Does the Racer 2 still have the same shape as the Racer 1 or did the toebox get more narrow?
@Murphy204318 сағат бұрын
It is at least as wide.
@barefootrunreview14 сағат бұрын
I never ran in the OG Racer, but from all accounts I've heard the racer 2 has the same fit as the original.
@Canaris22 сағат бұрын
What do they look like on feet?
@barefootrunreview14 сағат бұрын
Pretty decent. :) These are my go to casual/everyday shoe because they do seem to stick out as sporty shoes.
@small_strides23 сағат бұрын
Thanks for the review. I have 2 pairs of the Escalante 3s - those were the first Altras I owned. I actually enjoyed them.😅 I was considering getting the Racer 2, but based on this and your Escalante 4 reviews, I think I'll stick with 'real' minimal shoes. My current go-to is the Xero HFS II. I wear them for workouts, some easy runs and races. Ran my current HM PB on them. Any thoughts on which other Xero might make a good companion shoe? Also, requesting you to review some Xeros on your channel
@barefootrunreview22 сағат бұрын
@@small_strides if the Escalante 3's work, stick with them! You'll find the cheap right now. :) And as long as you're pairing them with some more minimal I think you have a perfect rotation. If you head over to my website barefootrunreview.com, you'll find reviews for nearly all Xero Shoe options. But I've not got videos yet, because this is all new for me. For me the Xero shoes Speed Force II is great. Very minimal, that true Xero shape and lighter than anything else. The HFS II didn't work too well for me, it seemed a little stiffer and more cushioned than the typical Xero options. But that's a personality thing. The prio Neo can be a nice compromise between the HFS II and Speed Force II. Anyway. Hopefully that helps. Let me know if you'd like to know anything else!
@RunnerdJKКүн бұрын
Any thoughts on Escalante 4 vs Magnifly 5?
@barefootrunreviewКүн бұрын
I've not personally tried the Magnifly 5, but I've tried ST's in the past, and Terraventure's. I'm really not a fan of the pronounced arch support they all had. From what I've heard that's true across the whole range. Because of that I decided not to review any more of their range. (I've only got so much time and money 😀 ) In generally, I noted that Topo's seemed to be a little wider in the midfoot, and had a little more depth than most Altra models. And the build quality seem to be better overall which I think would translate to a longer lasting shoe. I hope that helps a little! :)
@RunnerdJK21 сағат бұрын
@@barefootrunreview thanks!
@elvay6847Күн бұрын
You listening to music while making this video? No? Then take the ear buds....
@barefootrunreviewКүн бұрын
They have a directional microphone which yields better autdio quality than the phone microphone. They are a must for now.
@plastikmaidenКүн бұрын
What's your problem 😂
@ericplancke4382 күн бұрын
Très bonne revue , les miennes sont en commande... à suivre !
@barefootrunreview2 күн бұрын
Oh yeah! You'll enjoy them!
@user-xf4es7eh9y4 күн бұрын
This shoe uses Altras OG last, which is their widest one. But here's the thing. take the insole out and compare it to any normal running shoe like a NB or even a Hoka. It's the same. it's no wider than a normal running in 2E. Nevermind that NB and some Hokas come in 4E which is clearly wider than any Altra in the toes. And they don't need that "foot shape" gimmick. And yes, Altras tend to run tighter in the heel but it's the midfoot that gives most folks issues with these poorly designed shoes. Almost everyone I've seen try on an Altra has the lateral side of their midfoot and going to the pinky toe hanging off the side of the shoe. Because they aren't designed right. the quality has also gone down big time since they got bought by VFC. I say all this as someone that owns 3 current generation Altra shoes. So just to be clear, Altra has 3 lasts. the OG which is used in this and the Via Olympus for road shoes. then they have "standard" which a bit more narrow that comes on shoes like the Torin, etc. Then they have another one that comes on the riveras, etc. that's even thinner still. "Foot shaped" is a lie and a gimmick, most folks feet don't fit well in any of their shoes. Running shoe brands LOVE marketing and gimmicks. You get all the clown shoe aesthetic with no extra benefit over any other running shoe with a low drop. That's just the truth. I will say that Altra does generally do a really good job of making stable shoes at least. better than many brands. But. they clearly don't have the talent or resources of other bigger brands and it shows with al ot of the very poor decision they make. The next version of this shoe will prob have 28 mm stack based on how it's going. Anyone remember like not that long when 28 mm stack was considered like.. not very minimal, more like maximal? idk what else to say. I would say, they need to fix their durability issues. quit skimping on materials VFC. Fix some of their silly design choices, stop radically changing everything all the time, constantly adding stack to every model, making every model the same shoe with a few differences, etc. make the shoes ACTUALLY shaped like a foot.
