Oh the ignorance. She knew the outcome would likely be this since the courts are corrupt. Learn the law and graps the understanding that you're a debt slave even if you pay cash for your home or have it paid off through a mortgage. It's all illegal. You clearly don't understand what she is exposing and how there was no consideration from the bank. If you'll open your mind to listen to how we've all been scammed you may understand she's doing this to exposed the fraud. It has nothing to do with getting out of a constitutional lawful obligation. rumble.com/v51pfo3-ep.-116-bank-fraud-exposure-is-inevitable-watch-to-the-end.html

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm The irony of you advising people to know the law. What's more likely true? All courts are corrupt, or you are simply mistaken about what you think about the courts? SovCit BS is a lie you're either shilling, or have been conned into believing. Either way...

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm She sounds like a paranoid schizophrenic on a bad acid trip. If there was no consideration from the bank, then her underlying purchase was invalid. Either way, she loses. But luckily for her, she's not smart enough to know how badly she's embarrassing herself, so at least she won't feel the pain of that shame.

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm The courts aren't corrupt. They ruled exactly how the law requires. The law isn't some weird secretive thing with hidden meanings. Anyone who knows how to read a simple treatise and knows the meaning of the words in the codes and regs understands. What happened to her was a fair and just outcome. She just wants freebies that no one else gets, because she has this fantasy about the law being some kind of puzzle that only a few lucky people can solve. Reality is actually pretty straightforward.

She sees herself as some kind of savior however her actions cause only harm and her words mislead others who are facing foreclosures resulting in more harm. Her ignorance is a disgrace to our Lord Jesus as she has become the fool of Rom 1:22.

You people have no context on the situation. She has paid on her loans for years and didn't stop because she couldn't. She like many have done the research to learn how the loans are fraudulent. Don't believe it and want to keep the comments about her being stupid or trying to walk away from some obligation because she signed for the loans just shows how lazy and ignorant the masses still are. This is exactly why we're in the position we are right now in this country! We've been poisoned, lied to about history and damn near everything. Go educate yourself on your birth certificate, the act of 1871, the US Corp and research what Contin ui ty of Go vern ment is. I'll bet each of you who are commenting about how stupid she is etc. all got the jabber too. WAKE UP AMERICA!

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm She stopped paying money when she owed money. What a scoundrel.

You’re totally unaware of your God given rights and common laws. x.com/legalfockery/status/1801417423410667807?s=46&t=Biti9JdvZniYHQjXANB7Vw

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm You are the clueless one that ignores our Lord's commandments and does not understand that common law is nothing more than court made law, that is precedent created by courts. What a fool you are and what an embarrassment to our Lord to see you having become the fool of Rom 1:22 The courts have never taken your musings seriously as they are lies, misrepresentations, or total misunderstanding of law. You, my friend, our our Nation's worst enemy. But in our Nation, under our Constitution, laws are created by the legislative branch, executed by the executive branch and adjudicated by the judicial branch and while the Federal government has limited powers, the 10th amendment grants broad powers to the state. You have no understanding of the law. You make up facts, you blindly repeat known lies and you show no repentance for misleading people with your nonsense. May the Lord have mercy on your dark soul my friend. And God does not create the laws for those who reside on the soil of We the People, the true and only sovereign. And We the People reject your selfish claims and will expose your ignorance and cheer everytime foolish arguments like these are defeated in court. No court has EVER accepted your claims, and countless have rejected them as frivolous, false, lacking foundation in law. We laugh at your ignorance and will protect the innocent who may take your false claims seriously. Our Lord demands nothing more and nothing less. PS: Thou shall not steal... And yet you worship those who take money and refuse to repay it. Why is that? What makes you violate our laws and our Lord's commandments? Harding argues that the federal government and the court lack jurisdiction over him because (1) the Organic Act of 1871 created a United States corporation which does not have jurisdiction over him as a citizen; (2) the CHARLES JAMES HARDING named in the indictment in all capital letters is not a natural, living person; (3) there is no corpus delicti; and (4) this is a court of admiralty. Harding's arguments are akin to those advanced by proponents of the sovereign citizen movement who "believe they are not subject to federal or state statutes or proceedings, reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate, and place special significance in commercial law." United States v. Brown, 669 F.3d 10, 19 n.12 (1st Cir.) (citing Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement (last visited Jan. 13, 2012)), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 2448 (2012). Similar arguments raised by defendants in other cases consistently have been rejected as erroneous as a matter of law. United States v. Delatorre, No. 03 CR 90, 2008 WL 312647, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 2008); see Quigley v. Geithner, No. 1:09-CV-293-REB, 2010 WL 3613901, at *1 (D. Idaho Sept. 8, 2010) ("The [sovereign citizen] legal theory (in all of its various forms) has been struck down consistently by the courts."); see also United States v. Jagim, 978 F.2d 1032, 1036 (8th Cir. 1992) (defendant's arguments, e.g., that he is a citizen of the "Republic of Idaho" and that the government in prosecuting him was acting on behalf of an agency controlled by a foreign entity, were "completely without merit, patently frivolous, and will be rejected without expending any more of this Court's resources on their discussion"); United States v. Sloan, 939 F.2d 499, 501 (7th Cir. 1991) ("Mr. Sloan's proposition that he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States is simply wrong."). Because they are contrary to established law, Harding's arguments will likewise be rejected.

