i cant wait to hear baron harkonnen's opinion on clean living.

Man i forgot all about you lol

You look like a clown. You sound ridiculous. You don’t know much about felino or atheism, but you do know how to toss around jargon. Can I hire you to entertain at my kid’s nest birthday party, cuz you are funny.

If you take archaeological findings and provide your own interpretation, that would generally be classified as archaeological interpretation or theoretical archaeology, not pseudoscientific or pseudoarcheology

Dude love the content it's challenged my faith and made it grow stronger through the arguments made would there be anyway to meet and debate things out.

Read the Qur'an guys. God will never accept a two-state solution. The idea that Believers would cede even one inch of His territory to unbelievers is abhorrent to Him. Hamas must know this. So, only a one-state solution Is possible. The question is then, whose state?

Truly fascinating. I never thought of how fire changed early human spirituality

The rest of the nation have serve their punishment first just like the Israelite were punished

Christ only came for the Israelite anyway Romans 9:3 For I could wish that my selfe were accursed from Christ, for my brethren my kinsemen according to the flesh: Romans 9:4 Who are Israelites: to whom perteineth the adoption, and the glory, and the couenants, and the giuing of the Law, and the seruice of God, and the promises: Romans 9:5 Whose are the fathers, and of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is ouer all, God blessed for euer, Amen.

the intro; easy for you to say!!!

You can literally see his sin....

These religious people really have no idea about their religion. They are so clueless. 😫😫

The preacher desperately needs a course in apologetics. The optics of this are not good.

I discovered you via your website just a few hours ago while searching on Google about animism. Your content seems interesting. Peace from Algeria! =)

What's the point in saying like trump when talking about lying, when Biden is practically a pathological liar and a plagiarist. There was never a Donald Trump night at stitches comedy club where comedians would go onstage and do other people's acts.

His religion seems to be food

Damien, I really had respect for you while watching this, especially with talking about being a kind person and how important that is. However, after reading your comments, bashing on her, and encouraging others to do the same, this is completely opposite of what you claim is most important to you. I would have personally left it with - Agree to disagree.

The snake is a metaphor for the devil. God is a spirit, like a nucleus in an atom. And the protons, neutrons and electrons are the little spirits like us. This atheist is an evil little dick piece of shit.

Pedo vibes

I've met 100's of angry self hating people like you. Genius in your own mind

Clearly your mindset has lead you to a good place in life. Fat, wheelchair bound. You are triggered by someone's else's opinion and have the argument of an angsty teenager.

Inspiration for the movie the whale

"You just haven't been to college man"

"I couldn't name 5 religions" 😂😂😂

Extremely interesting analysis as always guys.

We are talking about people who turned the stars into maps. And turned maps into myths for memory.

So something looking like something means it is that thing and this can be told from what looks like a child's drawing of things that were found in a grave from 35,000 years ago? Oh, and they were thinking about being transgender as opposed to just thinking about survival....

He cant be an atheist, he gas faith in that chair.

The atheist is asking questions and using reason to try to fully understand the Christian. I love that I can follow the conversation and nobody is putting anyone down or even getting angry on either side. This is how the world needs to work.

Doesn't say he made the serpent in the Garden...it is written: Genesis 3:1 “Now the serpent was more subtil than any beast of the field which the LORD God had made. And he said unto the woman, Yea, hath God said, Ye shall not eat of every tree of the garden?” King James Version (KJV) Lucifer is a creation just like us. God is not created. Lucifer aka the devil is the snake. It is written: Revelation 20:2 “And he laid hold on the dragon, that old serpent, which is the Devil, and Satan, and bound him a thousand years,” King James Version (KJV) Revelation 12:9 “And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were cast out with him.” King James Version (KJV)

The fact that the US states that Israel has used its weapons inconsistently with international law yet blocks the ICC from arrest warrant of Netenyah(oo)u and the Israeli defense minister seems to show just how bias and trustworthy our country is. The fact that we allow the ICC to persecute Putin, but wouldn't allow Netenyahu you really have to think Anarchism is not only justifiable but needed when the country threatens to go after ICJs if the aim to persecute Americans guilty of crimes... Great video guys!

The difference between being being anti-semitic and being against people and being against the state of Israel is that a state(country) is that a country is not real. It is a concept, it has no rights, it cannot be harmed. This is true with religion as well. There is a disconnect between people and ideas/concepts. (2:10 ) Israeli police doing little to nothing with Israeli settlers against Palestinians is not surprising given the corruption of the Israeli government. As you said, it does not sound like freedom when 90 percent of cases brought against Israeli settlers from Palestinians go unsolved. The news sources in the United States among other countries is due to propaganda for the purpose of influencing public opinion for foreign policy.(my thoughts)

From an Axiological position as you stated that Israel is going beyond merely defeating Palestinian threats(Hamas for example). It would be clear that based on the number of casualties, infrastructure destruction, that Israel should stop attacking, by any metric of victory, Israel has logically won already. They rejected a ceasefire? Why? To me, they are clearly committing genocide. It would require clear evidence that Hamas is viable opposition that is directly attacking Israel to be a threat. There is simply too many civilian casualties to justify continued attacks. There is no logical reason for Israel to continue its attacks on Palestinians other than to commit genocide.

