LITERALLY? How many people died? Was anyone held to account? Who went to prison?
@MoparMissileDivisionСағат бұрын
0:38 Second gen Road Runner? 4:37 That sure is a gorgeous '68 GTX!🤨🐎💩 This was actually a decent video that just wasn't edited very well. 👍🖖
@erin190303 сағат бұрын
It was the ugliest car made at the time
@mustangracer51243 сағат бұрын
The back of my hideous 'cuda must have been hard to get used to. 'look at a color choice of that car beating the crap out of me'
@plap.23 сағат бұрын
As a kid when these were eight or ten years old I thought they were hideous, they may still be. Somehow I happen to like them much better now, especially hot rodded little. But then again that makes everything better looking.
@Vegaswill714Күн бұрын
I had the Dodge version, with the 318 Poly and an automatic. It was no racecar, I timed 0-60 in 12 seconds and got around 15 mpg combined highway/street driving. I inherited the car in the early 70's with 100k miles, so my performance figures were with a somewhat tired engine. It was comfortable, dead-solid reliable and handled extremely well. I could out-corner most contemporary cars. Sadly these cars were very rust prone and most rusted out before they were worn out. I lived in the northeast, had to put plywood in the trunk so cargo did not fall through the floor. So many good memories.
@BaltimoreAndOhioRRКүн бұрын
LITERALLY
@TheBeachedoneКүн бұрын
That's a cud'a not a 2nd gen Roadrunner!
@bongodave13Күн бұрын
Funny. A few days ago I was bopping through the countryside, and what did I see? A Plum Crazy '71 Challenger convertible with a white top and interior. He was just sitting at the side of the road with the top down. It had a 383 Magnum badge. I don't know what tranny it had, but I'd be happy with either in a car like that. It was gorgeous. Makes me wonder why they didn't sell all that many. Then again, maybe they did, but these things were rust-buckets, so only southern cars had a chance of not rusting out. Well, few cars will last 50 years, anyway. They've become too expensive for the average guy to get, but they're still a pleasure just to look at.
@user-ht1xu4gv2uКүн бұрын
Beaver Cleaver's Dad. WARD had this. Car in last season of. LEAVE IT TO BEAVER. Shown opening credits of them all getting in car a 4 door and then backing. Down. Driveway...
@waltstovall372Күн бұрын
Tacky Flag My Ass. You don't know what you're talking about!
@chupamgaitdkaza3122Күн бұрын
was this AI made? Why it showed a mclaren F1 car, when he mentioned the F1 Mclaren?
@atae7185Күн бұрын
Why is the general lee flag “tacky”?
@OG-ReJeXКүн бұрын
The Paint must still be a little wet 🤣
@michaeldose2041Күн бұрын
because woke
@terryschnereger8531Күн бұрын
I stopped watching as soon as he said that.
@bongodave13Күн бұрын
It's a symbol of racism and slavery.
@hknuutti8137Күн бұрын
It’s a random regiment battle flag of a defeated army. It wasn’t even a flag of the defeated nation. It represents nobody’s heritage, but racism and slavery. World wide. I hail from across the world and that is what it means. Here too, there. Everywhere. Having an orange charger with a pushbar makes you a badass. Having the flag, general lee callout and the numbers makes you a manchild.
@chuckcity82 күн бұрын
Dollar three hundred fifty
@Johnnywhamo2 күн бұрын
You LITERALLY don't know what the word LITERAL means.
@DaveSam13 күн бұрын
2012 GT350 is more powerful than newer model
@Flies2FLL3 күн бұрын
Stock, with the best engines, these could get into the 13's in a quarter mile. Barely~ These days a V6 Toyota Camry would give a Savoy a run for it's money. Let's not even get into modern muscle cars.....
@mr.josephcannon65503 күн бұрын
Learn what the word "literally" means.
@efandmk33823 күн бұрын
Chrysler products are always fun to drive. No argument there. They are also needy where maintenance is concerned, and usually uglier than hell.....until the late 1960s. Demons, Roadrunners, Chargers, etc. Remember those?
@ThatVideoGuyTom3 күн бұрын
Thumbnail says rapist
@michaeln73053 күн бұрын
Jay Leno Rapest?!
@jaycole26083 күн бұрын
that's what I saw
@Pengu1no_044 күн бұрын
imma make it on the list next time 🙏
@thomasj10264 күн бұрын
You missed a couple mustangs. 550hp 2012 shelby 2013 662hp shelby
@Riverdeepnwide4 күн бұрын
Literally?
