I am surprised that this photo has not been challenged by the photography community, for instance who shoots at 1/8000, f1.6 unknown ISO doing that type photography. The 1/8000 the ISO would be between 500 - 800, tell me why a profession photographer who would have those stupid settings; something fishy going on😬😬☹
@NetvoTVКүн бұрын
Hey Jameel, my name is Johnny and I'm a freelance logo designer, currently I'm looking for more works, do you love to have a logo for your channel's branding to have a memorable graphic based monogram logo to help your audience recognise and follow your channel easier? I would love to design a photography themed logo inspired by your direction for you! Let me know if you interested to make it happen! :-)
@coreycampbell7855Күн бұрын
Trump just posted the Doug Mills photo as evidence, claiming the streak is a blood stained bullet right after piercing his ear. His right hand was on the podium when he 1st reacted. In the photo it is halfway to his ear. That took a minmum of .4 seconds. Wouldn't the bullet have travelled @ 1000 feet past him in that timeframe?
@Boldorion1958Күн бұрын
When I do protest or demonstration photography, I usually use a Lumix GH6 with a Panasonic-Leica 12-60 lens, although I sometimes use a Pan-Leica 25 or 42.5. When I need to be discreet, I may use a point-and-shoot camera like a Panasonic LX10 or a Fuji X-30.
@MilmidStudiosКүн бұрын
@@Boldorion1958 thanks for sharing! Sounds like you have a great toolkit for different applications. Would love to see your work! 🎯💯
@RVNmedicКүн бұрын
Very interesting but why was he shooting static subjects at 1/8000 sec. At F1.6 there is also an incredibly narrw DOF. Just saying.
@MilmidStudiosКүн бұрын
@@RVNmedic You ask a valid question! In my recent video I replicate his settings while trying to recreate a similar photograph. His settings are plausible in my opinion. With it being a bright day coupled with him shooting wide open at f1.6, he would be required to jack up his shutter speed to balance his exposure. His colleague Evan Vucci was shooting a 24-70 and a 70-200. Both were shot at f2.8 and his shutter settings were at 1/4000. So I guess the better question would be why he was shooting wide open! Thanks for the comment 🎯📸💯
@FullPlaythroughs2 күн бұрын
Thank you for doing this! I was hoping somebody would!
@MilmidStudiosКүн бұрын
@@FullPlaythroughs glad you enjoyed it!! Thanks for watching 📸🎯💯
@OCDAAD-zh1gq2 күн бұрын
Almost the ultimate trophy shot for the New York Times.
@OCDAAD-zh1gq2 күн бұрын
New Times mostly give.trump glass half empty headlines
@TheShadowseesyou2 күн бұрын
Love these videos digging deep into these photos from a neutral place focusing on the craft of taking the picture rather than subject
@MilmidStudiosКүн бұрын
@@TheShadowseesyou I appreciate you! Thanks for the comment, you worded it perfectly! 🎯💯📸
@frogboyx1Gaming2 күн бұрын
Looks bad ass brother enjoy your new gear.
@MilmidStudiosКүн бұрын
@@frogboyx1Gaming thanks so much, my friend!!!
@frogboyx1Gaming2 күн бұрын
I have been thinking about getting the Atmos Ninja
@MilmidStudiosКүн бұрын
@@frogboyx1Gaming the Feelworld gets the job done with a few annoying quirks. I would recommend the Ninja for sure if cost isn’t an issue!🎯🎯
@RedKapMedia2 күн бұрын
This is prime content!! Love the dedication to the craft!
@MilmidStudios2 күн бұрын
Thanks brother! Had a lot of fun and also got a lot of mosquito bites 💯📸🎯😂
@TeddyCavachon2 күн бұрын
According to the FBI a total of eight shots were fired so it is possible the one in the photo isn’t the one that actually struck Trump in the ear.
@MilmidStudios2 күн бұрын
Good thinking, you could be right about that. That one looks like it’s on a promising trajectory though! 🎯📸💯
@markmalasics34132 күн бұрын
The photo was faked in Photoshop. From the minor reduction in elevation from the video images, he STILL should have captured people behind Trump in the stands. And in THAT direction at that time, the sky was partly obscured with grey overcast clouds in the distance. The faked blue sky background serves to allow the "bullet" to be seen. And the last time I went to a political event to capture an image of someone speaking at the podium, I didn't need, or even consider, to shoot at 1/8000th of a second.
@MilmidStudios2 күн бұрын
Appreciate your skepticism, Mark. I for one do not believe the photo was photoshopped for a few reasons. Doug Mills works for the New York Times, which is a well-known left leaning publication that consistently endorses Democrat candidates. For the publication to photoshop the image to make Trump look like a victim, wouldn’t make much political sense. Secondly, the image was taken at 24mm. The one shown in this video was HEAVILY cropped. So the section of the sky in the cropped image may not include the overcast clouds you mentioned. Finally, his exposure settings… I just released a video where I expose similarly to Doug and it is plausible that those were his settings. If it was a sunny day with harsh light and he was shooting wide open at f1.6, he would need to have a high shutter speed to balance his exposure. Obviously this is just my opinion. I appreciate your comment regardless 🎯📸💯
@markmalasics3413Күн бұрын
@@MilmidStudios For me there are just too many coincidences. He just happened to be shooting what he knew would be a stationary subject at 1/8000 at F1.6 on a harsh back lit day. And nobody that I am aware of has mentioned the ISO and it's not listed in the settings shown. He just happens to hit the shutter for a whatever number burst of images before he even knew a bullet was flying. He just happened to capture the bullet even before Trump knew it whizzed by him. I just find it very fishy in these manners. I would love to see the raw file.
