Correct. The plate on the RH25 has both a Picatinny section and a dovetail for Wilcox mounts. There's a link to each part of the system in the comments!

I'd highly recommend the 12x42 or the new 10x52/14x52! The 42s are on sale right now on our site - Outdoorsmans.com. Feel free to give us a call and talk more, too!

We've only tried CS:GO and it's a little clunky.

It's looking like iRayUSA is going to be okay for now. The recent sanction was directed at the distantly-related parent company. iRayUSA has stated that it is completely uninvolved and will (hopefully) not be affected.

@@Outdoorsmans I ordered one just in case lol but lets hope this is the case!

Holy moly.

@@Outdoorsmans ... just sayin'. tzzzz... 🔥

I'd say the 10x52 is a great option for all-round. The 10x42 NL might be worth a look in your case, too. Slightly smaller and easier to carry with very minimal loss optically.

It's hard to believe, but you can. It's miles better than the 15x56 SLC and even an EL 12x50.

daily nightly beer intake dependent

Yes , I have the 14 x 52 I can keep still without the FRP Head Support NL Pure I will have this in the coming days so it makes it bit easier to keep it still

Outdoorsmans will! 😏

Funny you should ask... outdoorsmans.com/pages/optics-trade-in

Or me!

It's just an ADM Picatinny Riser

Hell yeah. Thanks!

It sure will. Thanks for pointing that out! We'll quote you @PittedLikeThat21 when we pass along this feature!

I accept cash or check

It's in the mail.

Well we are a business and advertising is generally involved.

I cut mine just long enough to still fit after the holidays.

Now this is a review. Glad you like it! We'll definitely be using the "dog's balls" to describe it from now on.

Sensors are similar... build quality and warranty much better.

We don't recommend falling, but we haven't had that issue. This frame system has been used by thousands of hunters for nearly two decades!

The NL Pure only comes in 32 and 42 😬

I'd still give the edge (no pun intended) to the ELs for sure. Also, the new lower pricing on ELs makes the decision a little tougher, but the advantage of the SFL is the size and weight. Great for bowhunters, etc.

That's Joe's Sony A7RIV

@@Outdoorsmans thank you 🙏🏻

Canon 5D mark 3 with battary grip (16 centimeter) height be suitable ? ?

With the velcro divider system, I think you could make it fit perfectly!

You don't need to if you can shift the image with software

​@@spldrong That would be collimating.

@@thearmorer5527 sorry, I've always hear of that being the process of how they make the unit "straight" so that there us not POI from the factory. Most military units say that's how they are zeroed... amd most are that way from the factory... butniver time we got sorlftware to make up for the very small shifts

It's probably fine. I'd suggest storing them eyecups down if you're transporting them or carrying them in a pack. Sitting on a shelf is fine though!

Overseas.

Great to hear!

This is for the EL and EL Range binoculars only. Nearly every other model of binocular uses a simple thread-in stud that you can do in 5 seconds at home!

This is an interesting place to choose to share this information. Thanks for the comment.

After looking through both side-by-side, the NLs are well worth the extra cash if you can swing it. That massive field of view that's sharp all the way to the edges really puts them in another category.

@@Outdoorsmans did you heard about rubber armor problems on the NL Pure?

We haven't seen any issues with them. @@s.d.r1062

We LOVE the SFL. Cheaper, lighter, and the glass is very hard to distinguish between the two.

@@Outdoorsmans but i think SF is better in lowlight?

Just barely. 2mm of objective is a worthy sacrifice for the size and weight difference.@@s.d.r1062

@@Outdoorsmans But SF has also bigger FOV and Schott glass. Better coating for low light conditions

Yes, there are some differences. If it were my money, I'd go SFL for the weight and cost savings. That said, give us a call and we'll be happy to sell you a pair of SFs!

(From Joe) We don't have a ton of experience with the Trijicon, but I would say it’s a slight upgrade from the Zeiss. The LHT scopes are great, but they don't quite compete optically. The Amplus performed well enough in low light that I didn’t like take note of anything or thought that it was subpar in any way. It also tracks extremely well and held zero extremely well. Optically, Leica is one of the better options, and at this price point you're getting a lot of value.

We shoot off of this head all the time! It was great before, but now with the Arca-Swiss compatibility, it's so simple.

None of this sounds familiar to me... sorry you've had that experience. Might be worth taking up with Swarovski

Thank you! You rule for saying that.

Correct. These were discovered by a paleontologist. We have since switched to M-LOK

I haven't seen that. Can't stand mushy torrents

Hell yeah brother!

Reported.

What a review! We agree, General Tso.

And when you compare to victory SF?

Theyre NOT made in Germany. $1800 is spicy for being made in japan? $13-1400, I might buy

Looks like that's a very familiar design if you catch my drift. The Atlas Trainer was the first of its kind, is on a more robust, flexible frame, and can be swapped with any of our hunting packs on the same frame. The Atlas Trainer is also in stock, as it appears the FNG is not.

@Outdoorsmans Does the top of the frame jab into a person's neck if they accidentally fall forward on the ground?

@travelinman482 Knowing your limits is a big factor with rucking for sure. We can't guarantee safety in the event of a fall, but highly recommend not falling either way!

@Outdoorsmans Why make the top pieces of the Ruck Trainer not point towards the user's neck/head? I understand your company's safety cautions from a legal standpoint.

True, besides the price, magnification, laser range, whether it offers ballistic programming, whether it works well, and Joe's opinion of it, I suppose we didn't include any relevant details.

In your case, between those two, I'd go with the 10x42. For tracking a moving bird, I would highly encourage you to check out an 8x or even an 8/10x32 and get one in your hands. The clarity of these optics really changes your understanding of magnification. The 12x42 is excellent, but it's field of view seems to shine at longer ranges (500 yd+). Field of view probably has the biggest effect on tracking a moving object. More FOV = less chance of an animal escaping it, and the more perceived stability you'll have. Thanks for the question!