Sorry Eduard - I can't help you here. I'd recommend contacting Canon directly.

@@NaikMedia Thank you very much for the feedback. Have a good day.

😂 The 105 for self defence ... to quote Boris the Bullet-dodger: "Heavy is good, heavy is reliable. If it doesn't work, you can always hit 'em with it."

@@NaikMedia 😂😂😂 absolutely!

Yes - it fits on any Canon EF-S camera.

It's a specific video talking about a certain feature set of the camera (including some real examples of each mode). There are other videos on my channel showing real world samples of the R5C. Maybe check those out instead of complaining about this one?

@@NaikMedia thanks for replying , but comments are to say an opinion , or to critic any content as long as it is public , I will not allow my self to critic a private content. So accept it with a good heart if you care about improvement

@@nasseryounesvideo It's not an opinion if you state something 'is waste of time' and publish it for others to see - you could instead write 'I think this is a waste of time' then it would truly be an opinion. Your comment was also made in ignorance of the nature of the video (despite the accurate title), and of the availability of content that you were expecting from this one to be found elsewhere on my channel. My reply sought to rectify this. I care about improving my work, always do. But I need constructive feedback for that to take place, not complaints without basis. I'd suggest you check out my most recent video with R5 C real world footage - it's called 'R5 C Sample Footage).

@@NaikMedia dear I simple didn't like the video which I found accidently , so I have my right to reflect my opinion my way, if you didn't like it , simple delete it , block me , it's simple for you , but you are not allowed to put in my mouth words suits you , so simple , thank you

@@NaikMedia if I have time sure I will check other videos made by you , but I was searching for something important about canon 5RC and your video pop up as a suggestion, I watched to get what I want, but unfortunately I didn't so I saw as a waste of time

Only with one of the EF-RF adapters, and even then it will only allow the R's APS-C mode, giving you around 11mp. So it will work with the adapter, but you'll lose some resolution. Not that 11MP is at all shabby!

Hey, glad you found the video helpful! =D Shutter angle is one of the tips that I learned at the start which made *all* the difference for the quality of my videos. Enjoy making videos BobRob!

You're too kind. I have to admit, this video was made purely to make me happy - there's no market for it and it was very self-indulgent. But I'm thrilled you watched and enjoyed it =)

As far as I know, yes it should fit. The T3i is an EF-S mount, and the lens is too.

Thanks for the info! =)

Never tried the Tamron, but if the price is similar I'd suggest go Canon for likely more reliable auto-focus, particularly in video.

Hey, thank you so much =) Glad you liked the video. You'll need an adapter for the M50 but it will be a great combo.

Good question, it was Canon R5C.

Yep. I since replaced all my Rode mics with Neumann and Sennheiser. Different league really. Was very close to getting the MKH50 but went for the KMR81 & KM185 instead. I still want it though!

Banding on the C70? Wouldn’t have guessed it … ouch!

No audio? Just checked and it's still there. Thanks for commenting though. Perhaps check your player settings.

Glad you found it useful! Thank you =)

Great question, thanks for posting =) In terms of the sound of the fan, there are several settings you can choose: Always active (high, medium, low, automatic) or active while in standby (similar options as the always active, but it only turns on when the camera is NOT recording - so the fan turns off when you press record so it doesn't interfere with audio on the video file). However, I keep mine on constantly - not great for battery life - but never once has it overheated, and never once have I heard the sound of the fan in recording. It's very, very quiet, so I wouldn't worry about it at all. You have many options even if was loud enough to pick up on the shotgun mic (never happened for me with on camera mics - the lens focusing is usually louder). Stabilisation wise: for photography IBIS is something I miss on the R5. The OIS on the RF lenses is excellent, and probably better than EF lenses, but the IBIS + OIS combo of the R5 is magic for photos. I'd argue that the R5C with RF OIS is a bit better than a DSLR with EF OIS. If you can, rent an R5C and test it out with your longer lenses. You might find it acceptable, or you might hate it. Better to try before selling your R5 and/or buying an R5 C. If I required longer shots and potentially handleld, I'd buy or rent an R7 to complement my R5 C. The video matches really well and has similar oversampling and it has IBIS and a 1.6x reach. Check out some KZfaq reviews for the R7 video and bird photography; there's a few about and it could be a good solution for you.

Thanks for your opinion and comment =) I think it comes down to your needs. For my uses this surpasses the R5 in almost every way. The only thing I miss is the IBIS in photo mode, but it's something that can ruin video footage which I shoot more than photos, so it's a compromise I'm happy to make. I'd recommend getting more acquainted with the video benefits and you'll see that the video quality is way beyond that of the R5 (e.g. extended dynamic range, better colour and falloff). Check out Josh Sattin's videos on how to properly expose C Log 3 - when I learned this properly the video footage just went to the next level. Hopefully the regret fades, and you start enjoying it more. It's a powerhouse for content creation. Cheers!

