Пікірлер
@speak_er_up
@speak_er_up 16 сағат бұрын
I have a theory regarding Moldova's televoting. It was the first time they used online voting. I remember the situation in 2021 when Cyprus got an unexpected 12 points from Russia in final. After that, it turned out that most of the voters needed to confirm the votes by clicking 1. By doing so, the audience accidentally voted for song #1 that was Cyprus. that secured Cyprus the first place in the Russian televoting. Maybe something similar happened this year in the first Semi-Final in Moldova? Just saying.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 16 сағат бұрын
Interesting theory! Might be really close to the truth, when you look at the result. Lucky Silia, as without these 24 points from Moldova and Azerbaijan - she would have been just 2 points ahead of Australia 🙃
@nastia3690
@nastia3690 18 сағат бұрын
Great idea 😮
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 16 сағат бұрын
👍😉 my pleasure!
@meirifrach8937
@meirifrach8937 19 сағат бұрын
Interesting insights 😊
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 16 сағат бұрын
I am glad you liked it 😉 be sure not to miss my next video, about the 5 biggest drops in the televote in the Eurovision 2024 👌
@Adrian-S.
@Adrian-S. Күн бұрын
First like!!!😃
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst Күн бұрын
You were quick 😅👍
@cangalovic221
@cangalovic221 3 күн бұрын
Budalewtina komenira umetnicko delo uzas
@ido_cohen
@ido_cohen 4 күн бұрын
Eden is the hero of our time, heroooooooo. 🇮🇱 🇮🇱 🇮🇱 💙🤍
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 4 күн бұрын
I loved her performance, but also adored her bravery and strength 👍
@diekommentarekommentiererin
@diekommentarekommentiererin 5 күн бұрын
But France getting more jury points would've likely not only taken points from Switzerland, but also from Croatia. Though regarding Switzerland, I don't think it would've been a lot. France likely wouldn't have finished ahead of Switzerland in most of the 22 countries who gave them 12, maybe right behind them on 2nd place receiving 10 points instead. That would've only decreased the gap, but considering it was almost 150 points, not by much. And if France was last in the Australian jury, I don't think a better performance would be enough to improve 15+ places (Other results such as Georgia - which I'm still so sad about - show that vocals don't always matter for juries) In conclusion, it would still not be enough to beat Switzerland. And of course Croatia heavily benefitted from the disqualification. The Netherlands was their biggest televote competition and would've taken a lot of points from them. And this would have resulted in Switzerland winning by a bigger margin. This must be sad for Croatia though, that was their best chance in years and they might not get another one in a long time (which could also apply to Finland)
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 4 күн бұрын
It feels so unfair, that one performance, which people have not even really seen has impacted the final results so much. Now we can only guess how the results could have been like 🤔
@OldFroaky
@OldFroaky 5 күн бұрын
Sorry I didn't like the reaction you skipped so many times at parts which had a lot of power
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 5 күн бұрын
I did not skip anything, I just had to cut it from the video, which I upload to KZfaq :) it is just not allowed by KZfaq to post the song played entirely due to the copyright 👌 I hope you enjoyed the rest of the analysis though
@Dickens58
@Dickens58 6 күн бұрын
I would have preferred Denmark over Norway, but definitely not Czechia over Georgia. Love the analysis...and again, you have such a pleasant smile!
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 5 күн бұрын
I absolutely agree, would have chosen Denmark over Norway but still Georgia over Czechia 😉 😉👍
@julinona
@julinona 6 күн бұрын
Do you think the jury was completely fair? In particular for Israel, for example?
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 6 күн бұрын
I think for Israel it worked both ways. Some juries have ranked Israel too low because of politics, but some others too high because of the whole situation with bullying and so on. You know, I love this entry, one of my personal favorites, but objectively this type of a song is not something the juries would usually put in their final top-5
@julinona
@julinona 6 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst ok, thanks for your answer :))))
@ofirw9814
@ofirw9814 6 күн бұрын
I recommend seeing the song with the original lyrics performed Infront of the kidnapped people families
@FizzPunk
@FizzPunk 6 күн бұрын
huu very scary!!
