I think that effectively no structure larger than a single neutron passes through. No structure. Everything is made into a mass UNIT. Neutron Proton. Electron Proton electron Proton/electron Protonelectron Neutron Neutron in at event horizon Neutron out in deep void Decays and expands Creating DM and DE Then falls Towards an event horizon. This is neutron decay cosmology A homeostatic universe maintained by the reciprocal processes of electron capture at event horizons and free neutron decay in deep voids. 1 for 1 Accounting for black hole decay is the only problem.

The geometry is clear. GR with boundary is all. The topological trick of an EinsteinRosen bridge many people don't get. Fortunately I stumbled across books on higher dimensions in middle school. And then studied super fluids in lab for 5 years. I thought the explanation of the physical processes and the chain of casualty was clear but if you have any questions feel free. Interaction is good. 🖖

@@KaliFissure Interaction is indeed good. A critical factor in the field of condensed matter physics. There is an an intuitive feel to it all.

I would be immensely pleased if I felt like another person grokked the geometric inevitability of this schema. Is not me. It's geometry says this is how it works.

First of all, in my opinion, understanding what you explained here is a key and somewhat clearly demonstrates physical visual reflection and representation in 3D space of the fundamental forces involved. Secondly, understanding and diving deeply onto these topics, including nuclear physics will get us closer to reaching "uniform energy"/"last layer of matter"/"bedrock of informational order" call it whatever you want, but in my opinion its the key to figuring out alternative methods of interactions with forces deemed uncontrollable this far. Thirdly, i wonder and must ask you, what led you to this path of exploring such "mysterious"/"contraventional" forces, was it through past or present educational path? Or through personal life journey or else? Personally, my life journey so far, with the combination of the life lessons and experiences learnt along the way, led me to the path of quantum physics and my personal trait and skill of "predictive behaviour" analysis. I've personally worked backwards sequence from events in search of initial cause of the event itself, which has so far been aligning with current physics theories and mathematical calculations, yet for some reason seeing "bigger picture" seems to be difficult for many people to see, even in right and correct departments in both academia or research groups. OR has been secretly worked on behind the locked doors.

@15xNightWalkeR I was always a huge science nerd but ended up in a different career area. But I continued self education perennially. Most specifically to my model I think that reading the work of Charles Howard Hinton at a young age helped. To consider higher dimensional manipulation as logical as rotation or translation.

Fascinating, I'm glad to see more people get involved. I'm getting a notion of curiosity and logical thinking arising among the new generation more and more, and i would say we are constantly met with dismissal, silent treatment and academic bullying so to speak from both private and public organisations, and generally from close minded "professionals" and "academic" representatives. Instead of dismissal, maybe exploration and consideration regarding such matters by individuals from the outside looking in, can offer different perspectives on some and are unfortunately totally refused and neglected. It is dismissed as uneducated teaching the "top of the food chain" educators themselves. I believe either the igo higher up in the ladder has played the part in stagnation of the progression in technology or its been long privatised and locked away.

@15xNightWalkeR the truth will out Neutron decay cosmology is inevitable First principles meets geometry Why would we expect the universe to be anything BUT a perfectly designed self supporting structure

If I was a professional I might. Dirty feet are a much a part of this universe as anything else. 🙂 But you might want to watch other videos in this playlist. They are all about this model and certain different aspects. Thanks for comments. 🖖

@@KaliFissure Thanks for the information. I will check out your list.

What will change in technology? Maybe nothing. But to have a sensible physical process that demonstrates the elegance of an endless flow of nature? I think that this will give reassurance and stability to many average people. Rather than a random explosion with no real future, this connects us to an eternal recycling flow.

And thank you for the compliments. I appreciate your understanding.

@@KaliFissure New technologies, new research tools. BIG SCIENCE doesn't want to eliminate the *BIG MUD* of noise in fundamental optical experiments. WHY? Let me suggest for schoolchildren and students on one's own to measure the Universe, dark energy, black holes, etc. To do this, I propose two practical devices. «laser tape measure *+reference distance* 1,000,000 m”» and «Michelson-Morley HYBRID Gyroscope». I am writing to you with a proposal for the joint invention of a HYBRID gyroscope from non-circular, TWO coils with a new type of optical fiber with a “hollow core photonic-substituted vacuum zone or (NANF)” where - the light travels 250000 (In a laser tape measure, the length of the optical fiber is fixed at 1000000 ) meters in each arm, while it does not exceed the parameters 84/84/84 cm, and the weight is 24 kg. Manufacturers of “Fiber Optic Gyroscopes” can produce HYBRID gyroscopes for educational and practical use in schools and higher education institutions. Einstein dreamed of measuring the speed of a train, an airplane - through the Michelson-Morley experiment of 1881/2024, and only then would the experiment be more than 70% complete. This can be done using a fiber optic HYBRID gyroscope. Based on the completion of more than 70% of Michelson's experiment, the following postulates can be proven: Light is an ordered vibration of gravitational quanta, and dominant gravitational fields adjust the speed of light in a vacuum. you can make scientific discoveries; in astronomy, astrophysics, cosmology, higher theoretical physics,... (We are not looking for ether, we will see the work of gravitational quanta) The result is a «theory of everything» in a simple teaching device and a new tape measure for measuring the universe.

I never saw why Michealson Morley would be expected to work. It would require a very specific kind of ether for it to be detectable.

NOTE: I am not a physicist, astronomer, etc. I have NO accreditation in any of th these domains. What I am is someone who looked at the physical evidence and has proposed a (mostly) straightforward physical process to test and account for all of the evidence. Simultaneously, cohesively, and holistically. The universe is of a piece, an interconnected unity. 🖖

What this seems most connected to is the Casimir effect. Especially as investigated by Stephen Wolfram in one of his first papers. Can this be used to propel micro satellites? Can ambient charge be shaped by the condensed matter it resides within to leverage a low intensity Biefeld Brown effect?

There is a longer edit where I make three interlinked cordage rings but it is to messy and long. A photo of the construction I posted I think....

Geocalc Geogebra

No doubt they do. Otherwise where do the different qualities of the different quark come from? From the differences in their structure. Quarks are not stable in themselves. They are really best though of as ingredients to create other things. Just as 3 legs are needed to create a stable base.

I will have to look into that. Thank you. 🖖

It's actually marvelous, to my eyes, thank you!

I didn't know it. I could easily make a model on this. There seem to be all sorts of claims but nothing very precise except for this physics.tamu.edu/rodins-coil/ This Texas A&M one though... if the coil crossed in the middle it would be Shirley's Surface. Reminds me of another video I need to update, improve.

Thanks for the feedback. 🙂 I hadn't heard of that coil before.

I'm happy that anyone else at least sees the logic in what I propose. And I believe that the geometry is quite compelling as well

That's not really a torus because a torus has a distinct inside and outside and this has an undefined region, that vortex in the middle.

🤣

I could watch fluid flows all day. It was my job for 5 years. Playing with a super fluid modeling set up.

An "AA" battery, with a rare earth magnet on top and a bit of wire wrapped into a coil, creating a solenoid. When the tip of the coil wire touches the magnet, it is powered and pops off the magnet only to be pulled back down by gravity and springiness of coil. Repeats based on tensions balancing, creating a simple relaxation oscillator Thanks for watching.

No. That's not at all accepted. But quark have fractional charges.

There is the theory of preons that posits the existence of sub electron particles if anyone is interested

@@pacificll8762 and much recent work with 2d materials has indicated the same. I think that the unitary size of electrons is more about the unitary and localized charge of the protons

GeoGebra and GeoCalc 👍

@@KaliFissurethanks