Bruxy Cavey was a scandal before he was caught.

If you really want to know what is happening. If you can actually handle some truth. I invite you to watch the documentary "Bad Faith" then use your reason and critical thinking and draw your own conclusions

... riveting ... 😴

Those who do God's will are always glorified. Many clergy believe that Jesus was only sent to die. IF that's true, then all those who helped Jesus go to the cross, should be glorified. BUT, they weren't. Judas threw down the money. Judas has been vilified as a betrayer. Jesus said it would have been better if had not been born. Then, Judas hanged himself. That doesn't seem to be glorification, does it. It proves that Jesus was not sent to die. But, to be accepted and followed, as he said from the very beginning of his ministry

Thank you

Insanity and lying and Pharisees. So haven't had a chance to watch this yet. But are we talking about the self-proclaimed the 13th apostle who does not have a throne to the right hand of Jesus in heaven? You know the one that teaches his gospel not jesus's. Paul the Pharisees among Pharisees and a fellow herodian

May God bless my brother.

The king of Jerusalem had a biblical mandate from Yahweh to uphold justice and righteousness over his people. (Prov 16:2, 29:14, 20:28, 29:4, 22:11, etc) Herod held that office and the divinely appointed mandate for upholding justice and righteousness that came with the office of the King when he delivered Christ over to Pontius Pilate to be flogged, scourged and crucified. Christ told Pilate, “therefore he who delivered me over to you has the greater sin.” John 19:11 The very last mortal to deliver Christ to Pilate was Herod. If God’s prophetic anger was aroused by unjust kings like Ahab and Baasha, how much more Herod.

Amen brother!

❤

Amen

The Eastern Orthodox Church does not enumerate the mysteries as this guy suggests. You can just do a KZfaq search and find priests talking about this. They hold to the seven that the Roman Catholic Church have, but they do not limit them to those. He later talks about the priesthood of all believers. Yes, very good, the NT says believers are a royal priesthood. But Israel in the OT was also called a kingdom of priests, amd yet they had a dedicated priesthood as well. So the priesthood of all believers does not by itself undercut the priesthood of the EOC or RCC. I think I will just add more of my comments to this one. In answer to the first Q&A question, he said that EO priests can get married. From my understanding, priests can BE married, but if they are to marry it has to be before their ordination. A single man who becomes ordained as a priest cannot then get married while a priest. I also think it a bit odd to criticize the EOC for their emphasis on the Incarnation but then go to Athanasius to argue for sola scriptura in the early church. Athanasius is, of course, the author of the famous treatise ON THE INCARNATION, which has that (also famous) line, "God became man that man might become deified" (I don't like the translate "might become God," because the Greek text doesn't just reuse the word θεός there). And by the way, in that treatise, Athanasius talks a lot about Christ's crucifixion and resurrection, so it isn't like he tosses those out to talk about the incarnation instead, although I have been a bit concerned myself about what I think is maybe an overemphasis on the incarnation. I'm also just not sure Dr. Costa is quite in tune with the nuances of how the EOC views salvation and "faith working through love" (which is from Galatians 5:6, by the way). In fact, in most of these discussions, the word "salvation" is never quite defined, and so I think there ends up being a lot of talking past one another, because people just aren't quite talking about the same thing. Although this video is titled "Eastern Orthodoxy & the Gospel," I didn't hear much about how EO actually denies the gospel. Again, to affirm "faith working through love" seems to me simply to affirm Galatians 5:6 and James 2:14-26. And while if you press Protestants, they will agree that salvation includes sanctification and glorification, salvation is really talked about and thought about as equal to justification (and "going to heaven when you die"). Salvation in the EOC seems to more explicitly and more consistently incorporate sanctification and glorification/deification, so that to say that salvation has no place for works sounds like saying that sanctification has no place for living a more holy life. Dr. Costa also references Joshua Schooping's book *Disillusioned*, which I have read, regarding Jesus being angry and people having to approach him through his mother. I think this is a valid criticism of those prayers and practices, but I do not think it is fair to equate that to the EO mindset generally, and especially not to the official teaching of the EOC. In fact, priests that I have listened to and read say over and over again that God is NOT angry with us and WANTS to save us. A common criticism from the EO against the Protestant understanding of penal substitution is that it an angry God who must be appeased by blood. Whatever you think of that criticism, it indicates a reluctance from the EOC to talk about God as angry and distant. I think there is a lot more that I could comment on here, but I will just give a summary now. While I think Dr. Costa gives a handful of points that are worth consideration, there is also to my estimation quite a bit of misrepresentation, as well as some odd arguments that don't have a lot of force. But I am not Eastern Orthodox, so take these things for what you will. I may also have misrepresented Eastern Orthodoxy somewhere. I appreciate the opportunity to hear arguments against Eastern Orthodoxy, though, as I continue my inquiry.

