I got his book, "Marges of the philosophy". Great book!

To classify Aristotle as a bad writer seems to me rather glib..

Imagine having a terror group using culture to destroy a society in order to built it back in their image afterwards. And then calling it philosophy 😂

Philosophy: Give us your children, pay the tuition and we will give you well developed Marxist.

Now I understand extensionalism. Nothing more to Jews than they are just a class. Except there are something’s to Jews may be not bad stuff but why not good stuff?

speaks to the truth that heaven exists, regardless of how much anyone wants to say they're an atheist since they dont like the way the world works. You cant listen to this and not know deep inside that heaven exists.

Matemáticamente el NEXUS se puede explicar como un paradigma entre las 11 dimensiones conocidas Mathematically the NEXUS can be explained as a paradigm among the 11 known dimensions Mathematisch kann der NEXUS als Paradigma unter den 11 bekannten Dimensionen erklärt werden Mathématiquement, le NEXUS peut être expliqué comme un paradigme parmi les 11 dimensions connues. 🌍🌐🌎🌐🌏🌐🗺

Thanks for posting. Unfortunately Bryan does seem to be asking Iris questions that he's obviously prepared answers to and sometimes seems to be steering her a certain way.

My anbiceke rum man

Not a great speaker, but give the man a break, he was probably already suffering the effects of Althusser Disease at this time.

Quine was best analytical philosopher of post war period

2:13 Iris begins

I found out about Iris from an app called Enliven that showed me one of her quotes: 'We can only learn to love by loving."

🥰

Fr Copleston is the best person this show could have gotten for talking about the history of Philosophy.

W😊nderful. Thanks for making available

Magee jumps too quickly from question to question. A number of times you could tell that Murdoch was about halfway through her answer before he moved on. Then again, her point about philosophy being fodder, like sailing or any other material, I thought was far-fetched. I think there is a necessary link between philosophy and life itself, since practical philosophy has as its aim-an enhancement in our understanding for life. And since literature plays an enriching role in our lives, it seems it would also enrich our understanding. Sure sailing can enrich our lives, but I doubt there is any necessary link between sailing and literature unless it becomes essential to the plot. (e.g., a book about sailing) THEN it is fodder. Necessity is the key idea.

I like his nephew Robert more.

Thank you for putting this entire list together. This is great stuff.

This is a fascinating video, thanks.

Fascinating mind!

She was preeminently insightful about form and Form.

My grandfather and me loved this movie he especially loved the nexus part because of him being a pastor but sadly he died in 2019 from very aggressive cancer every time I listen to this it reminds me of him and where he is

By minute seven (no more time for the remaining time given it promises to be useless) one has not heard a single phrase of the kind "deconstruction is" followed by some definitional element(s), so that one could see the world in a different way or disagree. Only metacommentary. This is not a general comment on the validity of the word/the thinker, but it makes one think...

He’s so cool

Many many thanks. I miss the days when this what our TV offered us.

Thank you so much for this. It reminds me of how TV used to be when I was younger. How far we have fallen!

WTF this video is so old 😂

And the most curious point I would ask, is how could the most learned person in Britain be a CATHOLIC? It amazes me. (No offense to believers).

A'int that the question?. To Be Or Not. Catholicism or Atheism. I have been fascinated by how a COPPLESTON, HANS KUNG, could remain CATHOLIC. I have also understood how to be an atheist. Have ended up a Vedanta Hindu .

Who was toby in morganbessers life?

Saw this guy mentioned in my david denby book

This guest is caricature of all that’s British

Perhaps the best track of the Generations film score, and may very well Dennis McCarthy's magnum opus among his work for the Star Trek Franchise.

Why you took plato as a role model in philosophy and not the father of philosophy Socrates

Hegel's writing is notoriously difficult and can be challenging to understand, especially for those not well-versed in philosophy. Here's an example from his "Phenomenology of Spirit" that is often cited as being particularly difficult to comprehend: "The self-conscious spirit is, however, in its own self the negative, and hence is the opposite of its own essential nature; this is the abyss which sunders its own self and in which it loses its own self, but which at the same time, as the negation of its own self, has equally the opposite significance of being the restoration of itself."

Such a beautiful theme, it's truly one of the most beautiful pieces of music ever written

Being 70. Lifelong learning, understanding, observation, experience, re-examination 247 365. Absolute truth is a disingenuous pursuit whereas the pursuit of 'a truth' is an experiential truth 'in question' that is to say, what may be true now is subjective and not objectively implicit.

J

Someone should’ve told Soran there’s these things in the 24th century called holodecks which can mimic anything you want without having to blow up multiple planets to enter the nexus

who is the interviewer?

Baside great CONTENT to understand in a better way great presenters of a decade or more before also gave a great feeling of their majestic depths of understanding and simplicity of flow telling. THANKS.

Adorno case’s 1:30 is one very interesting; although am I fan, it’s clearly, as in many cases, that “brilliatism” is often an misinterpretation of boldness.

Dreyfus was a pioneer of Husserl studies in the U.S, but his reading of Husserl is now widely questioned. As Evan Thompson explains, "For a while Dreyfus's interpretation functioned as a received view in the cognitive science community of Husserl's thought and its relationship to cognitive science. This interpretation has since been seriously challenged by a number of Husserl scholars and philosophers. Thompson calls Dreyfus' reading "a peculiar interpretation of Husserl. Dreyfus presents Husserl's phenomenology as a form of representationalism that anticipates cognitivist and computational theories of mind. He then rehearses Heidegger's criticisms of Husserl thus understood and deploys them against cognitivism and artificial intelligence. Dreyfus reads Husserl largely through a combination of Heidegger's interpretation and a particular analytic (Fregean) reconstruction of one aspect of Husserl's thought-Husserl's notion of the noema. Thus the Husserl Dreyfus presents to cognitive science and analytic philosophy of mind is a problematic interpretive construct and should not be taken at face value." (Mind in Life, p.413) independent.academia.edu/JoshSoffer

What a garbage human being 🤮🤦‍♂️

As you can see they use this on every crisis that they invent today. NWO is on the way folks.

These jackasses should have stayed in Germany.

He might be a genius but he’s a terrible speaker.

Wittgenstein should have continued with his engineering, become a mediocre engineer, he could not have become an exceptional one, kept his father's inheritance and invested it in his own firm. Unfortunately he encountered Russell, a brilliant logician with absolutely no clue about philosophy. Philosophy, specifically philosophical genius, has nothing to do with logic, i.e. Greek common sense. Those who have not read the writings of the Divine Plato (that is nearly all successful academics) will never understand the cultural history of the Western Civilization, including the Greek-speaking Jews who came up with the idiotic, the so-called New Testament.

I personally find Wittgenstein unreadable and boring. Now, according to Wittgenstein's own thoughts, is it my fault that he cannot reach me?