Thanks for Sharing

Would love better audio quality. Perhaps a Wireless Lavalier Microphone. Keep up the great work!

Memo to KZfaq ... I boycott all products that you advertise.

One of the Greats.

What a great talk! Thank you very much! At just the right level for an outsider to follow. Now I need to get ahold of the power points, which don't seem to be here.

You got somthing new!? Watching it :D

Love Professor Strominger

Black holes are based on a mathematical misconception. Most people don't know that Einstein said that singularities are not possible. In the 1939 journal "Annals of Mathematics" he wrote "The essential result of this investigation is a clear understanding as to why the Schwarzchild singularities (Schwarzchild was the first to raise the issue of General Relativity predicting singularities) do not exist in physical reality. Although the theory given here treats only clusters (star clusters) whose particles move along circular paths it does seem to be subject to reasonable doubt that more general cases will have analogous results. The Schwarzchild singularities do not appear for the reason that matter cannot be concentrated arbitrarily. And this is due to the fact that otherwise the constituting particles would reach the velocity of light." He was referring to the phenomenon of dilation (sometimes called gamma or y) mass that is dilated is smeared through spacetime relative to an outside observer. It's the phenomenon behind the phrase "mass becomes infinite at the speed of light". Even mass that exists at 75% light speed is partially dilated. "Time dilation" is just one aspect of dilation. General Relativity does not predict singularities when you factor in dilation. Einstein is known to have repeatedly spoken about this. Nobody believed in black holes when he was alive for this reason. Dilation will occur wherever there is an astronomical quantity of mass because high mass means high momentum. There is no place in the universe where mass is more concentrated than at the center of a galaxy. It can be shown mathematically that the mass at the center of our own galaxy must be dilated. In other words that mass is all around us. This is the explanation for the abnormally high rotation rates of stars in spiral galaxies (the reason for the theory of dark matter) the "missing mass" is dilated mass. According to Einstein's math, there would be no dilation in galaxies with very, very low mass because they do not have enough mass in their centers to achieve relativistic velocities. It has recently been confirmed in 5 very, very low mass galaxies to show no signs of dark matter. The shape of a galaxy is common in nature. From atoms to our solar system the overwhelming majority of the mass is in the center. The same must be true for galaxies. Where there is an astronomical quantity of mass there is an astronomical quantity of energy. The night sky should be lit up from the galactic center but it isn't. The modern explanation for this is because gravitational forces are so strong there that not even light can escape. Einstein's answer would be because the mass there is dilated relative to an Earthbound observer. Black holes were popularized by television and movies in the 1960's and belief in them gradually came to be despite the fact that Einstein said they cannot exist and there was no evidence. What we see in modern astronomy is evidence of dilation, a known fundamental property of the universe.

You've an inspiration

These talks are never long enough.

Man, the quarantine was produtive, I think that in 10 years there will be another physics base on this principles and math

A rough idea of Navier-Stokes formatting turbulence as a Feynman type guessing thought experiment about how Partitioning of Dirac's large number theory inversion that fixates on 137, all-ways all-at-once here-now-forever sync-duration of Spinfoam bubble-modes in this fractal conic-cyclonic modulo-geometrical AM-FM Reciproction-recirculation Totality of Black-body i-reflection Singularity aka Entanglement here-now-forever or Eternity-now Timing-spacing coordination Interval, ie Superspin Superposition-point QM-TIME 1-zero-infinity->quantization Completeness. Or the parallel coexistence POV of Geometric Drawing and Perspective Projection Observational (in)Accuracy pulse-evolution differentiates = superposition axial-tangential orthogonality frequency-amplitude numberness dominance alignments, etc, etc. The same mechanism-Principle of superimposed logarithmic vector-values Perspective.

I appreciate the lecture and what you taught about the subject.

Thankyou

Thankyou.

😓 𝐩яⓞ𝓂𝓞Ş𝐦

Juan, thank you so much for sharing this conservative semi-classical derivation using straightforward GR.

9:09 At r=r_s , the radial component of the metric diverges, so why isn't the cigar infinitely long?

