ENGT 509 25-1 Fourier Series
14:28
ENGT 509 24-1 Integral Transforms
9:42
ENGT 509 22-1 Machin Like Formulae
13:12
ENGT 509 23-2 Vectorizing MATLAB
11:31
Пікірлер
@DAMN__________
@DAMN__________ Күн бұрын
9:55 😂
@user-le1dh2zh9z
@user-le1dh2zh9z 2 күн бұрын
Your amusing you make physics like game I wish to study in your claas
@michaelmalarkey2943
@michaelmalarkey2943 13 күн бұрын
I find your programs very educational. Having had classes in linear algebra, i can say that your applied method now makes more sense to me.
@jidapa2969
@jidapa2969 14 күн бұрын
Thank you, this really help me.
@freddieordinario1265
@freddieordinario1265 14 күн бұрын
Is the elastic modulus always higher than the rupture modulus??
@daryavoyush4949
@daryavoyush4949 15 күн бұрын
thank you for your video!
@Doritsaresus
@Doritsaresus 18 күн бұрын
1.585D
@sajharguru
@sajharguru 23 күн бұрын
Great explain ❤❤
@thorstenstraub3657
@thorstenstraub3657 25 күн бұрын
A nice overview containing manual and symbolic integration and plotting the results. The shown commands provide nice plots with minimal effort. Especially I like how MATLAB uses common default values. For example, the additive constant C from the integration process is set in a way that the initial condition (t=0) for v and x is 0. It was a surprise to me that the integral boundary can be called t when the independent variable is t, too. It was explicitly mentioned that this violates no rules - and MATLAB accepts it - but in my understanding these are two separate things. The integral boundary is a static specific point in time at which the integration ceases. While the t in the formula is floating and takes all values within the integration boundaries. Anyway, it is simple and it works. A numerical integration is not shown, though. Instead the formulas obtained in the previous symbolic step were re-used. Tiny correction: The expression for x in 18:14 contains '..+3*t...' which is wrong. It should be 2*t since the expression for v contains a 2, not a 3.
@wjdavey3
@wjdavey3 25 күн бұрын
❤️🎶🎵👍🎶🎵🙏😎
@submarinemalen
@submarinemalen Ай бұрын
Excellent video
@chir0pter
@chir0pter Ай бұрын
How embarrassing for you to be using units that people who actually make stuff found effective for hundreds of years before moving decimal places with calculators was a thing
@usersslimss
@usersslimss Ай бұрын
☝️🤓
@teitgenengineering
@teitgenengineering Ай бұрын
thanks for the great explanation and thanks for using metric.
@oscartenelema4457
@oscartenelema4457 Ай бұрын
So very nice, great. Thank you tecaher.
@_BiologyMatters_
@_BiologyMatters_ Ай бұрын
You're so likeable and Gumbo is to die for cute! Thanks for your videos!
@DavidMOUSSONGA
@DavidMOUSSONGA Ай бұрын
Merci beaucoup.
@krishalbasnet
@krishalbasnet Ай бұрын
You're a god
@HARI.ARRA.
@HARI.ARRA. Ай бұрын
Sir, how is it possible that concrete has a lower young's modulus than steel?
@mengivokes8675
@mengivokes8675 Ай бұрын
Lec : I did this in undergraduate and I didn't really understand actually my mind : You are good by not understanding😂😂
@haroonwazir6490
@haroonwazir6490 Ай бұрын
What does it take to soak up as much knowledge as you?
@kareemsalessi
@kareemsalessi Ай бұрын
18:40 Because Apollo-Saturns were fake rockets 🚀
@kareemsalessi
@kareemsalessi Ай бұрын
21:00 SpaceX is also fake
@checull
@checull Ай бұрын
thanjk you! :)
@melchizedek077
@melchizedek077 Ай бұрын
This is a cool, simple explanation. I googled "How high does a building need to be to require a flying buttress and this video popped up" It doesn't answer the question exactly but the general terms are nice.
@eyeinthesky3013
@eyeinthesky3013 Ай бұрын
Fantastic explanation and experiment. I'm trying to understand the dynamics of riding electric unicycles and one of the biggest unknowns in the gyroscopic calculations is the moment of inertia of the rim and tire. This looks like the best way to measure it. Thank you so much for the video!
@forgottenforever1036
@forgottenforever1036 Ай бұрын
Thankyou!
@Deshprem25.
