By whom?

@@ultimaterankings1154 It is somewhere on the internet . Connie absolutely deserves the award . She payed her own way in the late 1960s to travel to Viet Nam to entertain and boost the morale of our American soldiers . While there , Connie performed the most important concert of all time , singing God Bless America while 25 thousand soldiers sang along with her . Connie's concert is more important than all of the Beatles concerts combined . Connie has sold more records worldwide than any other female singer as she sings in 16 languages . Connie should at least always be included in a list of top 10 entertainers and absolutely should always be in the top 10 list of female singers of all time . At least Connie sings and not just whistles !

Without injuries, Sayers might have gone down as the greatest runner ever.

@@ultimaterankings1154 one of the greatest . i don't believe in any one and only greatest anyone or anything

I'm am sure I would like your list even less than you like mine, so that would make you worse than nuts.

@@ultimaterankings1154 😂

The singer has to be famous to the general public in the US to be considered -- I never even heard of this person. I'm sure I would think even less of your list than you do of mine.

I actually agree -- I am old enough to have seen him play but with 9 MVP's etc, all the Gretzky fans would go crazy and say the video is a joke and has no credibility. When I do rankings videos I look at other lists so it's not just my opinion.

You can't for legal reasons.

ELVIS NEVER PUBLICLY DISPLAYED THE ABILITY "TO HOLD" A FREAKING NOTE. HE MADE ALL OF HIS MONEY AND GLORY BEING A SELECTIVELY ATTRACTIVE SELF STYLISH "MUMBLER". POST 1 CLIP OF ELVIS PRESLEY ACTUALLY HOLIDAY AND NOTE WHILE SINGING A SONG. AND FOR RACIAL BALANCE.....PRINCE IS NOT A DAMN "SINGER" EITHER. HE ONE HELLUVA OF AN INSTRUMENT EXECUTER AND HE HAS "A LITTLE DANCING ABILITY. SO. PRINCE IS THE PERFECT EXAMPLE OF A "MULTI TALENTED" PERFORMER BECAUSE OF HIS "INSTRUMENTAL ABILITIES" AND HE IS ONE OF MY "FAVORITE RAW AND UNPREDICTABLE " ENTERTAINERS. BUT HE'S "NOT" A SUFFICIENTLY COMPARABLE VOCALIST AS MUCH AS HE IS AN OUTSTANDING OVERT PERFORMER WITH EVERY OTHER MUSICAL TALENT "EXPECT" VOCALIZATION. PRINCE SHOULD "NEVER, EVER BE MISTAKENLY CATEGORIZED AS "A POLISHED PROFESSIONAL VOCALIST" VERSUS AN OUTSTANDING ENTERTAINER. BUT THESE LISTS ARE "VERY SUGGESTIVE" TO RACIAL PREFERENCE, CULTURAL PREFERENCE AND MUSIC GENRE REPRESENTATION VERSUS AND/OR COMPARED TO WHOM?

@@PeteBaylis-pe2lw your ignorance is alarming

@@Elvista HOW? How do you DEDUCE THAT MY IGNORANCE OF MALE VOCALIST "IS ALARMING @Elvista? WHO BTW I AM ASSUMING YOU ARE AN "ELVIS" PSYCHO FAN CORRECT? ELVIS PRESLEY ISN'T SUPREME OR KING AT $HIT SON. THEY BUMPED UP EVERYTHING ABOUT HIM BASED ON"HIS LOOKS AND INDUSTRY TIMING TO PROMOTE "SOMETHING OR SOMEONE CAUCASIAN AND IN THE 40's, 50's and 60's who could PROBABLY, HOPEFULLY OR PRAYERFULLY KEEP "THE RACIST INDUSTRY" IDEALS THAT "A NIGGA" IS A LOWER LEVEL HUMAN BEING WHO DID NOT, COULD NOT AND DEFINITELY "SHOULD NOT" POSSESS THE ABILITY TO DO "ABSOLUTELY, UNEQUIVOCALLY NOTHING BETTER" THAN THE MASTER RACE. BUT. FREEDOM OF "GOD-GIFTED" EXPRESSIONS DISPELLED MOST OF THAT IGNORANCE BEFORE ANYONE WAS PERMITTED "TO PAY FOR COLORED PEOPLE" TO PERFORM ON A STAGE, LET ALONE ON A RECORD OR RADIO OR TELEVISION SHOW. I ENJOYED WATCHING ELVIS PRESLEY IN HIS OWN LANE AND NO COMPARISONS. ELVIS PRESLEY WAS ONE OF ONE. A PIONEER. "MY IGNORANCE?" CAN YOU EVEN"HOLD A DAMNED MUSICAL NOTE IN PALM OF YOUR HAND" TO MEASURE NEXT TO ANOTHER Elvista? Or does your ELVIS PRESLEY SUPERFAN"DUMB" SIMPLY AND SINFULLY "ANESTHESTIZES" YOUR ABILITY TO BE GENUINELY HONEST...... EVEN ABOUT YOUR OPINIONS? I'LL WAIT.😳🤔🧐