Almost dead and still teaching. The Higgs boson can't create its own mass, hahaha (0:59). Particle physics is just a fantasy.

I have mathematically unified physics. THE clear (AND BALANCED) UNDERSTANDING OF GALAXIES, AS ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON BALANCE): Gravity/acceleration involves BALANCED inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE ON BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE !!! This explains F=ma AND E=MC2. (Accordingly, ON BALANCE, the rotation of WHAT IS THE MOON matches it's revolution.) Great. Inertia/INERTIAL RESISTANCE is proportional to (or BALANCED with/as) GRAVITATIONAL force/ENERGY, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. This explains F=ma AND E=MC2. Great. The stars AND PLANETS are POINTS in the night sky. NOW, carefully consider what is THE SUN AND the speed of light (c) ON BALANCE. (This explains the supergiant stars AND the “birthing” of stars.) This explains the cosmological redshift, as I have CLEARLY explained why THE PLANETS (INCLUDING WHAT IS THE EARTH and the Moon) move away very, very, very slightly in relation to what is THE SUN (ON BALANCE); as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON BALANCE) !!! NOW, consider what is THE EYE on balance; and notice the black “space” AS WELL !!! LOOK up at what is the blue sky (on balance), as THE EARTH is ALSO BLUE. What is a galaxy also proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is (CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY) proven to be gravity (ON BALANCE) !!! TIME is NECESSARILY possible/potential AND actual IN BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. Indeed, TIME dilation ultimately proves (ON BALANCE) that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON BALANCE). Importantly, what is a galaxy (including stellar clustering) involves stars together AND stars apart ON BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON BALANCE. A galaxy is understood as invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE, as gravity is (CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY) proven to be ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy ON/IN BALANCE. So, notice the glowing central bulge, the galactic jets, the “birthing” of stars, AND the “black hole(s)” ON BALANCE !!! Moreover, consider what are the supergiant stars AND the supernovae on balance. Great. About HALF of what are galaxies are “dead” or inert, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity on balance. What is a galaxy is consistent with the cosmological redshift AND CLEARLY proves ON BALANCE that ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity (ON BALANCE) !!! Accordingly, I have very CLEARLY explained why the orbital velocities are constant (and even increasing) in the outer parts of certain galaxies. Magnificent. Again, consider the “birthing” of stars. Consider what is a spiral galaxy, for example. Consider the supernovae. Galaxies consist of invisible AND VISIBLE SPACE in fundamental equilibrium and BALANCE, as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is CLEARLY AND NECESSARILY proven to be gravity ON/IN BALANCE !!! Again, consider stars together AND stars apart ON/IN BALANCE; as ELECTROMAGNETISM/energy is gravity ON/IN BALANCE. GREAT !!! It ALL CLEARLY makes perfect sense, as BALANCE AND completeness go hand in hand. By Frank DiMeglio

I'm guessing somewhat as there was no real question, But how does QCD relate to String theory ? I can only say ... +1ºC = +1C^3 10W=+1ºC (When ambient is less than 2000ºC) 1W=+1ºC (Ambient over 2000ºC) And ... In these collision cases Compressed space can be cause by Temperature and Velocity (Earth Gravity being outside scope) Compressed Space is Synonymous with Time Dilation. Time dilation ratio is T=(C^3Weight / 5)^2 seconds observed for one second at the C^3 or the ºC weight space SR interactive dimension. The time dilation red shift effects for the photon level observer ... 1. QCD Temperature frequency (Half the sum temp if interference occurred) 2. Spin Velocity (Half the rotation speed for twice the ºC) 3. Actual Velocity (Half the velocity for twice the ºC) 4. Kinetic mass (Half the weight by distance for twice the ºC) Which means you may need to blue shift some things to get the true SR spacial depth observer numbers for the zero sum Gravity/Mass/velocity calculations. Cheers, Great Lecture ;-)

I think only a small percentage of all theoretical physicists understood the lecture. This guy has a volcano inside his head instead of a brain, unfortunately he knows nothing about how to be didactic

Rave

Great talk ! For now time is still not a 4 fourth dimension. First i like to see how time behaves differently 2 , 3 and 4 dimensional or i want to see how time behaves the same from a 2 , 3 and 4 dimensional point of view. Non of this is experimental proven yet.