@nept1232 күн бұрын
You are clearly delusional. Try finding a Hoka with a straight big toe
@lmbraga5 күн бұрын
What Altra have been doing with toe box size is strange. The Lone Peak and the Olympus are super spacious to the point my foot can slip around in there. The recent models of the Superior are so shallow what my toes catch on the upper. The Timp was the only one with a sensible toe box volume, if they're changing that one too I can't understand what's Altra's audience anymore. Super-spacious shoes for hikers and super shallow shoes for short-distance runners.... where are the Ultra runners gonna go? Topo Athletic? Too bad, because I always wished for a Vibram Timp.
@barefootrunreview5 күн бұрын
I tend to agree, but like you say, there are still options in the Altra lineup. I personally make most of these options work, but still my favourite is the Superior, even though it's shallow. A quick switch of the insoles makes it comfortable for me. Have you tried anything like this? Otherwise, I avoid Topo because of the pronounced arch support. I don't think it belongs in shoes of this kind.
@MilesLangley7 күн бұрын
I love the Lone Peak 8 on the trails. For my road shoe, The Torin 7 is okay (had to go up half a size). But I really want to try out this shoe as a road running alternative. Keen to hear your review for the Altra Escalante Racer 2.
@barefootrunreview7 күн бұрын
I think this would be a good pairing with the Lone Peak. The Escalante Racer may be a bit firm in comparison. But it's a great training tool either way. I love them.
@AllainPL9 күн бұрын
I just got those, but it looks like they are not wide enough for me. Also, from what i compared sizes 10 vs 11 they have the same insole width, so that's weird. Currently I'm waiting for the escalante racer 2, because according to runrepeat they should be wider. What is your experience? Also do you have any other WIDE recommendations?
@barefootrunreview9 күн бұрын
Which point of the shoe is not wide enough? I find the midfoot to be a bit snug. Just note that measuring via the insoles is not an accurate way of measuring the shoes, as they may use the same insole across different sizes. Maybe as you've found. Personally I've found the Escalante 4, and Escalante Racer 2 to be a very similar width, but with a bit more depth in the toe box. Overall, the sizing is similar, it's the feel where they differ the most. For wider options, I would suggest Bahe Revive, Lems Primal, but these are more minimal than the Escalante, so you'll have to decide if that works for you. I hope that helps!
@AllainPL9 күн бұрын
@@barefootrunreview For me it's the transverse arch / just before the toes start + my pinky really wants freedom. Thanks for the recommendation i will check the Lems, they somehow did not pop up on my radar. I hope it will not be too minimal :) As for the insoles, the length is different, it's the with that was the same. Maybe it changes for other sizes but the width on 10/11 looked the same Thanks for help!
@barefootrunreview9 күн бұрын
No worries.
@user-xf4es7eh9y4 күн бұрын
the data on that side is widely inaccurate all the time. you really can't trust much of what you read on there. i herd other folks say this and thought they were just being haters, but after doing some research i can see what they mean. the issue is that it's not all wrong, but you just don't know what is and what isnt. so be cautious about it. And yes, different sixes use the same insole, it usualy tells you right on the bottom of the insole which size range it's fot, also these shoes aren' that wide to begin with. Any similar NB in 2E is wider than these in the midfoot and just as wide in the toe. for instance. Even a 2E Hoka, when you compare the insoles, this altra which comes on their widest last, is no wider. actually the hoka had more room inside.
@barefootrunreview4 күн бұрын
@@user-xf4es7eh9y considering we've mentioned companies use the same insoles in different sizes means we can use insoles to compare the size of shoes as you've found. That being said. I understand what you mean by Altras not being wide. The question is. At what point are the shoes wide. If we're talking about the midfoot, they are not. If we're talking about the forefoot and toe box, then yes they are. A simple visual check will shoe you the difference in toe boxes when comparing with Hoks and New Balance like you mention. And that brings to the point that Foot Shape, does mean wide. It means more room in the toe box, and less taper on either side of the toes. You do not see that in conventional shoes like new balance and hoka. What do you think?