@@NaikMedia i just filmed with it today and autofocus disables, goes gray when I switched to slow motion. All my footage is out of focus. I kept on having to manually dial in exposure settings when switching back and forth from slow mo to real time while the client stood there waiting on me because there’s no custom modes. Idk bro i hate it. You want to buy mine?

@@allinthemind2006 What lens are you using for the S&F mode? EF-S lenses don't autofocus in S&F mode, or have limited focus options. You really should be punching in to check focus in any case for best practice, this has saved me many times and isn't an option on the R5 (while recording). When your shutter is set to angle rather than speed, the camera will automatically adjust the shutter speed to 2x that of the frame-rate - so if you're filming in 50p and switch to 100p, then your shutter speed is automatically changed from 1/100 to 1/200 (if using a 180º shutter angle). Turn shutter to speed if you don't want the exposure to change, but you'll have jittery footage. Or put iso settings into auto. Or assign one of the buttons to S&F shooting (that's what I do, but I still have to raise the iso as it darkens the shot). Custom modes might help, I don't know. You know in the end what camera works for you best. How much would you like for your R5C?

Thanks for the advice! Im using the RF 24-70. I realized yesterday that autofocus actually works only in 60fps s&f. Before i was in 72fps. At least it works now. Im gonna give it one more go but if you’re serious I may sell it to you. Probably will want 3200 if you’re interested. it’s pretty much brand new and i just payed full price for it from B&H. Im gonna play with the CLog 3 maybe it will inspire me

@@allinthemind2006 Glad to hear the AF is working now! =) If you're in the US then I'd recommend finding a seller there - shipping to the UK is easier said than done sometimes!

Happy to help! Thanks for stopping by and commenting =)

Really glad it was helpful =) I appreciate your comment and feedback so much! I'd recommend checking out Josh Sattin's video on exposing C Log 3 on this camera to get even better footage. I'll be doing a video on this hopefully soon - I keep saying that but dad duties are keeping me busy in my free time!

You're very kind Chris! Hopefully I can do your subscription justice with more content soon! =)

Thanks for the question! Here’s my take: Even ruling out resolution, to me, the oversampling in the R5 C makes its 4K footage look cleaner and more detailed than the C70 (*when exposed correctly*). Oversampling is one of the reasons the C100’s HD image is still lauded 10 years later. What makes an image more ‘cinematic’ to you? More film like? Better highlight roll off? ‘Cinematic’ to me means more the choice of shot, the control of the lighting, and the narrative of the footage, so image quality doesn’t enter into it in my mind. Super 16mm film looks objectively poor quality compared to most other formats but can still be cinematic and subjectively pleasing :) The R5C and C70 are so close on image quality that it really comes down to all the other factors, which are far more relevant for making content (particularly cinema content): size, weight, handling, rigging, useability, content distribution requirements, client specifications, other crew and their needs etc. The c70 is unuseable *for my purposes* hence why I sold mine. Do I miss the image quality now I only use the R5 C? Not one bit. The R5 C is far more useable for me, more rugged, and more dynamic with incredible image quality. BUT: there will be C70 users out there saying the exact opposite. It comes down to your usage, your requirements and which camera makes you happiest (something underrated in my opinion). Comparing image quality is a wasted exercise when they both produce such good images. I’d recommend you try use both, and see which feels natural to use as a film-maker/videographer. Leave image quality comparisons to tech engineers ;) One thing I would say in staunch favour of the C70: it is more forgiving with exposure. If you mess up exposure the image will still be clean. The same cannot be said for the R5 C: you need to practice with it, and know how to best expose it or be plagued with nasty digital noise. Josh Sattin explains how to expose c log 3 the best. However, on the flip side, if you mess up focus, the R5 C’s detail and 8k is more forgiving.

Thanks for commenting :) There are a lot of reasonably priced gems out there: this lens in particular, the 50mm 1.8 stm, 17-55mm 2.8, and the 18-135 STM. I’m using that last one a lot recently and it is *excellent*. Ignore the chart sharpness videos, these EF-S lenses are brilliant in real world usage. I’ve used the 55-250 and 18-135 in numerous ‘professional’ shoots. Clients love the images and don’t care the lens doesn’t have a red ring on it or cost thousands. You can find very reasonably priced and well taken care of samples on eBay etc. Oh, and welcome to the community! Enjoy using your proper camera! 🙌🏻

Thanks for the sub! Been mad with client work but new videos for the channel in production!

Aye, it’s C Log 3 by the looks of it.

Interesting, but this option isn’t feasible for non-handy people like me. Thanks for sharing anyway!

