Gracias por tu análisis tan objetivo y profesional. Yo tengo los Stax S3 y estan geniales. Saludos cordiales desde Chile.
@Icecold_ArtАй бұрын
Thank You for this test, super helpful. Stax S3 is somewhat lean, but it has great breathing room for a closed back and is easily the best Bang for the Buck, If I had to go wireless though? Bathys all the way. Personally Going to probably buy the new Focal Azurys.
@charleyweinhardtАй бұрын
I think it's impossible to compare audio like this, you need a much longer sample to be able to compare the transitions of each product
@yorklancaster2187Ай бұрын
不知为何,怎么感觉西电声音在听交响乐时有一点拖沓呢
@user-hd6rn2hx2x5 күн бұрын
It seems that the transient response of the newly reissued WE300B tubes has been deliberately slowed down, perhaps to create the characteristic rich sound typically associated with tube amplifiers?
@joshuvaantonioАй бұрын
Watch from 3:50 - The difference is massive between Hd800 and Utopia
@culle6522Ай бұрын
B&W is Winner !!!
@swllzАй бұрын
You are doing a great comparison. Your way to compare speaker is unique on your tube, your definitely can do more and attract more viewers. This Monitor Audio Studio speaker is lacking in midrange, critical for human voice. All Monitor Audio speaker are overpriced themselves against competition in recent years.
@StephenwongdirectimagingАй бұрын
Tad me 1 is the winner
@Stephenwongdirectimaging2 ай бұрын
All time favourite hd800s after all kind of hi end headphones
@Stephenwongdirectimaging2 ай бұрын
After going most hi end brand headphone from 1000-5000 usd I end up sennheiser hd800s my favourite with tube amp drive
@user-mj9tq1yf7k2 ай бұрын
Technics
@dudethe45422 ай бұрын
第一次看到有人这么真实的评价劲浪bathys 网上快把他吹上天了
@user-hd6rn2hx2x2 ай бұрын
谢谢!
@soulfulfool2 ай бұрын
looks like I need NAN in my collection
@jasonmui13142 ай бұрын
我有聽WE300 2021, superTNT, 還有EML
@fabriziodeangelis49403 ай бұрын
Technics 👍🔊🔊 fantastica
@kindface3 ай бұрын
Accuphase is my preference. I have a certain hearing impairment which predisposes me to favour the lower-mids and the base notes. I don't hear the full spectrum of the mids so that when I hear mids and highs that are minimally "unpleasant" or "off", that's easily amplified into harshness, lack of balance, and/or overbearing sibilance, etc. Because the Luxman seems to predominate (over the Accuphase) in the mids, it more often "runs roughshod" of my listening comfort zone so that by default, Accuphase comes across as the more pleasant experience for my ears. Like hearing aids, it's great that amp manufacturers adopt unique/different sound signatures so that there's always an amp or two that's right for someone with compromised hearing profile.
@jimmysjunkyard3 ай бұрын
The Takatsuki has widest bandwidth, great low and extended high... Linlai is second, followed by Full Music...
@makiskouloumparitsis92034 ай бұрын
I do not understand why you would even put the LS3/5A in this test, to me its clearly much outclassed by the other speakers, the other speakers are high end and transparent to varying degrees, the LS3/5A almost sounds coloured. for if is no contest, i think the TAD was the most natural, KEF most neutral and B&W played nice too, they all played much better than the LS3/5A
@padde14 ай бұрын
what amp was used? thanks
@user-hd6rn2hx2x3 ай бұрын
TECHNICS SU-R1000
@user-qw2dq5wq7o4 ай бұрын
販売終了は勿体ない。ユニット単品の販売もすれば良かったのに。天井埋め込み型とかでさ
@DaW11db4 ай бұрын
TAD sounds better but you put those technics too close to the back walls, i think they need more back space , judging from your recording on my monitors...i think i will go for technics its cheap here in EU 🤓TAD is for millionaires here...
@bernie_xj4 ай бұрын
Thanks a lot for this comparison, amazing performance vs. price of the Chinese tube, a little harsh and less precise in bass. Takatsuki and new WE are very close, over all I prefer the WE a little more balanced for my taste. Unfortunately Takatsuki 300b is hard to get here in Europe. Airtight 300b mono very impressive, even when playing hard rock...
