Nobody is taking Harry Potter from us and the next generations! Let them experience the Magic! :D

To be fair voldemort wasn't a person at that stage, as he even says himself "see wat i must do to survive, live off another, a mere parasite". With that in mind they nailed it, because he doesn't look human, he looks demonic, like the sort of entity that will use you up and abandon you when you are no longer useful, which is exactly what he did to quirrel.

Hang in there & keep up the good work! Rowling is absolutely right and Watson and Radcliffe are idiots!

here is part of reason why fantastic beasts failed ... she removed Johnny Depp from the role of grindewald or however it's spells

Time for a Harry Potter marathon!

They can't reply logically so they do shenanigans instead

Actors should not be afraid to support JK Rowling.

Chris Columbus was the perfect director to kick off the initial phase of Harry Potter. He has an astounding adventurous vision to his films with a young, whimsical touch to them thats perfect for Harry Potter's first couple of years. I wish they would have planned directors to handle a couple of films at a time and have the fist director meet with the next director to explain his vision and little cues and seeds that hes planted. Chris Columbus did the first 2 films, Alfonso Cuaron directed the third, Mike Newell did the fourth and then David Yates finished the rest of the series. Columbus nailed the feeling and stories of the first 2 films, and then it perfectly switched to a slightly darker, yet still whimsy film in Prisoner of Azkaban. Alfonso kept the same magical feeling Columbus had instilled in the world, yet the story was getting darker as Voldemort was beginning his comeback and the film reflected that. It was just a phenomenal transition and worked so flawlessly. Had Alfonso directed the 4th film as well, it would have been much more amazing. Mike Newell did an amazing job as director, everyone loved him on set. The problem was that his vision didnt fit the story that needed to be told and felt like a deviation from the ground work of the previous films. Goblet wasnt terrible, it was just a misfire and didnt fit perfectly. We needed a circular puzzle piece and Mike Newell gave us an oval shaped puzzle piece. It fit the overall narrative, but the general structure of the film was just not right. It went darker then Prisoner, and really showed us that we are no longer watching Harry Potter having childish adventures, he had to grow up and do it fast. Then David Yates absolutely NAILED Order. It went even darker and turned one of the WORST BOOKS into one of the BEST FILMS in the series! He understood the source material, seen the groundwork of the previous directors and cut everything that didnt work and add to a cohesive film, while keeping and even highlighting the things that worked in the film.

There should be a movie about the creation of Hogwarts. It would be interesting to watch.

You can love the art and not like the personal opinions of the artist.

I have met people who bought second hand copies of Hogwarts Legacy to avoid giving J K Rowling any money 😂 They preached about how disgusted they are by what she has said and done but then they still cave into playing Hogwarts Legacy and she still got the other person’s money who originally bought the game in the first place so beats the whole purpose of boycotting it. Hard to take people like that seriously 😂🤣

2:03 into your video, and you just explained everything that you don’t seem to understand. JKR created a piece of fiction that taught a generation the power of love and standing up to hate. Then you are surprised that people are angry when JK herself spews evil and hatred into the world? That response is not “cancel culture” it is brave individuals doing exactly what Harry Potter taught them to do and stand up to Evil.

Quite sad how barely anyone Here is able to have a proper Talk Abt this. Especially now that jk has openly claimed that trans people werent k*lled and targeted during the Holoc*ust. This is who you are blindly supporting, this is not only Abt womens rights anymore.

Well, i really don't care so much about computer graphics (CGI) i think the practical department did a superior job in creating the atmosphere of the wizarding world of Harry Potter and capturing its essence, so that's what has always captivating me the most. So to me, they remain intact. So intact that i always suspend my disbelief when the CGI comes. 🧹✨

I remember this movie back in the day. I feel old, was nine years old when it came out.

This is becoming a Death Eater channel lol congratulations on coming out as a conservative. It’s always good to be honest about where you stand.

Here is a semi-serious HP movie idea. Since Harry doesn't use the Elder wand nor use it to fix his Hawthorne Wand. Maybe the Malfoys present Voldemort's wand to Harry. (Movie only) the Malfoys world of heard about Harry defeating Voldemort for good. And May want to leave there Death Eater connections behind. Plus Harry has helped them. So Draco could in theory. Give Harry Voldemort Wand. But more likely. Harry just uses Draco's wand for the rest of his life. Still like the idea of Harry redeeming Voldemort's wand though.

After a “nervous breakdown” this movie on continued replay was the only way I could sleep. I owe my health to this s movie---DO NOT EVER CHANGE IT!

It's perfectly fine if a movie from 2001 looks and feels like it was made in 2001. I read the first three books in 1999, and as an imaginative young teenager had my own mental idea of what the characters and setting looked like. I remember being disappointed in the movie because everything looked and felt different than it did in my head. That, along with the fact that everything felt rushed compared to the pace of the book, and what I saw as annoying changes or omissions, caused me to not really like the movies all that much. But these days I have come to see their value: like you said they got so many people to read the books and Harry Potter is probably 10x the size it would be without the movies.

The cgi is not nearly as bad as your lack of understanding of what was and wasn't cgi. Most of the scenes you highlighted you had paused when the motion blur was the most extreme. And voldemort is supposed to look how he did.

You forgot The Chronicles of Narnia and Percy Jackson.

1:13 Ice cream truck? No, that was a Ford Anglia, remember?

-If Nagini had not been destroyed, would it have been possible for her to die a natural death despite being a horcux? -If so, would her natural death have been enough to destroy the piece of Voldemort's soul within her?

