Where did you get the clams to hold the lathe tools? or did you make them?
@Hi_Tec7 ай бұрын
I made the clamps on that milling machine…
@mermikerni89097 ай бұрын
Magic
@anythingoldmechanical8 ай бұрын
Stunning!!!!
@jamesmattioli86728 ай бұрын
Ciao, si possono avere le misure dei 2 serbatoio del carburante, e del rubinetto del acceleratore? Grazie mille
@Hi_Tec8 ай бұрын
Tank: diameter 50mm, length 62mm. Surface carburettor: diameter 50mm, height 65mm. Gas tap: diameter 22mm, length 17mm. // Serbatoio: diametro 50mm, lunghezza 62mm. Carburatore di superficie: diametro 50mm, altezza 65mm. Rubinetto gas: diametro 22 mm, lunghezza 17 mm.
@Hi_Tec9 ай бұрын
I would like to help out. However, I do not find an E-Mail address…
@ScottGoldthwaite9 ай бұрын
Is the bottom face of the clamp that's in contact with the lathe tool square or at a slight angle? It occurred to me as you tighten the clamp down, it will want to tilt a bit, putting the clamping force on the edge of the tool holder. Also, on the piece that's clamped between the vise jaws, it looks like theres a rib or something. What's the purpose of that?
@Hi_Tec9 ай бұрын
The clamps have a small step at the front and back. Therefore, the contact with the tool holder is in the center and with the base plate as far back as possible (more favourable leverage).
@Hi_Tec9 ай бұрын
Yes there are ribs on the clamping block. Two on the side of the fixed jaw (top and bottom) and one (middle height) on side of the moving jaw. The fixed jaw should always win if there is the slightest deviation in parallelism.
@ScottGoldthwaite9 ай бұрын
@@Hi_Tec That's a good idea.
@ScottGoldthwaite9 ай бұрын
@@Hi_Tec Is the piece that's clamped between the jaws just screwed to the upper fixture plate, or do you have pins (or something) for alignment of these two pieces?
@Hi_Tec9 ай бұрын
@@ScottGoldthwaite I have milled a flat groove in the underside to ensure that the mounting block rests at a right angle. Other methods also work, of course.
@SRG2169 ай бұрын
Can you share the Fusion 360 files for the hold-down clamps and the fixture plate?
@Hi_Tec9 ай бұрын
Yes, I can. Where to send them files?
@SRG2169 ай бұрын
@@Hi_Tec Thanks. Every time I try to give you my address, even splitting it up, KZfaq deletes the comment. I've tried 3 times already. Are you on one of the machining forums, like CNC Zone?
@Hi_Tec9 ай бұрын
@@SRG216 I‘m not on the forums. Can you split the E-mail address in two answers. On before and on after the at?
@Hi_Tec9 ай бұрын
Maybe even a third msg for aft the dot.
@julianwatts9024 Жыл бұрын
By any chance you have the step file so I can make a similar plate ? Or if you have em for sale I’d buy one
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
I can share the step file, no problem. Where to send to?
@FrankTuk Жыл бұрын
Well done! It's a really neat and clean setup to cnc turn some small parts. How did you modify the post processor?
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
Thanks! The logic is as follows: When a tool change is due, a CNC-subroutine is called from the post. In the CNC this subroutine will change the G54 offset according to the tool position. The process works fine. However, finding the correct offsets after a tool swap in the fixture is a bit of a lengthy procedure. Finally I CNC-converted my lathe, too...
@Tubben-tools Жыл бұрын
Nice set up I like your toolholder . I was also doing some turning with the mill . I have also eding software And fusion360 Can i have your post processor? It would help me al lot with my projects
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
You can have the post processor. I just need an E-Mail address.
@Tubben-tools Жыл бұрын
You tube is blocking everything whats like a email adress thats wy i tri it like this.
@Tubben-tools Жыл бұрын
Hello Hi tec I put mij adres on my channel ... if you kan look at that .. this is nou the only way to send you my adress. Thank you
@OhHeyTrevorFlowers Жыл бұрын
So many people’s work was scraped to make those models. Copyright laundering to the max. But neat, I guess.
