"Conceptuality," somebody was determined to use their word of the day calendar despite being a high functioning idiot.

both of the songs performed here are so haunting and effective. they have mystique without any pretension; this is just how she was

Philip Larkin is a decent poet indeed.

nice

I love Junior Senior.

Watching this in a basement flat in Berkshire is how I discovered Pulp.

7:10 the voice crack actually sounded good ahah

pink triangle sounds so good here

dope

What a joke

Matt was the secret ingredient to pure weezer.

🎸🎤🎼🎸

I love Thom's little "arigato"

'Working For The Man' was used to great effect in the ominous opening scene of La Femme Nikita Episode 21: "Verdict"

I love you thom & jonny from radiohead❤❤❤❤❤

Creep

La calidad que falta la ponen ellos

❤

Thom is the only gay in the village.

bro it’s 2024 and it’s still perfect

He's never happy.

X-mas

Thom always interrupts Jonny

Yeah, pretty good.

WOW, NO ONE ELSE SOUNDS EVEN BETTER LIVE

Gorky’s at their peak 👌

Joe biden doesnt give a fuck about people.

la encontre despues de 8 años que genial video dios!!!!!

This is a serial killer song. A truck driver in particular. Wonder how she came upon this. The interstates are a killing ground. Especially around the rezzes. The demons are running wild. Where are the hunters?

This is one of my fave looks she's done ❤🥰💅

i love this

that last guy just wanted to get up in front of people and show off all the words he looked up in a thesaurus during the speech

The question at 2:22 is actually genius

The first clip is not an incoherent question. The man is basically stating that he believes discussing the substantiating evidence for religion is inconsequential for him, as he's witnessed first hand the "curse of a religious state". That is to say, regardless of any substantive evidence for religion, it's no way to rule a society. Christopher Hitchens understood and agreed with this point, which is why he said "Good for you".

here's a higher quality version kzfaq.info/get/bejne/Zpx3ot1pnq_Gnps.html wasn't on youtube until a year ago

What question is he asking?

That first Iranian wasn't dumb, he was just making a statement out of turn. But a fair statement.

**spouts utter gibberish for ten minutes** **oh shit, this was supposed to be a question** "so... s-so, how do you feel about that?" Genius.

When i read the title of this video, I thought; "finally, i have found my niche"

y

Religion, fast talking snake oil sales for the slowest of thinkers (Mainly Republicans these days)

The guy that posed the question to Dawkins is our future, as is Science. Such luminary thinking 12 years later should you read this, I commend you for, as expectedly after hearing your first few sentences you made the distinction between religion and experience. In these discussions I rarely hear such a lucid point made, which of course cannot be answered by anyone including myself since each experience is only relevant to the individual. Props to that guy, before his time.

The last speaker’s argument for an afterlife was basically an analogy. He said, let us suppose that life came from nothing and returns to nothing. How could we know what follows death and the dissolution of life? He proposes to represent non-existence of the individual consciousness as 0, its existence as 1. He then asks, what is the next number in the sequence (0,1,0). The answer to this question could be “1”. It could be “2”, a number he hasn’t assigned a meaning to. Indeed, mathematically, the next number in the sequence could be 0 or any number in the sets Q or P or iR. Impossible to know. So his analogy is irredeemably useless, as well as being silly.

At 03:00, David Whitton from Hong Kong talks about the value of religious “experiences”. In the first hour of the Four Horseman discussion, Sam Harris makes a case that “numinous” experiences can be immensely moving to humans, but that having them neither requires nor motivates religious beliefs. Hitchens, Dennett and Dawkins, while not cheering Harris on, certainly allow his point. Any scientist would say that numinous experience, ecstatic experience is certainly human and enjoyable: it releases a flood of dopamines in the brain. However it doesn’t provide any rational guidance to good behaviour. Such experiences can accompany the commission of atrocities, in fact.

The young man speaking 09:00 onwards only wished to say that, whatever the content of any religion, living under a theocracy, as do the people of Iran, is an abominable situation. Not incoherent in the least. The Christian nationalists in theUSA should remember the sage reflection of Dietrich Bonhoeffer!

Salah satu lagu terbaik sepanjang masa

Wish I could sing like that. I wish I could sing at all.

Rivers looks like Marty McFly here.

1:01 - 2:25 As an Indian, that Indian is insufferable. Hes also trying to hard to sound American. And he's basically vivek ramasswamy.

I see this clip is 12 years old. So it hasn’t changed since. I’m sick of going to events (Chatham House, Soho House, IOD, wherever..) and the questions are all statements. We haven’t come to hear the audience. We’ve come to hear the speaker. These rambling statements disguised as questions are rather narcissistic.