You should be absolutely ashamed of yourself for posting something as unintelligent as this, William Lyons!!!
@realemonful3 ай бұрын
And if you don't know what I mean, William Lyons... stick to serving fries at McDonalds!!!
@AleHand_3 ай бұрын
Last one broke for sure
@gusm51284 ай бұрын
Untwist itself ? Don’t they have slip rings ?
@husavillain2 ай бұрын
Untwist CABLES
@UQRXD5 ай бұрын
No way to put out a turbine fire.
@UQRXD5 ай бұрын
They only last 30 years.
@user-oh6sn9mu9h5 ай бұрын
Wow masahallah will don very nice good job My brother 💝 love from Pakistan 🇵🇰🇵🇰💕🌹💐🏏🏏
@SHAWESH047 ай бұрын
I am 17years I wish be renewable energy engineer in future we'll come to Egypt ❤❤🇪🇬🇪🇬
@AmandaHugandKiss4117 ай бұрын
The most problematic parts are the generator and gear box which are "cooled" by being full of petroleum oil. Great! That and lightning...even better to destruction of a 7 million dollar 8 to 12 year lifespan, inefficient, highly flammable, unreliable electric generator. Wow even better 😅
@user-pb5zk3pc4g7 ай бұрын
The best presentation ever🔥🔥🔥🔥
@saleemsaeed2738 ай бұрын
Is it Location of transformer near of generator Or in bottom
@GrolyBasita-vj6ze8 ай бұрын
Good job
@RonnieSiphika9 ай бұрын
🎉
@edswider930910 ай бұрын
Wow so much engineering you have all the areas covered nicely done
@TempoDrift148010 ай бұрын
This is the kind of guy I would want taking care of this machine. Sounds like he's extremely competent.
@MrProvinspoul10 ай бұрын
There is NOTHING "green" in these infernal machines, Denmark is about to be totally destroyed by these infrasound noisy infernal machines, there are a few people with very deep pockets who earn fat from this scam..The man stands and says that the system itself uses a little over 1Kw before the turbine starts making power!!! it is not a little power as he says, it will be a lot of power during its lifetime, when you see that these hellish machines stand still 60% of the time because agreements have been made to purchase power in other countries, that is that's a scam that wants something, it's unbelievable that people can't see it's a scam of the worst kind, these machines never turn green, blades are buried because they're so toxic that they can't be recycled!!! Well, it's great to get poison in the ground, isn't it! if you look closely, you often see oil leaking out of the clutch where the blades are fixed, if there were finally to be this kind of crap to make electricity then you shouldn't install more than you need, it's too stupid to keep putting them up just because there are people with deep pockets, One of the world's best sound researchers is called Henrik Møller and comes from Denmark, he once said that there MUST be at least 80km to the nearest habitation because these turbines make so much infrasound that people and animals get sick from the noise from them, we get the disease Hyperacusis and when when it hits it's too late to do anything about it, Denmark is destroyed by the noise from these crappy machines, noise everywhere from them plus Denmark is looking like a pilot site for wind turbines, no matter where you look you see these machines in the countryside .
@zaitonyahya476810 ай бұрын
Rimba hotel&sani experience
@minethegap11 ай бұрын
This has been my go to video for terrible insomnia
@roberto49ism11 ай бұрын
EXCELLENT! Thanks for posting this.
@WilliamLyons11 ай бұрын
Glad you enjoyed it!
@mikeall701211 ай бұрын
23% capacity factor is terrible. Nuclear is 90% or greater. At 1.7 million euros per 850kw, it would take 8 billion euros worth of these to replace 1 1000mwe power plant, in order to match the mwh equivalent per year. That also doesn't include the lack of reactive power made by wind generators. They have very poor power factors when compared to large synchronous machines.
@ToyotatechDK11 ай бұрын
From my time at Vestas. Great memories
@43wagonwheel11 ай бұрын
Too bad they are a waste of money.
@cwmbc11 ай бұрын
Pity the system that turns the blades in to wind was not shown or demonstrated yet its a vital part of the system.
@wesley198311 ай бұрын
No mention of the inverter?
