16 сағат бұрын
19 сағат бұрын
21 сағат бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
2 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
3 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
4 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
5 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@thomasstarlit2427 5 сағат бұрын
Interesting video. I have the TTartisan 90mm and a 18mm extension tube which I was hoping to use for close-up portraits. But the maximum focus distance is something like 40cm, so the lens is too close to the subject's face. What is the focus range on the 90mm with the 11mm extension tube? I can't find that information anywhere online
@alanplatt888 2 күн бұрын
Excellent video, thank you.
@paulschefz Күн бұрын
thank you!
@nevvanclarke9225 3 күн бұрын
I really thought about this camera for a lot, but I decided to wait and just yesterday my GFX 100s ii arrived and personally I think it offers better value. I'm not a big fan of that EVF sticking out. I actually like the camera close to my face. I don't like something sticking out like that. It also makes it impractical putting it into my bag for landscape photography as well, while I think it's a really cool feature I don't think it was required. Plus, I'm not shooting video with a GFX. I have three other cameras that can shoot 4K 60 with no problem..... So I think it's not really a camera that I'm gonna use for video at all because the weight also. that said the 100 ii I think it would be an amazing camera. I'm loving my GFX journey. I also have the 50s ii two and if you just shoot stills and landscapes check that camera out people it's slow focusing not suitable for portraits but man pumps out some great images GFX has now joined the party, with full frame cameras and honestly they are better value in my opinion because of the image quality. I think now there's a third option which is the hundred 100S ii. so many great options
@paulschefz 2 күн бұрын
the 100SII was not available when I got my 100II, I did not have the choice, it definitely is a great choice to have! I love the tilt finder, I agree with it being a pain when packing and storing the camera! I havent shot any video with the 100II yet. I have not needed that ultimate video quality, I also always use smaller cameras. with the latest canon/nikon/sony announcements it almost seems as if they are just handing Fuji that high end landscape/IQ with the GFX. I just saw that fuji released the SDK for GFX use on drones, this is big because phase still had that high end commercial/industrial covered. easy now to think of GFX for that use as well. great system getting better all the time!
@zachbenson9548 4 күн бұрын
Thanks for the review! I've been getting into more macro photography lately and that's led to trying out more flash solutions. This looks like a lot of fun with unique results.
@paulschefz 4 күн бұрын
I actually used the lux master with silver reflector in the new macro video. tried the soft box first but wanted more specular light, worked really well! I am so used to working with my big 1200ws packs and heads but this was a lot easier. might get another lux master.
@gastontrrs 4 күн бұрын
That's the cutest softbox I ever seen haha.
@paulschefz 4 күн бұрын
I know! it works but...the dome and silver reflector make more sense.
@MrMuckiMicki-jo3lh 4 күн бұрын
Danke Dir.
@paulschefz 4 күн бұрын
hoffe es hilft!
@MrMuckiMicki-jo3lh 4 күн бұрын
@@paulschefz 😀
@emeryfred 5 күн бұрын
It's a very soft lense, there is a lot of ghosting at PO, and I found the bokeh a little bit nervous
@paulschefz 4 күн бұрын
definitely not a perfect lens, definitely lots of ghosting wide open but I am still happy with the sharpness and the bokeh might not be completely smooth but has character, which is really what these lenses are about anyway?
@microminstrel 5 күн бұрын
i feel like someone just woke this dude up, with zero warning and forced him to make a video against his will. lol. I'm 3 min in and he's just now "getting on board with the idea of it"
@paulschefz 5 күн бұрын
@@microminstrel not quite but thanks for watching!
@RyanKemperinOhio 3 күн бұрын
😂😂 hilarious comment. I didn’t feel that way at all about the video, but still funny.
@luiscarrasquillo5544 5 күн бұрын
Have this lens which is sharp love this lens is all about use fast shutter speed for sharp photos
@paulschefz 5 күн бұрын
yes! getting to use those super fast shutter speeds is definitely a factor for producing sharp images! I have had to dial my iso down a bit here in sunny CA!
@Sgt43 5 күн бұрын
neden çok fazla ağız şaplatma gereksinimi duyuyorsunuz? sanki leziz bir yemek yiyiyor musun gibi? altı üstü flash reklamı yapıyorsun.