@@NaikMedia My pleasure! It's actually not that hard to replace this back cap (bayonet) if to follow my video.

I’ve been purposefully overexposing by 1-2 stops and images look completely noise free in both 800 & 3200 😁

Thank you, really appreciate the kind words :)

Recording in an iso setting below the base iso actually crushes the shadows more, reducing dynamic range (base iso will always have the most latitude). By recording an iso below the base and crushing the blacks slightly gives a cleaner looking image, but reduced DR. This is what I’ve learned from watching other videos on the subject (Crimson Engine does a good one on it)

@@NaikMedia Awesome, thanks so much for the reply, and yep you’re absolutely spot on. Apologies I’ve just re-read my above comment, and you’ve more accurately described what I was trying (and failed) to get at. You do lose Dynamic Range, as the bottom two stops get crushed and you lose DR above middle grey. Here’s the video (or one of them) from Crimson Engine, where Rubidium describes what happens when you shoot below native ISO and why doing this gives you a cleaner, less noisey image. (Same applies but he’s using the C200) kzfaq.info/get/bejne/rs-kabOq1NvOaX0.htmlsi=41rSwbnFbgixf4tp (Time @ 2:32) Am I understanding this correctly though, is this what you saw in this video with the R5C - choosing Base ISO 3200, and shooting below it in ISO 800 - resulting in a less noisy image? If so, I still wonder if you’d get the same or similar results using the lower Base ISO 800 and shooting in even lower ISO’s (say ISO 200 or ISO 100)? Thanks so much again, thanks for the video, and thanks for helping clear up my previous comment.

So sorry for the slow response and thanks for linking the CR video (Rubidium…what a name - I love it!). Thank you for your comments too and the discussion :) I think what you say is accurate. So: Base ISO 800 + 100/200/400 iso = less noise, but lower dynamic range. Same for Base 3200 + 800/1600iso. People go on about dynamic range these days like it’s the be all and end all. Knowing that using below base iso helps reduce noise but lowers the DR is just another very useful tool in our belt.

@@NaikMedia absolutely agreed. Thanks so much for the reply too (and absolutely no apologies necessary 🤩🙌). Love it! And keep up the amazing work!

Cheers mate!

I’m not a fan of dismissive comments like this. We’re a community - amateur or pro, we should help each other. That’s what this video set out to do: help people who made the same mistakes as me. I solved an issue I faced, even if it was borne from my own ignorance, hence the title. Some people read manuals, others experiment and try things out; the latter is how I learn in particular.

*Automatic Black Balance

@@NaikMediaI wasn’t aware of any noise issue

Thank you Teddy! 🙌🏻 glad you enjoyed it. My partner bought the wallpaper at diy.com (GoodHome Loroco Beige & pink Metallic effect Leaves Textured Wallpaper)

Thanks for the comment, glad you found the video useful. I’ve been shooting raw a lot lately and I’m still astounded by the image quality. If the R6ii is a contender just keep in mind the log footage is very noisy, and in 1080p it’s unusable. R5C is sublime in all modes 👍🏻

You’re welcome! Enjoy the lens 😁

I’m so pleased you found it useful! Thank you for the kind comment :)

Avec plaisir, merci pour vos commentaires !

Thank you for the helpful comment!

You’re right. That is probably a more comparable lens. I was going mostly on FF equivalents of the focal length that 55-250 gives on Canon APS-C, so didn’t look at that one as a comparison. Thanks for raising the point though :)

Glad you found it helpful Kayla! :) which lens are you looking at?

Thanks for stopping by! Glad it was useful :)

I’d love to have all three but the weight of those would be so impractical for my needs 😅

Hey! Glad it’s been helpful :) HEVC causes less issues for me with management (smaller and as you said, easier to preview). For the times you don’t need 120fps, you can always write raw to the CF Express and HEVC to the SD card. That way if there ever was an issue with colour or exposure you have a backup - and with Angelbirds 1TB CFexpressB costing the same as an SD card, this is my new setup. Enjoy shooting surfing!

That sounds very weird. Might be worth contacting Canon about it. The only reason I could think of that happening with photos is the camera cranking up the iso or putting on some effect (without your instruction). Perhaps a factory reset or firmware update might knock it back in line.

Your manners are excellent - glad you enjoyed the video and feel inspired! Happy shooting. Thanks for watching :)

I have a few STM lenses and you’re right: they’re perfect for video (silent and smooth).

Yeah, I think the banned this simply because they didn’t want to approve any hybrid/mirrorless cameras. I’m convinced Canon was affronted and ‘finessed’ the situation but that’s just speculation 😁 Good content is good content at the end of the day, even if filmed on a potato (eg Blair Witch Project, Black Swan)

Some brilliant lenses by them, glad you enjoyed the video!