whining about energy efficiency in these buildings that they weren't designed for energy efficiency? And why would they be? Energy is cheap, and people are willing to pay for buildings that allow in tons of light and look good. Hence all the glass. If people want to pay for energy efficiency, they obviously can. But it's not obvious why they should. I own a house that was built in the 1980s. It's terrible from an energy efficiency standpoint, as most houses built in that era are. I have a heat pump. My electric bill is still less than $200/mo even during hot summers. If my house were built with modern energy efficient building science, it would have been much more expensive. So it's a simple trade off that the homeowner (or building owner) has every right to make. I get the jaded view of "green" on the commercial side, but it's easy to explain. Commercial building owners like to pretend to be "green," because there's a senseless, almost religious commitment to "green" today, without any consideration for cost and tradeoffs. Which is to say, there's no consideration for basic economics. What is the cost of "being green" versus the cost of not being "green?" And what do people prefer and at what cost? The problem with this lecture, and most modern attitudes among engineers and designers, is they don't care what the buyer wants or can afford. They don't care about the difficult tradeoffs and choices that homebuyers and the builders they hire must make in order for real humans (which is to say, middle class humans) need to make. This guy's irritating sarcasm just bleeds contempt for anyone on a budget who wants a house.
@JigilJigil27 күн бұрын
0:10!! after the Strider Technologies report on how over 154 Chinese scientists who worked on government-sponsored research at the U.S.’s Los Alamos National Laboratory over the last two decades have been recruited to do scientific work in China, I thought we would see a different approach towards admitting and hiring foreign scientists, it seems not.
@yoonjin85329 күн бұрын
💜
@ReOp14Ай бұрын
Awesome! Love to see robotics being combined with AI
@Thomas-hj7ucАй бұрын
Amazing Physicist! I saw him on Oppenheimer too. I just want to be like him, or like any other Physicist.
@JMJlsАй бұрын
I want to take a class this week.. Thank a lot for this Video 🙏🏽❤️
@BedonyeАй бұрын
What is it?
@rafiamasrat648Ай бұрын
Can you please tell me how and from where to download the CIF files of these MOFs in particular to Cu- MOF
@user-um9sl1kj6uАй бұрын
You have to warn people of any kind of radiation. You can’t just sneak up on them or keep it quiet.
@PiiLLoO10002 ай бұрын
Hola. Se que este video ya es de varios años atrás ahora estamos en el 2024. Pero tengo un caso que me gustaría compartir con la doctora. Es acerca de el transplante de bacterias. Mi esposo tiene una diarrea crónica desde los 10 años de edad y en la actualidad ya tiene 52 años y está decayendo mucho. Espero alguien me pudiera dar su contacto. Espero llegue este mensaje a alguien que me pueda ayudar. Gracias. Saludos cordiales desde México
@Holiday2163 ай бұрын
Some good content, but not a very good teacher/lecturer
@Blackscorpion19634 ай бұрын
Science has come a long way since our friend the 'Bunsen burner'...
@robertoguerra53754 ай бұрын
Impressive :) in which year was this interview? Atomic power was just in Einstein imagination or was it discovered already?
@user-qm8bc4bu1t5 ай бұрын
I love you 😢❤
@OCEREVXRB5 ай бұрын
i wasnt even born then, im still like 9 months away form living
@kevinpatrickcarey37415 ай бұрын
shes a hottie
@maria-giulianalatini17246 ай бұрын
Can you not coat pre-existing structures, such as river beds etc?
@cariocadenyc6 ай бұрын
This guy speaks the blunt truth about that GSA mess.
@SciHeartJourney6 ай бұрын
Josh Harnet portrayed Ernest Lawrence in the movie Oppenheimer. He was the one that built that giant apparatus that led to an experiment verifying nuclear fission was possible. They barely showed it. What a wasted opportunity that was. 🤦
@qk7x7 ай бұрын
Negawatt
@Douglas21407 ай бұрын
22:28 wild
@davidwheatcroft27979 ай бұрын
3 Nobel winners recently looked at the graph of storms/floods/droughts etc, and said, "The FLATTEST line I have ever seen!" Further, the IPCC itself admits, "There is NO increase in storms/floods/droughts." Hansen was admonished by the US Gov for not revealing hos method in arriving at World temperature, and for its OBSCURITY! Alarmists are mediocre; liars; cheats; bullies.
