Rezun says "wet" when he means to say "that" or "those." Took me a while to catch on.
@Bialy_1Ай бұрын
Yea, catching on fast is just not your thing...
@laps42413 ай бұрын
Wowwww😎🤣🤘
@johnarose33054 ай бұрын
Seems obvious that Stalin had planned to invade Germany
@mitchrichards15323 ай бұрын
Only if you buy the BS narrative this guy is selling and don't bother to read up on the criticism his claims have received. When you peel the onion on this, it seems obvious that he's full of it.
@user-wj6dt5bq3w28 күн бұрын
@@mitchrichards1532 No, it seems obvious you still haven't done the proper research that Russian historians have on the subject: Mikhail Meltyukhov, Boris Sokolov, Mark Solonin, Constantine Pleshakov, etc. Lose the David Glantz worship and discover the greater depth of information out there.
@mitchrichards153228 күн бұрын
@@user-wj6dt5bq3w Sure, I call your BS. Name one major aspect of their research that Glantz, House, Stahel, etc. did NOT cover. So far all you've done is make accusations without explanation or depth and then just hide behind names. How about YOU offer some facts? You claim to have read these authors, and that they have greater insight on the topic, so go ahead and quote something, anything... Otherwise, it's just BS, which is more or less what I expect anyways.
@user-wj6dt5bq3w28 күн бұрын
@@mitchrichards1532Mikhail Meltyukhov explains that the first Soviet plan to attack Germany was created in October 1939. There's a documentary on youtube that features Meltyukov and Solonin. Its easy to find. Go watch it. I'm not going to explain entire books to you that you should have already read. Glantz, House, and Stahel don't even discuss the many Soviet plans to attack Germany before Barbarossa was launched.
@mitchrichards153228 күн бұрын
@@user-wj6dt5bq3w Plans do not equal preparations or even intent. I have personally been part of 4 different planning efforts and warfighter simulations to face the Russians over the Suwalki Gap scenario. Its a f'ing Staff Exercise that does NOT equal intent. Its what Staff Officers do and how they train, develop skills, etc. Glantz, House, etc. DID cover exactly that topic and you cannot extrapolate those plans out to intent, actual preparation, etc. You have to understand what you're looking at. Planner's plan, Staff Officers conduct staff exercises, etc., that's how they train. Soviet MP-41, and DP-41 were NOT invasion plans and there were no plans in 1939 or 1940 that were realistic or acted upon. I suggest YOU read Glantz instead if beating the drum of Russian Historians and not knowing what it is you are criticizing. The fact remains that the Soviet forces as they were manned, equipped, and arrayed in June of 1941 were not capable of strategic attack. Thats irrefutable fact. Those formations were found by the Germans to be too untrained, underequipped, poorly led, and understrength to effectively execute major operations of any kind, defensive or offensive. That is why Barbarossa went the way it did.
@hazimeyumer73234 ай бұрын
Superrrr😂
@aranos62695 ай бұрын
Lenin/ stalin aim to take all Europe in wwii was mentioned as a fact in communist schools in eastern Europe. I remember all that. Of course they never mentioned stalin Hitler pact or 1939 soviet war on Poland.
@KampfgruppeDirleganger5 ай бұрын
41:20 Suvorov predicting the future
@user-bs4hp3cq9v6 ай бұрын
Do you guys think that the 1st echelon has been held back. And the war against Ukraine is actually the 2nd Echelon?
@Bialy_1Ай бұрын
Putin was played like a little boy... they feed him with 100% wrong intel via FSB and Ukraine was pretending that they did not prepared anything even after the invasion allready started. They want Russia to bleed out and they are failing for it again... they never learn.
@shaiaheyes2c416 ай бұрын
41:14 ''Can you imagine if Comrade Putin now will take one million people from a prison, give them kalashnikovs and move them to the border of somebody?''........YES.
@user-bs4hp3cq9v6 ай бұрын
Yes. Putin has said that the greatest tradegy of 20th century was the collapse of the USSR. The whole power structure in Russia unchanged. No purge of the Intelligence Services of Russia after the "collapse" of USSR. It was a staged, managed restructuring. Same policy, same organizational goals. Unbroken.
@user-bs4hp3cq9v6 ай бұрын
Is this the full lecture?
@jdjones48257 ай бұрын
4:55 😂
@marcusmartinez64308 ай бұрын
Very good content! Thank you for sharing this recipe.
@angelinevandieman16859 ай бұрын
Thank u for ur recipe. Ostrich steaks is so nice and it's mostly a meat we likes on a Saturday afternoon. Have to make it tomorrow with u'r recipe 😊
@1234vison9 ай бұрын
Много ми хареса!