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 6 күн бұрын
Which country you would have missed in the final? Norway or Georgia? 😉
@FizzPunk
@FizzPunk 6 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst Joost Klein
@greg1769
@greg1769 7 күн бұрын
Slimane of France should have won 1st place. Swiss won because of so called Peace summit there in June. Eurovision Officals accepted bribes for the winner.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 7 күн бұрын
I agree, but have you seen his performance at the jury show? If his voice would have not had those bad cracks - France would be the winner I believe 👍
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 7 күн бұрын
Be sure to check my final results analysis video 👌
@Roastveen
@Roastveen 7 күн бұрын
San Marino does not have a televote because they cannot facilitate a separate network for San Marinese people to vote through, as they are part of the larger Italian telecommunications network. That's why their jury votes are counted every year as a televote substitute.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 7 күн бұрын
Interesting point, but well, they have definitely found some solution, cause their televote points are counted in the final alongside the jury points (Sammarinese televote is not 1:1 as the jury points and is also not similar to Italian televote). And when both juries and televote were counted in the semi-finals - they also had a separate Sammarinese televote
@Roastveen
@Roastveen 6 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst No, there is no San Marinese televote, period, it's technically not possible. The scores that are presented as San Marino's televote scores in the final are a combination of other countries with similar voting patterns. It's basically an aggregate to substitute for the real thing as there is no way to separate San Marinese calls from Italian calls.
@Roastveen
@Roastveen 6 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst From 2009-2015 San Marino only had a jury vote, and from 2016 onward, they have had this aggregate calculation average of a certain set of other countries that has acted as their televote score, so that - alongside their jury - they would have another set of points to give. There is and has never been an actual San Marinese televote.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 6 күн бұрын
Oh really? So an average aggregate like for example Belarusian jury had in the final of 2019? Do you know which countries they use for that?
@Roastveen
@Roastveen 6 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst Exactly like the 2019 Belarus case. No, the EBU has refused to release which countries it's based on, even the San Marinese broadcaster doesn't know.
@ziemniakmaster9520
@ziemniakmaster9520 7 күн бұрын
San Marino, Czechia and Malta should have qualified
@wystxrr
@wystxrr 7 күн бұрын
YUP
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 7 күн бұрын
Czechia and Malta have definitely deserved qualifying 👌
@cabemaru1
@cabemaru1 7 күн бұрын
Mmmm i agree except for Denmark, too much points. I think Latvia and Albania could grab some points for the vocal ability. So, Albania could be better but not enough to qualify sadly. I think Georgia should grab more points for the show itself.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 7 күн бұрын
Unfortunately Latvia and Georgia were rated very poorly by the juries in the final as you can see in my first table 😢 I also would have expected the juries would like them more than they actually did
@lisa.3585
@lisa.3585 7 күн бұрын
So interesting, thanks a lot! And always with your big smile😄
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 7 күн бұрын
My pleasure 😉 such a pity EBU does not reveal the real jury voting results from the semi-finals
@lisa.3585
@lisa.3585 7 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst Oh! I didn‘t know that there are jury votes for the semis! So they vote, but it doesn‘t count?
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 7 күн бұрын
exactly! Since the televoting was introduced, juries always kept voting. Just in case there will be a televoting issue, so that the backup jury score would be used instead (which happened on few occasions, quite often with San Marino which failed to receive a minimal required amount of votes). And in the last two years with the removal of juries from semis, it is actually the same. They still vote on an evening before the live show, but now their voices just do not count at all as long as there are no issues with the televote.
@lisa.3585
@lisa.3585 7 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst Thank you! I didn‘t know that, but it‘s logical as a backup. Now I‘m a little bit wiser😉
@Adrian-S.
