Before watching this wonderful lecture and Q&A, I gave the transcript to an llm for a summary and highlights. I got a great and very useful and interesting summary. I just learned how to do this today and I will use this technique a lot. I always watch a video if Geoffrey is in it but for a lot of videos I might be satisfied with a summary, especially if that summary doesn't intrigue me.

A receita é simples: elon musk fabrica carros assassinos comemore os lucros e investe em IAs, agora é só aguardar um futuro próspero.😂

I feel like Douglas Adams was all about this, and way ahead of his time for a writer... besides being immensely hilarious. He actually explains RL really well throughout the Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy series.

overrated

My main question is, if this is intelligence assuming a more sophisticated form... what appetites is it satisfying?

A 1 A2 A 3 biopshycal cycle 11:12

His constant comments about Trump and right-wing politics were a bit out of pocket and not relative in some of his replies, but I largely respect his outlook on AI and where everything is going

LLM's have a goal, to give the most probable answer to a prompt. It could be argued that when they hallucinate they are being creative not just mimicking. Actually some models are purposively hallucinating new proteins.

Soul chemo

About job-losses.. There's this decades-old 'First Computerlaw': "The number of staff required to feed a computer will always finally exceed the number of staff abolished by it's introduction".

No Daniele, of course you are not the only one who takes a delight in Hintons thoughts, and the beautiful and now and then tongue in cheek - humorous way he expresses himself.

This is so profound. These principles literally explain so much about the world, especially in our corporate system that is wholly driven by the bottom line.

The US govt is remotely "'hacking" human brains. This is no joke. Please take heed. #Justice4TARGETEDINDIVIDUALS

שלום למשה ורדי, אני כותב בעברית כי אני מקווה שאתה תקרא את זה, עם אתה מקבל הודעה שהשאירו לך תגובה בסרטון. הגעתי אליך מראיון שנתת לרועי יוזביץ’ שחלק גדול ממנו לא הבנתי - אני לא בא מהתחום - אבל הבנתי את הרעיון של שילוב החשיבה הלוגית והאינטואיטיבית סיסתם אחד ושנים ושילובם אצלנו ובמחשב. וכך הגעתי גם אל הסרטון הזה שצולם לפני שנה ונראה כאילו לפני מאה. הנושא בו אתה מרצה, האתיקה, פתאום מקבל תפנית מפלצתית. התייחסתי בסרטון אחר Sam Altman: Lex Fridman Podcast #419 ובוא כתבתי שאני מאמין/סבור שסם אלטמן הוא תם .. לצערי אני חושב שתעיתי. אחרי שראיתי איך הוא התמסר למיקרוסופט בניגוד לדעתו של סוצקובר שהבין לאיזה מקום פיתוח הבינה המלאכותית מוביל, ועד כמה שימוש לא מוסרי, שהוא בלתי נמנע בגלל האופי האנושי מוביל, נראה לי שאנחנו במדרון תלול בו מעט חברות עם בעלים חסרי עכבות המנהלים אותן מיקרוסופט פייסבוק אמזון טוויטר - היום איקס - והכי פחות גוגל במרוץ להשתלט על העולם ומשאשביו. קשה לי לראות איך חברות אלה שבעצם גם שולטות בפוליטיקאים יתנו להם לשנות את חוקי המשחק. הברונים השודדים ששלטו בארצות הברית הם משחק ילדים במונופול לעומת מה שקורה היום. האם אני פסימיסט לחשוב שאחרנו את הרכבת? בברכה מכבי ליפשיץ

Dr. Hinton sparked my aspirations for AI. I have much to learn, but I will study every and all things about it.

so good :)

There is no such thing as digital intelligence.

This lecture is gold. He manages to explain complex topics in simple terms without getting overly technical

Thank you very much for sharing this presentation and follow-up q and a, clear and concise description of the problems we're faced with and solutions about how we might solve these problems, if someone stumbles upon this I'd highly recommend you take the time and watch this podcast, thank you again for sharing your time and work, peace

If AI replace human’s job, how human earn money to get food? Are there some jobs for human?

Thanks for this discussion with Prof. Luciano Floridi. First time to hear and see him discuss. His idea about AI as separation between agency and intelligence is new to me, something totally opposite to those of AI scientists and experts that we've heard on KZfaq.

Who ordered the TDS?