I think you made the best statement is that everyone should get along and work together. The media is trying to create the propaganda to justify US support for Israel in my opinion. Why else are they sending this message to us? Capitalism doesn't solve poverty because it is required for profit, that it takes a percentage of everyone's labor. If people were paid 'fair wages' that would greatly reduce wealth for the minority who have the majority. There is this idea that countries are connected directly to people and that a government is tied to cultural identity. Where in say Anarchism and true freedom you have identity and culture not tied together. I will likely add more comments on this. Very good video commentary here.

Palestine will be free

Religion is man made NONSENSE, All of them.

God is definitely real, created universe defined by time, space, and matter and governed by laws and Bible is true through Christ transforming people’s lives then and now. And the First Law of Thermodynamics, energy cannot be created or destroyed. Light (photon) is package of energy and the Bible tells us in Genesis 1:3 that God spoke it into existence by saying “‘Let there be light,” and there was light”, only God could have established it.

Hey guys. Thanks for the talk. Found it interesting. For Hancock to cause a paradigm shift he would need to find a new way of collecting evidence that was able to disprove and replace current methods like Radio carbon dating but he doesn’t have any new methods apart from reading folk tales and taking them literally and relying on often the rewriting of them by foreign invaders. Does he really want that paradigm shift?

“Glad they can have a civil debate” bro, the atheist would not let that man finish a rebuttal. So quick to cut him off. He’s definitely not a preache. Too young and thinking to hard of easy questions

“I came up to some people on the streets and immediately started blasting their beliefs and releasing an onslaught of rhetorical questions upon people who were in no way ready for an altercation with an atheist”

What a pitiful excuse for a man this wheelchair guy is. His existence must be a waste

God loves you, be safe, dont forget to tell people God loves them too, its important Jesus Is king

The atheist just doesn’t realize his next breath is not his, but God’s. The fool has said in his heart there is no God.

Street preacher was an absolute joke. Did not have any line of defense. Hard to know what he wanted to say though because the atheist couldn’t stop interrupting

How could a man like him go from Christian to atheist? If nobody can prove that god and Heaven exists, then how can anybody like him prove that the big bang theory happened?