@ayildiray5 ай бұрын
Tj 300b/n is relaxed sound., Takatsuki is have a good bass. I prefer Tj 300b/n mesh plate. My other favorite tubes are Psvane T mark II , it’s a very smooth presentation.
Thank you for the very helpful comparison video. LS3/5A sounds the most natural to me. TAD and B&W seem to be good at expressing details, but B&W doesn't have good transitions in the mid-high range, giving it a mechanical feel. TAD is also clear, but I feel a resonance-like sound in the midrange. The sound of the LS3/5A has a smoother transition from the midrange to the high range, and perhaps because of the compact, closed design, there is less resonance from the box, allowing me to immerse myself in the music. I think it's amazing considering the price difference.
@ColocasiaCorm5 ай бұрын
my two favs are ref 1 and ls3/5a
@ColocasiaCorm5 ай бұрын
jesus the bowers sounds bad.
@joicejewerly55795 ай бұрын
Cheapest🎉🎉🎉
@davidt84385 ай бұрын
They all sounded exactly the same to me.
@ColocasiaCorm5 ай бұрын
Technics wins
@bunbuntong13515 ай бұрын
TAD is my cup of tea 😊
@touwlay56915 ай бұрын
amazingly great sound
@bartvanransbeeck13415 ай бұрын
I did a test in my shop in the 90 ies of small monitors and Rogers LS3/5a came out winner by large....no other speaker was so studied by listening tests....
@harrykoba1415 ай бұрын
I completely agree with the results in this video as well.
@dirkbusche545 ай бұрын
Good Idea. But the Sound is full of Distortions, is it the fault of KZfaq?
@vonjuergen6 ай бұрын
Thumbs down for the music without bass or dynamics. Its like showing sportscars at 10 mph and slow accelleration.
@mariorobertopavanati80956 ай бұрын
Tad r the best one
@Ensignpeak6 ай бұрын
Some of the most natural, musical speakers in the world without a doubt.
@batomatovic62866 ай бұрын
Tad but.. mucho dineros❤😂
@klaymoon16 ай бұрын
Great comparison recording! They are all good, very hard to tell if anything is different. Based on the look alone, I like Focal the best. I also think it's sound is well rounded. And, I think it will be great to include HD800S in the comparison.
@harrisedgar6 ай бұрын
wonderful..!!! Thank you.
@jcvr187 ай бұрын
excellent best sound by far with own TAD electronics bravo
@1210Jazz7 ай бұрын
I'm never buying an Utopia thats for sure.
@ReverendDr.Thomas3 ай бұрын
I can't wear it, as the headband is unsuited to my bald scalp. 😅
@batomatovic62867 ай бұрын
Atc easy
@tanzhonghui7 ай бұрын
Currently use the HD6XX and NAN-6 EQ'ed to harman. As much as I enjoy the dynamics on Focals, combine that with their peaky tuning and I find them harsh at times. Moreover, the drivers on my Elex would die once every 3-12 months so I don't think Focal is a brand I'd want to own again. If I ever get a HD800, it'll be for comfort lol.
@MrHasai17 ай бұрын
Amazing to me that a speaker that was designed several decades ago can sound so good! Wow...bravo to the designer of the Kef LS3/5A.
@jazzpianoman017 ай бұрын
I have the HD800 and it sounds superb
@ZenTunE-7 ай бұрын
5:47 The NAN-6 sound so much wider and clearer than the focal with this transition. (I'm listening to this on a Sundara)
@markc87737 ай бұрын
I love both sound representations. I feel like there's a bit more tonal richness and density in the mids along with extended highs in the Luxman. The sound stage is also a bit taller, but more narrow. The Accuphase is more airy and holographic with a wider sound stage. The Luxman is more dynamic while remaining neutral while the Accuphase is warmer with a more ethereal touch. Can't go wrong with either one. I have the Luxman 595ASE unit 109 of 300. I absolutely love it. Chances are that I would love the Accuphase if I owned this unit as well.