@Mn_Prepper539 ай бұрын
Apple Pectin
@bugrademiratan77999 ай бұрын
NEGAWAAAAAAT
@Allahu_Akbar_the_one9 ай бұрын
Berkeley really took a legend from University of Minnesota.
@bruhman800510 ай бұрын
On a real ass note 22:25 NEGAWATTTT???????????
@nihinivi518210 ай бұрын
WHAT THE FUCK
@GoldenRoseRecords9 ай бұрын
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@urigeheadmot11969 ай бұрын
Negawatt ??????
@Tolu8 ай бұрын
negawatt??????
@mLK63510 ай бұрын
Lee Eng lock’s Negawatt is revolutionary I can already feel it coming inside me!
@aegontan68610 ай бұрын
Josh Hartnett did a great job
@John_66710 ай бұрын
What is blud saying 💀
@user-wz1li8dn3n10 ай бұрын
Nega watt
@therealendexanni10 ай бұрын
Negawatt
@lainiwakura374111 ай бұрын
>the models showed some evidence of working I should write that in my thesis
@mosalah11thegoat11 ай бұрын
if he can say negwatts i can say pakiwatts
@fostagade36028 ай бұрын
Negawatt
@judobeanz11 ай бұрын
negawatt🗣️⁉️🔥🔥
@violetlunna11 ай бұрын
How is it possible to have such a brain
@andres686811 ай бұрын
interesting, there is no date for this audio but I guess it was a few years before the Manhattan Project
@thomashoffmann839711 ай бұрын
Who gave him the pass 💀
@AlexM-ry7ih9 ай бұрын
I did, my bad
@poposcradle11 ай бұрын
genius
@goofyahhmichalejordan590311 ай бұрын
Negawatt negawatt
@meowcow21 Жыл бұрын
NEGAWATTTTTTT
@josu-5565 Жыл бұрын
XD
@felixgutierrez993 Жыл бұрын
NEGAWATT
@kosmly Жыл бұрын
WHAT HE SAY??
@felixgutierrez993 Жыл бұрын
NEGAWATT
@kosmly Жыл бұрын
@@felixgutierrez993 NEGAWATT
@felixgutierrez993 Жыл бұрын
@@kosmly NEGAWATT
@Krshnntj Жыл бұрын
NEGAWATT
@felixgutierrez993 Жыл бұрын
@@Krshnntj NEGAWATT
@ethieasmerom8763 Жыл бұрын
What a great accomplishment.
@josephhuether1184 Жыл бұрын
Great lecture! I will say this though… Joe says he’s never received a call from a client complaining “my building is leaking air”. Perhaps that’s the reason architects haven’t been drawing detailed 3-D “air control barrier” drawings…until VERY recently. But many DO draw detailed 3-D roofing and waterproofing drawings…often done by highly paid and skilled consultants. Yes…”bulk water” from rainfall and ground will always be the highest priority. It’s like going to the hospital. The first and foremost issue will be infection control, antibiotics and acute care. Meanwhile nobody will care about your metabolic health and the hospital snack-bar will be full of processed food that can lead to diabetes…20 years down the road.
@reneegenz Жыл бұрын
Her last comment... no pharmacy company is going to dish out that money for no profit. There will be an event
@jonneiss7562 Жыл бұрын
One thing that is supposed to be good is magnetic therapy. I mean you can pick up these tiny magnetic "dots" for next to nothing, if you want. And this anecdote is true. So, I got some MRIs for some injury. After the MRIs, for the first time in my life, I developed skin tags. About six months later or something, I started using magnetic therapy for my injuries. The skin tags just went away. And that is what they are purported to do, that magnetic therapy can reverse damage from a variety of EMF. And, I saw it personally. And, you know, not just my personal experience. And, you know, it makes some sense that the thing that can counter an EMF, is in that realm of physics...
@Ooft-1 Жыл бұрын
Is this good for someone who has had a CT SCAN. I’d be interested to know more about this.