@harjotsinghmahal71110 ай бұрын
Wowww Bon Joviiii Bulgaria verry Good 🔥😎🤘
@user-fx3hi3qb9l10 ай бұрын
Xaxaax super 😁❤️😜👍
@vylkanvylkanov653110 ай бұрын
И през 2023 г. kzfaq.info/get/bejne/odCenJud3dHbiWQ.html
@TheAshCooper10 ай бұрын
Cooking this for the first time tonight. I'll be using this for referance. Thanks for your service.
@dpause10 Жыл бұрын
41:15 "Can you image if Comrade Putin will take 1 million people from prisons, give them Kalashnikovs and move them to border of somebody..." prescient comments indeed!
@BartBart224 ай бұрын
Putin via Wagner put less than 30,000 prisoners in uniform. Get your head out of your ass Mr Dunning Kruger.
@darthbigred22 Жыл бұрын
I see people try to debunk him but this is obviously right, it's the core communistic belief anyways. Now you could argue Stalin might have thought he was about to send his armies over the line to help the Germans, after all socialists are just waiting to become communists but either way clearly Russia was planning on a war.
@seanwieland9763 Жыл бұрын
17:43 “Plain, simple Garak…” 😂
@rhysnichols8608 Жыл бұрын
Polish leadership has been secretly obsessed with rebuilding the polish Lithuanian commonwealth. They swallowed up territory of their own in Ukraine, Czechoslovakia, Russia Germany and Lithuania between 1919 and 1939. Even today Poland and Lithuania are proposing an intervention in western Ukraine in the on going war. Poles have a strong russophobic psychology which has no place in the 21st century. Russia has done many many bad things to Poland over the last century and more, but things have changed in the last 40 years. Poland has always been a trouble maker since 1775. They have some blame for the 1939 conflict too.
@floycewhite69913 ай бұрын
Foolish to trust small powers. They always want to play the great powers against one another to get more for themselves.
@rhysnichols8608 Жыл бұрын
I don’t agree with his thesis that Germany and the soviets were essentially the same, there were glaring differences between them ideologically and culturally. However overall I agree with his points
@johndenugent418511 ай бұрын
Hitler was extremely popular with 90% of Germans by 1940 -- and Stalin ruled by unheard-of levels of fear, torture and murder. Hitler had "only" 10,000 political prisoners by 1938; Stalin millions.
@rhysnichols860811 ай бұрын
@@johndenugent4185 quite right, the regime with the far bigger kill count at the start of the war was Soviet Union. When the western allies declared war on Germany, the regime at about 0.1% the dead total as Stalin did, yet when this far more monstrous regime (from a 1939 perspective) also invaded Poland a blind eye was turned. Clearly ‘stopping tyranny’ wasn’t actually the motivation of the allies.
@Bialy_1Ай бұрын
@@johndenugent4185 In 1938 Hitler got a model of New Warsaw based on 10% of the population of old Warsaw. The main difference is that he wrote a book with his plan and Stalin was better at pretending that he is the good guy. Germans in 1938 were not even pretending that they are the "good guys" that was invented after the war, just like the story that they did not know about anything when there was 10 millions of copies of the plan for everything! Also during Night of Broken Glass 9-10 November 1938 few times more people than 10,000 were arrested... Where are you people getting all that fake data from?!
@Alexandros.Mograine Жыл бұрын
People who think japan started it dont know that asia isnt the whole world :D reason it started in 39 is because by then there was huge wars in 3 continents.
@Bialy_1Ай бұрын
Germany signed anty comintern pact with Japan and the next move by them was to sign Ribbentrop-Molotov pact and split 50/50 Japan ally with COMINTERN and who Germany helped to destroy? Literally the only country that at that time did anything to stop Bolsheviks...
@galrod64 Жыл бұрын
So this man claims that Stalin had plans to invade Germany and Europe, but Hitler did it before. What archive documents prove that? Buy showing us photographs of different Soviet tanks and other equipment, that can be used for offensive and not defence, this man makes these assumptions. If he was a Soviet spy who defected to the West and studied in the Soviet military academy, he studied for sure the Soviet military doctrine on the eve of 1941. Soviet military doctrine on the eve of the 1941 war proceeded from the premise that a modern war can only be won by decisive offensive operations by the ground, air and naval forces. According to pre-war views, strategic defense was considered by Soviet military science as a concomitant and interacting factor in offensive operations, moreover, on secondary fronts. Strategic defense simultaneously on all fronts, as a forced way of waging war, was not conceived and considered by Soviet science. The poor performance of the Soviet army during 1941/42 can be explained that the Soviets had not trained their army to carry out defensive operations or how to fight under the siege. This and other topics of the WWII are covered in detail and with plenty of bibliographic reference in the book by Yuri Gorkov "Kremlin, Stavka and General Staff" militera.lib.ru/research/gorkov2/index.html
@user-wj6dt5bq3w26 күн бұрын
What archive documents prove that? They were found in the Kremlin during 1991-1992, numerous Red Army plans to attack Germany and Europe, the first plan was from October 1939.
