Wonderful working and important mathematics innovation. Please it's possible to make correlation between the theory of nonlinear diffusion with fractional operators and the theory of nonlinear diffusion with m- dissipating operators.

J'ai trouvé J.-P. Serre un peu heurté, ou peu conciliant avec son confrère mathématicien.

With her white pants she is like a piece of chalk.

Was hat der Colliot hier zu suchen?Er will wohl beweisen,daß er intelligent ist!? Er unterbricht ständig den SERRE.Was soll das? Ich kann es mir nicht verkneifen,daß Colliot sich mit Idiot reimt.

Wow !! Such a wonderful man to listen to.

@28:10 Can Jean-Pierre Serre comment on what Cohomologie means to him. The concept of a function space holds archetypal significance. A Bird Flying above all Others Is a function. In the sense of Riemann Roch, it is posed as if to say that The implied relationship between the Divisor-Data and the function spaces these two pieces of data define: has a meaning. There’s nothing natural about this kind of synthesis: that could be understood as part of the impetus for exploring the ring theory, especially to hold this theorem under the fire of the rank nullity theorem, in exploration of structures that can be called the same: Is that the same concept as Jean Pierre Serre’s ‘canonical isomorphisms’……? Coherent Algebraic Sheaves.

@12:53 Serre appears to be randomly against his colleague in the style of ‘Dance Moms’: I would suggest that he truly is referring to something sincerely terrifying in the culture of scientists en masse: Namely, that he specifically doesn’t do this kind of competition because the [Individuality of the scientist] Is found in a natural - not externally forced - invitation to certain kinds of theorems… to prove: for example. As was his experience with Reimann Roch. I don’t know if I would call the Right Hand Side a literally euler characteristic calculation ….. My personal interest in it - not His - is the concept of …. This begins in mathematics with the stochastic generating function used to count things in a discrete sense …. A vector formation, identified not in a literally defined vector space. Namely, merimorphisms are how electromagnetic charge is stored as data: this is the singularity or these are the singularities of a merimorphism. The root of a derivative of a merimorphism has a meaning that one ought to doubt…. In the case of Real (Reimannian, for the canonical ‘isomorphism’ with smooth complex analysis) Geometry, the Euler Characteristic for a 2-manifold is in relation to its genus, monovariately: Chi = 2 - 2g. The Reimann Roch theorem entertains non-geometric data additively synthesized with -1/2 times this quantity….. The real question is what does it mean to transform real geometry into complex geometry. Reimannian geometry is only the most obvious sense: namely: complex geometry proper does seem to imply that there is something fundmanetal about its algebra: namely, its algebraic closedness as a field, that opens up a relationship it has to the reals in ways that are other than the canonical bijection, and implied smooth maps. The Hirzebrcuh Reimann Roch is the statement of this: indeed the way to percieving the After one has seen the Gauss Bonnet, as a consequence of Green’s theorem in the plane and so forth….. attractiveness of calling this graph invariant - once proven to be a topological invariant - a characteristic class: Chi: Geometry. --> a global algebraic structure in discussion of global topology. With a comment on the geometry: how twisted it is, the existence of sections, or otherwise. It’s not necessarily the case, that anything metric - as actually IS the case in the subdivision theoretical real/ Reimannian geometry - has anything to do with the concept of an euler (poincare) characteristic given by Algebraic Topology: which is a field devoted to exactly constructing maps that this one quantity represents in spirit, alone. This is the Hirzebruch Reimann Roch theorem. The Grothendieck Reimann Roch is a production of the Geometry of this particular value: 2- 2g. Which is (1) first known as a subdivision constant, (2) second, as a topological invariant (3) according to GRR: a topological invariant along with there existing knowledge of the Geometry Put into this very particular number: 2 for the sphere, and 0 for the torus: one could state before appreciation of the recontextualization - by - definition. It’s a Reimann-Hurwitz formula for this HRR interpretation of this constant: in the sense of mathematically equating the Euler Poincare characteristic of two geometries , through transformation. In the Reimannian case of Reimann Hurwitz , the transformation is seen demonstratively. Grothendieck demonstrates only the existence such a map providing a relationship of equality between these two statements of topologie. Global topologie: this is the euler poincare characteristic of the data (X, V contained in TX) for a smooth complex manifold X. Under the hood of HRR: complex, if something other than Reimannian geometry, is the natural definition of this constant. I don’t necessarily know exactly what he means by ‘Reimann Roch IS an euler (poincare) characteristic calculation’

@12:57 Serre is being vastly appropriate in his relationship with Grothendieck with his correction at his colleague as to the nature of competition: Namely, this particular event of intellect is one of understanding: not competition. One is referred to Grothendieck’s relationship to this experience.