@paulschefz 5 күн бұрын
not sure if the translation is correct but I just want to point out that all my equipment is bought by me and used by me and I am simply passing on my own experience with the equipment.
@Fujik1966 6 күн бұрын
Hello Paul. Do you often use flash? Your results are quite predictable. I noticed that I completely stopped using additional lighting. I have two inexpensive Fuji 42 TTL flashes. I feel so sorry for them, now they are just gathering dust. Previously, I made such a reflector from a children's souvenir umbrella for $2, and lined the inside with white thick fabric. The flash was directed at the umbrella, the reflected umbrella onto the object. The shadows were minimal. (Google Transletter) Eduard.
@trollfiddler 6 күн бұрын
I'd call it a dome but that's just me. Thanks for the review. I dismissed the flash when I saw it first appear but the dome looks like it might be useful for lighting individuals in pub music sessions (in our dimly-lit Irish pubs).
@paulschefz 6 күн бұрын
dome it is! the flash is great, I guess there are cheaper solutions that do the same (but simply dont look half as cool) and yes I think the dome will probably see the most use for me. the silver reflector adds oomph and the soft box will come in handy if I dont have the big packs around (although I doubt it will put out enough light in those situations ?) again, the best thing is to have the tools available and not taking up a lot of room.
@trollfiddler 5 күн бұрын
@@paulschefz Yep, I've been avoiding speedlight type flashes as even with bounce cards I don't like them. My portable studio flashes are way to big to be discreet with their attachments. This one might do the trick! Worth a spin anyway :)
@paulschefz 5 күн бұрын
@@trollfiddler same here, I use flash a lot but have always avoided small portable (handheld) units. not that this one is that different or does anything magical but the size, power, overall package and system seems to work well for me. I am using it more and more.
@Mohika881 7 күн бұрын
Thanks for this review.
@paulschefz 6 күн бұрын
thank you! let me know if you have any questions!
@nutin321 7 күн бұрын
How does it compare to the Mitakon 80mm 1.6?
@paulschefz 7 күн бұрын
I can't tell since I don't have that lens. what is interesting to me and why I compared it to the AstrHori 75 f4 is that both lenses show similar issues/drawbacks/flaws wide open, which is obviously at different f stops (f1.25 vs f2.5, the "secret" wide open for the 75mm) Maybe the mikaton behaves in a similar way? Lots of character (flaws) wide open, solid once stopped down?
@super-z8943 8 күн бұрын
Your audio seems off.
@DionisFerizi 8 күн бұрын
i have the 50mm 0.95 from brightin star for canon r5 , they seem to have almost identical features and build ... lovely lens ...
@paulschefz 8 күн бұрын
interesting, great to hear, I will look into that brand, do they have GFX mount lenses? I guess I could always try adapters. great to have so many options now!
@DionisFerizi 8 күн бұрын
@@paulschefz AFAIK they only have it for Fuji x mount
@paulschefz 7 күн бұрын
@@DionisFerizi checked out their website, not sure if any of their lenses can be adapted to GFX, but great to see so many options for all formats!
@user-lu6ey7zw9d 9 күн бұрын
Dumb scarecrow At least write the text on paper first! What do you want to say Eeeeee Eeeeee
@JohnJohn-fz6nt 9 күн бұрын
In the late 70's I remember the fashion photographers Sarah Moon and Deborah Turbeville bringing in an "anti" element of softness, amplified grain and out of focus elements...all contrasting with the severity of Helmut Newton and Chris von Wangenheim's super sharp primary colors. AI's sameness, with everything turned up to 11, bores me. I like the idea of AI tools in the hands of artists, but hate it when it coughs up something just from a prompt.
@paulschefz 8 күн бұрын
I do remember them as well, I think that was the only time I really shot 35mm because the 3200 film gave that amazing grain and soft look. My issue with AI is mostly with the companies blatantly ripping off decades of hard and brilliant work so some AD can now harvest with a prompt. I am always for progress and pushing tech but the developments today seems to be a little off the rails, crashing forward without consideration.
@JohnJohn-fz6nt 8 күн бұрын
@@paulschefz Agreed.