The truth is that you are clueless about the law. What does the BAR stand for? Every attorney is under the crown who's part of the BAR association. Do you know what admiralty maritime law is? Do your research. Kat has balls that 99% of Americans don't. especially little keyboard warriors who sit behind a screen acting like they are so educate but have no clue what's gone on that they are a part of and never gave informed consent to do so.

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm Your totally ignorant Bar has nothing to do with British accreditation and’s maritime law has no relevance in state court’s and only applies in limited cases at the federal level. Stop being so willfully ignorant. And you do not need to consent to our laws, you are free to leave. But until then we the people, the true sovereign demand obedience to all and you too are subject to our laws. Fool

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm You are so clueless. Not only has no court ever taken your ignorant musings seriously but countless courts have rejected them as lacking in law, lacking fact, lacking in logic, lacking in reason Harding argues that the federal government and the court lack jurisdiction over him because (1) the Organic Act of 1871 created a United States corporation which does not have jurisdiction over him as a citizen; (2) the CHARLES JAMES HARDING named in the indictment in all capital letters is not a natural, living person; (3) there is no corpus delicti; and (4) this is a court of admiralty. Harding's arguments are akin to those advanced by proponents of the sovereign citizen movement who "believe they are not subject to federal or state statutes or proceedings, reject most forms of taxation as illegitimate, and place special significance in commercial law." United States v. Brown, 669 F.3d 10, 19 n.12 (1st Cir.) (citing Wikipedia, en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sovereign_citizen_movement (last visited Jan. 13, 2012)), cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 2448 (2012). Similar arguments raised by defendants in other cases consistently have been rejected as erroneous as a matter of law. United States v. Delatorre, No. 03 CR 90, 2008 WL 312647, at *1 (N.D. Ill. Jan. 30, 2008); see Quigley v. Geithner, No. 1:09-CV-293-REB, 2010 WL 3613901, at *1 (D. Idaho Sept. 8, 2010) ("The [sovereign citizen] legal theory (in all of its various forms) has been struck down consistently by the courts."); see also United States v. Jagim, 978 F.2d 1032, 1036 (8th Cir. 1992) (defendant's arguments, e.g., that he is a citizen of the "Republic of Idaho" and that the government in prosecuting him was acting on behalf of an agency controlled by a foreign entity, were "completely without merit, patently frivolous, and will be rejected without expending any more of this Court's resources on their discussion"); United States v. Sloan, 939 F.2d 499, 501 (7th Cir. 1991) ("Mr. Sloan's proposition that he is not subject to the jurisdiction of the laws of the United States is simply wrong."). Because they are contrary to established law, Harding's arguments will likewise be rejected. Why are you spreading known lies? And why are you embarrassing our Lord Jesus with your words and actions? Fool

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm Admiralty or maritime law is the law that applies to disputes arising from activities on navigable waters that are used for interstate or foreign trade. It has fuck all to do with whatever conspiracy theory you fell for. Bar is not an acronym. It doesn't "stand for" anything. It's a reference to where lawyers go in the courtroom, and the reason it was popularized is similar to the reason judges are considered "the bench." The clowns who tried to sell you on the super duper secret "fact" that it means “British Accredited Registry” were either scam artists or trolls, and you bought it. Use some critical thinking skills, Steve. The real world actually makes sense. It doesn't have secret codes for idiots to crack so that they can game the system in ways that no one else can, and if it did, it wouldn't be mostly losers and loons figuring it out. It would be the wealthy and powerful people doing it to get out of paying their debts, and it would be them cashing in on all the cool free stuff that Kat thinks she's going to get at the end of her crusade. And that's not having balls, dude. Anyone who's read Alexander Pope's "Essay on Criticism" knows what it is, and it ain't balls.

