Thanks, Mary!

Yes, a theme music I adore.

It is Louise Fletcher and Linda Blair voices generated.

Sorry I called you dude, Sofia!

Thanks a lot! Well, I was the first one 😅

@@gafaajacques Hahaa, that's okay, dude 😉

Really? 😅

Yaaaay, thank you, Berin!

Merci beaucoup!!

Thank you, Berin! What other scene would you like to hear in English dubbed? : )

😅😘

Muchas gracias, querida Lulu!

Alice! I'm in Benfeita village and internet connection is so slow. So sorry I haven't checked fb mgs in ages. <3 Hope you're well and lil Hayden too.

Thank you, Emily! Nice birthday present from you, watching my video. 😅

Thanks! So glad you liked it!

Feels so real.

@@rachelodom7519 love the artstyle of the Sims 4.

Pamlyn did the voice of Lucy on one or two of the Charlie Brown cartoons. She was sitting behind the desk

É mesmo, querida Lulu! Sims 2 has a lot of depth <3

Thank you!

Loren, you posted this exact text in my other video 'Regan's Birthday Trip Reconstruction' :/

Because to make sure that the scene could be as realistic as possible, William Friedkin got an actual team of medical professionals who were familiar with performing an angiogram.

I've always wanted at least a 5 hour miniseries version of Blatty's novel. Which is what I'm trying to accomplish with my Sims 4 adaptation. :3 I agree, my favorite scenes are the early scenes of normal-Regan and in the film, the cuts from those scenes to the next scene happen too quickly. I made a fan edit in which I “extended” these scenes. I disagree that Friedkin's film is no masterpiece. The atmosphere is perfect, chilling and ominous, excellent cinematography, there is a slow character development - although I wish for an even slower pace, it is much better than most horror movies' character development. And so on..

@@SofReginaI agree there are some excellent things about the film like special effects,atmosphere,acting and photography but in my mind it is still not a masterpiece. The first half of Friedkin's theatrical cut is very dry,shallow and poorly structured.Friedkin's cutting of twenty minutes created these flaws in the film.There is no gradual onset of Regan's possession in the first half of the film.Regan asks her mother what is wrong with her and her mother says it nerves just like the doctor said.What doctor?The first doctor scene is not in the theatrical cut.Regan urinates on the carpet,her bed shakes and she is strapped to her bed looking like a monster.Absolutely ridiculous that it would happen so fast.I have the original screenplay of the workprint version of the film.So many interesting scenes that were cut.It's unbelievable how much better the original cut of the movie was.The workprint version was a masterpiece--not the the overrated theatrical cut.William Peter Blatty hated the theatrical cut and was furious with Friedkin for butchering the original cut.Thankfully,they were able to put some of the cut scenes back into the extended cut.I'm glad I have a copy of the book in my possession.In my opinion the book is far superior to the theatrical and extended cuts of the film.

@@loren7551 Yep, many years ago I uploaded my Exorcist collection on here and I have Blatty's book, From Novel to Film which features his first draft screenplay. As he mentioned, the original theatrical version ran almost 3 hours. Film studio executive and producer John Calley was the one who suggested Fredkin to delete many scenes. At first he was taken aback, but eventually agreed. I blame John Calley ; ) for deleting the more gradual onset scenes. Sure the novel is superior, as is the case with most books and I used to sound like you first time I read Blatty's book.. However, to each their own. For me, no matter which version of the film is shown, it will always be a masterpiece.

Hi! I thought I did. Here's the right link : ) www.mediafire.com/file/rws5r2t9rpk03c5/ActingGig_hug.zip/file And thanks!

Oh nice! I bought most of Linda's movies on Dvd and Vhs, in my teens and 20's. Still have a cool Born Innocent vhs cover art. : )