@JohnJohn-fz6nt 9 күн бұрын
Especially love the top left and the middle right. Thanks for the review.
@paulschefz 8 күн бұрын
thank you! means a lot!
@Fujik1966 9 күн бұрын
The lens is very similar to a projection lens, they are also fast and blur the background very much. Vignetting at infinity shows that it works at the limit of the possible image circle, designed for FF. If necessary, I would choose any old lens from a medium format film camera. I don't buy these new third-party lenses, I'm waiting for them to be "tested." They quickly lose value. (Google Transletter). Eduard.
@simonkipper2657 9 күн бұрын
Great Editorial look
@paulschefz 9 күн бұрын
thank you! means a lot!
@strippedlist 9 күн бұрын
compression is amazing but is soft the lens, i like to give softness in post
@paulschefz 9 күн бұрын
I barely add sharpening in post anymore, these files are all not sharpened in any way.
@strippedlist 9 күн бұрын
@@paulschefz i know that, i didnt said they are sharp, the lens is soft
@paulschefz 9 күн бұрын
@@strippedlist I guess I misunderstood but for me ( at least my sample) sharpness is exactly where I would want it. And the files sharpen easily and well in post if I need some selective sharpen.
@MrMuckiMicki-jo3lh 9 күн бұрын
I'm just as convinced as you are about this lens, I've had the GFX 100II from the start, bomb. There is no lens that can be compared, and the weight is in a class of its own. I'm from Germany, sorry for my translator. Thanks again.
@paulschefz 9 күн бұрын
Alles klar, kein problem! yes, the lens is one of those surprisingly well performing "cheap" lenses IMO based on old German glass, I wish I could find more info on the origins. obviously these new ones are updated and improved but the general overall look is still vintage and organic to me. just (mostly) without the obvious flaws of actual older glass.
@JohnJohn-fz6nt 12 күн бұрын
I'm fascinated with the almost monochromatic colors. I see these in nature as well and they have a muted beauty.
@paulschefz 11 күн бұрын
Thank you! I have have always found myself drawn to pattern, fabric, texture and nature provides all at its best!
@JohnJohn-fz6nt 14 күн бұрын
I appreciate the comparisons and the "for a very long time" plug. Spending that kind of money for a fleeting experience window is scary.
@paulschefz 14 күн бұрын
I completely agree, there have been some digital cameras that have been "milestones" canon 5D and Sony ARIII among them for checking so many boxes and doing so many things so well. As tech improves faster and faster the advancement in sensor tech seems to get smaller and more fine tuned and a lot of improvement goes to software and AI (around the actual sensor) which is all great but when it comes to IQ, I am just not really sure this latest GFX series will be unstated too soon.
@onyekachinwaturuocha6007 15 күн бұрын
Good information what lens is on the carmera?
@paulschefz 14 күн бұрын
That is the AstrHori 75mm, check out my review! great little lens, says f4 but actually has an "off the menu" f2.5 setting.
@oman4229 24 күн бұрын
What monitor do you use to edit the 16bit photos?
@paulschefz 23 күн бұрын
I use an older LG graphics monitor, it's ok, not the latest greatest but calibration is the key anyway. there are no 16bit monitors and sometimes I wonder if the much larger file size is worth it compared to 8bit TIFF but once you start tweaking color, you just have to stay in 16bit. as far as true 16 bit capture vs 14bit, (or compressed vs uncompressed raw) really digging into the shadows often shows the small difference.
@oman4229 23 күн бұрын
@@paulschefz thank you very much for all the insight!!!
@renatojlopes 24 күн бұрын
Interesting you mention the angled top LCD. First thing I noticed in my Fuji X-H1. It’s not as pronounced as this one. It does make a difference. Sadly they have gone back to a flat top LCD on the new X-H2.
@oman4229 27 күн бұрын
Question can you do a video & test with dji’s lidar autofocus on the gfx 100ii to see if that makes it viable for sports photography?
@paulschefz 26 күн бұрын
sorry, as much as I would like to do that, I am not comfortable providing a review or test with gear I dont have enough experience with. I am really intrigued with the DJI lidar accessory, I think they are really on to something.
