Doing theoretical physics is probably no different from doing philosophy.
@tubalcain10395 күн бұрын
Pauli was one of the most scathing and brilliant critics of errors in physics. Yet, Pauli,along with C.G. Jung studied Jung's paranormal theory of 'Synchronicity' and possible connections to quantum mechanics. Pauli was very,very brilliant and hard working. Why would he waste his valuable time studying a paranormal theory unless he thought that it might be true? Feynman valued Pauli's criticisms of his theories. Synchronicity is often connected with a supreme intelligence or God.
@snehashispanda48086 күн бұрын
Monotheism is the instigator of ignorance, oppression, and violence. Monotheism has been a "totalizing discourse", often co-opting all aspects of a social belief system, resulting in the exclusion of "others". Monotheism is less pluralistic , because monotheism stipulates that people pigeonhole their beliefs into one tenet. "Monotheism is irreconcilable with the existence in our nature of the instincts of benevolence" because it compels followers to devote themselves to a single Creator. The logic of monotheism yields little basis for tolerating other religions". Monotheism anesthetize the sense of wonder as if one were committed to a single line of thought by a cosmic legal contract".
@xaviergarcia82749 күн бұрын
I find it enlightening listening to him.
@shaytanisislam505610 күн бұрын
Science doesn't mean experiments. The processes to get you to science knowledge are different. He called himself a scientist but knew nothing. How?
@ladyhawk670914 күн бұрын
Religion is man-made. God was, is & will be.
@danieln775116 күн бұрын
Interesting thoughts...but some people still think that faith and religion must accommodate in science worldview and think that a person who believes is a person who doesn't doubt. If we look to history of science we'll find a lot of great scientists who believe and doubt simultaneously and, I believe, because of that pursued the "truth" and made a lot of contributions to science and society.
@JohnAlbertRigali19 күн бұрын
He was a brilliant scientist, but his scientism got in the way of him embracing religion. Ironically, the phenomenon of scientists and science-minded people rejecting religion because of scientism has only been around for two or maybe three centuries. I was one of them.
@Qwerty123zzuy16 күн бұрын
Scientism😂. Anyway, what got u out? Just curious.
@johnbrown618921 күн бұрын
This is what honesty sounds like.
@user-rb7dr4ni6yАй бұрын
The problem ✡️✝️☪️ The solution 🧠
@damirvaldgoni2625Ай бұрын
To što ne plaši njega i mnoge druge ne znači da neče nikada biti onih koje če plašiti. To što on i mnogi drugi uživaju riješavati ne riješive zagonetke ne znači da nema onih koji mrze ili nisu sposobni riješavati zagonetke. Ali najvažnije je da če uvijek biti onih koji če njima ponuditi neko instant riješenje. Kao promjenu spola u trans gender debil. A još i važnije od najvažnijeg je da su mase jako podložne hipnozi.
@jeffreysokal7264Ай бұрын
I love this man.
@user-gk4jp9ph9xАй бұрын
this is the philosophy of the Holi Quran. The Quran says to us thet we must ask and wandering about the nature of the World. There is a verse in the Qur’an that says: (Indeed, in the creation of the heavens and the earth and the alternation of night and day are signs for those of understanding. Those who remember God while they are standing, sitting, and on their sides, and contemplate the creation of the heavens and the earth. Our Lord, You did not create this in vain. Glory be to You, so protect us from the torment of the Fire)
@jocobbrody1533Ай бұрын
Praise the lord Jesus Christ.
@Qwerty123zzuy16 күн бұрын
Nah praise be to Abraham.
@jocobbrody153316 күн бұрын
@@Qwerty123zzuy Abraham as well.
@haveyouseenjoeejoАй бұрын
Anyone who put a comment here is a wanker 😅
@youtoob1403 ай бұрын
It clearly bothered him deeply that he had no faith. Otherwise he wouldn't get all worked up trying to explain it away
@Qwerty123zzuy16 күн бұрын
Aint nobody worked up here😂
@fabzlab19804 ай бұрын
Who is this that darkens my counsel with words without knowledge? Brace yourself like a man; I will question you, and you shall answer me....
@shivoesho96385 ай бұрын
Every student is eager to learn knowledge from him. 😊
@arivaro5 ай бұрын
maybe the world needs all kind of people.
@ianbarnes85935 ай бұрын
It’s interesting that he acknowledges he has a soul. Did he ever ponder the question where that came from?
@ihsanfaisal7 ай бұрын
Why complicate thing. We all are created, yes?!
