IMO, most powerful 400s emperor is either Marcian or Leo. As Marcian was able to stand against the Huns, and Leo eliminated germanic influences in the court.

St John the Baptist looks like jesus Christ but he is not from Byzantine Empire

Классные видео! Желаю удачи и успехов! AVE ROMA!

GOTHS THINK THEY SLICK

Should probably be called "number of campaigns" won rather than "number of battles" won

Song name please

You mean to tell me Zeno couldn't fight his way out of a wet paper bag? No way, now I know why they buried him alive, not just for being a semi illiterate barbarian but for being so pathetic that he never even fought to help Julius Nepos.

Πολυ ενδιαφέρον βίντεο για μάχες του Βυζαντίου που δεν γνωρίζαμε μπράβο σου 🤝

There’s a chance that it controlled territory in modern iran in lake urmia during the 11th century

Where is Empress Irene!!!!. She was the kindest Eastern Roman ruler ever of course!!!!!!

nice power point presentation bro, hope u got a good grade for it

I am Isaac so I laugh

😇 !

ROMA INVICTA!

Would be more epic if Rome was mentioned in the very end of the video, seems Byzantium owning all of Italy not that well known fact among amateur historians

My name is also Anastasius

Things from their 1000-year history fit into a video of less than 1 minute? Pussies

Agghh! Not the eyes!! Not again!

Great video!

Good video!

Respect to Greeks from Turkey

Basil II did not destroy the first bulgarian Tsardom. The Tsardom was already integrated and was taken over by Nicholas and afterwards his sons (one of which was Samuel) the country was called the Medieval Macedonia Kingdkm however the name "bulgar was so engrained in the minds of the byzantines that they labeled it as such

Fun fact: Roman Last Name are basically their cognomen

Alexios I John II Komnenos, Basil II Macedonian, Heraclius, Theodore Laskaris be like: nah we will not join in competition, we are too good for this😎

Julian not being included is genuinely so funny to me 😭

Nice

"byzantine" lol

You forgot John Byzantine

Justinian I got me good

Greatest Byzantine (Roman) emperors : 1.Constantine the Great: - accepts christianity as a rightful religion. - stabilizes the entire Roman empire. - moves the capital Rome to the well - fortified city of Byzantion, later renamed Constantinople in his honor. 2.Theodosius ii: - one of the longest ruling byzantine emperors. - fights lots of enemies. - establishes the Constantinople university, then known as the Hall of Magnaura. - receives a good education. 3.Justinian the Great : - claims to restore the former Roman empire by reclaiming back some of the old Roman western territories, in this case Italy, North Africa and parts of Spain. - builds the church of Hagia Sophia. - creates a codex, consisting of the laws of the Roman empire,thus emphasizing that Byzantium is a successor of the Ancient Roman legal tradition. - the last latin speaking Roman emperor 4.Heraclius: - leads campaigns against the arabs. - reclaims Jerusalem, Egypt and Syria. - saves the cross on which Jesus had been crucified. 5. Nikephoros ii Phocas : - known for his many campaigns against the arabs, reclaiming Mesopotamia. - known as a brave leader. 6.John i Tzimiskes: - reclaims some of the old Byzantine Balkan territories such as northest Bulgaria. - leads campaigns against the arabs. 7.Basil ii The Bulgarslayer : - the longest ruling Roman (Byzantine) emperor. - his reign is considered the second peak of the Byzantine empire. -leads war campaigns against the First Bulgarian empire, the arabs and many other outer and internal enemies. - blinds 15 000 captured bulgarian soldiers which caused the Bulgarian tsar Samuil to die of a heart attack upon seeing them returning . - enslaves Bulgaria for 2 centuries. Annexes the Armenian kingdom to Byzantium. - known as the last greatest Roman emperor.

Subscribed

0:31 thats how i know the creator of this video is french

Очень классные видео! AVE ROMA

I completely agree with this list except for: - Theodosian dynasty: Theodosius 'the Great' is super overrated. His war with Eugenius weakened the western Roman empire and he failed to deal with the Visigoths after Adrianople, and also placed his two useless sons on the throne. I'd pick Marcian instead, as he launched successful attacks against the Huns that aided the western Roman empire and didn't really have any flaws as major as Theodosius. - The Angelid dynasty: They were all pretty terrible but I'd say that Alexios III was better at putting down revolts/rebellions than Isaakios. Still a terrible ruler though. - The Palaiologan dynasty: I'd pick Manuel II over Michael VIII. Both were pretty good, but Michael VIII caused some long term damage to the empire by signing those economic treaties with the Italians and then disbanding the Akritai in Anatolia. Manuel II didn't have faults as significant as these and did a pretty impressive job of extending the empires lifespan by about 50 years despite the dire conditions by which he ascended the throne.

Funny how the angelids are such a terrible dinasty that isaac II is considered the best, just because he wasn't totally useless or moronic

Ewww stop using B word

you forgot Siege of Nicae in 727

Diogenes had some potential if it wasn't for his in laws.

Very good . Only thing i would change is the letters of john comnenus they are hard to see.

you should do the shortest know!!

Otgsys and tribulations 🤨🤨

😂😂 KOB Tay is my wife to get W the

Shouldn’t nikephoros II phokas be better?

Alexios Komnenos?

Nice

0:50 smoking on that Latin Empire pack🚬🚬🚬🚬

I have read somewhere that Nikephoros Phokas was very pious christian, even after his death, his body didnt decompose that much and instead of producing an unpleasant smell,his body produced really nice smell(like incense) i hope someone will understand me, Glory to God ☦️

Can you make a video about best byzantine generals? (Like belisarius?)

Turkey❤😮

meanwhile caliphate conquering arabia, persia, levant