Proud of you sir

RIP Steven Weinberg

Nothing is more relaxing than hearing this man speak!

The Vedic Indians knew a thing or to many many years ago. Modern physicists should have a wee look at Vedic writings.

This is such bs. The infestation of theoretical physics and axademia by money junkies.

We the Indians are proud for you Mr bhowmik.

Thank you for uploading this! But it's hard to hear what he's saying

Oh boy, lenny has lost it

what a shitty quality

Better sound?

Even when I have just come from my sleep, I can easily differentiate between a scientific argument(which can be derived from physical principles) how ever true or false they can be tested to be and a transfered guilt pseudo science argument(which know not why physical laws are relevant in the logical possibility of scientific argument) and how it can be tested or extend our testing techniques. Thanks frank wilzcek. Take forexample; 1- if one claims that his idea can be tested through relativity principle; if he make any gravitational claims he must make sure that they pass the test of general relativity, If he makes any claims of energy he must make sure that his claims pass the test of special relativity, And if he makes any evolutionary claims, he must make sure that his claims pass the test of big bang. The typical example of relativity principle we still have is Einstein model. In all the above, tests have been made and we still know how to make more tests or compare results over and over again. 2- if someone proposes that his idea can be tested through conservation principle, if he claims energy, he must make sure that his claims pass the test of isotropic vacuum solution: 0.83%(cosmological constant)+99.17%(dark energy, dark matter and mass-energy)=100% vaccum density inform of conservation of energy. If he makes evolutionary claims, he must make sure that his claims pass the test of flatness linkage solution: 0.17+0.83=1 (inform of conservation of time symmetry. If he makes gravitational claims then he must make sure that his claims pass the test of homogeneous feedback loops solution (inform of conservation of gravitational woldline). In this case, feedback loops (as the minimum path of the pressure gradient of relative density as a function of vector rotation, transformation and translation) can be realised through the constancy of time symmetry over gravitational constant equals mc2. Such that 1/6.6=0.17 arc sec. Thus, physical laws are smooth in space and continuous in time (inform of space-time manifold) regardless of change in reference frame(inertial frame, accelerating frame and superposition frames). Any loss of a single bit of information will lead to discontinuities and non smoothness in the system of physical principles. The typical example of conservation principle we still have is that of cosmological principle model. In all the above, we know how to test or compare results over and over again. 3- if some one proposes that his idea can be tested through action principle, if he claims gravity, he must make sure that his claims pass the test of least action. If he claims evolution, he must make sure that his claims pass the test of reversible time. If he claims energy, he must make sure that his claims pass the test of thermodynamic energy(see hawking black hole thermodynamic model). The typical example of action principle is the Newtonian model. In the above we know how to test and how to compare results over and over again. 4- if some one proposes that his idea can be tested through quantum principle, if he makes gravitational claims, he must make sure that his claims pass the test of graviton. If he makes energetic claims, he must make sure that his claims pass the test of particle physics. If he makes evolutionary claims, he must make sure that they pass the test of negentropy and entropy(see wave-particle duality). The typical example we still have is that of standard model of particle physics. In all the above , we know how to make tests and how to compare results over and over again. 5- if someone proposes that his idea can be tested through complex principle, if he makes evolutionary claims, he must make sure that they pass the test of synthetic analysis (subset sum, sub set integral and subset optimisation, etc). If he makes energy claims, he must make sure that they pass the test of vacuum vibration frequency resonation. If he makes gravitational claims, he must make sure that they pass the test of gravitational time-like singularity. With gravitational time-like singularity, while the phenomena are relative, changes are topological and time is complex. Such that, the time function determines dynamical relationship and dimensional interactions of all other physical principles inform of topological phenomena. In this case, space-time function will determine the topological complexity of space-time physics inform of decreasing complexity), proper time function will determine the topological complexity of proper time physics inform of increasing complexity. and decidable time function will determine the topological complexity of decidable time complexity inform of entwined phenomena of decreasing complexity of space-time time physics and increasing complexity of proper time physics). We know how the above physics can be tested through any principle claimed above and we know how to compare results over and over again. Science is just simple like that since many things nature will make it for you if you have a relevant or correct idea