@TheBFN4 күн бұрын
👿🔱😈... 335hp... laughable today but was prob crazy fast back in the day
@KeithCriswellКүн бұрын
it was laughable then, actually put out over 400hp
@Bbbbad724Күн бұрын
The CJ was 415 and the solid cam 427s ( a dealer installed) was 450-465. CJ tq was 470 and the 427 solid was 490-500.
@JamesWicker-ps4gq4 күн бұрын
Over sized trucks an saves that never gets used for what they were made for. Why can't us real people have big car's that we can use 😢
@-fuk575 күн бұрын
"Literally destroyed everyone on the road" implies that the car was responsible for multiple deaths. You know, "literally."
@georgecupac12025 күн бұрын
the manual is very nice.
@Macarena222795 күн бұрын
Learn what the term "literally" actually means,dumbbell!
@bmac12056 күн бұрын
worst vids made by dumb millennials that don't know squat.
@danmyers93726 күн бұрын
You flat out can’t compare the performance of cars from back in the day based on magazine test times. The magazines routinely super tuned some cars more than others and also routinely modified cars. The weather conditions on the days the cars were tested also make a huge difference. You also need to know the car options. Rear gearing? Auto vs 4 speed? Lastly who was driving the car? Some mags employed professional racers who obviously could get much better results than any magazine writer. And as far as that Cougar GTE I would bet most anything that the car was modified with slicks and open headers to run that ET.
@robertlee93958 күн бұрын
What a pathetic video. Try getting your facts correct, to some degree, before posting. I wish KZfaq would let people block crap posters!
@daveriley63108 күн бұрын
It's funny. I lived through that era, and the literal destruction of literally everyone on the road did not make the news.Or it is just possible that you don't have any idea of the meaning of the words literal or literally.
@lancasterritzyescargotdine26028 күн бұрын
You need to have been there to understand how despicably ugly both the 1961 and 1962 Plymouths and Dodges were!
@bertvosburg5589 күн бұрын
Had a 1960 Plymouth, "Suburban", Looked kind of like the black car in this video.Push button automatic on the left dash. Had a slant six super 270 c.i. (as opposed to a 225 c.i. slant six which was more common.)
@slimsantilli44769 күн бұрын
413s were mostly used in trucks and campers. The wiring harness and exhaust manifold were their downfall.
@johneckert13657 күн бұрын
WRONG. 413 was the biggest Chrysler car engine available for several years until the 426 & then 440 were introduced. The 413 was VERY common in cars through 1965, until the 440 was introduced in 1966. Yes, Industrial versions of the 413 were used through the mid 70's in trucks, motorhomes, forklifts, stationary power units like pumps & generators, and other industrial applications.
@shirleyrichard-qv9lw8 сағат бұрын
@@johneckert1365caterpillar 318 s ?
@johneckert13657 сағат бұрын
@@shirleyrichard-qv9lw Yes, 318's were also used in industrial applications, but I was addressing the claim regarding the 413.
@justanamerican902410 күн бұрын
Sorry, they were UGLY!
@justanamerican902410 күн бұрын
Now, the 1965 Fury . . . beautiful!
@markchapmon867010 күн бұрын
My dad bought a 1962 Plymouth station wagon with a 318 v8, automatic, and homely (by my tastebuds anyway) tan color. It was comfortable and carried our family on long distance vacations in comfort. I didn't care for the styling, but styling isn't the most important consideration when picking a car.
@Walkercolt110 күн бұрын
OH, the Valiant WAGON! Get the BIG 225 "Leaning Tower of Power"-even with a TorqueFlite, it's got more Ummph than a GM 250-ish or the Ford 260-ish straight six, and it uses LESS GAS! Yeah, you want a 3.55 or 3.77 rear end in the wagon, it's heavy for a little car, but ten years from now, sheet metal won't be falling off of it or if your in a wreck, you'll be GLAD it's heavier. The Chrysler engineers built an experimental 300-ish CID slant-six, but the extra displacement didn't give THAT much more power and the "New" A-318 V-8 got about the same fuel economy-not worth the effort. Yah, custom-built 225 can make 300+ HP, but not as a "grocery-getter". Compared to the Ford Falcon or even the MUCH better 1962 Chevy II wagon, the Plymouth was a MUCH better built, but more expensive car. The Dodge Dart wagon was in a class by itself in '62. Quieter, better ride and handling, the fold-down-side forward rear seat was FAR more comfortable than Ford or Chevy (or Pontiac Tempest) AND more rear leg-room than the Nash Rambler or Studebaker wagons. Falcons and Mercury Comets had worse front-ends than Corvairs! I drove ALL of them for delivery cars for photofinishing. The Study was VERY nice with that bullet-proof Continental straight 6, but it COST nearly $4 grand-Big Buick price! Nash was nice too, but too much money too. Driving 450-miles in a day in the Valiant didn't "beat you to death" like a Falcon or Comet with some miles on it. I REALLY WANTED to like the Tempest, but it had too many "quirks". The rear suspension disappeared at about 50-60K miles, it shook your teeth out and handled like a log truck.