@Qwerty123zzuy16 күн бұрын
No
@tapaiferenc5778 ай бұрын
Best teacher in this civilizáció!
@fnalls67008 ай бұрын
Having an intellectual leave an opening for the possibility of something more then their personal conclusions is refreshing.
@eidiazcas8 ай бұрын
That's really common, having a religious leave an opening for the possibility of his dogmas being wrong would be way more refreshing
@AnonymousAlien20998 ай бұрын
Looks like Oppenheimer didn't give him a copy of the BhagavadGita.
@user-uu2cd4wl3i8 ай бұрын
He didn't know that the Bible never stated humans were the only thing God ever made.....
@eidiazcas8 ай бұрын
It only talks about creating creatures in this world and most of his 6 days of createion were wasted here, but you sure can as always dodge by changing the meaning of things, like saying that days are not days but thousands of years or that world doesn't mean world but universe so anything can mean anything or even the opposite of what it actually says, which is the same as saying all that BS means nothing
@user-uu2cd4wl3i8 ай бұрын
@@eidiazcas but if that's what the Bible says then everything you just said is correct whether you like it or not buy
@user-uu2cd4wl3i8 ай бұрын
@@eidiazcas okay well most of the world knows .... by now I think the Bible was rewritten by man but ultimately what I said is not wrong and what you said is not wrong
@user-uu2cd4wl3i8 ай бұрын
@@eidiazcas So the electron is really condensed energy made up from the electromagnetic field.... Now the negative charge around the electron is just the field being pulled in by the electron ... And for the nucleus of the Adam the same thing with positive charge..... And the same thing with the neutral charge inside the nucleus.... Now whenever negative charge meets negative charge the field around the electron is the same density as the other field around the other electron (and of course I'm talking about the charge around the electron or the energy around the electron)so ... Because the negative charge around the electrons are the same density they bounce off one another.... And whenever positive charge meets negative charge they are different densities so they pull into one another.... But positive charge and neutral charge are around the same density so they pull into one another.... And positive charge is more condensed so it condenses the neutral charge inside of it.... Then whenever the electron comes along with its negative charge then the energy that's already condensed inside the positive and neutral fields around the nucleus becomes even more condensed inside the electron and that energy that is condensed inside the electron made up of the neutral and positive charges....... Pulls on the neutral and positive charges more because it is more condensed and they're around the same condensity... So whenever the election leaves the electron does not have a strong enough pull to pull on the positive and neutral charge that it made more condensed inside of it so the electron moves away from the nucleus and then the nucleus pulls out the energy that was in the electron and that creates a photon my name is dylan stone...... If energy in a particle acts like a ghost then you can compact other energy inside of energy.... Which would probably be how you got decay.... Basically what would happen the center energy in the particle would push out other bits of energy and they would become different condensities in other parts of the particle....😂 And obviously the bits of the energy being pushed out of the center of the particle would already be part of the particle..... It would just become packed in other energy on the edge of the particle.
@user-uu2cd4wl3i8 ай бұрын
@@eidiazcas hey so if the photon can create a field for a couple of seconds because the energy and the photon pushes to its edges and pulls them just a little bit of the electromagnetic field then you could say the electromagnetic field crushes it to become or give it enough pull to crush the photon into a straight line
@helenthompson9128 ай бұрын
He is amazing!
@DejanBogdanovic9 ай бұрын
Just WOW :)
@byExtrux9 ай бұрын
i agree with Feynman, it's too local, we can't say the origins of the universe, at least all worlds/ doesn't come from the Sun. It's too provincial as he says.
@dylangabriel270310 ай бұрын
Feynman was an incredible man
@JasonGoodfellow10 ай бұрын
What a legend.
@clutchlevels11 ай бұрын
Smart man. Flawed as we all are. King Solomon would've been nice to have in the room. He would've laughed a bit. Then proceeded to question all primitive logic before dropping key proverbs of wisdom that would quiet the room. *exits the room to proceed ruling his kingdom*
@jameskeating471911 ай бұрын
Soo cool yes sir
@pigetstuck Жыл бұрын
perhaps he didn't doubt hard enough
@EclecticDiscus Жыл бұрын
Need a good accurate movie on his Life.
@lonzo61 Жыл бұрын
Oh, I wish I could have been a student of his, or even met him. We need more like him--especially now. Well, admittedly, we are always in the darkness in some respect. It is the scientists, philosophers and thinkers who keep us out of the murk--at least to a degree--in any era.
@AndrewJamesMcQuinn Жыл бұрын
Having knowledge makes the simple lies easy to spot.
@syedmahmood7454 Жыл бұрын
Remarkable.