It's really not that deep. J. K. Rowling is a spiteful, vindictive person, who excels at creating spiteful, vindictive characters. She feels it's totally credible that someone would harbor a grudge from childhood and mistreat an innocent child for something their *dead* parent did. She got upset that the series audiobook reader wasn't sufficiently awed by her genius, so she deliberately included the word "pocketed" in every subsequent book once she learned that he struggled to pronounce it. JKR has raised pettiness to an art form. But in truth, Harry's abuse has less to do with Petunia's characterization than Rowling's need to highlight the Cinderella aspect of the plot. It's a revenge fantasy for kids. It also establishes Harry's near-saintly ability to overcome adversity by choosing to be a hero. The fact that this leaves Petunia a contradictory and undefined character doesn't matter; she's a plot device rather than a person. Consider this: Petunia and Vernon are portrayed as being obsessed by how others view them, but they ignore Dudley's extreme obesity and poor school performance until forced to act. This is in complete contrast to their purported goals and motivations. They also dress their nephew in ill-fitting hand-me-down clothes, something that makes them look like horrible people. They also tell terrible stories about what a delinquent Harry is, despite the fact that this would make others think less of them. I repeat: This makes no sense within the internal logic of the story. But if you want to exclude JKR's later additions to the lore and analyze the story from a death-of-the-author standpoint, the only solution that makes sense is that Dumbledore put a spell on the Dursleys to make them abuse Harry, as part of Albus's master plan to raise Harry "like a lamb for the slaughter". He needed to have Harry think of Hogwarts as his true home so he'd be willing to die to save it. He also wanted to make sure Harry didn't get a "swelled head", because if he did he might reject his role of Willing Sacrifice. Remember, Dumbledore was getting regular reports from Arabella Figg, so he knew at least in broad outline how Harry was being treated. We can only conclude that Dumbles was 100% okay with his treatment. His eleventh hour scolding of the Dursleys was mere window-dressing, to make Harry *think* Albus cared about him.

I remember anticipatingly waiting for this tobe released in the cinemas back in 2001. I remember seeing all the different posters they had with very little information on them yet I was entranced by them. When it was finally released I decided to go and see it about a week after its initial release date rather than get caught in the crush (this is what I do whenever a new movie is released that I really want to see). Then when I heard about the next one I knew I had to go see that too. This was when I realized they were also a book series so I started getting those before the release of Prisoner of Azkaban. I also remember when I purchased the Philosophers Stone on VHS back then that it also came with a deck of cards and the Prisoner of Azkaban movie a lego Knight Bus.

It's cool back in the day I moved on

It was cgi in 2001 they were using computers programs to make the magic happen there was no real magic involved so it's all fake for your entertainment there is no real magic in Harry Potter all computers nobody had real magic powers in the whole franchise it looked good on the film but you know what computers can do a lot of stuff computers have been around for quite some time since 1996 you know we always had the technology pretty much down by the time Harry Potter came out it is CGI it is not real casting a spells it's all purely entertainment purposes of a computer program and that's it so for all of those out there that thought they were actually doing magic know it was all computer programs apart from the acting that was the only thing that was real

Harry Potter is for kids nobody cares anymore

Harry Potter was a long time ago people need to move to come up with something new quit relieving Harry Potter it's pointless it goes nowhere I was a fan back in the day not anymore and Harry Potter isn't everything theres more in this world then Harry Potter grow up stop living in the past

Harry Potter was good but things must come to a end nothing last forever move on

Great Video!!!!!

If only they showed the weasley twins pranking him and voldemort with snowballs in the movie that would have been funny😅

The original Voldemort on Quirrel was awesome! They said it was too scary tho

You forgot that she lured umbridge to the centaurs in times like this I sometimes think she could even have been a slytherin 😅

Stop using ChatGPT to write your scripts.

No, silence is not ignorance. It's self preservation . Unfortunately it seems that youu can't voice an opinion or fact without getting backlash. I agree with her 100% . Please don't crucify me me for what I 'm about to say: though it's said that none of them would speak to her ever again but J.K knows her own worth and she doesn't need people prone to backstab others just like that. She had gone through so much already .

Small thing but I would like them to rename the first American Harry Potter movie to "The Philosopher's Stone". I think other films have dialogue where the kids say "The Philosopher's Stone"...so I don't think it'll be a huge fix.

Lol I actually thought voldy was the best CGI tbh

where can i watch the behind the scenes of the harry potter movies? is it avaiable at Max?

SIRIUUUUUUUUUS THE BEST CHARACTER 😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭😭🖤🖤🖤

I won’t even talk about Harry Potter much in Facebook because of how nasty some people are.

The only thing I miss from the first Harry Potter film is Richard Harris' Dumbledore. It was pitch perfect casting, but he didn't live long enough for the franchise's evolution to the end. We had him then we lost him; just bad luck for us Harry Potter fans. He was a warmhearted wizard with a heart of gold and colored robes. Michael Gambon's Dumbledore, on the other hand, was too blunt and emotional, wore gray robes. Even though they're different in their own way, I give kudos to both actors.

The Harry Potter movie series were created in the best era of film making (early 2000s), because they used more practical special FX rather than CGI like Marvel. It belongs to a film making museum, cause it was ahead of its time.

I love the first movie, and I think it is weird to remake the movies especially after spending a billion dollars on a theme park based on the old movies. Are they going to start selling merch for both versions? I would love a version of the movies that follows the books more closely.

I could never watch the first film all the way through because I was terrified of Voldemorts face. Took me till I was 13 to watch it all the way through without getting chills. Still gives me slight chills now at 26

I will never forget how the introduction music made me feel when I first watched it. It's music etched into soul

If it’s not broken then don’t fix it

Reading the books gives my imagination more leeway than being fed someone else's vision apart from suggestions. Timelessness is the feature and the setting can be anything and anywhere in the world.

*Sorcerer's Stone

I say it should be left alone