@@Elvista I RESPECTFULLY DISAGREE WITH YOU SWEETHEART. BECAUSE "EARNEST IGNORANCE" IS SINFULLY SMASHED AND SMEARED BENEATH THAT ROCK THAT YOU ARE STILL LIVING UNDER IN THIS DAY AND AGE. ELVIS PRESLEY HAD HIS TIME "IN HIS TIMELINE" TO LEAVE HIS HISTORIC MUSICAL AND ACTING" LEGACY WHICH HONESTLY........ IT'S A "GOOD" CACHE WITH LOTS OF VOLUME. THE CONTENT IS CONSISTENT WITH THE TRANSITION INTO ROCK AND ROLL THAT GOT US TO THE LIKES OF ROD STEWART AND BON JOVI AND VAN HALEN. BUT! AS AN "ORGININATOR" HE WAS APPRECIATIVELY SUFFICIENT. JACKIE WILSON, MICHAEL JACKSON AND EVEN PRINCE FOLLOWED IN CERTAIN "MINIMAL" ASPECTS OF HIS TALENT AND CAREER TRAJECTORY. BUT DON'T GET IT TWISTED. ELVIS PRESLEY BENEFITTED FROM BEING "A PROGENITOR" OR ONE OF THE FIRST. AND WHAT HE ACHIEVED HAS BEEN SURPASSED WHILE NOT BEING REPLACED. I DON'T BE THAT SEVERAL OF THESE PEOPLE ON THIS TOP 25 LIST SHOULD BE TOP 25..........😳🧐 WHAT MALE CAN SING AND PERFORM "ALMOST ANY GENRE OF MUSIC" AND MAKE IT SOUND AND LOOK "PROFICIENTLY EXCELLENT" IN CONTENT, DELIVERY AND ENTERTAINMENT WORTHINESS?"🤔🧐👑🤗

I appreciate you liking my top picks but I disagree with you that my approach is “probably very flawed.” 1. “Outstanding players will capitalize on an easier era far more than the average player.” What evidence is there of this? Even if it is true it would only be very slight and not something that you could quantify. 2. “Also I think that there's a big difference between the 2010s and the 2000s. Also 1950-62 was statistically easier than 63-99 (but not as easy as post-2000).” I see no evidence of any of this. 3.Your Breakaway Speed theory: I don’t agree at all with that and would argue that more likely the opposite is true. You are grossly underestimating the importance of big plays in football (and sports in general). A. They are a huge momentum builder and 50% of the time a momentum swing. B. Big plays result in fewer plays so there is less of a chance of a turnover during the drive, hence, it is more likely the team will score on that drive. C. Big plays result in fewer series of downs so less likely the drive will stall, and hence, again more points. 4. Payton did have good power for his size but he still was not as good a runner as the 4 I have above him. Sometimes, exciting athletes (i.e, Great open field runners) actually end up underrated because so-called experts claim they are overrated because the casual fan just sees only the exciting part and not their shortcomings. Sometimes true; sometimes not (Michael Jordan who was also very fundamentally sound). Deion Sanders I think is underrated because he wasn’t physical and not a good tackler. Yes, but no player in the history of football took away 50% of the field, shut down great receivers, and also made a lot of big, momentum changing plays. (One writer ranked him 123th greatest player ever (delusional thinking) and he was only 37th in a big NFL poll. He is the best corner ever and should be higher. Interestingly, Jim Brown was a lazy blocker and no one ever downgrades him for this (voted best NFL player in history in 2000 by the AP). 5. I agree the quality of the team and offensive line are important but an offensive line quality is especially subjective and very difficult to quantify. Because of this, it seems random on how much weight you put on these things. Hence, I tried to take these things into consideration but not go overboard with them. Anyways, thanks for commenting and I’ll put some thought into whether I underrated Marcus Allen.

