🤣

You take way better care of your stuff than I do 😂 might be why my P1000 doesn’t work so good anymore

​​@@SuperZoomVideos, What a shame! I've had it for 3 years, without "chronic" problems, I live in the northeast of Brazil (coast) we have a lot of humidity here. If you don't store it in the dehumidifier, it won't last long. It depends on luck too, lol... Avoid blowing or handling with food-stained or oily hands, this prevents the fungus from feeding and proliferating. Thank you for passing on the information that Nikon will not continue with the P1000, unfortunately!

grazie amico mio

@@SuperZoomVideos thanks my dear friend

😂

Oooo good comment

Not wrong

Somebodies gotta do it right?

🤷🏼‍♂️

I’m going to need you to take those expectations all the way down buddy

Probably just the guy who made it

And I would argue still worth picking up second hand or just the P950

I’m not sure how valid this FYI still is 😂

I am from the Netherlands , it is flat here :)

I literally just took what google gave me 🤷🏼‍♂️ talk to them

Well said mate

I’m hoping it doesn’t go anywhere soon but everything has a shelf life.

The video quality is definitely better but my editing software upscales a bit

Oh yeah I really do want to catch that one year, you guys really know how to put on a light show and fireworks.

@@SuperZoomVideos yeah it’s very cool , wouldn’t mind catching it myself one day

No sir :)

Yup, that is the impression that I get. 🫤

No, they do not research on their own. Instead they decided to just believe what flat earth youtube videos say and don't question that.

I’m not one myself, but I’ve met them and they tend to know more about the globe model than most people, and likely you as well.

This was like 4 years ago, I cant even remember what I was thinking yesterday

@@SuperZoomVideos )))

Yes to everything you mentioned, a lot of that I feel could be overcome with an updated version of the camera.

You were close, it was unavailable for a good chunk of 2022, I think this was primarily due to a shortage of chips but I suspect other things were hard to come by as well

Goodness me, “those guys” is hardly a derogatory term.

Like 97% tech I would say, the good thing is most of them are so straight forward they don’t really age. Is that the tripod/camera assembly intro 😂

@@SuperZoomVideos thank you and yeah I love it the flipping of the camera and zooming was nice and the of music intro sends you right back to 2018

There are other videos 🫥

Real science, real physics 😂 Sure. Zoom in the sun and moon after they are "sank" behind the horizon. If earth is flat, you will succeed. Good luck

@@mikemental8285 Do you not comprehend what I said and the problems with just 14KM? At the distance required, even more problems come into play. Why do you think the sun looks so big at that distance? Too much water vapor and atmospheric contamination to deal with which causes a lensing effect. Then there are also land obstructions. Even technology has its limits. Just like the human eye, cameras can only see so far. The atmosphere itself acts like one giant lens and this becomes apparent the further through the atmosphere an object is. Lit objects are affected more than nonlit objects because of their interaction with the atmosphere. Besides, zooming isn't necessary when all you have to do is increase your altitude, and bam there the sun is again in full view. Even this will stop working because no matter how high we go, we can never see the whole surface of the Earth. After all, the maximum distance of sight is being reached. Maximum distance could never be reached on a surface that curves and eventually obscures itself and no matter what you do, you would never be able to bring anything back into view... Now, how can this same camera capture the surface of an object that is 239,000 miles away when it can't capture more than 500 miles of Earth before it becomes too grainy to see because of its limits? Even the 500-mile ability to see in any direction destroys curvature itself. At these distances, objects should be leaning away from you but they never do...

@@mikemental8285 I also forgot to mention that at sea level 14km away, you wouldn't even be able to see any part of the ship because it would have sunk below curvature preventing it from even being seen... 0 height at 8.6 miles equals 49 feet of obstruction and the ship is only 47 feet in height...

@@mikemental8285 REAL science and REAL physics will ALWAYS destroy pseudoscience and theoretical physics...

@@Elkysium Ok, real science? So how do YOU calculate how far we should see if earth is spherical, at the size we've been told? How? Let's see 😉

Just the camera mate :)

Why Thankyou my friend :)

We can dream!

We can only wish for it XD

I had really hoped to get over there but it was the one bloody day it rained 😂

@@SuperZoomVideos yeah always the way aye