@@thefirm9746 go do your research. This post might help along with todays SCOTUS ruling. x.com/legalfockery/status/1806734513726206365?s=46&t=Biti9JdvZniYHQjXANB7Vw

Where in the constitution does it say you have to pay taxes? They are voluntary yet so many still pay them out of ignorance. There’s a few great Ex IRS agents who go over this in detail and one hasn’t paid since he learned the truth in 1999 and quit his job. We the people have so many false beliefs through the indoctrination of the central banker, Dee p st ate ca bal. The great awakening is in full swing yet so many are still under the spell. You better buckle up because it’s coming and it’s coming to jar you out of the psychosis you’re under

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm taxes are in place for many many reasons. We wouldn’t have a lot of the things we take for granted if we didn’t pay for them in some way. I’m not in any delusional state but you are failing to see the ridiculousness of what this woman is saying. It’s not unconstitutional in any way for her property to be repossessed if she refuses to pay for it. If you sold something to someone under the agree to at they needed to pay you X amount of payments to add up to the value of what you sold and they didn’t pay, how would you feel. My point in mentioning the construction is because you and her brought it up as a relevant factor in this argument. It has nothing to do with it. She defaulted and thus her shit was ceased. Rightfully so. I’m taking a guess here, but I’m sure you’re not in business for yourself like i am, otherwise it would make sense. But if you choose to believe that simply because someone finds themselves in the unique position of being alive that they are entitled to stuff they didn’t pay for, then you are the delusional one my friend…. Stealing is what she is doing. Simply put….

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xmYou sir are insane and broke for a reason.

That does not mean she wasn't standing in Truth up against the deep state. She knew the risk even though she was right and had all the documents to prove it. When corruption at all levels works together it's a long shot but she's willing to do this to expose the corruption. If we did it in mass it would end but to many live in fear

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm And what economic system do you propose?

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xmShe stated that the bank provided no consideration. How did she walk out of a car dealership with a car without paying for it? How did she own a home without paying the prior owner? It sounds more like she is the one committing the ‘fraud’ than the bank.

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm There is no such thin as the deep state. Her documents prove nothing, in fact the only thing it proves is her ignorance. There is no corruption other than the corruption of her mind, and yours apparently. She is clueless about the constitution, the law, makes misleading claims that have no foundation in law and behaves in a selfish manner. She is a great example of Rom 1:22, where she has become a fool believing herself to be wise. I understand that some people need people like this fool to tell them what to believe but they become fools themselves when they willingly embrace these lies and misrepresentations. The simple fact is that she voluntarily engaged in a contract with the bank with her house and car as collateral and then refused to pay back what she owed. The only fraud was hers when she hoped to get away with such behavior. May the Lord have Mercy on her dark and ignorant soul.

@@ejp99 Indeed, she pretends that she has 'proof' which allows low information thinkers (sic) like TurhTalk to embrace and spread further ignorance in the hope to enslave more people with this ignorant nonsense. They should be ashamed of themselves but alas. they lack moral compass.

Or pay your bills on time and don’t get into debt you have no way of paying for.

That has nothing to do with it. Educate yourself. You’re paying for the home in the first place from your cestui que v Trust and then paying back that loan plus interest. Until you learn about your birth certificate, maritime law vs common law you’ll believe what you have been taught. America is in the position she is right now because we’re to busy, to lazy or don’t care to search for truth. Be part of the solution instead of the problem

Hahahahahaha

@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm well, you must surely have a long list of cases won against the current laws of the land, because I don't see how cosplaying as Dale Gribble is going to do anything for anyone.

What you just said was redundant. Crazy and sovereign citizen, are the exact same thing. No average citizen has ever encountered a sovereign citizen and unironically stated "wow, that totally sane person talking about contracts and admiralty law should totally represent me in my legal troubles."

She speaks absolute Truth. If the rest of us had the balls that she does their fraudulent Ponzi scheme would be over. She’s willing to stand in honor and truth against an cabal and central bankers who give unconstitutional loans to the masses to busy to See the con. Do your research and it ought to piss you off. Humans are nothing more than debt slaves

Nut Case is too kind. Like other Poster's said : Listen to her and you'll be homeless:☆☆☆Here's the deal and you may not want to listen or you may not want to comply but Homelessness Sucks / Foreclosure Sucks / Eviction Sucks SO pay your rent, lease, or mortgage in full and on time every month. Help yourself out by not ever spending more than 25% of your take home pay including escrow for housing costs but even if you have to only eat beans & rice, have no phone or cable, or drive a $500 beater to work your 2 jobs pay for housing first because homelessness is life changing. Good Luck

You obviously haven't done your research about how every loan is illegal, how taxes are unconstitutional and are voluntary. Humanity is nothing but a de bt slave to the Ca bal cent ral ban kers. The I R S and Fed eral r eserve are not US Government agencies. It's time we the people wake up, learn about to the Act of 1871. This is when The United States of America Corporation was created. All under the Crown. Come on people we have got to stand up and unit. Kat may lose to this cabal but she sure as hell is setting an example of what standing up for truth and honor means. Read about the act of 1871 beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2020/08/the-act-of-1871-the-united-states-is-a-corporation-there-are-two-constitutions-2-3728833.html

​@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xmthat's nice Steve, but do you have anything that works in the 21st century? These SovCit notions don't seem to work in the modern era.

​@@TruthTalkwithSteve-es3xm good luck with that.

You’re very welcome. Thanks for watch 🙏🏼