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
Interesting aspect…
@Hellogaybowser Жыл бұрын
how do you make the machine?, and is there a blueprint file for making the machine?, if there is a file for making the machine, please tell me🙏😊
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
My model is based on parts which you can find following the link below. However, I made a lot of modifications to come closer to the original motor and to get the idle RPM down. For these modifications I do not have drawings. I did make drawings at the time but with a long outdated CAD system… www.ts-modelldampfmaschinen.de/gussteilesaetze-verbrennungsmotoren/verbrennungsmotor-karl-benz.html
@Hellogaybowser Жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec thank you very much 😊
@olivvapor4873 Жыл бұрын
What a fantastic model ! 👍🏻😊 I dream about some day they become more popular so one can purchase a fully machined kit ! 😊 A good workshop would not be enough to build such a beauty with success ... Thanks for sharing the video, please let me know if one day you want to sell it !
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
...will do
@DianTomov_ST_Dupont_Lighters Жыл бұрын
How do you modified the post processor on fusion, how do you set your axis?
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
The main modification was made in regard to the tool change. When a tool change is called for, the post will actually write a code line to the G-code file which calls a macro routine. In this CNC macro routine the tool change is then converted into a G54 shift. This moves the reference point in the X/Y plane to the selected tool. The axis remain as is. +X on a lathe moves the tool away from the workpiece. On a mill +X moves the spindle to the right side (or the table to the left side). No change necessary. Same applies for +Z. I hope this gives you an idea.
@DianTomov_ST_Dupont_Lighters Жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec thank you, but my Stepcraft post-processor do not working properly. How to set is it, what I need to modify? Actually I use generic 3 axis machine. My spindle slides along X axis. I use Stepcraft Fusion 360 post processor, if can modify it for me and sent it to my email, I will tip you without proble.. I really I will appreciate your help
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
@@DianTomov_ST_Dupont_Lighters Sorry, but I cannot modify your post processor. I even don‘t know the purpose of the modification. I recommend studying the post processor code and implementing the necessary changes yourself. You will find tutorials online. It is not an easy job and it will take many hours if time, unfortunately. You also can generate a machine configuration in Fusion 360, which represents your actual machine.
@DianTomov_ST_Dupont_Lighters Жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec thank you, I appreciate! On kinematics I need make some configuration to represent my machine. Unfortunately I know that I need exchange the roles and directions of all axis + spindle axis. I don't know this one should be rotary or linear. I know that I need exchange the direction of z axis
@carmelofarrugia5855 Жыл бұрын
My compliments very precise work
@maximf.5537 Жыл бұрын
Exellent idea, turning and boring in one device. Will have to try this
@wulff642 жыл бұрын
Cool device. Do you have the file for this fixture, that you can/will share?
@Hi_Tec2 жыл бұрын
I can send you a step file or a Fusion 360 file.
@theodorewendorff3847 Жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec I would really like to see the Fusion 360 file, especially for programming, would you be willing to share?
@Hi_Tec Жыл бұрын
@@theodorewendorff3847 No problem. I need an E-mail address to send the file.
@darranedmundson15052 жыл бұрын
I’m just about to embark on designing a similar fixture/tool holder. I’d really love to hear about some of your design decisions, what works well, things you would in hindsight do differently?