@soul.112 күн бұрын
البنت الي معك بس تضحك😂
@ozbullymorales10203 күн бұрын
This photo could not have happened to a more deserving photographer.
@MilmidStudios3 күн бұрын
@@ozbullymorales1020 I agree! He appears to be a mentor to many of his colleagues. Seems like a great person! 💯🎯📸
@AKStudio24kt4 күн бұрын
Again bro nice setup!
@MilmidStudios3 күн бұрын
Thanks bro!!! 📸👍🎯
@canonwhale4 күн бұрын
I keep missing your new video releases even though the bell is on!! Great stuff as always Jameel!
@MilmidStudios3 күн бұрын
I appreciate that Isaac!🤙🎯📸
@lwinaus88105 күн бұрын
One centimeter to the right and it would have been a spectacular photo!
@ozbullymorales10203 күн бұрын
💥 😢
@teleaddict235 күн бұрын
I can’t help wonder why he was shooting his camera at 1/8000 of a second at 1.4, as he didn’t know what was going to happen, but it was lucky he was
@randallbourne2717Күн бұрын
Kind of makes you wonder.
@teleaddict23Күн бұрын
@@randallbourne2717 Yes was he tipped off and got his camera ready?
@teleaddict235 күн бұрын
I bet Sony A1 sales have gone through the roof
@zimezum5 күн бұрын
This photo stinks like hell. I know that is possible to take photo from a flying bullet but anyone with common sense can see trough (try it). Beside if you take a look to the photo, the writing on Trump's cap that is ain't no 1/8000.
@pixel_hook5 күн бұрын
Why was he at f1.6 in bright sunlight?
@justamanwithanopinion5 күн бұрын
I recently bought an R3 for about £3,800 and was doubting my decision with the R1 coming out. After seeing the announcement I can't see myself "upgrading".
@MilmidStudios5 күн бұрын
Hahaha we are in the same boat! 🤣📸🎯 The R3 is still very relevant!
@canonwhale6 күн бұрын
Is that the UPPABaby Vista?🙊😂
@MilmidStudios6 күн бұрын
🤣🤣🤣
@canonwhale6 күн бұрын
@@MilmidStudios only know this cos I’m in the market for a Cruz v2! Anyway, bring the M11-P back!!! Missing that gem these days
@user-go9fi6ul4d6 күн бұрын
Really nice photos and I like this video😆 I like fruit photos and 4:39 portrait 🍒🍓🤴 I think this town like RAMBO First Blood place😄 Do you buy EOS R1?
@MilmidStudios6 күн бұрын
Thanks so much!! Haha you are right, it does resemble the town in that movie 🤣🤣. I will be waiting for the R3 MKII! 💯📸🎯
@derthephoto28826 күн бұрын
April 1st came late this year. Absolutely no reason to shoot this scene at those settings. The data displayed look more like a "word" document than an exif layout. Good ol photoshop!
@lour77536 күн бұрын
I still don’t understand why his shutter speed was 1/8000 sec. That’s not a shutter speed you would normally ever use for anything other than high-speed sports. Even shooting at f/1.6 you wouldn’t normally be at 1/8000.
@AKStudio24kt6 күн бұрын
Big up again brother, the more I think about it I'm gonna keep my R3 instead of getting the R1. Thank you again man for reminding me how great of a camera the R3 really is!!!
@MilmidStudios6 күн бұрын
I feel the same way, AK! Super happy with the R3 every time I use it! 📸🎯💯
@danc37466 күн бұрын
I have one question, why is he at 1/8000 while at a speaking even? Unless he was expecting a bullet to fly across the frame?
@MilmidStudios6 күн бұрын
Hey! I think your question is valid. In my opinion the reason he shot at 1/8000 is because he was also shooting wide open at f/1.6 on a bright sunny day. In order to keep exposure balanced I think his only option would be to jack up the shutter speed, or use a VND filter. I’m sure he was also shooting at native ISO. Just my two cents 💯📸🙏🏽
@danc37466 күн бұрын
@@MilmidStudios I totally get it and understand the numbers, but at an outdoor speaking "rally" event? f/1.6 at 1/8000 just doesn't make sense unless I am expecting something VERY fast to fly by lol. I just got done covering 12 high school graduations this year, these are "speaking events", f/1.4 lens at 1/1000 tops, and certainly NOT 30 FPS!...I wasn't expecting a bullet lol. Unless this is protocol for these types of events because of THAT possibly???