She is so happy doing math 😊😊😊

2883 0:26

This is what a real maths lecture is like. It's easy to fall into the trap of thinking that science and maths experts' frontier of knowledge is equal to the content that they deliver in pop science programs (see Brian Cox, Jim Al-Khalili, etc.), but that's a deadly mistake. Real experts (Cox and Al-Khalili included) know a f*ck load more than the rest of us are led to believe. Kudos to you, Holly.

Wow she is intensely hot!

5 0:59

저는 나이 든 사람은 현실에서 어려움을 겪을뿐이지.양자단계에서는 똑같다고 생각해요.

Moi qui m’est arrêter au division et qui écoute le cours comme si je pouvais en comprendre un dixième

my godess

great

whenever I will be understanding all this I will be raedy to leave this earth

It is good to take notes, I agree.

M. Serre, médaillé FIELDS 1954, pas 1953 !

Double RIP

Young sheldon

5:42 bcd does not seem like a tree because b-d and c is not connected. Is this wrong or am I missing something?

Very interesting presentation, thank you. It is helpful for my own research and learning!

J'ai relevé une petite imprécision à 4:36, mais dans l'ensemble ça tient la route.

read ur book in my postgraduation study sir...really liked it...thank you

pas forcement car même si Henri Poincaré a apporté nombre d'idées qui vont servir à la relativité einsteinienne, critique de la simultanéité, redéfinition - insuffisante - du temps, inertie de l'énergie, structure de groupe des transformations de Lorentz, principe de relativité appliqué à l'électromagnétisme - il continue de tenir à l'éther. C'est là son échec. Poincaré ne les consigne pas dans un seul et même texte, nulle part il ne fait de synthèse, nulle part il ne propose « une théorie physique », il passe d'une bonne idée à l'autre sans mettre tout cela en ordre, sans structurer l'ensemble. L'article de Poincaré de 1905 ne contient pas tous les points nécessaires à « monter » la théorie. le cœur de l'article d'Einstein, c'est de démontrer (ce que ne fait pas Poincaré) que ses deux principes, de relativité et de l'indépendance de la vitesse de la lumière par rapport à sa source, impliquent les transformations de Lorentz. Poincaré a fort bien jalonné le terrain, il n'en a pas vu le plan qu' Einstein lui a mis en évidence.

Extremely helpful lecture, especially following the morning introduction. Are the slides available anywhere?

Professor Nero Budur is a beacon of knowledge and inspiration in the academic realm. His passion for teaching is infectious, creating an engaging and nurturing environment for his students. With a wealth of expertise, Professor Budur not only imparts wisdom but also fosters a sense of curiosity, encouraging his students to explore the depths of their intellectual potential. Beyond the classroom, his kindness and dedication leave a lasting impact, making him not just a teacher but a cherished mentor to those fortunate enough to be under his guidance. NeyNey BuBu

he's quite cute, actually.

ЖЫВЕ БЕЛАРУСЬ

Jme tape tte la video juste pr faire un chall root-me... (c interessant sah mais il est 1h du mat et il me reste 1h30 a regarder)

god proof formula sn=n/3[3a+(n^2_1)2d] mf mohamed mathani mba

Il est sympathique ce monsieur j'aime bien son sens de l'humour

Cedric, on vous aime ^_^ ❤

RIP

A travers cet exemple, on voit le fosse entre mathematiciens, et physiciens

Ya rien sur les methodes numeriques. Je sais par experience que ca peut tourner au cauchemar. Si quelqu un peut m indiquer de quoi lire pour vlassov poisson, Boltzman... Merci

super bien expliqué !

Younare so very good spich but any body no time your video 😢😢😢😢😢

Les feuilles bien mystérieuses , car il enseigna toujours note, que le Professeur Serre tourne et retourne sans cesse , pose, reprend et repose de nouveau pendant l' entretien , contenaient -elles son testament scientifique qu'il fut empêché de délivrer par les deux intervenants ?

On ne voit rien. Déjà à l époque quand je suivais à Bordeaux les TD d Etienne en maîtrise on ne comprenait rien .. Il n a pas changé 😢

quelqu'un sait comment il a trouve c(t) à partir de c'(t) à15:41?

Merci pour ce sujet de grand oral

Rien ne vient du ciel ! Oui, il est temps de prendre ta retraite ???

I think there is no object in algebraic geometry that was not mentioned in this speech.😊

Where is the Part II please?

You can't discuss string theory this way.

This is amazing thank you for sharing.