@galrod64 Жыл бұрын
What a bunch of nonsense this man is saying. First of all, the Soviet Union was the last country in Europe to sign non agression treaty with Germany. It was on 1939. The first country to sign this kind of agreement was Poland in 1934. Then UK and France followed the suit. The Baltic states also signed their agreements with Germany. What about the policy of pacification carried out by UK and France, who allowed Germany to annex Austria? What about the Munich agreement between UK, France and Germany? The result was Germany's annexation of parts of Czechoslovakia. And Poland as Hitler's ally, also got itself a piece of Czechoslovakia. This is why Churchill called Poland the hyena of Europe. The Soviet Union had an agreement with Czechoslovakia and was willing to help it. But Poland didn't allow Soviet Army to pass through its territory. While Stalin was trying to create a coalition of European states against agression, UK and France were doing the contrary, by signing agreements with Germany and hoping that Hitler would attack the USSR only. What about the so called strange war? When Germany invaded Poland, UK and France declared war to Germany but didn't undertake any military actions. In fact,.their soldiers spent time playing cards and football. The Soviet Union only entered Poland after its Government ran away through Romania. De facto Poland was left without any government. The Polish ambassador in Moscow received an official note from the Soviet government declaring the war. The so called parade in Brest in reality was a change over. Germans were leaving and the Soviets were receiving the territory which was historically Russian. It went to Poland after Polish Russian war in the early 20th. So the Soviet Union took this territory back. The Soviet Army moved up to the so called Kerson line. In his radio speech to the nation, Churchill admitted that there was no crime in this.
@galrod64 Жыл бұрын
The founder of the Rockefeller dynasty, William Avery Rockefeller, was a traveling snake-oil salesman who posed as a deaf-mute peddler and hawked miracle drugs and herbal remedies. The smooth-talking huckster dubbed “Devil Bill” alternately fathered children-including the future industrialist-with his wife and mistress, the couple’s live-in housekeeper. The itinerant William Rockefeller also lived a double life posing as an eye-and-ear specialist named Dr. William Levingston, and in 1855 he secretly married another woman. Basically, a con artist. Stalin studied in a seminary and later became a follower of the Marx theory of the class struggle between the proletariat and capitalists. During his early years as a revolutionary, he did robbed banks to get finances for the cause. He didn't keep money for himself. Kind of a Robin Hood. While Rockefellers from the very beginning did everything to con and exploit others in order to get filthy rich. Stalin became the leader of the Soviet Union, a country without capitalist exploitation. Rockefellers built a family empire based on exploitation.
@drpeterc12 Жыл бұрын
His first statement of 'fact' is fiction.
@petroff22 Жыл бұрын
...МУЗИКАУТОР!!...
@wisetibetanmonkey1624 Жыл бұрын
The question is who's starting WW3 😮
@hugepanini8468 Жыл бұрын
STRAHOTNI STE!
@ckhprojectpro777 Жыл бұрын
Thank you for such a simple recipe that lets the meat shine. Just made ostrich fillet with your recipe, and it turned out perfect. I tend to dislike garlic but caramelizing it is a whole different experience. Love the cat too.
@MrChikot Жыл бұрын
"Can You imagine Putin arming covicts..." Its 2023...yes We can!!
@RT-tn3pu Жыл бұрын
Detrumpification now.
@Cornel1001 Жыл бұрын
41:16 Can you imagine if comrade VP take one milion convicts and send him against Europe ? Yes we can now !
@realtroller9102 Жыл бұрын
oh my fricking god that cat its so gorgeous
@LostfoodCooking Жыл бұрын
Is look good very good, wee eat Ostrich to, Love how you explain the recipe, easy to follow
@robertbennett9949 Жыл бұрын
The Soviet Union did not 'attack Poland' in 1939. The Soviet Union restored the eastern border of Poland to the Curzon Line which was decided after the Versailles meeting in 1918. This is where the Polish border is right now. The so-called 'second watch' is a magnetic compass. Compasses were standard issue for the Soviet military.
@alexleibovici4834 Жыл бұрын
> The so-called 'second watch' is a magnetic compass. Disguised as a wristwatch. And two on EACH wrist 😁
@rhysnichols8608 Жыл бұрын
The Soviet Union sent tens of thousands of polish POWs to gulags and executed thousands of officers and intelligencia. Polish and Russian troops fight each other, of course it was an invasion
@robertbennett9949 Жыл бұрын
The Soviet Union did not 'attack Poland' in 1939. The Soviet Union restored the eastern border of Poland to the Curzon Line which was decided after the Versailles meeting in 1918. This is where the Polish border is right now. The so-called 'second watch' is a magnetic compass. Compasses were standard issue for the Soviet military.