@MilmidStudios6 күн бұрын
@@danc3746 I do appreciate the skepticism and I think we should practice more of it. Let’s just say I HOPE you aren’t right! I want to try recreate the photograph… stay tuned📸🎯
@danc37466 күн бұрын
@@MilmidStudios Thanks and please understand I am not trying to start trouble, I just don't understand the settings he was in for that type of event. I guess he had one camera with those settings just in case something like that happens...who knows lol
@christiandumontphotography39967 күн бұрын
Excellent video. A real pleasure to discover your work.
@MilmidStudios6 күн бұрын
I’m honoured my friend! Thank you for taking the time to watch, and for you kind words 💯📸🎯
@tomCGNpics7 күн бұрын
Why such a high shutterspeed? Because he could. I guess that he wanted a wide open f and didn’t cared about the shutterspeed. Guess a photo journalist does not necessarily use grey filters.
@pepitobayarte89278 күн бұрын
Beautiful vibes = beautiful portraits. Congrats brother! Hope you get all the views and subscribers you deserve!
@MilmidStudios6 күн бұрын
Thanks so much for the kind words, friend! Really appreciate your time and support 📸🎯💯
@jonathanraven59398 күн бұрын
Absolutely amazing
@canonwhale8 күн бұрын
Insane!! Thanks for sharing this Jameel!
@MilmidStudios8 күн бұрын
Thanks for watching as always bro! 👊🏽🎯💯📸
@johnmac34109 күн бұрын
I assume he shot a burst of stills at the time. Good photographer and awesome shot.
@ab-hx8qe9 күн бұрын
It’s amazing Doug was able to move so fast with those balls of steal.
@MilmidStudios8 күн бұрын
🤣🤣
@bondgabebond49079 күн бұрын
Besides some of the smart-ass comments, Doug got incredible photos. It reminds me of the photo when Jack Ruby shot Lee Harvey Oswald with a Nikon S, a rangefinder film camera. You know, one shot at a time. He shot the photo 1/65th of a second after another photographer took a picture showing only Ruby holding the and Oswald just standing. That difference made all the difference in the world. The one who shot with the old Nikon got the photo and because famous for it. The other guy just vanished as it was not picked up for publications. Timing is part of it, being there and firing away has to help. I shot a lot of photos while working on USAF base newspapers. I got a few good shots of sports, etc., but nothing like this shot. This is why I love photojournalism and love still photography over videography, not that one is better than the other, but I just love stills. It's a slice in time permanently recorded on film or a hard drive somewhere.
@MilmidStudios9 күн бұрын
Loved everything about your comment! Thanks for the refresher on Jack Ruby. I agree with your sentiments on photojournalism and still photography. Beautifully articulated 👏👏👏
@bondgabebond49073 күн бұрын
@@MilmidStudios Thanks for the kind words. Photojournalism means a lot to me. The people who go out where it may be dangerous grabbing photos and videos leaves me in awe. Most people will never see these guys or think of how they are also in the line of fire taking photos. Thanks for the video.
@markmalasics34132 күн бұрын
So glad you believe this shot wasn't a PhotoShop production. SMFH.
@MilmidStudios2 күн бұрын
@@markmalasics3413 Absolutely not! I actually recreate it in a video I'm releasing tomorrow. I can confirm its real.
@iamreneh9 күн бұрын
Such a great video!!! 😊
@hehegone44999 күн бұрын
F1.6! Almost wide opened and that image is so amazingly composed.
@schultzeworks7 күн бұрын
The A-1 is a $6500 camera. Top of the line with the best autofocus in the biz.
@spirg9 күн бұрын
Fabulous work ❤
@spirg9 күн бұрын
Sony 🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻🙌🏻
@Clownsareus9 күн бұрын
This is a fake photo , reason 1: no photographer would have set his camera 8000 th of a second on manaul , 2: the ISO speed was never stated . And 3: its imoppible to record a bullet in a still photo due to its high velocity
@YaYousef59 күн бұрын
I take photos in bright direct sunlight all the time and 1/4000 or 1/8000 is normal for wide open apertures if you don't use an ND filter.
@AlexanderRay929 күн бұрын
I screw an ND filter onto my lens specifically because 1/8000 is sometimes not fast enough to avoid blown highlights when wide open 😂
@bingbong48489 күн бұрын
I've taken pics at 1/8000. It's not an impossible thing. Everyone does things for their own reasons
@k4kafka8 күн бұрын
Pulitzer Prize forthcoming 😊
@Ruikesan3 күн бұрын
The exposure triangle lets you pick 2 of the 3 parts of the formula and let the third be whatever it takes to get the right amount of light. So if you want a wide open aperture and a low iso you can adjust the shutter speed to get the EV you want, and on bright days you can easily get to 1/8000 with fast lenses and you'll get great shots with no motion blur for most things. I do this all the time at the zoo, it just depends on how much light there is.
@mtmccornack9 күн бұрын
I'm just glad someone got the shot!
@TheChadWork20019 күн бұрын
A moment in time, evidence.
@jamesr55649 күн бұрын
At f1.6, I am surprised he didn’t have a lot of blown highlights. Even at 1/18000.
@d3xmeister9 күн бұрын
The photo after the event, with the blood, the fist up and the American flag in the back is much, much better.