@Hi_Tec2 жыл бұрын
Hi Darran, Most of my (hobby) work on my mill is done using the vise. I therefore designed the turning tool holder to be held in the vise. To switch from mill to lathe I have to clamp the holder and set a parameter in the CNC software. It‘s quick and easy. This design decision limits the available space for tools. Depending on your needs you may decide differently. The disadvantages compared to a lathe to be aware of are: - Limitations in workpiece size and overall rigidity. - No through-hole for long stock. - Tool setup is a bit more complicated (finding tool zero points) Being aware of these limitations it is a very nice add-on. I did not want to CNC convert my little lathe because most of the work can be done quicker manually (one off). However I am currently working on integrating the very neat Rocketronic device to my lathe. www.rocketronics.de/shop/en/electronic-leadscrew-els4basic.html Probably I will combine it with a cheap, little China CNC controller and the ability to switch between both controls. A video will follow but It will take some more months to finish the project. When I started with computers in the 80‘s it was often said: What can you do with a computer? Solving problems which you otherwise did not have. With hobby machines it is similar 😀
@GilmarBarbosaBr2 жыл бұрын
Cool. I did something like this but not as fancy as yours. I have also used Fusion 360 and a Siemens 828D controller. Used constant surface speed and spindle indexing. Congrats! kzfaq.info/get/bejne/j7Zxd5acns7IY4k.html
@johannesklein11472 жыл бұрын
genius guy
@Hi_Tec2 жыл бұрын
😀
@jacobbranker1592 жыл бұрын
This is excellent work. Very inspiring. Hats off to you sir
@Hi_Tec2 жыл бұрын
Thanks 😊
@micheldilly85312 жыл бұрын
Très beau travail ! Et le réalisme et la fonctionnalité est parfaite (je suis en train dans fabriquer un avec le kit complet et l'allumage)
@dumitru55112 жыл бұрын
Do you still have the post processor? I would like to try that. I will also use Eding CNC.
@Hi_Tec2 жыл бұрын
Yes, I do. However, it is a combination of the post processor and a number of macros as described in earlier comments.
@djzatka2 жыл бұрын
Post more videos
@Nabeelboragrag12 жыл бұрын
👍🏻👍🏻❤
@tjkirkpatrick94512 жыл бұрын
Is there any chance you might do a video of how to program this? Cheers tj 👍
@Hi_Tec2 жыл бұрын
The CNC-programming is done (or CAM generated) as if this was a lathe. However, to enable the mill to be programmed that way requires a lot of special routines. How this can be done depends very much in the type if control. And it will not be possible with all kind of controls. Example: A tool change like T200 in the part program must be catched and be redirected to a change of the program reference point, as all tools are already in place but at different positions in X, Y, Z.
@tjkirkpatrick94512 жыл бұрын
I use fusion360 and am looking at a milling machine with mach3 controller hoping it will be possible as it appears to be a very handy machining op for a variety of different parts to be made 👍👍
@DavidFernandez-ek2zk2 жыл бұрын
Gracias profesor
@kimsmet-woodworksbangalore73433 жыл бұрын
This is so cool. I need to try this in wood. Thanks so much for the idea. Love it
@aronjaderosario83203 жыл бұрын
Think about video
@mokuroglucnc3 жыл бұрын
There is no such thing as impossible. It is clear from this video that as long as you want to be successful, you will definitely be successful.
@ngounchantha7923 жыл бұрын
I was recommended to see it. This machine is still new
@JanBinnendijk3 жыл бұрын
Ah, another EDING CNC User, I have 3 machines running on EdingCNC (2 Mills and a Lathe), with plans to retrofit my second lathe (no conventional machines in my shop, apart from the drillpress) I really like your setup, lovely execution. I've been thinking about building a lathe like that.. based on a mill.. exchange the mill head for a Lathe Head, enabling me to use longer bar stock, and 3 Jaw Chucks as well But you'd have to lie the mill onto its back,
@Hi_Tec3 жыл бұрын
Obviously there must be a number of EDING CNC users, otherwise the company wouldn’t exist. However, little to find on KZfaq...
@JanBinnendijk3 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec Oh.. do they Exist!.. (i am more or less involved with EdingCNC, as Bert Eding himself is a friend of mine) When i started Using EdingCNC 14 years ago, first thing i did was re-design the GUI together with Bert Eding, so.. basically, what you're staring at when operating the machine.. is my design.. Bert did the software side of things. I wrote a Teach-in macro for my lathe. no need for CAM, except for very complicated parts. On the Mill, also a lot of hand written Cycles for all kinds of operations.. I rely heavily on the User-Functions.. I do have some CNC Video's on my channels, but not specifically on EdingCNC, as for me.. EdingCNC is just my trusty Controller..
@Hi_Tec3 жыл бұрын
@@JanBinnendijk I also work a lot with user functions and dialogs. Good stuff. However I am missing the will for continuous improvements of the UI. I made a number of proposals which had been easy to implement. All neglected...
@federicovirdia19093 жыл бұрын
Great job! It's awesome!