@MrGoogelaar Жыл бұрын
0:37...Simply brilliantly summed up!
@greyeyed123 Жыл бұрын
I am a high school teacher, and the central question of my existence is how to hook the interest of students who have no interests. "What are you interested in?" "Nothing." "What are your hobbies?" "I have no hobbies." "What's your favorite movie?" "I don't have one." "What's your favorite tv show?" "People don't watch tv anymore." "Do you play sports?" "No." "Do you like any sports?" "No." "What do you do on the weekend?" "Nothing." "What's your favorite book?" "I don't have one." And these are the students who give you any kind of answer at all. Sometimes all you get are blank stares and a refusal to even write an answer. At least 20 years ago when I'd give a questionnaire on the first day of school, kids would actually write things that were mostly true--things they were actually somewhat interested in. Today they might write their favorite song or something, but the rest are "IDK", blank, or "I don't have one."
@greyeyed1234 ай бұрын
@@redryder3721 I think you are severely out of touch with the reality of the situation today.
@greyeyed1234 ай бұрын
@redryder3721 Yes, you are severely out of touch. Consider for a moment that maybe you don't understand the big picture. That someone with 20 years teaching experience may have some insight that you don't have. And that my 20 years does indeed trump your "time and effort" into writing a handful of paragraphs in a youtube comment. (And now you've deleted your comments and run away. Typical.) If you sincerely want to learn something about the issue I'm concerned about, I'm here.
@toshitnerurkar9284 Жыл бұрын
A highly intelligent person speaking with a new york accent is the greatest thing ever
@cruzromwaldgabriell.7032 Жыл бұрын
ily feynman
@appidydafoo Жыл бұрын
Total and complete Zen
@shotcaller69 Жыл бұрын
Isn’t it the quest for the next question, not the answers?
@scot_smith Жыл бұрын
Listening to him makes me wonder if there really is any difference among science, philosophy and a religious mind (free of religious organization) ...the ability to doubt and question without fear or seeking security in an answer is an amazing and rare capacity
@magnusdude61 Жыл бұрын
As charming and brilliant as Dr Feynman clearly is, he is disguising with his verbal prowess a certain intellectual pride that will lead to his downfall if he doesn't address it - playing God. Since ordinary, average IQ people know that "the fear (and search for) God is the beginning of wisdom....." Dr F, by bragging that he is not afraid of not knowing what happens after death, is reeking of ugly pride. The fear of death is bedrock human nature, and he is lying to himself.
@eidiazcas8 ай бұрын
If that's the beggining of wisdom why are they average IQ in the first place, and that kind of thinking is more prominent in places with very low IQ, how the beggining of wisdom ends always in low IQ people?
@bryanleovy2163 Жыл бұрын
A genius walking on eggshells
@Richard-hq1yh Жыл бұрын
Yeah . Serious Benediction Your insurance qoute and adjustment will not rectify Yalls problem But I'm going off to actual Pin Locale Soft for preekin
@matthewbair4754 Жыл бұрын
Didn't Feynman consider that we have answered these questions with the richest color pallete available to us thus far? We approached them by playing with the languages of myth, religion, and philosophy. These provide further questions, not answers, to questions that are bigger than mere questions and require expression through art rather than some reducible eureka of modern science! Science is just a new and more refined color on the pallete.
@9one9Music Жыл бұрын
Religion is a plague and cancer on Humanity.
@venenareligioest410 Жыл бұрын
A humble man, a true genius.
@TodaysBibleTruth Жыл бұрын
I think there is a difference between healthy skepticism and doubt. Good science is made up of healthy skepticism and curiosity. This also requires faith that one will find an answer and that an answer exists. However, doubt sets one up for failure at the outset. You only find truth/God where you're looking for him. "He resists the proud and gives grace to the humble."
@sussusamogus8860 Жыл бұрын
faith is for religions. science is not something one can believe in. its always true. science is the obervation of whats around us (gods creation if you will) and the outcomes of countless expirements which tell us how things work. if we never doubted, we would still be in caves.
@jimsaturday4945 Жыл бұрын
I think the fact that you only find God when you’re looking for him suggests that Gods are largely a psychological construct, especially because the same thing is said about Gods of other religions. They have the same philosophy in the movie “Polar Express” about Santa Clause. You can convince your brain that something is true through repetition and faith alone, especially when it offers comfort, purpose, meaning, and a sense of community. There’s nothing wrong with that in my opinion, I just wish that these communities were more accepting of each other. I don’t like the “my god is the true god” kinds of faiths.