@Adrian-S. 8 күн бұрын
Beautiful. Thank you. Very interesting,. sorry for Malta
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 8 күн бұрын
Sarah has definitely deserved better! ❤️
@MatthewEade-hj6tf
@MatthewEade-hj6tf 9 күн бұрын
I have discovered something a bit weird with Esc results, specifically with nordic countries , for some odd reason nordic countries allways have something bad happen to them if the contest is hosted in a fellow nordic country Some examples of this are Swedens only nq happening in norway 2010 In sweden 2016 not a single nordic country qualified In denmark 2001 norway and iceland were tied for last place Finlands best result in a nordic country since the 2000s is 18th in 2000 Sweden 2024 where norway came last , finland a televote magnet flopped , denmark failed to qualify with a half descent song and then iceland came dead last with only 3 points Hoping for a nordic country to win again so we can see what the curse does next
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 8 күн бұрын
I have noticed it too, but 2013 is a big exception, where Denmark won, Norway finished top-5 and all other 3 Nordic countries were in the final 👌
@tomislav982
@tomislav982 10 күн бұрын
at 12:35 you say that Portugal was blanked by Croatia, while Croatia actuall gave 12 points to Portugal. However, great effort!
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 10 күн бұрын
Eagle eye! 👍 have realized it after I have posted the video :) I mean Cyprus, mixed up these two countries. Thank you, the video about semi-final 2 comes soon :)
@tomislav982
@tomislav982 9 күн бұрын
@JustESCAnalyst haha. Just a Croatian very involved this year in ESC 😁
@cabemaru1
@cabemaru1 10 күн бұрын
The jury should be included too
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 10 күн бұрын
But this year I am glad Slovenia has qualified because there was no jury 😅
@Dickens58
@Dickens58 10 күн бұрын
Love a good analysis. You also have one of the most pleasant smiles!
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 10 күн бұрын
♥️
@johncallaghan1787
@johncallaghan1787 10 күн бұрын
37 Juries gave Israels best ever entry on 30 points. What lesson can Israel take from this ??? 🤔 (But sadly they will think the Public vote is the majority of people as opposed to certain people voting MANY times for Israel.) .
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 10 күн бұрын
The juries were often very supportive of Israeli entries, but Israeli ballads in 2010, 2013, 2019 were also always rated quite low by the juries. Eden did actually quite good with the juries in my opinion 👌
@AppNetEnt
@AppNetEnt 11 күн бұрын
I get more and more pissed at Eurovision every year when it becomes more and more obvious that people cannot separate their emotional feelings for an artist, country or culture from the actual song. And it's getting worse. At the end of the day it is a song contest. Read the tin label. Yes, I understand culture will always play the bigger factor of the three, that's obvious, but I think this guy hits the nail on the head. Australia misses out of the 'neighbour' factor (by extension some cultural elements - ignoring the diaspora factor in Australia to some extent as Europeans are a lesser percentage/weighting these days), yet other countries like Poland, Lithuania and Ukraine have such a massive diaspora across Europe that they can, and do, actually affect televoting results). The thing that ruins this contest for me now more and more is this inability to say 'yes I am Xxxxxish, yes I want Xxxxxxxx to win, but Yyyyyy's song is better so I'll vote for that' (you can replace Xxxxx and Yyyyyy with any country you like). That isn't human nature, generally, especially when you factor in an artist may be your favourite, you saw them three times on tour promoting their song and you heard it the most, or all your friends are voting for it for their own non-empirical reasons. All of this can work in the opposite too, of course. Even if you think a song is better than your own you won't vote because 300 years ago they did whatever they did. Look, I am not naïve, I know there are deeply held reasons why people do and don't do what should be an empirical action, but this is why we will forever need juries to smooth over the sharp edges of peoples' irrational actions. Maybe I am just being an idealist and what I am arguing for people to do is irrational in itself, but I feel I can never trust this contest again when factors as those this guy lists are in play. How can (or should) you use previous jury trends as part of an analysis? Every song *should* stand on its own merit, devoid of any historical context, populist context and frankly commercial context. The only way to achieve this is to have anonymous songs by artists not from that country all sung in one language so you've no idea where it's from until afterwards and clearly none of that can never happen. The solace I take is that in general the 'best' song *generally* wins (2022 excepted in recent years) through this smoothing process, but analyses like this should be moot because the populace *should* be able to separate an empirical judgement on a song from all the other crap clouding our brains. But I know we can't. This is a song contest, not a performer, culture, bezzie mates nor radio play contest. I'd love people to at least think of some of that before we pick up our 'phones. Some people really would vote for a farting goat on stage if the rules allowed it for any of the reasons above. Some probably have.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 10 күн бұрын
