Henry Rodgers kissin cousin.

P R O M O S M

Nice fade haircut today. I would get a fade, but I save $50 a month just growing my hair out.

Krusty the clown hair

Way too much personal information. I came seeking help for an interview n 30 minutes I am very disappointed.

Very unprofessional

24:35 Thank you so much for saying this. I needed to hear this. I am a 26 y/o Blk male in the purchasing field for 8 years now and am currently in between companies due to a very unfair/ gas lighty layoff. The self-doubt was creeping in for sure. There's just not much game or advice out here, especially for us. Thanks for the gems!

I'm upset, I've been working as a buyer assistant for 12 years in my country Brazil, so I decided to do carrier orientation, I can't no longer wait for a possible promotion.

This interview was great. Math is absolutely my favorite subject. I love it so much, in fact, that I've taken advantage of opportunities to help teach and tutor it to my peers. I look up to Mr. Allmond a lot, especially because I get to see a fellow black math nerd like myself 😅.

Respect to the black girls and boys doing this and not the other thing 🙏🏿this is inspiring me before my interviews

Great exposition

Thanks @Inquire Higher | Black Student Success Network for posting this video about affirmative action / supreme court. Here are the viewpoints expressed by Supreme Court justices regarding affirmative action. 1) This case is about a group called Students for Fair Admissions (SFFA) who sued Harvard College and the University of North Carolina (UNC). They said that these schools were not fair in their admissions process because they were using race as a factor, which they believed was against the law. The law they referred to is the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment*. 2) The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. The SFFA believed that by considering race in admissions, Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally. 3) The Court looked at the history of the Fourteenth Amendment and how it has been used in the past. They also looked at how other cases involving race and college admissions were handled. They found that while diversity in a student body can be a good thing, it must be handled in a way that treats all applicants fairly and equally. 4) The Court also looked at the idea of "strict scrutiny*". This is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional. 5) The Court found that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC did not pass strict scrutiny. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear or specific enough, and it resulted in fewer admissions for certain racial groups. They also said that the schools' use of race in admissions seemed to stereotype certain racial groups, which is not allowed. 6) The Court also said that the schools' admissions systems did not have a clear end point. This means that there was no clear plan for when the schools would stop using race as a factor in admissions. This was another reason why the Court said the schools' admissions systems were not fair. 7) The Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not clear, specific, or fair enough to be allowed. 8) However, the Court also said that schools can consider how race has affected an applicant's life. They can look at how an applicant's experiences with their race have shaped them and what they can bring to the school because of those experiences. 9) In the end, the Court decided that the admissions systems at Harvard and UNC were not fair and did not follow the law. They said that the schools' use of race in admissions was not allowed because it was not clear, specific, or fair enough. 10) So, the Court decided that the SFFA was right. They said that Harvard and UNC were not treating all applicants equally in their admissions process, which is against the law. They said that the schools needed to change their admissions systems to be fair to all applicants, no matter their race. *The Equal Protection Clause is a part of the Fourteenth Amendment that says that every person should be treated equally by the law, no matter their race, color, or nationality. *Strict scrutiny is a way for the courts to look at laws to see if they are fair and necessary. If a law or policy is found to be unfair or unnecessary, it may not pass strict scrutiny and could be considered unconstitutional.

👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

Love these!! Keep them coming!

Big thanks to Marcus for letting us highlight his great work!

Big thanks to Marcus for letting us highlight his great work!

Please, let's just use common sense for a second. When did our bodies become science projects? If nature did not. Make it, do not take it. Don't take it if nature didn't make it.

Great conversation!

Big thanks to Renee for participating! #mu #marquette

Great interview! Thanks

Thanks again to Ed for sharing his story! Learn more about Inquire at inquirehigher.com!

really appreciate the “REAL” input with us taking up spaces

Big thanks for Adam for taking the time to chat with us!

Great job son!! Proud mom❤️

This is my cousin!!!

His voice changed the World. He ruined the Free World, and advanced Communism, under the guise of compassion, quicker and more deeply then we ever could have imagined.

Congratulations to my nephew Javari Carlton

very well spoken young man!

🔥🔥🔥

Awesome vid. Thanks Ashley and Aaron. I now have a better idea of what to expect for new purchasing manager position.

It was so great chatting with you 🙌🏽

Yes. I’m a vegetarian so I’ve never eaten there, but I heard of it. Lol.

Yeah. Moving into a new environment like that can be such a culture shock especially with a pandemic in play. So glad you navigated all of that and are doing so well.

Go panthers! 🖤💛

I work with procurement. Thanks for the insight. One day I wanna be Senior Procurement Analyst.

I'm excited. Great to hear that this content is available

"WIN THE MORNING, WIN THE DAY"! 🙌🏾⛲️🎁🙏🏾

MY HUSBAND WAS THE BEST BBQ KING.... EVERYONE REQUESTED HIM TO BARBECUE. 💯🍗🍔🍡

Everybody An'Nim😁😁

"MY BELIEF CARRIES MORE POWER THAN MY REALITY"! 🙏🏾🎁⛲️🙌🏾

CELEBRATION OF THE SMALL WIN 🙌🏾⛲️🎁🙏🏾

#ChallengeLimits 👍🏾🎁⛲️🙌🏾

"When I can see it, I CAN BE it!!! ⛲️🙏🏾🎁🙌🏾

Supply chain analyst or procurement analyst which one having more career growth!?? Can you suggest me

Congratulations Aaron!

Great video and perspective. I am not in the journalism field, but I use my degree and skill sets daily as a consultant.

Nice to stumble accross this youtube page as a junior supply chain professional from UK & i went St.Ignatius for a short time (UK school) hahaha! AMDG!

8:00 - 9:20 . Don’t let that go over your head. A lot of people don’t know that and they don’t want you to. This is. The first interview I’ve watched where it was mentioned.

Not bad advice Ms. Ashley…👌🏾👍🏾✊🏾