@manmanabhawmanmababhaw94263 жыл бұрын
9873213680
@Tubecraft13 жыл бұрын
Absolutely beautiful but get rid of the awful electronical junk in the box Karl never had that 😁
@Hi_Tec3 жыл бұрын
True, I changed it already. However, not back to Carls solution as of 1896, as this was no solution at all. As he later wrote: Ignition is the problem of all problems. He precisely described the effort and pain to get the small and fast spinning (at that time) engine to run, allthough he was an experienced engine designer and maker. The "awful electronical junk" in the box was closer to his solution than a conventional ignition coil. But finally the ignition coil works better but is bigger.
@itsjustmeferds3 жыл бұрын
Its sounds like detroit diesel how cool!!!
@Ale_Lab3 жыл бұрын
Hi great work! I have a BF20L converted based on the einfach-cnc.de plans. It works great. I made a lathe tool post as well grabcad.com/library/tool-post-for-mill-turning-2, but I like your solution becasue use much less aluminium and it's more versatile. Do you mind share the Fusion file? I would also like to have a look at your post processor and subroutine you use in the CNC control software. I guess is a modified M6 command to call work offsets instead of just tool numbers. Or maybe each tool is defined with a specific incremental distance from the initial G54. I am using Fusion360 for CAM and mach3 for controlling the CNC. Maybe I can adpter your macros for Mach3. In case you are willing to share these file, my email is [email protected]. Thanks a lot!
@Hi_Tec3 жыл бұрын
I will send you the files via E-Mail within the next days. You can study my solution and see what you can use. Most of the work is done in the control macros which are control specific. A tool change will be translated into a shift of the G54 offset the reference point of the tool. Key to the ease of use are a number of set-up routines. E.g. for semi automatic correction of the tool offsets based on the measured outcome of a reference geometry.
@Ale_Lab3 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec thank you! I will have a look and see if I can replicate the same in Mach3.
@robertpalt89014 жыл бұрын
Hello. Nice work :-) Is this a damping carburateur ? Is it possible to get the drawings ? Thanks in advance :-)
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
Yes, it is. Details how to make such a carb can be found here: ridders.nu/Webpaginas/pagina_benzinedamp_carburateur/dampcarburateur_frametekst_engels.htm Just make sure, that you can mix the gas with fresh air in a wide range. Heating the carb with the exhaust gas does help. I use „green“ fuel for chain saws. I do not have drawings.
@robertpalt89014 жыл бұрын
Thank You for the infos ! I‘m make today a video from my engine. Regards :-)
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
@@robertpalt8901 Please share the link
@robertpalt89014 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec Here it is: m.kzfaq.info/get/bejne/r8h1oN14rdKdqas.html Regards :-)
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
@@robertpalt8901 Great!
@tonymarlow95554 жыл бұрын
Hello Your engine does not miss a beat. Thats impressive as I have made one of these and like several others I have seen here it does not run anywhere near as well as yours. Please can you tell me if you made any changes to the cam/valve timing or to the inlet port?
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
Hi It took me quite some experimentation to get there. The video does not show the latest version. The engine runs even a little bit better today (lower RPM, easy start, no missing beat). Cam timing is not very critical. Closing and opening on bottom dead center works best. The inlet valve needs some attention to get it sealed. I milled a relief slot around the inner sealing surface so that pressure can build up on a smaller area. I do not know whether this makes a difference as I did it right from the beginning. Today I am using a conventional ignition coil with an electronic which reduces the current on the point. The key improvement, however, was increasing the compression ratio to about 5. I achieved this by an inlet in the upper part of the cylinder, which is basically a cylindrical part with an upper end which fills up the hollow part of the cylinder head and a bore inside. Quite unconventional but making the piston longer was not an option due to the mounting of the spark plug from the side. With the very low original compression ratio the fresh gas mixes with a lot of remaining exhaust gas so that it takes two cycles to get to an ignitable mixture. It took Carl Benz also a long time to get the engine to run as he has described in hit autobiography. So, struggling is part of the journey 😉
@tonymarlow95554 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec Thank you so much. I also made a few changes to the basic model but with little improvement. I have used a home made long reach plug that goes right into the cylinder. I also added a degree of siphonic cooling taking a low point near the mount. I also increased the piston length but this is limited to 4mm by the plug protruding into the cylinder. I estimate the compression ratio to be only 2.5 : 1 after the changes. Is my understanding correct that by ''inlet'' you mean that you reduced the clearance volume with a plug that fills part of the void.