You are absolutely right! I have a couple, who are my close friends, who for example vote each and every year 20 times from both of their phones for the same country, because one of them came originally from this country. Even if they don’t like the song 😂 I think it is unfair, but so is their human nature and EBU has no way to stop such cases, except by eliminating the televote completely, which will not happen
@AppNetEnt
@AppNetEnt 10 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst it’s a shame. We are emotional beings and maybe it’s just my (extremely) mild autistic tendencies to automatically separate my emotions from fact. I’m not always successful of course, but I try.. haha Btw your videos are great. I love your style and presentation and have an extremely camera-friendly manner (and face!), so please don’t think any of this is a criticism of the work you’ve done. I think it’s great and you should be very proud of this output. I covered ESC as press from 2005-2014 and stopped for a lot of the reasons above, and the runaway costs! Don’t even talk about the Baku costs and Malmö 2013, I’m already feeling the pain for those guys go head to Switzerland next year! Ouch! But seriously, great videos and lovely presentation.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 10 күн бұрын
Thank you so much 😉 very interesting, I am sure you have a lot of nice memories from those times. But the costs are, indeed, extreme. Luckily nowadays you don‘t really have to be there in order to cover the contest as a press 👌 but I am still glad I have at least visited one show in Malmö 🇸🇪
@fyrhunter_svk
@fyrhunter_svk 12 күн бұрын
Oooh stats, love this!
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
Then you have found a right channel 😉 be sure to subscribe to not miss the video about the Semi-Final #2 ✌️
@IsraelESC
@IsraelESC 12 күн бұрын
0:53 I mean, Kiril, that was BRUTAL Lmaoo
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
🤣 with all the love to Hera, this entry was just a mistake. I hope she had fun nevertheless 😅
@jason256-8
@jason256-8 12 күн бұрын
Then Poland could’ve qualified like I wanted! But… Finland would be eliminated which wouldn’t be good for me… I’ve been starting to root for Finland ever since Kaarija’s outstanding performance.
@jason256-8
@jason256-8 12 күн бұрын
But either way maybe it’s time for the juries to continue voting in the semifinals, because now with them out of the semifinals, the juries have fewer choices to choose in the grand final and potentially there will be fewer songs that the jury would like. Hence these few songs would have more concentrated jury scores. And it led to issues where they came off as ‘biased’, like how they gave Sweden 15 sets of 12 last year and Switzerland 22 sets of 12 this year.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
@@jason256-8 you are so right about this! Especially I was able to see it with the second semi-final qualifiers when all of them except of course Switzerland were not really liked by the juries at all 😅
@cathalsheehan9596
@cathalsheehan9596 12 күн бұрын
Australia came 2nd last in Eurojury ahead of only Finland…I’m curious as to why some people think juries would have suddenly supported it.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
Eurojury was based on the music videos and not on their live performances. Australian song was one of a few radio-friendly ones in this semi-final and it really came alive with this live performance 👌 Also don’t forget that, ranking all 37 songs at once, juries would had Australia rather in the middle of their tops, meaning not giving points. But choosing just among 14 other semi-finalists, I am sure they would have to give points to Australia
@cathalsheehan9596
@cathalsheehan9596 12 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst Eurojury also asses the song quality which as it showed the Australia song is a bad light. The performance live wasn’t enough to overcome the reality that the song just isn’t very good. Possibly but the same argument could be made for all the other songs it was competing with. I suspect with a lot of people that they think just because it’s Australia it would automatically be liked by juries despite the grave signs that don’t support it.