আমার কাছে আপনি একজন ঈশ্বরতুল্য মানুষ। আমি জানি না আপনার কাছে আমার কথাগুলো পৌছবে কি না ?.... আপনি একজন অসাধারণ মানুষ। আপনার লেখা প্রায় সবকয়টি বই আমার পড়া শেষ। রঞ্জন বন্দোপাধ্যায়ের লেখা মনিকাঞ্চন:এক বাঙালির রূপকথা বইটি সত্যি বলতে আমার অনুপ্রেরণা। জীবনে যদি কোনো দিন সম্ভব হয় আমি আপনার কাছে পদার্থবিদ্যার সম্পর্কে অনেক কিছু জানব আপনার সামনে বসে। আমি বর্তমানে পশ্চিমবঙ্গে সূর্যসেন কলেজে (শিলিগুড়ি ) পদার্থ বিদ্যায় স্নাতক স্তরের পড়াশুনো করছি।আমাকে আশীর্বাদ করবেন যেন আমি আপনার মতো একজন হয়ে উঠতে পারি। আমার শত কোটি সশ্রদ্ধ প্রণাম রইল আপনার কাছে।

What's the temperature of dark matter ? Is there a thermal pic around?

Multi dimensions one antimatter all around but dose not interact unless pulled into your dimension and once hear must be bound as if it interact well cancel yet once hear reacts the same to light?. Just behind you !

Sean Carroll, Lawrence Krause and others should schedule a conference call with Frank one day and learn a few things before hawking their bubble gum science.

what i heard, conclusion was ,is that many worlds theory is correct due to the history of entanglements ?

Hi Lisa, I was just wondering like stars implode and create holes then could we not use a continuing implosion bomb to create wormholes, excuse my words im self trained

bullshit. Real physics is observable in the lab. The real physics is condensed matter

Lisa Randall, when will you scientist get real and began real scientific research by acknowledging your ignorant of fact has lead you to misinterpret data wrongly and fictionalized dark matter. Every one of the reasons you gave has a simple explanation if you knew the structure of matter, nature of gravity and their interaction. You do not know galaxy evolution or structure of space bodies. Your current model is pure fiction agreed among your self and presenting it as fact. You do not know correct model of space or matter and have been too stupid to ask past 43 years officially. Your government is happy to steal my info for your scientist to match with data to present it as new discovery, but do not have courage to acknowledge the source. That is why I do not give them any more unless it is on official request. Meanwhile the world scientist like rats in cage chasseing their tails getting nowhere looking for fictional creation like dark matter, expansion, accelerated expansion and all other nonsense. MG1

Dark energy condense into dark matter, which in turn condense into ordinary matter --- hydrogen atoms. This incidentally explains the abundance of hydrogen element in the universe. Hydrogen atoms emit energy in the form of beta radiation back to the universe, which diffuse into dark energy, the frequency and wavelength of which correspond to radiation of 2.73 degree K. This completes a cosmic cycle of matter and energy as well as a picture of an universe which is constantly changing, but on the whole always looks the same, anywhere and at any time ---- a picture described by the Steady State theory of the 1950's.

I just told you beacuse no mater if its a past experience playing something backward its still moving forward in time

Hope yall see this

Because playing something in the past is still playing it forward

Start teaching The Electric Universe and everyone will be 100% better off! Seems to me Academia is intent on robbery instead! Just sad!

revising a Model is great, especially when it's very much needed, but continuing to call Burclen Currents, Waves, and Frequencies... dark, black anything! Give credit where credit is due! The EU has shown much better proof of what this old Model CAN'T!

Very cool ! I like the hypothesis !