Wait a minute, if baby mario was born before

,

Not Thor Bro

Bro really giving everyone a whole gawddamn bakery 💀💀

55:55 What?!?! Oh no!!! I’m Worst Yellow or Purple

wtf did i find

I made this 667 comments.

This is sus bro and not for kids

Mama Mia!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Noticed my 3 year old son watching this and immediately switched it off. I just want you to know that this is silly and you are ruining the minds of innocent children. I'm not blaming my son for this I'm very much blaming you. He doesn't know what's right or wrong to watch so instead of making silly videos like this I'd like you to be more serious instead of filling children's minds up with this abomination so early in their life thank you.

23:00 Mario is bald! 😂😂😂

❤🍑

1st but I’m two minutes late to be first

Mario save peach

0:21 bah bah

Therapy Button! 👇

What is this

I've never seen a video about mario that confused me to this extent. The video about Luigi and Mario teaming up to take Peach to the hospital really shouldn't be widely distributed. 😵‍💫😵‍💫

Wait a minute, if baby mario was born before, what was the purpose of putting him back in peach's belly and then out again?

💀

👁👁 👄

damn you KZfaq KIIIIDS!!!!

Mario

.....someone summon beerus this vid and its creator dont need to exist

oge canser

Cringe.

Кринж🤮🤮🤮

KZfaq WARADO TO THE MY LIFE

5:55 Slient Tartaus Galaxy Slient Quather breaker Super Mega Final Boss Unreal MythicMithical Illuminati Demon

😍 Loved every second of it!

🌟 Brilliant! This video deserves all the praise it can get

🎉 Incredible job! This video is so captivating and well-made

🥇 The best video I've seen in a while!

What the fuck

I would most certainly eat out princess peach ahole 😂 so thanks for the thumbnail

i thought it was neat

☠☠☠☠☠☠☠☠☠☠☠

Mario fans are F%&king weird...

How and why is this story captivating?

OK you’re inappropriate

Can i ask one teeny tiny question?.....WHY?!?

Your account should be suspended for this 💀💀💀

You need therapy, I mean that shit to.

... bruh

Hkvhikuik vyv gbjhgvr to btffyb God!d!kdokskskslskskskskskskkskskskkskskskskskskskkskskslssk!!skskskskkskskskskskskskskskskskkskskskkskskskskskskskakskalslslslsslslsllslsllslskskskskskskkao!!

Religion and politics often make some people lose all perspective and give way to ranting and raving and carrying on like emotional children. They either refuse to discuss it with reason or else they prefer argumentum ad hominem, which is a hell of a way to conduct a discussion. Well, anyhow, not long ago, I was talking about the elections and how the campaigns were ignoring the issues, and sticking instead to invective and personal crap that had nothing to do with the substantive problems of running a government (which is all true, as you know if you followed the speeches and so-called debates of the candidates). Anyhow, one of the guys I was talking with said not a word in the whole conversation, except at the end, when he suddenly chuckled and said we were all full of sh*t and why didn't we go live in Russia or China if that was the way we all hated the United States of America? Next thing you know, the whole blooming discussion was more like a brawl and the epithets flew thick and fast and the noise was incredible! Someone said "son of a bitch" and I think he said "bastard!" (I couldn't be sure; it was all so confusing.) Well, anyhow, I was attempting to get it all back on a rational level. I tried, for example, to talk to the one who had started it all, and I asked him just what did he mean we were all full of sh*t? Was he making a statement of fact as he knew it and where was his documentation to back up his claim? I think Socrates would have been proud of the way I refuted his argument. That is, I tried to refute it. But all he could offer by way of rebuttal was more of the same: about how we were all full of sh*t. But he wouldn't say why; he just kept on repeating it. That and the part about Russia and China and communist dupes. And I'll have to confess that I got a bit angry and told him to stuff his ideas up his *ss (which you don't have to tell me is hardly a way to convince anyone in an argument). Then he got salty and threatened to give me a punch in the mouth if I didn't shut up. And I really got hot and the others did, too. And we all beat the sh*t out of Mr. Conservative. And, after all, he had only himself to be blamed. This is still a free country and anyone telling a fellow like me, "Brother, you're full of sh*t" better be good and ready to answer politely when asked if he'd care to say WHY!