@Sword_of_justice103
@Sword_of_justice103 12 күн бұрын
She clearly won Eurovision , hands down!
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
She did so well! Be sure to subscribe and check my results analysis videos 😉 I hope you will learn something new
@diegosanchezhernandez2356
@diegosanchezhernandez2356 12 күн бұрын
Really interesting video, was thinking about this the other day. One thing I disagree on is Poland getting so much points from the juries, as Luna's vocals were not particularly good, so Finland or Slovenia would have still qualified
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
Thank you, Diego 👌 You are right about the vocals, but they were actually not really bad. Her voice is not strong, but she was just singing in quite a delicate way and she has hit the notes. I believe the juries would vote for this one as it is one of very few potential radio-hits from this semi-final. Modern pop track but not a trashy europop, which juries usually do not appreciate 😅
@diegosanchezhernandez2356
@diegosanchezhernandez2356 12 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst Yeah, Luna's song felt very current and in line with current music trends, so maybe the juries would have loved it. And it may have been one of the rare ocurrences in which Poland gets more points from the juries than from the televote, haha
@nastia3690
@nastia3690 12 күн бұрын
I really don't understand why we still have jury voting in final, maybe SomeoneWantsToControlTheFinalResult, and they don't vote in semi final because "favorites" will qualify 100%.... 🤫🤔🧐🧐🧐
@tonyttt31
@tonyttt31 12 күн бұрын
We need the jury because if the final is just televote it will result in novelty and joke entries being entered every year like in the 00s.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
The juries are very important cause the televote is too much influenced by politics and attracted to catchy performances rather than judging who has better voice, more modern song and who can have an international success in the future
@AppNetEnt
@AppNetEnt 11 күн бұрын
Because the public can't be trusted and vote for the populist song, rather than a good song. 2023, remember that? There is NO WAY you could even entertain the Finnish song being a "better song" than Sweden's, IMO, but certainly was "better entertainment". The public can't discern the difference, unfortunately.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 11 күн бұрын
@@AppNetEnt I absolutely agree! If we want it to be a SONG contest and not a "performance" contest - the juries are of course required. But they often of course also pay a lot of attention to the vocals and professionalism of the singer, rather than at the quality of the song. So many things could be improved :)
@tonyttt31
@tonyttt31 10 күн бұрын
@@AppNetEnt and yet France, Iceland, Serbia, Cyprus and Norway all had jurors that voted Cha Cha Cha higher than Tattoo. Those juries all gave higher points to Sweden. In fact, 14 jurors overall gave Finland 12 points. I'm not trying to prove that Cha Cha Cha is better. I'm saying that even with the guidelines given by the EBU to jurors while scoring, they dont all think the same and vote the way you expect them to. I do not want a televote-only final. That would kill Eurovision.
@MatthewEade-hj6tf
@MatthewEade-hj6tf 12 күн бұрын
I did the maths and if you take the jury results for switzerland from the semi final 2 countries and take away all the countries that didn't compete in semi 2 than Switzerland hypothetically got 214 out of 218 points, but that's assuming they voted the same in the final as in the semi but I don't think it would be far off
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
Yes, it is a very impressive score there!Just Israel and France did not let it become an absolute maximum. Actually 212 of 216, not 214 of 218, but it does not matter so much 😉
@nastia3690
@nastia3690 12 күн бұрын
Wow! Great idea💡
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
Thank you 😉👌
@user-zl4mq3bf5c
@user-zl4mq3bf5c 12 күн бұрын
Croatia the Best ❤❤❤❤😊😊😊😊
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
Baby Lasagna has absolutely smashed the competition in his semi-final 😉👌
@oliverqueen5883
@oliverqueen5883 11 күн бұрын
Nah m8, #CrownTheWitch
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 11 күн бұрын
@@oliverqueen5883 they really brought THE performance of the year! And it is super impressive, that they were ranked so high with the juries too!