@alfredrobinson1849 күн бұрын
What insole do you suggest to get some more depth? I tried these and my true to size felt a bit snug. I tried sizing up and then they were too long.
@barefootrunreview9 күн бұрын
I usually say, any insole that you have hanging around. Most altra insoles are around 4mm thick, which is quite thick for a insole. I use some Xero Shoes insoles normally, and I know you can buy them directly from Xero Shoes if you need them. I hope that helps!
@zollox977 күн бұрын
In Altras I often just remove the insole altogether! Not sure if great for the shoe, but has worked great for me.
@barefootrunreview7 күн бұрын
@@zollox97 interesting. Because most of the foot beds in Altras are a rubberised tacky material, I've never tried them insole-less. I was worried about rubbing. What distances are you running in them?
@fransera6 күн бұрын
@@barefootrunreviewrunrepeat measurements have most of Altra near the 5.5mm mark. That's thick, I tried swapping out my Racer insole for more toe height but the ride changed somewhat with my thin insole from other minimalist shoes
@barefootrunreview6 күн бұрын
5.5mm! 😮 I've not measured them to be that thick, but they are thicker than most. I have found they, or the midsole doesn't pack out after 50km though, so sometimes it's worth pushing through. But for me. Fit comes first for sure!
@andreashjalmarsson988610 күн бұрын
Great review! Compared to Rivera 4, what's the big difference above the more stack in Rivera? For style, in your opinion which is more suitable for everyday wear, Escalante 3, 4 or Rivera 4?
@barefootrunreview9 күн бұрын
The main difference between the Escalante and the Rivera is the fit. The Rivera's more narrow, and "fitted". The upper on the Escalante is more flexible and wider in the toe box. For casual I'd love to recommend minimal shoes. :) but if you still need some cushion, the Escalante 4 is a good choice.
@davidroberts181615 күн бұрын
Just ran in them luv em , my knee which had been a bit sore was fine
@barefootrunreview15 күн бұрын
That's great! Glad to be heading it!
@hood4thought69918 күн бұрын
i have printed out the template for the size 13 even though i am normally a mens 10.5 or 11, they are nowhere near as wide as I thought they would be
@barefootrunreview18 күн бұрын
At what point are you measuring 11.4cm? Looking at your measurements, you have a similar length to me, but an extra cm on the width which does make your feet relatively wide. I can't imagine many brands working great, sorry. What shoes do you use right now?
@hood4thought69918 күн бұрын
@@barefootrunreview thank you for your response. I currently wear RealFoot Natural Runner 2 - it would be dope if you review these! I also wear SoftStar Primal Runamoc. I do have a pair of Altra Escalante Racers in 10.5 that I wear during the winter with a couple of wool socks. I thought since I could wear those, that these would fit pretty well. How does the width for the bahe revive compare with the escalante racers?
@barefootrunreview18 күн бұрын
@@hood4thought699 realfoot + softstars completely make sense! But I'm surprised by the Escalante Racers. I even find them snug in the midfoot. Still runnable, but not perfect. I would say the Bahe's are wider than Escalante Racers, and for sure deeper.
@hood4thought69918 күн бұрын
why did i just find this channel? Awesome reviews! I am very interested in this shoe but not sure what size to get for my 26.5 x 11.4 splay feet
@hiatsini20 күн бұрын
Awesome review
@CptAngelKGaming26 күн бұрын
It's unforgivable for the biggest barefoot company to make shoes that prevent outer toe splay. That should be the end of that discussion. It literally prevents you from having healthy feet. I get that they fit some people but most people struggle. Their shallow depth is also a problem. Why should so many people have to be forced to use them without the insole? Maybe you want it there, especially in the winter that you need to keep your feet warm. Plus it makes them duck beak shaped which looks goofy. They have the best designs and the best technologies, but the terrible last they use ruins both their looks and usability. But why even bother with those when the Mesa Trail is 100 times more comfortable, lighter, more flexible and cheaper.
@barefootrunreview18 күн бұрын
To counter that argument, I know many people that can't use the Mesa Trail because there's too much depth, and need a shallower shoe (hence the Primus Trail works). We've got to remember there are differently shaped feet and ankles out there, and that may even change over time (as we build foot strength + gain/loose fat). It's all about finding the shoe that fits you right. If that's the Mesa Trail II (like me), awesome! But it may not work for everyone.