@@ultimaterankings1154 1. I don't think you need to see evidence of it -it should be self-evident. However, I do think that there are a suspicious number of the better RB's who started out in the 90s who started producing significantly better numbers during the 2000s when they were getting older. This is unusual -especially for RBs. So I do think there is some evidence (though certainly subjective) to support this. So, I'm not convinced the effect is as negligible as you seem to. 2. I don't get what you're saying. That the eras I mentioned are statistically advantageous to RBs is a fact. How much of a difference that makes is subjective but as I've indicated above I think there's reason to believe its significant. As defences have increasingly shifted to focus primarily on passing from the late 90s onwards it should be obvious that it'll affect rushing. 3. Again, I think you're just denying a fact here. You're certainly (correctly) entitled to see the value in breakaway speed and the momentum and impact such players can provide but it is just a fact that when it comes to averages it does distort the expectation of what a player will regularly achieve on an attempt. If you are using averages as your fundamental base to build your entire list from then I do think this is worth bearing in mind. This is especially true of Bo Jackson since while other players will generally lose a few tenths from their average he loses over a whole yard from his average when his 50+ yard runs are excluded. Don't forget that the impact of long breakaway runs are still reflected in TD stats. I can remember John Riggins being used over and over as a bulldozer grinding for short yardage gain which must have been murder on his average. I can't imagine that Sayers would've been used the same way very much. A player's qualities will influence how they are used. 4. I have no problem with you placing Payton below those guys -everyone's entitled to their opinion and those guys are all great. I just don't agree that they are clearly better runners as you claim based on an eyeball test. They are definitely all better open field runners but in tight spaces and under pressure I think Payton is much better than all those guys with the exception of Sanders. That's where Payton shines as a runner and I think is readily apparent on an eyeball test. As you say he is also much more physical than all but Brown which does also have impact on the opposition that can't be measured in averages. Anyway, glad to hear you'll give Marcus some further though (Tiki Barber...sigh).

1. It is not self evident, you are just re-stating without evidence your original statement. I'm just not convinced of your theory, in fact, the opposite is more likely to be be true. Elite runners will always be great, but the easier conditions will actually make it more likely and more often that average runners look good. 2. The eras differences are what I said in my video and not what you wrote, just look at the numbers. Not sure where you are getting your facts from. 3. I am not denying a fact, I am merely disagreeing that a runner with long runs is overrated merely because his average goes down more when you remove his longest runs. Of course that is true, but it does not make him overrated and it more likely makes him underrated for the reasons I gave (in other words, these advantages more than outweigh your argument). In addition, it is a rather arbitrary thing to do: should for example, we subtract runs that lose yardage because it lessons their average for their other runs more? Same thing that you suggest and just as illogical. @@sirperybLakeney 4. Your entitled to your own eye test. 5. While Payton was a more physical runner than Sanders, OJ, and Sayers, I don't agree that made him better in tight spaces (better with contact yes) because the other 3 were all shiftier runners that Payton which helps in tight spaces. In addition to this they had more speed and quickness than Payton. These two areas more than offset Payton's advantage in power, hence, they are better runners and the stats are consistent with this. I love Payton and he was a great all around back, but as a pure runner his is a tad overrated by his fans (most of whom never saw Brown, Sayers, and Simpson run). In fact, if Sayers hadn't gotten seriously injured twice (or he had modern medicine), or if Simpson's first 3 years weren't wasted (most running backs best years) by two terrible coaches and 3 terrible teams and offensive lines, they both had the potential to be greatest runners ever. I can't say the same for Payton.

Great list!

Michael Jackson's VOCALS AS AN ADULT CANNOT HOLD A CANDLE TO MOST "CROONERS", ESPECIALLY BRUNO MARS. WHO "PATTERNS" HIS ENTERTAINMENT APPROACH AND ENERGY TO "THE KING OF POP" BUT BRUNO MARS CAN STILL "SANG" SON.😎😁🎵

WHERE'S LUTHER VANDROSS, DARRYL HALL, STEVE PERRY AND DONNIE HATHAWAY Amber_xo_133?😎🧐😳

The list was for individual dancers, that why I put them where I did, 1B

I RESPECTFULLY AGREE WITH YOU @thanksmr.obvious6427. There are A FEW HYPERSENSITIVE fans in this "OPINIONATED" segment.

Calling Whitney "rubbish" makes YOU the joke. Karen who was monotonous with no ounce of soul is in no way superior to THE Whitney Houston. You need to stop sniffing that glue mate 😂

There is no indication that any of your statements are true.

girl bye

Studio enhanced flavour 😭 She is NOT on Whitney's Godly level. Sit down delulu lamb 😭

??? Did you even watch the video? Whitney is number 1 and Aretha Franklin is number 2. SMH

I missed that part and there not on the list in the comments. It's still a shit list. Any list with Beyonce on it is garbage. @@ultimaterankings1154