I love this, extremely accessible and the implied further reading list of references you cited throughout from the book Entitled, to Science and Democracy excites me. This was one of the most complex things I've ever seen, in the positive sense of having a lot to sink your teeth into intellectually, rather than in the sense of being needlessly difficult to understand

Boy, that’s some really weird and borderline incoherent philosophy of mind espoused by Hinton. And his poorly reasoned belief in the subjective experience of chatbots flows from this weird, overly linguistically determined theory of consciousness.

Just a thought. Biological intelligence seems to be a geometric progression when there is prolonged intensity. Digital intelligence seems to be of arithmetic progression when there is prolonged intensity. Digital intelligence seems spectacular but there is hope yet for biological intelligence, all dependent on intensity and length of time.

AI is very overated. It can never arrive at consciousness which Roger Penrose succinctly defined as non- computational. I also object to these comparisons with the human brain. Besides a whole lot of theories neuro-scientists haven't got a clue regards how the brain actually works. There are plenty of scientists who argue that consciousness is foundational and creates the illusion of a brain rather than the other way round.etc,etc

I appreciate Professor McIlraith informing the audience that their questions would end up being posted online, as the presentation was being filmed. That is admirably considerate and conscientious. Some people might not want to ask a question if that means they will be on the net. It should be standard, but don't remember ever hearing someone do that before - and I listen to a lot of lectures online with audience questions at the end.

Currently, I think what is possibly most concerning is AI being used to win wars. As a hypothetical: If Putin had an AI which could guarantee that he could defeat NATO with acceptable losses on his side, he would definitely put that plan into action. I'm sure Western militaries have discussed the possibility of China developing AI for such a hypothetical goal. This then logically leads us into an AI arms race, with, out of possible necessity, little regard for safety. Even at this level of AI development, an existential threat may exist and that is before the AI gets super smart and decides to have done with the human race for its own goals.

Buen avance de la technology Ahora voy hacer un espectador del avance technology y lo religioso me interesa.

I find the host s introduction without any humility and grace.. I don't know how western people cant replace ' semblance of arrogance/arrogant mentality from day to day engagement s...

very good work

AI is the biggest scam ever!

None of the scient7sts ask questions about the rôle of the spirit and soûl and angels which give support or cayse harm or punishment to the human being after instructions from Allah/God.

"How is compost heap like nuclear bomb?" - Hinton sharp witted as always

At about one minute we get to learn exactly what kind of fundamentalist Hinton actually is. Good self disclosure.

So pleased artificial was not used as the title reference. Thank you

Obviously the atheio-Darwinists would bristle at findings of this sort because it's a refutation of their theological beliefs. Amidst Creation we can see that variation preserves an order that is not random. The inductive approach here finds an apt application. Excellent.

This guy holds a lot of grudges

great Prof. Hinton

why do we keep pets around? this will be the same reason why ASI will keep us around. because the pets feel familiar to us humans, cats like women, dogs like men. make sure we make the AIs in our image, male and female.

⚛️

Prof. Hinton’s frankencites were terrifying!

00:07:23 Geoffrey Hinton 01:03:24

So much of that was what he believes and not evidence based, also speculation if this happened then the conclusion would be this! Very disappointing.

15:25 lol, did this guy just label a bunch of people racists our of nowhere for no reason in the middle of this lecture about AI?

This one for when people come back to their senses: Good talk but full of pessimism and wrong facts. “Should you feel guilty ?” , Should the people who produced knives feel guilty ? and The idea that LLMs or anything else similar understands is totally misguided. One can predict the next word without any understanding at all- think of a foreign language, one can say what comes next without knowing what it means. As for LLMs or AI taking over, absolute garbage. These LLMs don’t store words/tokens and that is correct and so does the brain. No words are stored. LLMs store computable connections between the representations of the input given to them. Open-source models may help bad actors but they also help good actors and it’s dumb to think only the few should have access. It’s all maths. Nothing intelligent. Fantastic and useful tools but "mechanic" tools.

Duck dogger organ

This is asinine. So like if I write a program that takes a prompt from the user and prints the result, when the computer prints ‘hello’ it did something emergent and not just what I told it? This man is a snake oil salesman, and of the worst kind-one that believes his own dope.

Nonsensical

Mankind is different from Robot is creative by human they must still have There are many flaws. Robots have a large amount of memory. They were created by humans over many years. Human memory is limited, but humans can use AI artificial intelligence to assist humans, instead of harming humans.