@lightningspike445227 күн бұрын
So I printed out the size chart and size eu43 fit my forefoot and toes the best but it has 20mm extra in the front, do you think that is too much?
@barefootrunreview27 күн бұрын
20mm seems on the large side, but fit is not all about length. If I were to go on the length only, dropping a size would reduce that 20mm to around 12mm, which sounds better. But if that doesn't fit your width, then it'll never work. My advice would be to order EU42, test it for size, and if you have issues return it for the EU43. Bahe have a 30-day return policy.
@mistersmith3986Ай бұрын
I tried these on today at REI. They feel better than my Olympus 5 Low Hike GTX. The toe box is higher, the cushion is perfect, the uppers are flexible and well ventilated. I mainly use Topo Athletics, but also have a few Altras. I'm thinking of adding a pair of these to my life. Thanx for the video my Brother 👍
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
That's awesome! I'm glad you like them!
@DaveDEF82Ай бұрын
The fact that it is so much cheaper than Vivobarefoot is reason enough to give them a try.
@slavasss2189Ай бұрын
On feet footage??
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
I'm not that great yet. :p One day!
@TaziodАй бұрын
I wear a vivo barefoot current in a size 40m which is quite a size down, and yet I still have about 1.5cm of room infront of my toes. I've gotten used to it at this point, but what size of these would you recommend in that case? Or any sizing for alternative versatile barefoot shoes
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
Which Vivobarefoot model do you use?
@urlauber2884Ай бұрын
As someone who owned them before, this is a very good overview of the shoe. I would like to add that the crease at the flex point varies from shoe to shoe. In my first pair it was so painful I had to return them, but the replacement was good out of the box. Just something to keep in mind. Oh yeah and the glue they use is absolute shit. The sole separated from all my Vivo's pretty much immediately (only at the flex point). It doesn't impact the performance of the shoes but at that price point, it's a little disappointing.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
All super useful things to know. Thanks for sharing!
@davidr717Ай бұрын
Thanks, Nick! Looking forward to hearing your thoughts on the escalante 4 and racer 2.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
I can't wait to try them. It just takes a while for things to ship to NZ :)
@DevelopingNLАй бұрын
TY so much for focusing on depth 😊
@mthuthuzelimsobantu5546Ай бұрын
Shallow forefoot volume has always been a bugbear of mine with Altras, it forced me to wide fit HOKAs -Arahi & Bondi. They've fixed the volume with the later Olympus versions. Great review.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
Agreed. The only one I've found to be deep is the Lone Peak. Ironically that's too deep for me and ends up in a sloppy fit. :)
@annerose5401Ай бұрын
Great detailed review thanks
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@an.20.24Ай бұрын
Can you use them just for walking/hiking on trails or do you think they're purely made for running? Thank you!
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
Yeah, you sure can use them for walking! In fact they're likely a better hiking shoe than a running shoe due to their minimal make up. When you're walking you can be more mindful about foot placement etc.
@an.20.24Ай бұрын
@@barefootrunreview Thank you. Have ever tried the Scrambler low? What do you think about them?
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
@@an.20.24 yeah reviewed them over on my website, and I raced a 100km them. They're not as minimal as the Mesa Trail and a lot less flexible. But if you're moving over a longer distance, or if you need more protection, they're a good option. They fit fairly similarly.
@an.20.24Ай бұрын
@@barefootrunreview Thanks a lot. Considering I usually walk with the Prio from Xero, I think I'm going to buy the Mesa. Thanks.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
@@an.20.24 that makes sense to me. You'll like theM I'm sure.
@WalksOfWonder-BCАй бұрын
Mesa Trail 2 still a better trail shoe, in my opinion. I’ll always grab my Xero’s when doing harder trails, although the Vivo’s are still adequate.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
Yeah, they both have their place. The extra protection the Primus Trails provide is nice.
@anniwilson2534Ай бұрын
I’ve the WP version of this shoe and wasn’t impressed at all - exceptionally stiff sole, the upper feels rigid and plasticky. Sizing was also way out - had to go up 2 whole sizes as it was so small. The only decent thing was the tread! I’ll stick to my Vivos and VFFs.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
😁 Pretty much the complete opposite to all of my conclusions, but hey, everyones different.