@asamxs Ай бұрын
Canon, nikon too low dyamic range compare Medium format. it's the fact of ditortion when you shoot on full frame senson.
@Yupthereitism 25 күн бұрын
Wrong
@RainerHoschStudio Ай бұрын
Great info, thank you Paul!
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
honored to be able to help the master!
@HealingMushroom Ай бұрын
Great video! Right now I am looking for a lens for GFX 100II that has a minimum focus distance, closer to what the 35mm FF cameras have. Most of GF lenses have 68cm MFD while the GF 35-70 seems to only have around 35cm MFD. I might need to check out the GF 35-70. What is your opinion for AF speed and MFD? Cheers
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
thx! MFD is a little tricky. First: I think the 35-70 has to have a place in any GFX kit, it's a no-brainer. great performance, fast AF, versatile range, small, light and dirt cheap. I have shot still life with it because I was able to get just a little closer with it (compared to most other lenses). I just got a shorter macro ring and will look into some tests in regard to MFD but I dont expect miracles from the 35-70 in that regard? but who knows it always surpasses expectations! I definitely have no issues when it comes to AF speed (or accuracy), it always delivers, the only GF lens that I always thought was a little slow (other then the 120 macro which has a really long focus range obviously) was the 32-64, but I also have to say I havent used it on the 100II. hope that helps!
@HealingMushroom Ай бұрын
@@paulschefz That are some good insights! I mainly shoot fashion and portraits but sometimes I feel like I can't get close enough with the general GF lineup. MFD being 68cm is not that great. Therefor the 35-70 got interesting for me :) I just hope that the f4.5-5.6 is sharp enough wide open! Any thoughts on this? You definitely further helped me pulling the trigger on this lens. I can't wait to test it out.
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
@@HealingMushroom I think the sharpest of the 3 mid range zooms is the 45-100, which even at f4 is just crazy but it is much much bigger and heavier and I always found myself wanting more space at the wide end, so I reluctantly sold it. I dont have any issues with sharpness wide open with the 35-70 but I mostly shoot it around f7 - 8,. I am editing a fashion shoot right now, shot on the AstrHori 40mm, and a new (for me) manual GF 90mm lens (which I will do a review of shortly) and the 35-70 and it is just such a joy to shoot with, wide, close, always hits focus, just great.
@HealingMushroom Ай бұрын
@@paulschefz I just had it delivered yesterday and took it out for a spin. The focus actually is really nice on the gfx 100 II. Switching between close, wide, with the subject is definitely the biggest positive for this lens. At 70mm MFD, it is really soft in comparison to the 45-100 which is super sharp across all focal lengths. The 35-70 will be my new action lens whenever I need to jump around and have more flexibility. I don't mind the less sharp image, my photography doesn't need 100% sharpness. My other lenses will be used whenever in studio or in rather slow shoots.
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
@@HealingMushroom the long end is not a strong area and yes (especially) the 45-100 is simply better. BUT size, price, weight its just hard to beat all around and for the shots I use it for the down sides simply dont matter. enjoy!
@stefankost3071 Ай бұрын
Hello. Is the new surface coating on the camera body of the Fuji GFX 100II durable? Or is the coating more sensitive than on the GFX 100S.
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
I think it is a little early to say how the surface will hold up, I honestly have not had any durability issues with any of my GFX bodies, I do like the new surface better, it is nice and "grippy" without being rough, I also think the texture looks cool!
@nevvanclarke9225 Ай бұрын
For me the slightly smaller form factor is great 👍 The 50s ii has been a fantastic camera yes it's slow but it's amazing camera still
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
I agree, I think the size of all GFX bodies is just right, I actually just got the grip for the 100II but returned it, makes the camera too big.
@nevvanclarke9225 Ай бұрын
@paulschefz I didn't want the 100 ii I waited for this ..does it use the W225 battery
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
@@nevvanclarke9225 it uses the NP-W235 (same as all GFX afaik)
@joegorocket Ай бұрын
Keep the Mac little away from your mouth.