@Deshprem25. 2 ай бұрын
A millions of thanks sir... I was being wrong,,, because I didn't multiply 9.81 m/sec. square with weight. Thanks for my clarification
@sajharguru
@sajharguru 2 ай бұрын
Thank you very helpful video ❤
@NobodyOfNote-qv5wh
@NobodyOfNote-qv5wh 2 ай бұрын
Nice work, and relevant to a school project here in NZ!
@Ramamoorthy1602
@Ramamoorthy1602 2 ай бұрын
Thanks for the explanation..really helpful
@wissalzaher4868
@wissalzaher4868 2 ай бұрын
Thank you for this enlightning Video, very much appreciated sir. I do have one question, I am looking to calculate the deflection of an Aluminium side Profile of a conveyor System that I reinforced with a Steel beam underneath. The profile and steel beam are connected with bolts. Will this approach work? Thanks :)
@Szendza
@Szendza 2 ай бұрын
currnetly 15, trying to make my ingame car corner better. this is fire
@TheChris14topher
@TheChris14topher 2 ай бұрын
If I had a 65000 lb mass hanging from a point, square in shape like your binder with stuff in it so it doesn't have a known center. Is it possible to know how far to move that hanger over if you knew that 1 side hangs 3/4 inches lower then the opposite side? 6ft by 6 ft cube basically that the lifting point is not center to account for weight.
@Gielyak
@Gielyak 2 ай бұрын
My main issue is static specially in the of freebody diagram.
@sebastianmontoya-vargas62
@sebastianmontoya-vargas62 2 ай бұрын
I had the pleasure to attend a guitar building course with proff. French at Colombia and I have to say his clarity in explaining complex things in a simple way is just awesome!
@user-yn1lc5cn5s
@user-yn1lc5cn5s 2 ай бұрын
you content and video really helped me for my exams especially this. Love it ! Am I able to reach out to you for questions
@abiyaselvindoss1764
@abiyaselvindoss1764 2 ай бұрын
Good explanation❤
@kauserahmed6669
@kauserahmed6669 2 ай бұрын
How to background blur.please share this code in Matlab
@jeffbeltramo9836
@jeffbeltramo9836 2 ай бұрын
Hi Mark, fellow Engineering Technology professor here. I love your videos and definitely try to channel some of your vibe when explaining things. When it comes to 2nd moment of area, in addition to stiffness, I tell my students it describes how the area is distributed around the centroid...large I, lots of material away from the centroid. First moment of area (aka statical moment) is used in calculating vertical shear in a beam. What I have always struggled is providing a physical feel for first moments, similar to what I can do with 2nd moments. As engineering technology students, I try to avoid getting into the weeds of deriving vertical shear stress and show them where the first moment shows up. Do you have a good physical explanation of what the first moment represents? I love to hear it if you do.
@abril5508
@abril5508 2 ай бұрын
12 years later and still saving egineering students. awesome video
@MuhammadRahatLatifTousif
@MuhammadRahatLatifTousif 2 ай бұрын
beautiful way of explanation. Thank you, sir.
@DytBaat
@DytBaat 2 ай бұрын
4:12 isn’t that a case of local buckling?? I mean if I’m standing on a coin, then no matter how much weight I put on it will never buckle like that. So I don’t get the short column thing later in the video. I find it strange that the wall thickness is not included somehow? BR Peter
@anujagrawal4404
@anujagrawal4404 2 ай бұрын
thats very clever shifting to polar rather than going for direct integration
@ArifKhan-he9km
@ArifKhan-he9km 3 ай бұрын
Join the rigging and lifting group
@axh759
@axh759 3 ай бұрын
Thanks helped me lots to understand
@dwahowrezaie7745
@dwahowrezaie7745 3 ай бұрын
It was best educational thing about this subject
@rapinncapin123
@rapinncapin123 3 ай бұрын
Good vid
@isaacfardig371
@isaacfardig371 3 ай бұрын
Area moment of inertia = area cross section resistance to bending, Mass moment of inertia = solid body resistance to rotation, Polar moment of inertia = objects resistance to twisting.
@sceneryj
@sceneryj 3 ай бұрын
Is it important for step 5 to be last in the recipe or could be executed earlier? (Or possibly at several locations throughout the recipe?)
@mimjorrison1121
@mimjorrison1121 3 ай бұрын
gg
@axeel_talks
@axeel_talks 3 ай бұрын
I think there is a mistake you wrote 113mm is between them even tho it’s written 150mm ? How is that possible