@CptAngelADVlogsАй бұрын
Amazing review. Barefoot trail shoe reviews are so rare, especially from people that actually use them in trails. So all that sole wear is from trails? That's crazy to me. Must be some very hard surfaces. If I didn't know any better I'd think it's a result of running on pavement.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
For the first 500km it was 100% trail. Now I don't mind doing "door-to-trail" runs in them, meaning there's some road running but still very little. It always depends on the trails you use them on, some hard packed and rocky trails can be just as hard wearing on shoes as roads can be. But if you're constantly in mud, you'll have a different experience.
@kurtz2718Ай бұрын
Hi Nick ! thank you for this review, I actually have high rise foot and was worried about timp5 will be uncomfortable, where do you recommend to get 2mm insoles?
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
Sure thing! I used some old Inov8 insoles I had hanging around. You could also try the Vivo insoles you have already. But if you're looking to buy some, I know Xero Shoes sell their insoles which around around 2-3mm thick. xeroshoes.com/shop/extras/replacement-insoles/
@zelarekaАй бұрын
its narrow, my feet know
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
:) there's nuance. Where do you find them narrow?
@zelarekaАй бұрын
@@barefootrunreview PINKY TOE
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
@@zelareka makes sense. If you have a wider little toe splay, it'll cause issues.
@zelarekaАй бұрын
@@barefootrunreview no issues with xero though
@chrisbates8943Ай бұрын
Great review.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
Awesome. Thanks 😊
@z0uLess2 ай бұрын
So far, only got the Primus Lite III, but I am of the opinion that the durability makes them worth the price. I think they have some policy where you can return your worn out pair and get 20% of the cost back. I just ordered Ra III on revivo, which is where you can buy used and repaired ones for a lower price. I am expecting the leather Ra III to last a really long time, since I allready have wax to treat the leather every now and then to make sure it does not dry out.
@barefootrunreview2 ай бұрын
All great points! I like revivo, especially when you're trying to find older models that aren't sold any more. I hope the RA III works out for you!
@sherg56132 ай бұрын
Great video, thank you! Two things. 1. Would you recommend the Mesa Trail WP for muddy conditions? Have you ran in Mesa Trail WP? 2. Can you speak louder in your future videos? I could only hear you at max volume. Thank you
@barefootrunreview2 ай бұрын
I've not used/run in the WP version, but personally, I never go for WP shoe options. Instead, I get wet feet and rely on the shoe's water drainage to remove excess water-which the Mesa Trail II does really well! I know that's not for everyone. But it's something to consider. Apologies for the audio quality. I'll continue improving.
@Alexander_Offshore2 ай бұрын
Man, I ordered a pair, tried them on and loved the feel! BUT they did rub against my ankle, due to my pronation I guess. Had to return them, what a bummer. Do not have this issue with my Superior 5, Escalante 2,5 or the Lone Peak 8.
@barefootrunreview2 ай бұрын
Oh interesting. That's good for others to know! What are you looking to try instead?
@Alexander_Offshore2 ай бұрын
Well I’ll stick with the Lone Peak 8’s great shoes. Have a pair of Altra Vanish Tempo on order, for longer road-days. But the Eascalante 2,5 are awesome as well
@ThomasSimpson2 ай бұрын
The volume is so small especially on the midfoot. I have swapped the insole and it is still extremely tight.
@barefootrunreview2 ай бұрын
Fair comment. We're all individual. What shoes do you find fits the volume of your foot best?
@stevenshorten61842 ай бұрын
What size are your feet?
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
I tend to go for US9 in most Altra shoes and the length of my foot is 26.7cm.
@FDNRunningandMotivation-ws1hd2 ай бұрын
On point with the midfoot, too narrow.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
The outer edge of the midfoot. My foot over hangs the base of the shoe a little.
@FDNRunningandMotivation-ws1hd2 ай бұрын
Definitely NOT worth it. The regular Mont Blanc is better and also faster, the only use for the carbon plate is as a rock plate
@FDNRunningandMotivation-ws1hd2 ай бұрын
Btw, the old MB heel was just perfect for me
@nicknamewinder2 ай бұрын
@@FDNRunningandMotivation-ws1hdyeah interesting. I think the consensus was that it was poor. But at the same time. It's awesome that it worked for you!
@stevenshorten61842 ай бұрын
The carbon plate acts to evenly disperse the weight of the foot into the lower foam as a primary function. The rock plate feature is secondary.