@user-dc2ot2tj2b11 ай бұрын
Yes if you build something wrong you have to compensate that with other things a fact is just useless things, he is talking for 5 years its ROI for building that thing that is not incl themaitenace, a ROI from 1 year can be done but not with this, simply a waste from time money and land scape, thanks for showing how stupid it is.
@fsj19781111 ай бұрын
Neat stuff, thanks for sharing.
@allezvenga761711 ай бұрын
Thanks for your sharing
@WilliamLyons11 ай бұрын
Thanks for watching!
@kerryburns604111 ай бұрын
I´ve never seen a cost/benefit analysis ...
@ifancysongs11 ай бұрын
A lot has changed since me working on the 250 KW models in the early 90's. Very happy to see, the Midas display and keypad has remained the same. Thanks for showing us around. Thank you.
@WilliamLyons11 ай бұрын
Thanks for sharing 👍
@markede1111 ай бұрын
Doesn't anybody realize how many people get cancer every year from the noise of these turbines. It's a tragedy that nobody but Trump can fix it. Ask him about it at one if his rallies.
@C-141B_FE11 ай бұрын
These eyesores should be nuked from orbit.
@mikeadler43411 ай бұрын
👍👍
@b43xoit11 ай бұрын
Is the rotor of the generator just permanent magnets made of rare earths? If it were made with windings and an exciter, how much less efficient would the conversion be? How is the yawing mechanism locked out when people are in the nacelle?
@007floppyboy11 ай бұрын
Yaw gear, looks like a worm gearmotor going through a planetary gear.
@campbellmorrison854011 ай бұрын
Now I can see how they catch fire. Very interesting to see, dont think I would want to be in there with the blades turning
@billj564511 ай бұрын
The first one has a critical mistake in its design- there are primary members that won't be activated because there is no rotational restraint at the end supports. The second one is a good minimal design that addresses the main forces. The third one is a straightforward design but would not be as efficient as the second. The fourth one addresses the forces well and appears to be very stiff. The fifth one again makes a mistake by trying to use end rotational restraint that isn't there. The sixth one is a basic truss and will work well if they have executed the joint connections well. It's also going to be very stiff. The last one has a critical design error by not bracing 2 of the truss panels, when they load it you can see excessive local deflection across these 2 panels. Overall though it looks like a lot of fun.
@gowdsake710311 ай бұрын
Would this be before it destroys its blades or gearbox and burn down
@GLF-Video11 ай бұрын
Thank you!
@WilliamLyons11 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@fredliperson917111 ай бұрын
At 4:06 did you see that beautiful red tailed hawk get taken out by the blade? ....
@cristiii760511 ай бұрын
Very good video
@WilliamLyons11 ай бұрын
Thanks for the visit
@michaeldaniels363911 ай бұрын
I live in northern Oklahoma, USA, and these things are everywhere. Some are very close to the highways and the size can be appreciated, and encountering a blade being transported really brings it home. Thanks for the tour.
@Automatons.Ай бұрын
Same thing over here in Cali, i see em everywhere
@martinday281511 ай бұрын
Thank you, no annoying music or fancy effects, just interesting facts.
@rocketman702 Жыл бұрын
Why doesn't it turn to face the prevailing winds? Wont this affect its ability to provide sustainable energy, or is the whole shebang a huge con????
@atvheads Жыл бұрын
The stupidest invention ever.
@atvheads11 ай бұрын
Do they really have Internet connection in Romania? Pikey! @@cristiii7605
@michaelfraser5723 Жыл бұрын
COST OUTWEIGHS ANY ALLEGED BENEFITS, AS USUAL vanity
@simonm14473 ай бұрын
Lie
@ChuonSophak Жыл бұрын
Thank you sir for make and offer video safety protection.I am support your video.
@frankanddanasnyder3272 Жыл бұрын
The turbine has not paid for it's self yet! The 40% subsidy is a cost to society and part of the true cost...plus you did not account for the time value of money.
@cristiii760511 ай бұрын
It has
@WillConley Жыл бұрын
The weak link was the thin board. The solution is to distribute its brittle surface across as many contact points as possible. That means a latticework. The trestle bridge came close.