Did he just say that Cain's offering to God was rejected because it was produce from the ground, which was cursed and was a product of human labor? Wow, I have never heard that interpretation before. Surely, he doesn't think Abel did no work in caring for the flocks. I dont know, I think he maybe needs to rethink the story of Cain and Abel and whether Cain even had a good heart before God when he made his offering.

Pascha is not Communion. I assume that was just him misspeaking. Pascha is Easter. Also, a criticism against the current Patriarch of Moscow is not necessarily a criticism of Eastern Orthodoxy as such.

Rrgarding the offices of the Church, the Eastern Orthodox Bible has an appendix on this. Their argument is that the distinction between bishop and presbyter under the monarchical episcopate structure was a semantic development, not an actual development of offices. That is, when the words were used interchangeably, there was still a "protopresbyter" for the sake of good order. Early in the second century - and we see this with Ignatius - the word "bishop" began to be used exclusively for the protopresbyter. The rest of the presbyters were still just called presbyters.

Where can we get a link to the chart? Thank you.

Great Sermon Pastor Jacob!

Amen

The leaven of knowing the truth and lying about the cause of these the birthing pains of this the millennium of climate change END TIMES is hypocrisy. They have a form of godliness without understanding his power The internal angles of Moloch's Jewish Antichrist star of Renpham is 60-60-60-60-60-60. "These are just the birthing pains. The new moon SE to NW antideluvian tidal Tsunamis are yet to come." Come to Jesus as his new Commandment united us all and new covenant warned us all. Have faith in the body of Christ humanity all the bad doctrine tribalism religions don't. Salvation is of the Jews because they know that the Precession of the Sun's shadow millennial Alpha omega Equinoxes not you or co2 are causing these the end of days

God is building an everlasting kingdom! Thanks Pastor. Your friend in the North

The image Jacob referred to during the message. Is this available online?

Praise the Lord!

This is indeed encouraging. I appreciate pastor Jacob's perspective. I am still letting this perspective sink in but it rings true in my spirt just as Postmillennialism took over a year to resolve its truth after first being exposed to it. Clearly, the zionistic temple worship, still to this day is a counterfeit to God's truth and his Bride conquering the earth.

Great Sermon Pastor Jacob, thank you

Amen

Thank you for sharing this wonderful message.. This is the assurance of the righteous 🙏🏽

Dear Pastor. If Daniel 7:13 was fulfilled in the First Century, how then does Christ say to the High Priest, at His trial, that "ye shall see" (Future Indicative Middle, 2nd person plural) quoting directly the events of Daniel 7:13? Does Christ not speak of a yet a future event? How would they see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of power? How will they see the Son of Man coming in the clouds of heaven? Are you saying (if this event is fulfilled in heaven) that the high priest or the Jewish leaders (the ones who rejected and called for the crucifixion of Christ) will be in heaven to witness this event? By the way, if Jesus was only anointed as King after His ascension, does that mean He was not King before His incarnation?