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
@@tonymarlow9555 Interesting, I made the same changes to the plug and to the cooling. Yes, your summary of my "inlet" explanation is correct.
@tonymarlow95554 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec I am surprised also at the similarities. I also have similar ignition points. Mine are slightly different as I have insulated the bottom one and made that low voltage so the cable does not need to flex. Would you be happy to discuss the surface carb you made. I realise you spent many hours researching and making these changes so I am grateful for the information you have shared already.
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
@@tonymarlow9555 I made the plug similar to the one I found in Carl’s book. The surface carb is quite simple and is not critical to make. There is the throttle body to regulate the amount of mixture (Carl’s car did not have a throttle). Then there is the mixture screw which allows to mix air with the gas coming from the fuel container (filled periodically in small doses from the tank). The mixture can be from zero fresh air to surely more than 50% freh air. In the fuel container there is fuel to a level of about 30% of total height. The incoming air comes through a pipe which goes about halfway into the container. Nothing of this is critical. The “problem” with the surface carb is that the mixture changes as the gasoline consists of different fractions, light to heavy. I use “green” gasoline for chain saws. More narrow fractions, less smell and “healthier” exhaust. Closer to the fuel used by Carl. The mixture needs to be adapted while the engine is running. Richer and richer as the light fractions disappear. Therefore, the mixture valve in Carl’s car was under the seat for adjustment during the ride. After a while you can hear the mixture changing as the exhaust sound changes with the mixture. I have ducted hot exhaust gases under the container to warm up the gas while the engine is running. This compensates some of the beforementioned effects. This was done by Carl, too. That is how this engine works. It's not a bug, it's a feature. This was the first IC engine which I have built so I had to experiment and study a lot, knowing it will work, finally, because Carl Benz did it long time before…
@inventorhsm49964 жыл бұрын
Hi @hi tec. Nice video. Are you willing to share the 3d model of your toolpost? Its nice!
Hello Hi Tec. Great video!!! Could you share with me the post for fusion360 please? I will like try apply this method
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
I can share the post processor if you provide an E-mail address or so. The key, however, is special subroutines for the CNC which, e.g. translate tool changes in a shift of the coordinate system. These programs are control specific. The post processor only provides, i.a., the calls to these routines.
@miguelzambranojr4 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec Thank You very mouch. I have several options, I want compare and see differences. My email is [email protected]
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
Sorry, I saw your response only now. I will send you the post tomorrow.
@nguyenminhthanh11223 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec hi, can you share me?
@Hi_Tec3 жыл бұрын
@@nguyenminhthanh1122 I did so more than a year ago. I resent that E-Mail a minute ago.
@way7206144 жыл бұрын
How to buy this engine?
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
I‘m afraid you simply have to make one.
@way7206144 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec I can not do that
@SRG2164 жыл бұрын
I'm currently trying to do some mill turning for the first time. Can you share your post processor. Perhaps post it on the Fusion360 Manufacture forum?
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
I can share the post processor if you provide an E-mail address or so. The key, however, is special subroutines for the CNC which, e.g. translate tool changes in a shift of the coordinate system. These programs are control specific. The post processor provides, i.a., the calls to these routines.
@SRG2164 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec Thanks. I got the post processor working (I'm using Tormach PCNC 1100). How are you automatically probing the length? Also, where did you get those clamps holding the lathe tool?
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
@Scott Goldthwaite: I made the clamp from stock (what do you need a mill for? To make parts which you otherwise wouldn’t need...). Regarding probing: what do yo mean? Electrically or how it is processed in the software?
@SRG2164 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec For probing, I mean software. Right now I manually set the part length with the tool length probing routine in PathPilot and my electronic tool-setter. I'd like to learn how to have my NC program automatically go to the tool-setter, probe the part length in the spindle, then continue on to the machining operations. BTW, I use Fusion 360 for CAD/CAM.