@MicaelaQueirozCardoso
@MicaelaQueirozCardoso 12 күн бұрын
Its obvious that with jury votes, iolanda would be even Higher! 🇵🇹💪🏼🔝
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
So happy for her she has not only qualified but finished in the final top-10 🇵🇹💪🏻
@MicaelaQueirozCardoso
@MicaelaQueirozCardoso 12 күн бұрын
@@JustESCAnalyst yes and that was my goal! 🥰
@user-qq5gi1ny7c
@user-qq5gi1ny7c 13 күн бұрын
The Code, from Nemo, was a fair winner song. Iconic, well performed, nice message, nice music. Well done Nemo, you're very sweet and shinning 💖💫. But Sweeden didn't give Nemo the deserved stage in the final performance, after being announced the winner. They just give them the trophy, an extra micro and let Nemo there. The brocken trophy was iconic too, after all this mess eurovision year 😉💖
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 12 күн бұрын
They are definitely a very well-deserved winner! You are right, last days before the final were just hilarious. Nemo breaking the trophy was like a cherry on top of this cake of disaster 🎂🍒😅
@ludwighaas8227
@ludwighaas8227 13 күн бұрын
Thanks for your interesting comments and insight, I am very much looking forward to seeing more of your videos. I fully agree that the Croatian jury did not act in a very professional way. As a swiss person, On the night, I was really scared that Croatia would finally win by less than 8 points (the amount swiss jury gave croatia), fortunately that did not happen. In any case thumbs up for Baby Lasagna, who showed a lot more class than the croatian jury, as he graciously clapped when the final result was announced, even though he must have been the most disappointed person in the whole arena.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 13 күн бұрын
Baby Lasagna definitely proved with his actions he should not be associated with these tricky judges ;) The new videos are coming soon 😉
@shirH84
@shirH84 14 күн бұрын
Thanks for another great video! We voted for Issak and i really don't understand the hate and mockery he got, joking as if he is obviously last place. His song is one of the few i listen on Spotify. And Croatia were robbed! ❤ from 🇮🇱
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 13 күн бұрын
I also absolutely do not understand, how the Eurovision community was sleeping on him. I definitely saw this coming, that the judges will support his entry 👌
@noamyoeli700
@noamyoeli700 14 күн бұрын
And analysing Ukraine's top 3 entry being sad for "politics taking it down a bit" is hilarious considering the fact that politics got Ukraine to top 3 position at the first place. Ukraine still receives many many sympathy/diasphora votes due to the war, from the televotes and also some from the juries.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 13 күн бұрын
Not sure that this year it was related to the war situation. This agenda was not really raised this year and the song had also nothing to do with the war… but there are a lot of Ukrainians now everywhere around Europe, so this will have every year an impact in a long run…
@noamyoeli700
@noamyoeli700 14 күн бұрын
The huge gap between Israel's jury's points and televotes should have not been ignored at this video for my opinion. It is clearly political, BOTH WAYS.
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 13 күн бұрын
You are of course right. It is obvious, that super high points were r not just given to the song, but rather to show support against the bullying of the Israeli entry. I would not consider the jury score too low, 12th place is a perfectly great result for a ballad, however a few of the jury members have admitted ranking this too low due to the politics.
@lessonbiology4531
@lessonbiology4531 14 күн бұрын
to understand why the "broken" dance, do a search of "Shani luke". If you can stomache it.
@romanmonosov1191
@romanmonosov1191 14 күн бұрын
Смыс песни о боли нашего народа. Не дай бог узнать это,когда вы спити а вас вдруг приходит в ваш дом и убивают вашу семью, я думаю что после этого ,что пережили эти люди израиль даже вам не присниться в страшнем сне
@romanmonosov1191
@romanmonosov1191 14 күн бұрын
🙏🙏🙏🇮🇱🇮🇱🇮🇱
@connie.22
@connie.22 14 күн бұрын
❤ I love it that you keep your comments positive and encouraging. Love never dies, your smile, enthusiasm, and your grace blesses the whole esc internet discussion. Thank you. ❤
@JustESCAnalyst
@JustESCAnalyst 14 күн бұрын
Thanks you so much for your kind words 👌