Пікірлер
@NurulHikmah-is2nb 23 сағат бұрын
Indonesia dont need this plane.. To weak Indonesia will buy rafale better than this
@ELLOBORAMSEY 3 күн бұрын
Twin engine Gripen would be much better in MULTIROLE
@nitinat8181 5 күн бұрын
Gripen EF We must prove ourselves in Asia by using Thai technology.
@najoeun 8 күн бұрын
I like your voice, pronunciation, and British accent.
@jeremydelta4485 10 күн бұрын
KF21 AIR CRAFT MADIN LOW COST 😂😂
@user-qh8xc6hs3p 12 күн бұрын
한국이 조금 늦게 만들 었지만 한국인들은 정말 꼼꼼하게 잘 만들고 a/s 는 정말 잘합니다
@user-jf3vz8xj6i 22 күн бұрын
👍🇹🇭🙏
@trjberg Ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/muCHha9omZudc3U.htmlsi=9INJdx-vsay3EIyT
@sayarmnil.2624 Ай бұрын
Thailand air force finally chosen Jas 39 gripen E.
@user-ym6fu7we8s Ай бұрын
you need to get your info correct... there was no investment from the indonesian country... the indonesian flag is still on the plane due to the respect of the korean nation! we could have removed their flag at any time but do not do so out of respect for indonesia! they have not paid what was promised in this supposed joint venture! infact they tried to steal the kf21's blueprints and got caught!
@jamesbartlett5640 Ай бұрын
If they haven’t paid their share then remove the flag they clearly didn’t respect you by not paying.
@user-ym6fu7we8s Ай бұрын
@@jamesbartlett5640 korea is just giving them respect for now since they have other big corporate dealings with the country. but i think it the flag may be litterally reversed into a polish flag, since they r building the kr black panther mbt and k9 thunder howitzers in poland. but ausi is bidding very hard with cash to get the kf21 boramae licensing n tech exchange.
@whytebearconcepts Ай бұрын
A simplified F-22A. Looks good, from what I've read it has great potential. It just doesn't have the vectored exhausts of the F-22A. Good job, South Korea, should do very well in your region.
@DEFENSEMACHINE Ай бұрын
Good point!
@lenkautsugi5747 Ай бұрын
The gripen E is a very underrate jet
@Thunder_6278 2 ай бұрын
If only it could go mach 2...
@dogone7262 2 ай бұрын
Everyone claims Mach 2. It is standard practice. True top speed is usually a secret number. But not a single fighter with an acrylic "front window" will ever pass Mach 2.1. It will simply melt. When you use long range missiles the top speed must be confidently above Mach 1, more like Mach 1.4-1.5, and your tactics must be spot on even in a contested environment.
@reneb3063 Ай бұрын
it does
@TobiasLundqvist-ys2xw 23 күн бұрын
It goes 2.1 last I checked....😊
@user-mc3xm7zs9t 2 ай бұрын
Basically, they've created a smaller F-16 XL
@dogone7262 2 ай бұрын
Sweden had "F-16XL" in the 50´s fighter J35 Draken. The Gripen is much better though. Big does not always mean more creative or better. But I yield, quantity is a quality in itself.
@user-mc3xm7zs9t 2 ай бұрын
@@dogone7262 You missed the point F16-XL was an experimental aircraft, much similar in performance to the Grippen than the original F-16. The comment was not intended towards size. Also comparing the Drakken to the F-16 is pointless, different eras different spec aircrafts (multi role vs interceptor), etc.
@GoldenStar-ch5hx 2 ай бұрын
The best agile ever built ❤❤
@Husky_Passion 2 ай бұрын
sounds more like a selling pitch than an objective analisis
@trjberg Ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/muCHha9omZudc3U.htmlsi=9INJdx-vsay3EIyT
@js-wq6zy 2 ай бұрын
Countries need to cancel F35 orders znd get these, nimble,capable and actually flight capable for more than 2 days in a row.
@mrbrand4720 2 ай бұрын
Why are you showing model c lol
@petter5721 2 ай бұрын
Awesome 👍🏻
@DEFENSEMACHINE 2 ай бұрын
Thanks 🤗
@joejones3042 2 ай бұрын
It does not look particularly stealthy?
@FinTomTom 2 ай бұрын
It has 1,2 m2 RCS so its not the best 4 gen figter jet but its not bad, best things of Grippen E on my mind are its radar and its cheep as milk to fly and it can do all things what 4 gen figter jet is require to do
@joejones3042 2 ай бұрын
@@FinTomTom Good points all, thanks for sharing.
@dogone7262 2 ай бұрын
@@FinTomTom The Gripen is hard to see too, with your eyes. But I would challenge the RCS you mentioned. Ask other air forces..
@FinTomTom 2 ай бұрын
@@dogone7262 Yes its hard to find the correct rcs, some sources say its 1,2 m2 and other say its 0,5 m2 but 1,2 is not bad for non stealth jet
@trjberg Ай бұрын
kzfaq.info/get/bejne/muCHha9omZudc3U.htmlsi=9INJdx-vsay3EIyT
@Eric-nm1pr 2 ай бұрын
Built for war
@NATObait 2 ай бұрын
Built for Peace too.