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
In detail this is specific to the control in use. I programmed a subroutine which uses the probing cycle G38.2 as it is called in my control. All the rest is controlled by #-parameters, which are partially set fix (like the coordinates of the probe, the Z-search window, the probing speed...) and are partially variables in the program based on user-dialog input (like the approximate stock-length). At the end the G38.2 will return the machine coordinates in the moment of contact. From there I can calculate the stock length, which is sored as the tool length of tool 99 (in my case). The stock length always becomes tool length 99 whereas the selection of a turning tool moves the WCS to the appropriate position (G54). A lot of #-variables are needed. It is important to pre-plan and to allocate and document fix and temporary #-parameters and to make sure you do not overwrite the fix parameters in other subroutines. Another way to do this is to reconfigure the control as a turning control (which is possible in my case but I went the other route for various reasons).
@similac954 жыл бұрын
what did you use to control motor rpm on the stock x3 or did you change the motor? Ive been looking for an upgraded motor for more rpm but have yet to decide on anything.
@Hi_Tec4 жыл бұрын
I have changed the whole drive. Motor, belts, no gears... Than I have added a standard asynchronous AC drive (www.elektromotorenmarkt.de/elektromotoren/pd_229/Drehstrom-Asynchron-Motor-mit-Kaefiglaeufer.html) with an inverter (WJ200-004SF ). This works very well. More than enough power, strong torque also at very low RPM. Tooth belt reduction. The motor can easily run at 120Hz (or more). All parts of the SX3 spindle SX3 spindle were originally machined well but assembled terribly. The spindle had to be disassembled and the bearing tension were to be to be adjusted. I usually run the spindle only up to 2500RPM but can program 3500 RPM. For the kind of projects I work on (usually small parts) I save a lot of time going a bit slower (and make less mistakes...). The SX3 Z-column was not perpendicular to the x/y-slides. This needed to be adjusted as well. For the project I was pretty much following the advises on einfach-cnc.de (if you speak German). However, in addition to the description on einfach-cnc.de I have added a weight balance to the whole spindle housing block to take away the tilting moment from the Z-axis guide ways because I don't think they are suitable for constant movement.
@ScottHadzik5 жыл бұрын
I need one of these for our new automotive building at Weber State University. I can't find the model available in the US. Do you have any leads? Would you be willing to sell this one or make another?
@Hi_Tec5 жыл бұрын
Thanks for your interest. However, this is a one-off model which I do not intend to sell. One of my next projects will be building the first Daimler engine as a model, the famous so called ‚Standuhr‘. So, I am busy and cannot offer building a second Benz engine. Some months ago there was a 1:1 replica of the 1886 Benz Patent-Motorwagen incl. the working engine for sale (by a London based vintage car dealer). That would be a fine show car...
@Hi_Tec5 жыл бұрын
I have designed the enclosure such that it can be made by metal sheet laser cutting, which is available as a service (incl. bending). Then some painting... The enclosure captures 98% of the chips flying around. It does add weight to the table which however is no problem for the hybride steppers.
@halvardfosse36575 жыл бұрын
The enclosure you have around the worktable looks very nice. Is this made by you, or is it possible to order it somewhere?
@Hi_Tec5 жыл бұрын
I have designed the enclosure such that it can be made by metal sheet laser cutting, which is available as a service (incl. bending). Then some painting... The enclosure captures 98% of the chips flying around. It does add weight to the table which however is no problem for the hybride steppers.
@halvardfosse36575 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec whould it be possible to get or buy the design from you? I have seen some other commercial versions, but yours are better 😁
@Hi_Tec5 жыл бұрын
I could send you Fusion 360 files. No charge. Maybe you can take it from there. Improve it and share it, too...
@halvardfosse36575 жыл бұрын
@@Hi_Tec That would be awesome 😊
@Hi_Tec5 жыл бұрын
Then I need your E-mail address.
@LCMNUNES19625 жыл бұрын
LINDA ê ÓTIMA MÁQUINA MODELO, VERY VERY GOOD, BRASIL OK.
@Hi_Tec5 жыл бұрын
Sorry, that is not my plan. Anyway, making the plate is probably the smaller part. Enabling the software might be the larger task.