Religion and politics often make some people lose all perspective and give way to ranting and raving and carrying on like emotional children. They either refuse to discuss it with reason or else they prefer argumentum ad hominem, which is a hell of a way to conduct a discussion. Well, anyhow, not long ago, I was talking about the elections and how the campaigns were ignoring the issues, and sticking instead to invective and personal crap that had nothing to do with the substantive problems of running a government (which is all true, as you know if you followed the speeches and so-called debates of the candidates). Anyhow, one of the guys I was talking with said not a word in the whole conversation, except at the end, when he suddenly chuckled and said we were all full of sh*t and why didn't we go live in Russia or China if that was the way we all hated the United States of America? Next thing you know, the whole blooming discussion was more like a brawl and the epithets flew thick and fast and the noise was incredible! Someone said "son of a bitch" and I think he said "bastard!" (I couldn't be sure; it was all so confusing.) Well, anyhow, I was attempting to get it all back on a rational level. I tried, for example, to talk to the one who had started it all, and I asked him just what did he mean we were all full of sh*t? Was he making a statement of fact as he knew it and where was his documentation to back up his claim? I think Socrates would have been proud of the way I refuted his argument. That is, I tried to refute it. But all he could offer by way of rebuttal was more of the same: about how we were all full of sh*t. But he wouldn't say why; he just kept on repeating it. That and the part about Russia and China and communist dupes. And I'll have to confess that I got a bit angry and told him to stuff his ideas up his *ss (which you don't have to tell me is hardly a way to convince anyone in an argument). Then he got salty and threatened to give me a punch in the mouth if I didn't shut up. And I really got hot and the others did, too. And we all beat the sh*t out of Mr. Conservative. And, after all, he had only himself to be blamed. This is still a free country and anyone telling a fellow like me, "Brother, you're full of sh*t" better be good and ready to answer politely when asked if he'd care to say WHY!

Religion and politics often make some people lose all perspective and give way to ranting and raving and carrying on like emotional children. They either refuse to discuss it with reason or else they prefer argumentum ad hominem, which is a hell of a way to conduct a discussion. Well, anyhow, not long ago, I was talking about the elections and how the campaigns were ignoring the issues, and sticking instead to invective and personal crap that had nothing to do with the substantive problems of running a government (which is all true, as you know if you followed the speeches and so-called debates of the candidates). Anyhow, one of the guys I was talking with said not a word in the whole conversation, except at the end, when he suddenly chuckled and said we were all full of sh*t and why didn't we go live in Russia or China if that was the way we all hated the United States of America? Next thing you know, the whole blooming discussion was more like a brawl and the epithets flew thick and fast and the noise was incredible! Someone said "son of a bitch" and I think he said "bastard!" (I couldn't be sure; it was all so confusing.) Well, anyhow, I was attempting to get it all back on a rational level. I tried, for example, to talk to the one who had started it all, and I asked him just what did he mean we were all full of sh*t? Was he making a statement of fact as he knew it and where was his documentation to back up his claim? I think Socrates would have been proud of the way I refuted his argument. That is, I tried to refute it. But all he could offer by way of rebuttal was more of the same: about how we were all full of sh*t. But he wouldn't say why; he just kept on repeating it. That and the part about Russia and China and communist dupes. And I'll have to confess that I got a bit angry and told him to stuff his ideas up his *ss (which you don't have to tell me is hardly a way to convince anyone in an argument). Then he got salty and threatened to give me a punch in the mouth if I didn't shut up. And I really got hot and the others did, too. And we all beat the sh*t out of Mr. Conservative. And, after all, he had only himself to be blamed. This is still a free country and anyone telling a fellow like me, "Brother, you're full of sh*t" better be good and ready to answer politely when asked if he'd care to say WHY!

3:33 What???