@Hammydavis10 күн бұрын
Just like the news, there’s no fact checking you expect this to be honest and upfront So for the younger generation, he could probably pass this off as fact, but the ones that live this era know better
@gclarkbloomfield884810 күн бұрын
…hmm…couldn’t even locate a ‘62 Plymouth ad in the dozens of online archives…a head scratcher from the get go…what other “facts did you knuckleheads fudge on???
@craigford464110 күн бұрын
Stodgy ? Not for 1963 ! That Plymouth Sport Fury is 1 of the nicest styled cars I have ever seen ! Maybe the Author of this video should have his eyes checked ! 😅
@kcav537411 күн бұрын
I miss my old street car' I turned into a bracket racer. 1962 Plymouth Sport Fury 2 door, bought it with healthy but totally stock 440 w/ a push button 727 & a 3.91 posi. I paid a hefty price for it as I spent $300.00 on it ! 😅 (and I drove to a buddy's garage!) Then came the Direct Connection 2.84/484 Hemi Grind Hyd. cam and lifters, Wieand open plenum manifold, 850 Holley card, 440 dual point (Curved) distributor. I bought an old, good set of street headers for like $25.00 & then welded in some 2X3" boxed tubing for sub frame connectors, And I measured a few other cars to find a newer car that was within 1/2" of the interior & ordered a roll cage kit from Jegs I believe for a 68-69 Ford Torino/Fairlane. Had a friend Craig who owed me a paint job and he sprayed it a 1969 Ford pure white. Really did a bang up job in a short time! I really liked that car! I LOVE the body style of those cars...
@davegoldspink535411 күн бұрын
The best cop car I’ve ever seen here in Australia was a Cop special prepared 2017 HSV 6.2 litre supercharged Maloo Ute during a car chase. The stock Maloos at the time put out 480kw or 650hp so I could only imagine the power output of that cop special.
@mkernen11 күн бұрын
AI narration much?
@rexmasters154111 күн бұрын
BULLSHIT!!!! My 1969 428 CJ mustang never lost to a Cougar!!!! The Mustang is way lighter.
@splender8811 күн бұрын
These cars yes were fast with the Hemi but they were some ugly cars. Remember seeing these quite a bit when I was a kid since they were cheap so they were plentiful most of them probably had the Slant 6 in them.
@jamesmoore951111 күн бұрын
My 62 Plymouth Savoy (225 slant six) was great ! It was what the cops used here and it was wild to see who could drive at the city speed limit at 1:00 in the morning. - ex Shell Oil fleet car. Way off subject - I notice KZfaq has removed the thumbs up character but not the thumbs down ! Is this to stop positive reactions.
@wingman915412 күн бұрын
Whooping ?
@briangodfrey742412 күн бұрын
You don't think any V8 could get 20 MPG? Just how far back are you familiar with? Obviously not before pollution controls. I know this video is about Plymouths, but I had a '64 Olds Cutlass with the 330V8, 4 barrel Rochester carb and a 2-speed "Jet-Away" automatic transmission. All stock. We didn't usually worry about gas mileage before '73, but I did measure it on a road trip to eastern Oregon in summer of '74 and we got 23 MPG with 3 adults and luggage in the car. I remember it because I lost a bet with my Dad over it. (He was one of the three people on board.) So yes, a V8 can get over 20MPG. I also once hit 135 (odometer) with four college kids in the seats, one parrot in a large cage, and all of one of the guys' possessions in the trunk. Hard to figure how a car with only two gears could be that fast and economical. 2nd must have been really high, but I suppose some of the more technically oriented will know. (And I do know better now.)