Trump means a little horn! Trump is the little horn of the beast, the man of lawlessness and American antichrist. Christians who worship Trump have been rejected by Christ, turned over to a reprobate mind, and will be left behind There are seven common characteristics between the little horn of Daniel and the little horn of trump are found in Daniel chapters 7 and 8: 1. Both are described as a horn; 2. Both are persecuting powers (Dan. 7:21, “I was watching; and the same horn was making war against the saints, and prevailing against them. Trump did this whne he deluded the church; Dan. 7:25 "And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws (the Constitution) : and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time. ; Dan. 8:3 I looked up, and there before me was a ram with two horns, standing beside the canal, and the horns were long. One of the horns was longer than the other but grew up later. 4 I watched the ram as it charged toward the west and the north and the south. No animal could stand against it, and none could rescue from its power. It did as it pleased and became great. (Totally Trump) Dan. 8:24 He will become very strong, but not by his own power. He will cause astounding devastation and will succeed in whatever he does. He will destroy those who are mighty, the holy people.); 3. Both are self-exalting and blasphemous (Dan. 7:8 I considered the horns, and, behold, there came up among them another little horn, before whom there were three of the first horns plucked up by the roots: and, behold, in this horn were eyes like the eyes of man, and a mouth speaking great things. Dan. 7:20 I also wanted to know about the ten horns on its head and about the other horn that came up, before which three of them fell. Dan. 7:25 Daniel 7:25 And he shall speak great words against the most High, and shall wear out the saints of the most High, and think to change times and laws: and they shall be given into his hand until a time and times and the dividing of time.; Dan. 8:5 As I was thinking about this, suddenly a goat (Trump) with a prominent horn between its eyes. Repent the little horn of the beast Trump!

Should we not be saying, that conquering comes with suffering, or suffering comes while conquering? Why do we always say that we conquer by suffering? That’s the wrong picture. In battle there is suffering. But you don’t step into battle hoping to have your head cut off because without having your head cutoff you won’t win. No. You set forth in battle to conquer. And in that battle, there will be carnage. Conquering comes with suffering.

Amen

Great Sermon, Pastor Jacob!

Thank you, Pastor Jacob. I found your semon so encouraging. After the darkness, there will be light. We see a suffering church, God sees a raised church. Oh the hope we gave in Christ.

thank you!

If I acknowledge these are summary of the 10, I should also observe the Sabbath as well

Herod is Pharaoh

PAUL GOSPEL

If we are living in post-millennial time, when did the battle of Ezechiel 38 take place? Any takers? 😂 I’ll be waiting… I wonder if anyone sees my uncomfortable question. No one ever replies. Makes me wonder if I am the only one seeing it (shadow-banned).

Excellent Post Millennial presentation. Truth to live by with a proper eschatology of hope!

@33:40 mark “‘At hand’ doesn’t mean thousands of years from now, it means imminent, coming in moments”. In similar manner, a lot of second coming passages use the identical ‘at hand’ expression in the Greek. 1 Peter 4:7 James 5:8 Hebrews 10:25 Romans 13:12

Amen brother!

Thanks Jacob for showing vulnerability in your interpretations. Personally I think it was Nero, but like you am uncertain. I am postmillennial in eschatology and agree that God stirs the chaos of nations for the advancement of hus own Holy Kingdom that will come on earth as it is in Heaven.

Amen

Thank you brother!

This pastor is the one who’s going to be saying Lord Lord. Who does this man think he is? Another self righteous Pharisee. Let him be accursed.

Such a blessing. I’ve shared many sermons in this series to friends. Praise God for this faithful pastor.

the developed doctrine of the Pre-Tribulation catching up of the church wasn’t recorded until the 19th century, while also noting that that doctrine is built on foundations that are spoken of often and early in the history of the church.

🙏

Amen

Would you tell your name Pastor

I am from south central Ontario, the protestant Canadian biggest church that I learned the gospel in, is now of the world, many of us left to find the gospel where ever we could! I am ready to go up in the Rapture. Canada & the USA are doomed to GODs judgement. right now! We need more house church for United church Christian who are really born again. WE do not need old buildings now, Thanks for your video.