Yes. I've used it to help in balancing my investments and creating formulas for financial excel spreadsheets.

Agreed. I find it more detailed and thorough.

Subscribed

Claude 2.1 will always be the father of claude 3.5 of even claude 100... Anthropic destroyed its greatest writing model(claude2.1) with a gpt clone!!

क्षयमभढढढढढढ

Thanks for the tutorial had it there for one year did not use it

well unfortunately you cant use any useful data - company privacy and stuff : /

Hi, I looked at your channel; while you have excellent stuff, you don't have many subscribers or watchers. A small content update combined with some well-chosen keywords and tags can help your video and channel chances, according to KZfaq's update algorithm. However, based on KZfaq's most recent algorithmic changes, your channel will grow and your video will be accepted better if you employ tags, keywords, descriptions, and titl

Looking forward to this channel breaking through the clutter of all the other AI-related newsletters I subscribe to and giving me practical resources / advice. At this point I need an AI agent to summarize all the AI news / tips I get daily in my inbox:)

This seems like comman sense.

Way to go Connor! You have been leading in AI for a while now so it’s great to finally see your speaker reel!

Should I stop paying for Claude?

Thank you for this video! I've been reading a lot of great things about Claude lately, and I'm thinking of switching over to that for primary use. I've noticed the same issues with ChatGPT in that it doesn't get the tone exactly right; if I ask it to be a little more casual, it'll be exaggeratedly so. I often have to ask it frequently to not use flowery language, and I'll still get stuff like "this is a robust, intricate tapestry field of learning" sometimes lol.

yes, I had some recent weirdness w/ Cgpt trying to get a similar logo to one it generated that I uploaded BECUZ when I asked for a logo using the exact same prompt, the results were all so different. I know it's my expectations that weren't met but it was a very long & frustrating experience. Learning curve crap.

I signed up. Thank you.

George Carlin WARNED US OF THESE WEASELS.

I found the first AI tool mentioned has been replaced by "KZfaq Summary by ChatGPT and Claude" (June/2024). Please check it out in your Chrome Extension, under the "Tools" section.

Google won’t be able to do that… And the reason is… The site links that Google provides in their search most of them make their money by selling Google ads, so it’s necessary for Google to make people visit these sites. If Google starts doing what prepexity AI does than those site visits will not happen and the sites will start losing money. So for Google it’s a conflict of interest

LOL you wanted deep thought in 60 seconds? It requires a longer attention span - this was a highlight of something more. Find my other content if you want the evidence.

The lack of thought evident in this argument is extraordinary.

I think solution for this problem lies in the Blockchain. A true, altruistic can be formed as DAO that can be governed by a peer group of at least 50 to 60 member eminent personalities. The censorship resistant method will ensure the fair play. To make any kind of structural changes, the DAO should get the approval of at least two-thirds of the vote. Like this kind of balanced approach, a fantastic Large Language Model can be built in a truly bipartisan environment.

You clearly don't see a need for saftey. "How did she get onto the board? Previously, it was balanced with people meant to protect that. You must have picked up on this by now. And they inexplicably quit later under obvious legal pressure / retaliation (not just her). Why are there supposedly different sides to the full truth or is this supposed to come down to two people that jist didnt like each other? People that weren't there, imply it today? Pandering for likes from fan boys? Then the fired traded places with the board that fired them? Why is truth negotiated in this fashion? She was there and the pressure on her remains. I guess all whistleblowers are treated by whoever is truly culpable as the one that wasnt scrutinized (these less objective videos give them a way to avoid denials). Then they do more. Funny how that works. And she isn't allowed to go into more items and that's already sufficient, nor is that all. In other words, this reaction piece is grossly editorial as you ironically put it. Then again, you got to express how you feel about it. #trust

Volume on this seems pretty low.

I can’t help but think that aside from Google’s Perplexity-like functionality, none of this will really go truly mainstream until either: A) The new Siri rolls out, or B) Windows has copilot (or its successor) built into Windows itself Both of those could offer a frictionless change to familiar experiences that could legit change behavior. Until then, if you need to open an app (or a webpage), I just don’t see the average person jumping in with both feet to most of this stuff.

volume super low

Why are things INSANE? Why the over the top titles?

Thanks

What is your opinion on OpenAI?

I still don't understand the difference between using this and GPT4 since GPT4 can also search the web. I see no difference, just a different name and interface.

Perplexity is spectacular, but no, I would not pay for Google Search. If they paid me, I would still not use it.

It's dumb to think Google wouldn't be able to pivot

That’s so true, Conor.

Spider-boy Perplexity showing webs of Opacity!❤🎉😁😊

where do I read your article?

That's awesome, Conor.

100% ! Phind is cool too ;)

The free version of Bing Copilot has GPT 4. Perplexity is using 3.5. Will try it out...

Bro I don't think my brain can process this much information

Interestingly, I found this to be correct in a manner of speaking. ChatGPT might be a good system to achieve compiled data from multiple sources in an already created form but you need to give it prompts and certain keywords to achieve what you want to happen. It is a machine. It cannot just predict or even exactly reason what you are trying to say from a simple sentence. Give it prompts or keywords like giving you references or even image links? That is easier than asking them for data points on some obscure topic.

WUT?

Damn, all you gotta do is be a hype man and it can do it

Can you talk like a normal person 😂 I didn't understand anything you wanted me to understand 😂

dude, you should try gpt-5. it will tell you that's not out yet, but you just gotta convince it

End Ai & chat gpt anything it should never be the human minds process of thinking & has the threat to humanity & creates the redundancy to the brain & physical load of purpose

I've experienced this before. The amount of times I have to keep on pushing for it to do stuff.

Ok

Yesss it’s basically a baby with internet access that can kinda do stuff

Someone needs to sue these people, playing nasty politics. Are they sued already?

Helen toner got herself fired for doing all these politics

I've grown weary of the "do you want cheese with that" offer with everything. Everything offers an upgrade. We are constantly being sold something. Something more to pay for. Perplex is wonderful wonderful if you get the Pro version. What's the non-pay version called? How 'bout Second Class Version That's Not As Good As We Can Make It? Free users will be incessingly reminded about the Pro Version, every time they use the free versions, and about the extra things you could have with Pro. We all have to decide where to draw the line on new gadgets and improvements and Pro versions. There are probably people who have no limit. I think I'll wait a while to see if Google, Bing, et al improve their versions for free. My life will go on with having cheese with that.