Thanks, I was very confused on how to use y~mx1+b, this video helped alot :)
@opinyinatedhomeydonpladat32126 ай бұрын
. I am going to document myexperiences🧲 on this channel.. Camp Pendleton's Qwantumley Intangled Q¡¡'s🎳, General Thomas Bev. Sco++ will be as well, 2×2. 🧮🧮 🃏 🤡 🃏 I am almost positivee. I also Atrophied @ll the lil þ¡¡pel- 🏆Killah Qlown Possé My artifacts, my library, my qipu's. My books. I want my books. V○¡n¡ch(ə & Old Muthah Hubbids Cupboards. East Coast Syntac, Definitely. After All, "George ə". Scott is dead. Lepht, lepht, lepht, right, lepht.. 🪖🪖 🤧🫳🫳👈🎨 🐴 nè 🎠📿ion 🦴a p🖼 ☮️✌️Piece🥧 🎼Goodbye Horses.
YOOOO THIS WAS BETTER THAN HOW MY TEACHER TAUGHT IT
@owo-qy2em7 ай бұрын
The way you explained this was awesome! and the fact that you look happy doing math inspires me to also see math as a fun hobby instead of thinking it as a hard subject :D
@AthenianStranger7 ай бұрын
You can do it!
@mr.duckie._.7 ай бұрын
due to how complex this method is, i think this would drive a mathematician insane so i tried it with 1101.64 and here's how it went: 1. i had to *estimate* which square is the largest without going over, most commonly done with *trial and error* (i got 33) 2. oh right you have to divide it into groups of 2 digits (__ . __ is ok, and not _ _._ _) 3. write the estimated number to the left of the √ symbol and above (the last digit of that number should be uhhhhh just write that placed down like normal long division) 4. the decimal i wanted to square root had digits after the decimal point, so copy that down (but if it has 1 or 0, then just write zeros instead) (so i have "≤ 1264" 5. uhhhhhhhhh 2:12 yeah i have no idea how to explain this part (i write 1 here) 6. ............. ………………………………………… and you just repeat step 5 and 6
@RobertGOrtega-eh9zl7 ай бұрын
Is a slide rule same as a caculator?
@RobertGOrtega-eh9zl7 ай бұрын
Is a slide rule same as a caculator?
@RobertGOrtega-eh9zl7 ай бұрын
What is a slide rule, used for?
@RobertGOrtega-eh9zl7 ай бұрын
What is a slide rule, used for?
@user-ds1uu9ih6f7 ай бұрын
then how about 37?
@user-po5lb7dp3d7 ай бұрын
Maybe I'm a little slow, I was okay till ya added (2) 00 zeros! Why do you add the two zeros, what's the purpose?😂
@user-vv7qt8fp3b7 ай бұрын
W VIDEO and W TEACHER🤙🤙❤🔥🔥👍
@RishabhPranav-cs4js7 ай бұрын
1 million views and just 10k likes?? Bro thats unfair
@redxsciencegaming96717 ай бұрын
That's Genius. Idk why haven't this got more views
@atulrastogi48368 ай бұрын
Biggest stupid
@sevirouscameroar22268 ай бұрын
So much helpful, thank you
@AthenianStranger8 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@gbcv46558 ай бұрын
Damn this is actually epic thanks captain
@Llupe90218 ай бұрын
Verbose
@danishsami85768 ай бұрын
Thank you so much
@AthenianStranger8 ай бұрын
You're most welcome
@ahmar9118 ай бұрын
Thanks. appreciate that.
@AthenianStranger8 ай бұрын
You're welcome!
@shade72838 ай бұрын
very cool we can get an exact answer. How does it work?
@jouskaa80378 ай бұрын
Such a fascinating video, i could watch these sort of lectures for hours.
@AthenianStranger8 ай бұрын
It's hard to tell if that comment is ironic, either way, I appreciate it, I honestly find doing mathematics by hand, and listening to some EDM instrumental music, with like a beat to be extremely soothing, almost like, vacuuming, and making the lines in the carpet straight, or maybe I'm just OCD lol. (I am, literally, OCD.)
