One of the best planes ever built apart from Concorde B747 and the Airbus A380
@rebelvodka99302Ай бұрын
Tu 154
@PantherAusfD19442 ай бұрын
never say 154 on a 777 🎅🎅🎅🐡🐡
@PaladinV22 ай бұрын
Me: (Buys a candy bar from the store) how much will that cost? Clerk: 154. (candy bar explodes)
@eli1000fer2 ай бұрын
🗣️🗣️"ONE-FIFTY-FOUR"🗣️🗣️
@jarret453 ай бұрын
That's the same sound they hear when a Boeing whistleblower comes forward.
@aqimjulayhi87983 ай бұрын
I’m at a McDonalds right now waiting for my food. The announcer going ‘one fifty four’ rang in my head as soon as I saw my pickup receipt came out as 154.
@arristheround92463 ай бұрын
1 54- 💥
@Tiltrotor863 ай бұрын
Russian Tupolev created a strong plane, Tupolev 154. Boeing : Hold my beer
@OmnoWombo4 ай бұрын
154 YEP
@FiveBlackFootedFerrets4 ай бұрын
There's only one way to know for certain. Destructive testing was the standard for many years. It is expensive but reliable.
@ahuddleofpenguins48424 ай бұрын
154
@jonbaker37284 ай бұрын
My father worked with Boeing in the 60's-70's. He would tell me, while waiting for a plane trip, that plane wings were only strong in one direction. He said, you stand out on the end and jump, it will break clean off. Bastard never told me he was joking and I believed that from 5 to 15 years old. Miss you ya old bastard.
@penzman53854 ай бұрын
I have the same warning system when a new girlfriend walks over the scale embedded in my washroom floor. 154!!!
@percsfake50114 ай бұрын
154
@hotliner28725 ай бұрын
The most impressive thing for me was both wings failed at exactly the same time. These are independent structures in terms of where they failed (mid wing), so this speaks volumes to quality of design and construction. I was actually expecting some lag between failures, in a structure like that there are literally thousands of opportunities for perturbation in either direction from the norm. So either they have reduced the perturbations into the noise, cancelled or at least RSSed them (i.e. one weak point either counters or is orthogonal to another, so the net effect is reduced... weakness A cuts strength in half, and weakness B cuts strength in half, but combined they reduce strength by just over a half ), for the result blew my mind. That is great engineering.
@voyager145 ай бұрын
I'm a recent grad. In 10 years this video will give me nostalgia I'm sure of it.
@user-kj2it3qy6u5 ай бұрын
Do they only pull at the tip or do they pull at calculated lift vector points along the wing? And just to be sure: 150 is 50% over the max possible load?
@trued20104 ай бұрын
its 54% beyond the intended design limit. the design limit should be above the max realistic load. if the max realistic load you expect is 10, you design it to not break until 15, the test would be simulating 15 + ( 15/100 * 54) = 23.1 you cant know the max possible load, you can only guess at what something can realistically be loaded to
@user-kj2it3qy6u4 ай бұрын
@@trued2010 Thx! And does it matter where on the wing you attach the cables or can they just pull on the tip only?
@trued20104 ай бұрын
@@user-kj2it3qy6u it looks like they have cables connected all over the wing. The whole wing is going to be in the air not just the tip, so the whole wing needs to see load in the test.
@user-kj2it3qy6u4 ай бұрын
@@trued2010 But how do they determine the load each cable is needs? or do they all have the exact same load? *Thx for your reactions btw
@trued20104 ай бұрын
@@user-kj2it3qy6u probably load cells on the lines.
@guesswho27786 ай бұрын
154
@Andyw12286 ай бұрын
It’s so old, but yet so modern. I love that drumming style.
@Arkiasis6 ай бұрын
When engineers ran Boeing instead of stupid suits who know nothing about planes.
@sioux226 ай бұрын
one fifty four [vine boom sound effect]
@user-vb1xy3kc3o6 ай бұрын
That was before money became more important.
@scotts34606 ай бұрын
all that technology and the best they can offer is a 480p quality video? Can barely see wtf is going on....
@Nurse_Diesel7 ай бұрын
154!
@54spiritedwill547 ай бұрын
Just less than 2 days before having to fly in one of these metal things, I had to watch this video lol I never liked flying.
@Anony1_7 ай бұрын
154💥
@mark6757 ай бұрын
At least they tested something
@jlangenberg7 ай бұрын
Boeing was such a great company before people started listening to the salesmen.
@americanpatriot277 ай бұрын
Ahhh…back when Boeing engineered instead of focusing on wokeness.
@places2visit7 ай бұрын
*154* is now etched in my memory for a lifetime...
@LuizStocklerHenrique7 ай бұрын
From the brilliance that was the 777 to the mess they are doday: who could have guessed?
@MrCyberShow7 ай бұрын
Try bending it the other way. Lol
@easygoing24798 ай бұрын
So when you fly just tell the pilot, “keep those wing loads at or below 153% design load, please”.
@benjaminshropshire29008 ай бұрын
Is that a rubber duck on the trailing edge of the wing at 0:39?
@FallsGaming8 ай бұрын
onefiftyfour
@jeromecabarus68938 ай бұрын
New fart sound effect
@n10cities8 ай бұрын
OKAY WE GET IT!!! 154!!! Jesus.....wonderful editing. 🙄🙄
@kennyc3889 ай бұрын
Peter Coyote
@bigmungus48649 ай бұрын
Just got thinking how far they have come now on the 787
@dongliker10 ай бұрын
One of my fav songs
@BaconIsNotBiceps11 ай бұрын
Unbelievable.
@erictaylor546211 ай бұрын
What would the G load be at 154?
@carljansen6896 Жыл бұрын
Did I hear that right....154?
@GabGotti3 Жыл бұрын
Airbus >Boeing
@muhdiversity74096 ай бұрын
@@savage101. ok. boomer
@ev446 Жыл бұрын
I missed it… what was it like one fifty something or other
@AAgunner Жыл бұрын
Someone should make a techno song from this! I feel it's got potential!
@alanamason2184 Жыл бұрын
Thread is as interesting as the video. You engineers are, like, jeopardy smart 🙃 A joke for engineers ( told to me by my engineer brother ) Q. How do you know if an engineer is an extrovert ? A. He’s looking at your shoes instead of his own ✊ To read this whole post back - you’d think I just like saying engineer.