@Bialy_1 Жыл бұрын
You are so full of sht... and the best part ia that you trying to sell that sht under this video... HAHA
@Bialy_1Ай бұрын
There was no Soviet Union in 1918... Bolsheviks also declared that USSR is not a continuation of Russia and because of that they not gonna pay Russian debt! That lie literally contradicts everything but this was never an issue with Russians that to this day living in the biggest country in the world and claiming that in whole history of Russia they did not attacked anyone...
@Bronislaavv Жыл бұрын
This was debunked in "Stumbling Colossus: The Red Army on the Eve of World War " by David Glantz , published by University Press of Kansas. Further to this , the Germans overran many Soviet Army & Corps HQs in 1941 , and never came up with any "Operational Plans" , nor even any "Warning Orders" in which Commanders tell their subordinates to start planning. The mind believes what the heart wants it to.
@user-wj6dt5bq3w28 күн бұрын
David Glantz is only one historian. Russian historians have debunked Glantz and agree with most of Suvorov's analysis. You should be reading Mikhail Meltyukhov, Boris Sokolov, Mark Solonin, and Constantine Pleshakov. There's a bigger world out there on this topic than just your idol Glantz.
@mitchrichards153228 күн бұрын
@@user-wj6dt5bq3w Gabriel Gorodetsky, Makhmut Gareev, Lev Bezymensky, and Dmitri Volkogonov, Iu. Gor'kov, A.S. Orlov, Iu. A. Polyakov, and Dmitri Volkogonov, Meltyukhov, Pavel Bobylev, Teddy J. Uldricks, Derek Watson, Hugh Ragsdale, Roger Reese, Stephen Blank, and Robin Edmonds are all listed as being directly opposed to the Soviet Offensive Plans theory. It isn't just Glantz, the majority of the historical community is opposed to the idea that the Soviets were going to attack in 1941. Glantz just happens to be the one that went into the most depth in his analysis.
@user-wj6dt5bq3w26 күн бұрын
@@mitchrichards1532Meltyukhov only disagrees with Suvorov that the German attack was pre-emptive since the Barbarossa order was given in December 1940. However, Meltyukhov certainly says Stalin was planning to attack Europe in the summer of 1941. You've obviously never read any Meltyukhov.
@user-wj6dt5bq3w25 күн бұрын
@@mitchrichards1532And which historians say that Stalin was planning to attack Europe in 1941? Mikhail Meltyukhov, Constantine Pleshakov, Boris Sokolov, Mark Solonin, Joachim Hoffmann, and Heinz Magenheimer. Get back to me when you've read them.
@mitchrichards153225 күн бұрын
@@user-wj6dt5bq3w I don't care what these historians are telling you, it is apparently not getting through to you that empty words stated by someone does not equate to physical evidence. What I mean by physical evidence is tanks, Soldiers, trucks, artillery, etc. located in places that corroborate the words that these people say. The Red Army was not mobilized before 1941, they were expanding and their units were unmanned, unequipped, untrained, and unsupplied. Saying that Stalin didn't care is just plain dum b. Its an oversimplification that you are making in order to deny the obvious and make the Soviet offensive plans theory plausible when in reality it is not. When you compare both sides of the argument, its clear that people like Rezun are frauds with no real evidence to support them. The other side of the argument has mountains of evidence that you can't deny. Comparing the two sides evidence makes it clear and undeniable.
@Kaththee Жыл бұрын
We learn from Mr. Suvorov that a government that kills its own people does not deserve the loyalty or respect of its people. I would assume that this also applies to a government that poisons or commits biological warfare against its own people, and commits false flag terror attacks against its own people.
@michaelcoombs7569 Жыл бұрын
Headline 'Judaea Declares War on Germany' - Daily Express 24th March 1933
@ivanhoe818 Жыл бұрын
Iceberg must be in cinema
@paddyo3841 Жыл бұрын
It was the USSA/ Uk/ Vatican
@chrispeacock2076 Жыл бұрын
I found the filming technique of showing one cameraman in the shot of another cameraman so annoying that I could not concentrate on the content. I switched off as the second piece of meat hit the pan.
@Spidaface666 Жыл бұрын
Sorry 😐 bro it's a 👎🏾 thumbs down 👎🏾 for me I don't eat raw meat 🍖
@user-vi5pk8pd9o Жыл бұрын
Луди жаби се наричат едни хора с зелени униформи дето убиват себе си и нас
@ecrnegyptiancancerresearch9724 Жыл бұрын
The cat cant believe his luck. He's looking around him to check who could it be for😆