@ultrametric93178 ай бұрын
The process here is really Newton's method based on finding the intersection of the tangent line at the estimated square root. You could have picked 7, or any number, and it will converge to the root. Example 38/7 = 5.43, add 7, 12.43, divide by 2, 6.21. 38/6.21 = 6.11, add 6.21 = 12.32, divide by 2 = 6.16. Reason - d/dx x^2 = 2x thus the division by 2. You can use the same method to take cube roots or nth roots depending on your patience :) You are estimating a function by its tangent line at the point in question.
@AthenianStranger8 ай бұрын
Agreed, I made a newer video about this because I don't teach this method anymore, just Google my channel for finding square root by hand without a calculator and look for the brown background video. Basically I'm teaching this to seventh graders so I have to kind of take the Newton method And sort of figure out a way to make it a little bit easier
@user-mv3ng9rj2l8 ай бұрын
Thank you, Sir! But if I may ask, what went through your mind that you thought of this method? What made you go beyond the comfortable boundary and thought "Ey, this could work!"?
@AthenianStranger8 ай бұрын
Absolutely nothing went through my mind because I took this method directly off the Internet several years ago and I have no idea how it works. I don't use this method anymore instead, I use a method which I published or more recent video within the last year with the same title And I highly recommend that you take a look at that video because I can tell you exactly how and why that method works but I have no clue about this one. It's a black box.
@tabeight57868 ай бұрын
This video is titled , "How to Find the length of a Cord". What the hell are you doing showing how to covert degrees into radians.. Stay the course lad.
@TH-oh8cw8 ай бұрын
I completely disagree. I believe you illustrated this information brilliantly. We can mince words all day long but the heart of the issue is clear. I walk away with a simple understanding that ten other videos couldn't bring into focus for me. So thank you.
@alimustafa76808 ай бұрын
I wonder how long it would take to do the whole process
@XDelta8118 ай бұрын
Thank you for your help. I got an A on my assignment 😊👍
@JustineKho-dl3jq8 ай бұрын
To be Honest for me this is a rare tutorial video on how to find the square root of non-perfect square numbers
@AthenianStranger8 ай бұрын
Please take the time to look and search my channel for the newer version of this video with a brown background and the same title, it's a much better video using a much better method, and I no longer teach this method but I appreciate the compliment I think you'll like the new video better
@HassanDinbalidinbalihassan8 ай бұрын
جاکش مزخرف است
@subhashdeshpande17729 ай бұрын
This not a short cut method |!
@mjs28s9 ай бұрын
Wouldn't this be close enough? Especially as the number you are working with the result gets closer and closer to the exact answer? kzfaq.info/get/bejne/qp94m86clbqmYZs.html
@tarunmathur469 ай бұрын
Calculator to nhi chahiye pr D scale ki zrurt pdegi😅
@solf20009 ай бұрын
Why in the world are you using the Protractor?!
@charlesarterton36469 ай бұрын
Thank God for calculators!
@thatbeme9 ай бұрын
👍
@beksman02849 ай бұрын
:O this is so easy! thanks!
@aLittlePal9 ай бұрын
lefthanded brother and sister!
@marccontreras81269 ай бұрын
Using your method find the square root of 600
@marccontreras81269 ай бұрын
My mistake, i meant to say 38 not 36.
@marccontreras81269 ай бұрын
Why don't you just divide 36 by 6 and take it to 2 decimal places?
@AndyU969 ай бұрын
I would rather stick to iterative comparisons
@TheRuizsByTim9 ай бұрын
Couldn't you just divide the remainder by 2 times the numerator in the division step? Another words, in your example, divide 2 by 12.
@sortilegus9 ай бұрын
Cool but this taught me nothing. :)
@rscott31419 ай бұрын
I did the next digit...and got 4.
@notanyaleiff89619 ай бұрын
This neat method is based on the binomial coefficients. For square root, it's derived from a^2+2ab+a^2 as such: a^2 + b(2a+b). A similar but more complex method gives cube root: a^3 + b(3a^2+3ab+b^2). For fourth root, it's a^4 + b(4a^3+6a^2b+4ab^2+b^3). Fifth root is a^5 + b(5a^4+10a^3*b+10a^2*b^2+5ab^3+b^4), and so forth. You would bring down groups of three 0s, four 0s, and five 0s, respectively. It's doable by hand for cube root, but rapidly grows to involve gigantic multiplicands when used for higher roots. Nonetheless, it works.