@shougo44532 ай бұрын
I agree the OG MB was a great trailrunner..🏃♂🏃♂🏃♂
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
It seemed to split the community then!? :)
@daven.76852 ай бұрын
How well do they drain and dry after a dunk in a stream? Thanks.
@barefootrunreview2 ай бұрын
Very well. I did many stream/river crossing yesterday and was still happy running in them. The materials are minimal so it doesn't hold on to too much water. An alternative, more focused towards water sports is the Xero Shoes Aqua X Sport. Which is very similar in construction, and more cut down. But for running, I'd stick with the Mesa Trail II.
@daven.76852 ай бұрын
@@barefootrunreview Thank you!
@badspinbowling2 ай бұрын
Where did you get the thinner insole from? Great review btw
@barefootrunreview2 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot! I used some old Inov8 insoles I had hanging around. But you could use any others you may have hanging around. Otherwise if you're looking to buy some, I know Xero Shoes sell their insoles which around around 2-3mm thick. xeroshoes.com/shop/extras/replacement-insoles/
@Alexander_Offshore2 ай бұрын
Please do an Altra Superior video (and maby the Escalante racer!) You have a new subscriber from Sweden
@barefootrunreview2 ай бұрын
Sure thing! I love the superior, but just haven't got round to doing the video review yet. You can check out barefootrunreview.com for a written review though. :)
@DevelopingNL3 ай бұрын
Which size do you use in relation to foot length?
@barefootrunreview3 ай бұрын
:) Foot length 26.7cm and I use US9. One of the only real true to size Xero I know of. Or maybe it's me. :)
@DevelopingNL3 ай бұрын
Do you think the Scrambler Low is wider or faster?
@barefootrunreview3 ай бұрын
I don't think it's any wider, and I have had some reports that the Scrambler Low midsole shape is uncomfortable for those with flatter feet, it causes pressure under the arch. That said the soft upper material make it very forgiving in fit, because in depth and width. I'd say you can run a little faster in the Scrambler Low because it has more protection underfoot, the draw back being less ground feel. It all depends on the goals for that run.
@alexm2873Ай бұрын
I have overpronation and find that my stability is noticeably worse in the scrambler low. You are higher up in that shoe, so it exacerbates any collapsing. The mesa trails have been incredible, they just won't protect you like that Michelin sole will.
@barefootrunreviewАй бұрын
@@alexm2873 Thanks for adding context. Always good to share experiences!
@fraac3 ай бұрын
agreed, great shoe. i haven't done a 50k in it though!
@barefootrunreview3 ай бұрын
Maybe one day? :)
@idontshakehands3 ай бұрын
Where do you find a plain 2mm insole?
@barefootrunreview3 ай бұрын
I used some old Inov8 insoles I had hanging around. If you're looking to buy some, I know Xero Shoes sell their insoles which around around 2-3mm thick. xeroshoes.com/shop/extras/replacement-insoles/
@peterbedford26103 ай бұрын
Try Topo. Much more durable and great fit for wide feet with an arch
@barefootrunreview3 ай бұрын
Arh yeah. I've tried Topo many times, but I can never get over the arch support. I don't think it's a great idea from a foot health perspective, and it feels uncomfortable to me. Because of that, I decided not to review them any more.
@aurorasurrealis10323 ай бұрын
Topo really limits foot movement the arch support gets really uncomfortable as soon as you yourself develop a strong arch imo.
@barefootrunreview3 ай бұрын
@@aurorasurrealis1032 I second that!
@cedric_v29 күн бұрын
@@barefootrunreview Same here, really want to love them. They have awesome build quality but cant get over the arch support. Tried a couple of them now
@barefootrunreview29 күн бұрын
@@cedric_v sadly it doesn't look like it's changing any time soon either. 😕
@Dan_South3 ай бұрын
Hey man, Great review! I also like minimalist shoes. I've got over two thousand miles on my vivo primus lites. I just picked up the timp after I saw your review and because I've used almost every timp model ever made. Can I just ask what insoles you put into the shoes? I would love to do the same. I've always looked for thinner insoles but never purchased them. Thanks!
@barefootrunreview3 ай бұрын
Sure thing! I used some old Inov8 insoles I had hanging around. You could also try the Vivo insoles you have already. But if you're looking to buy some, I know Xero Shoes sell their insoles which around around 2-3mm thick. xeroshoes.com/shop/extras/replacement-insoles/