The same jerkoff detected again... 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂

A round trip ticket from where to where to where was the cost of a car? London to Sydney First Class or London to Manchester Economy?

Not the USAF. These were special versions using Rolls-Royce engines instead of Pratt&Whitney engines. They were made to UK specifications. The USAF versions, C-137s, existed with Pratt&Whitney engines and USAF specifications. The E-3s AWACS are specials built to USAF specifications, similarly for the E-6 USN TACAMO aircraft.

Jimmie Nicol, he replaced Ringo for 2 weeks during a tour when he was sick

Nonsense. Did you notice the cramped 6 across seating in second class? That was Juan Trippe of Pan American Airways doing. That same cramped 6 across seating is in every airliner Boeing 737 in existence. Insufficient armrest space due to the seats being too narrow. Juan mandated that design so he could pack in passengers from Puerto Rico, Central America, and South America. The seats in first class were based on relatively honest ergonomic evaluations of what adult humans needed to be comfortable on long flights. The seats in second class were based on nonsensical rigged evaluations made to say that what Juan Triple demanded was good ergonomics.

I see you have had the anti-smoking agenda drummed into you. Why minus the smoking? It made the flight much more relaxed.

@@Ben-xe8ps I'm 20 now btw. My dad smokes and I physically can't breathe when I've been in small spaces with a bunch of people smoking. I've tried it and coughed up blood, sooooo yeah. Plus I see those commercials with former smokers with robot voice boxes. If others wanna smoke it's fine. It just really makes me particularly physically sick and with all the oxygen on a plane it's dangerous to smoke on a plane

@@renroxhrd I understand your particular problem and sympathise with you. However, let me tell it from the other side. Firstly, smoking on aircraft is not dangerous. There has never been a passenger fatality directly caused by a passenger smoking in the passenger cabin. NEVER. There have however been fatalities caused by secret smoking in the lavatory (which has always been forbidden) on non-smoking flights and passengers disposing of cigarettes in the paper waste. There is no more oxygen in an aircraft cabin than in normal atmosphere. Have no idea where you got this incorrect idea from. It looks as if you have been well indoctrinated with the anti-smoking agenda though. These days the atmosphere aboard aircraft is tense. Allowing passengers to smoke went a long way to create a much more relaxed and less tense environment. I was born in 1960 and have smoked since I was 17, having started smoking in 1978, still smoke, am fit and healthy for my age and suffer no ill effects. The ban on smoking on long distance flights has destroyed my life and the lives of many other regular smokers making such journeys absolute hell for us instead of the pleasurable experiences of the past. There is also the question of nervous flyers. Many people are nervous, even scared, of flying. That first cigarette after take off goes a long long way to calm such passengers. The same can be said in respect of calming passengers after any incident or event which can cause stress or anxiety during the flight. Also, the first instances of so called 'air rage' occurred when smoking bans were introduced, usually in the premium cabins. Air rage was unheard of when smoking was allowed. The ban on smoking was introduced primarily to allow airlines to save money by reducing ventilation. Fresh air taken into the aircraft requires heating which means more fuel is consumed. By banning smoking and reducing ventilation, less fuel is used. Even with smoking allowed the air in passenger cabins in the past was fresher than the dry recycled air of today. I too dislike being in an enclosed space with smokers but when aircraft were properly ventilated I never had any problem and, of course, there should be separate smoking and non-smoking areas..

@@Ben-xe8ps my dad is the same age as you, used to smoke on planes, been smoking since like 1972. Smokers not smoking on planes is uncomfortable just because they can't get a fix, as my dad puts it. He smokes before we go on the plane and after we land. It's not an airline problem as far as it being uncomfortable not to smoke on planes, its the smokers who are addicted and it calms them down. This is why I think don't do drugs so that isn't even an issue. But when I can't eat food to calm me down, I just find different outlets. I get nervous on planes and listen to music, fidget with stuff, use slime, watch stuff if they offer it, meditate. Anything for that dopamine release. Doesn't have to be nicotine. I see people on planes with nicotine patches or nicotine gum and they're ok