@Mr-Royn Ай бұрын
Love the in-detailed review. But what tent were you in, in this video? Also if possible, please do some testing with cine lenses like Atlas or Arri or Leica, etc? Like compatibility and how much loss with the compatibility, and of course photo and video quality, etc
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
😀 I am in an Ekodome dome, check it out! I dont have any real cine lenses but interestingly the AstrHori lenses I just tested both have de-clicked f stops and I really like them. I still have not really made a deep dive into the motion features but from what I have seen so far the camera is crazy good for motion. I think it has slightly different use then smaller mirrorless, but the IQ looks better then anything I have seen from smaller (Sony,....) files are great DR is the key.
@Mr-Royn Ай бұрын
@@paulschefz yep. already saw those videos. really helpful. thanks
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
@@Mr-Royn 🙏
@Dewabarasunderan 2 ай бұрын
Review without showing a single picture...
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
well it is an on camera flash which can obviously be used off camera as well, works perfectly with godox triggers, there is really not much difference in the way it looks compared to other flash, the big difference in light character and quality is in using different modifiers, which are not available to me yet. and even then I dont expect much since its a small pop up soft box and a very small reflector, I am right now mostly interested in the globe diffuser that goes on the small reflector, but again, it will look like most already on the market. the fold up reflector it came with is interesting but again, a small-is highly reflective (beauty?) dish, best thing about it is the compact size folded which opens to a decent size but still fits easily into most bags. hope that helps!
@Dewabarasunderan 2 ай бұрын
@@paulschefz Well, that said, you really explained well why this video was NOT giving any valuable information. 😅
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
@@Dewabarasunderan sorry I could not be more help but I am still not really sure what you want to know? output? using this flash will do the same as any other flash with the same modifier, there is no magic to the unit. it simply looks cooler (IMO) then other small (ish) on camera units. dialed down with a bare head my 1200 packs would provide the same pictures.
@Dewabarasunderan 2 ай бұрын
@@paulschefz The one and only thing that needs to be shown here would have been the light falloff, since that's the one unique factor here.
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
@@Dewabarasunderan I will post a follow up once I have the other modifiers and will compare light character (hardness, fall off,..)
@aniachka 2 ай бұрын
Very thankful that you compare it to a 4x5 camera. This and the dynamic range is what interested me the most.
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
I try to be careful when comparing digital to film and especially when it comes to film/sensor size. A good friend who shoots a lot of 8x10 just bought the gfx 100II and agrees, in terms of image quality (resolution and DR) and for final large print it beats 4x5 and compares to 8x10 but obviously the process is different and IMO there is just something about that huge film area. But being able to get this quality in that small size and never missing a shot ( for comparably little money/frame) is just hard to beat. I also really enjoy shooting the GFX with manual glass.
@induction7895 2 ай бұрын
Imagine Fuji *somehow* making a fixed lens (relatively) small medium format with 40/45mm f2.
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
I loved my 690 and 645 in the film days, Sony made the RX? Full frame fixed which was pretty great, I am really hoping for a fixed lens GFX with a 40 but I do know it will definitely not be f2, probably more like f 4.5 to make it compact, move the finder to the side, maybe even pop up like the Sony….one can dream!
@alexanderkenney2338 Ай бұрын
I would buy it immediately
@Evrce 2 ай бұрын
How much more faster and accurate is the gfx 100ii after the firmware update
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
AFAIK The firmware update for the GFX 100II only fixed an issue with the 20-35, a lens I own and use all the time and never experienced. But I heard about unreliable slow AF performance? It was only with that lens and now it’s fixed. Fuji is usually great about getting fixing issues and improving product.
@Fujik1966 2 ай бұрын
Why is your video moving left and right everywhere?
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
😂 I guess its AI!
@Fujik1966 2 ай бұрын
I love my gfx100s. I think this is my last camera. 100 megapixels is enough for all types of shooting, with a margin. Batteries run out quickly in *.raw, I have 5 batteries, maybe it’s worth buying a power bank. All that remains is to buy more Fujinon lenses; used ones will become cheaper over time. The video doesn't interest me at all. You were right in saying that there are special video cameras for this, which are even cheaper.
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
100s is still a great camera and I agree with everything you say. I think I am going through my batteries faster with the 100II compared to the 100s, which makes sense because of faster processor and (probably) more power hungry screens. When shooting tethered I let the MacBook power the camera, running around I just always have 2 batteries with me, I have never gone through 3 in a day, not sure I would want to deal with power bank and cable.I think the upgrade path is for GFX 50, other then that money is definitely well (better) spent on lenses!