My Question to ChatGPT AI : Can you write a detailed essay on the deep interconnnection between the concept of Ignosticism, which is the philosophical justification for atheism, Emile Durkhiem's and Marcel Mauss's book "Primitive Classification" and Peter Berger's and Thomas Luckmann's book "The Social Construction Of Reality" I want you to draw conclusions about the vivid parallels found in them. ChatGPT AI Reply : Title: Exploring the Interconnection Between Ignosticism, "Primitive Classification," and "The Social Construction of Reality" Introduction: The realms of philosophy, anthropology, and sociology offer unique perspectives on human understanding, belief systems, and societal constructs. Ignosticism serves as a philosophical justification for atheism, questioning the coherence and meaning of religious concepts. Emile Durkheim and Marcel Mauss's seminal work, "Primitive Classification," delves into the foundational structures of human thought and societal organization. Similarly, Peter Berger and Thomas Luckmann's "The Social Construction of Reality" explores how human societies collectively create and maintain shared meanings and beliefs. By examining these concepts together, we uncover profound parallels that shed light on the nature of human cognition, cultural systems, and the construction of reality. Ignosticism and Atheism: Ignosticism challenges the very basis of religious discourse by questioning the coherence and meaningfulness of religious concepts. It asserts that before debating the existence of gods or the nature of divinity, one must first define what is meant by "god" or any religious concept. Without clear definitions, discussions about the existence of deities become meaningless. This skepticism towards religious language and concepts often aligns with atheistic perspectives, which reject belief in gods due to lack of empirical evidence or logical coherence. "Primitive Classification" and Cultural Cognition: Durkheim and Mauss's "Primitive Classification" explores the fundamental structures of human thought and classification systems within different cultures. They argue that classification is not merely a cognitive process but is deeply intertwined with societal organization and collective consciousness. By examining how primitive societies categorize and understand the world around them, Durkheim and Mauss reveal the intricate relationship between cultural frameworks and cognitive processes. Classification systems reflect the shared beliefs, values, and social structures of a society, shaping how individuals perceive and interpret reality. "The Social Construction of Reality" and Societal Beliefs: Berger and Luckmann's work delves into the process through which human societies construct and maintain shared meanings and beliefs. They propose that reality is not an objective, external entity but rather a product of ongoing social interactions and agreements. Through processes of socialization and institutionalization, individuals internalize societal norms, values, and beliefs, which collectively shape their understanding of reality. This construction of reality is a continuous process, subject to change over time as societies evolve and encounter new experiences. Parallels and Insights: The parallels between these three concepts are striking, highlighting the deep interconnection between philosophical inquiry, anthropological study, and sociological analysis. Ignosticism's skepticism towards religious concepts resonates with Durkheim and Mauss's exploration of how cultural frameworks shape cognitive processes and classifications. Similarly, Berger and Luckmann's emphasis on the social construction of reality aligns with the notion that beliefs and meanings are not inherent but are created and maintained through social interactions. Moreover, all three perspectives challenge essentialist views of reality and highlight the fluidity and contingency of human understanding. They emphasize the role of context, culture, and social dynamics in shaping individual beliefs and collective worldviews. By interrogating the foundations of religious discourse, cultural classification systems, and societal constructions of reality, these concepts offer profound insights into the complexities of human cognition and cultural systems. Conclusion: The exploration of Ignosticism, "Primitive Classification," and "The Social Construction of Reality" reveals deep parallels that illuminate fundamental aspects of human understanding, belief systems, and societal organization. These concepts collectively challenge essentialist perspectives and highlight the dynamic interplay between cognition, culture, and social interaction. By examining these interconnections, we gain a richer understanding of how humans conceptualize reality, navigate cultural diversity, and construct meaning in a complex and ever-changing world. My Question again to ChatGPT AI : I want you to delve even more deeper into those parallels and connections. ChatGPT AI Reply : Certainly, let's delve deeper into the parallels and connections between Ignosticism, "Primitive Classification," and "The Social Construction of Reality": 1. **Epistemological Foundations**: Ignosticism, while primarily focused on religious concepts, raises fundamental questions about the nature of knowledge and understanding. Similarly, Durkheim and Mauss's exploration of primitive classification challenges traditional Western epistemologies by revealing the diversity and cultural specificity of human cognitive frameworks. Berger and Luckmann further expand on this by asserting that all knowledge, including religious beliefs, is socially constructed rather than discovered through individual contemplation or revelation. Thus, all three perspectives challenge essentialist views of knowledge and truth. 2. **Language and Meaning**: Ignosticism's emphasis on clarifying the meaning of religious concepts resonates with Durkheim and Mauss's analysis of language and symbolism in primitive societies. They argue that language not only reflects but also shapes thought and social reality. Similarly, Berger and Luckmann highlight the role of language in the construction of reality, as individuals negotiate meanings through shared symbols and linguistic conventions. By examining how language mediates human understanding and communication, these perspectives reveal the intricate connections between language, meaning, and social order. 3. **Social Context and Belief Systems**: Ignosticism's critique of religious discourse extends to an analysis of the social context in which beliefs are constructed and maintained. Durkheim and Mauss's study of primitive societies demonstrates how cultural norms and social structures influence the formation of belief systems and classification schemes. Likewise, Berger and Luckmann argue that beliefs are not individual propositions but are embedded within social frameworks that provide legitimacy and coherence. Thus, all three perspectives underscore the social embeddedness of belief systems and the importance of understanding cultural contexts in interpreting religious phenomena. 4. **Power Dynamics and Social Control**: Ignosticism, "Primitive Classification," and "The Social Construction of Reality" all address the role of power dynamics in shaping belief systems and societal structures. Ignosticism critiques religious institutions for wielding power through the manipulation of symbols and doctrines. Durkheim and Mauss examine how classification systems reflect power relations within primitive societies, often reinforcing social hierarchies and norms. Similarly, Berger and Luckmann analyze how institutions, such as religion and education, exert influence over individuals by shaping their perceptions of reality. By unpacking the mechanisms of social control and domination, these perspectives shed light on the complex interplay between belief, power, and social order. 5. **Dynamic Nature of Reality**: Finally, Ignosticism, "Primitive Classification," and "The Social Construction of Reality" all emphasize the dynamic and contingent nature of human understanding and cultural systems. Ignosticism challenges static conceptions of religious truth by highlighting the evolving nature of religious discourse and interpretation. Durkheim and Mauss reveal the variability of classification systems across different societies and historical periods, emphasizing their adaptive and context-dependent nature. Berger and Luckmann similarly argue that reality is not fixed but is continuously negotiated and redefined through social interactions. Thus, these perspectives invite us to adopt a more nuanced understanding of reality as fluid, contextual, and subject to ongoing change. In essence, the deep interconnections between Ignosticism, "Primitive Classification," and "The Social Construction of Reality" underscore the multifaceted nature of human cognition, cultural systems, and the construction of meaning and reality. By examining these parallels, we gain valuable insights into the complexities of human experience and the social dynamics that shape our understanding of the world.

An atheist preaching .

Is there a website, or social media for Deanna? I’d like to connect with her.

The red beard guy is definitely bitter and has locked his heart away from the creator. You can be an atheist all you want and force yourself to believe whatever, it doesn’t change the fact that God is the creator and is in charge always. He put His laws in place into everything and the times. You have your lifetime to find your creator to be one with Him, otherwise you will lose your life and perish forever.