@Fujik1966 2 ай бұрын
@@paulschefz I am very afraid that the camera will turn off at the moment I need. Therefore, as soon as the red low level icon appears, I change the battery. When I come home, I discover that each battery still has 20-30-40% of energy left. The camera shows the remainder inaccurately due to dashes. It would be nice if they set digital percentage of remaining energy.
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
@@Fujik1966 are you using original fuji or 3rd party? I have run the batteries all the way down in camera, I dont think it hurts camera or batteries?
@Fujik1966 2 ай бұрын
@@paulschefz Different batteries. I am constantly afraid that they will run out at the right time and change them in advance.
@Fujik1966 2 ай бұрын
@@paulschefz Different batteries. I am constantly afraid that they will run out at the right time and change them in advance.
@nevvanclarke9225 2 ай бұрын
I love my 50s ii But yes I want the 100s ii
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
nothing wrong with the 50, enjoy what you have, create and print!
@Fotonutzzz 2 ай бұрын
Wonderful video.......Thanks for sharing. I'd be so pissed with the fingerprints on the shiny aluminium part too 🤣🤣🤣
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
😂
@circlestudio4907 2 ай бұрын
This was such an amazing review. Would you be able to do a comparison/difference between the GFX100ii and GFX100sii. I'm considering getting into medium format, but I'd like to know the difference between the GFX100ii and the GFX100sii so i can make a choice. Thank you
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
🙏 just posted my thoughts on the new body!
@finder2267 Ай бұрын
Fujifilm may have a misfire here to our benefit! The only meaningful difference with the 100x series comes down to the amount of speed you need/get. which is kind of insane if you are just in search of IQ.
@paulschefz Ай бұрын
@@finder2267 yeah, the whole GFX 100 line is now pretty amazing when it comes to IQ, the very small differences between the first gen 100 sensor the the one in the 100II and 100sII probably aren't enough for trading up but there are now 3 bodies offering differences in speed covering most applications now.all in all great for the consumer and considering Sony, canon, Nikon going towards pure speed (even sometimes neglecting IQ) fuji seems to be doing their own thing with the GFX, going their own way.
@FDR_alex 2 ай бұрын
You explain about DR 19 but not using the functions like fact cut to easy delete ammmm, emmm, and pause from your video....
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
this is really only about Dehancer and film look creator in DR 19, thank you for the feedback!
@jonesuk123 2 ай бұрын
I recently purchased et-8550 and installed drivers. (Windows 11) but cannot find the Epson print layout. Or doesn't it work with RT8550 in which case is there an alternative? Thanks very much
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
not familiar with windows, but epson has a dedicated website epson.com/epson-print-layout where you can download, I wasnt aware the they also have a PS plug in!
@MrMick560 13 күн бұрын
EPSON PRINT LAYOUT DOES WORK WITH THE 8550, I HAD PROBLEMS DOWNLOADING IT BUT IT WAS BECAUSE OF A VIRUS, I RESET MY PC AND IT INSTALLED OK AFTER THAT.
@paulschefz 11 күн бұрын
@@MrMick560 its a great little app, glad to hear it worked for you!
@xe1zlgg 2 ай бұрын
Hi, in the Yellow Flower pic you say it is wide open... that means F 2.8 ? Nice video thanks for share
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
I am pretty sure I shot that at f4 to get the best useable wide open f stop. using the (off the menu) 2.8 shows image degradation, CA and soft corners, f4 does not. hope that helps!
@annobidigwe7079 2 ай бұрын
Please does the beta has a watermark print
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
pretty sure it does, I have a license so it wont show up for me.
@lostgleammedia 2 ай бұрын
That ad is about, if you don’t have all the creative stuff, you can buy a ipad to create like with any of that stuff
@paulschefz 2 ай бұрын
I guess that somehow is the idea behind it but it came out the very wrong way. the funny thing is that is actually a very straight forward copy of a LG ad kzfaq.info/get/bejne/hMmFdLRjzpu4lqM.html