the inflection in your voice makes you sound like a 10 year old girl,good info doe.
@JDsimplified9 күн бұрын
@@WhatWhat-ot5nr hahahaha, I get that a lot. Sometimes when a telemarketer calls my phone they ask to speak to an adult 😂🤷🏻♀️. Glad you found the lesson helpful! I graduated from law school back in the early 2000s so I'm definitely way way over 10 😌
@911Certifiedrobertwatson14 күн бұрын
Follow Watson v. Rev Al Sharpton 1:23-cv-08958-LTS - SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK IN RE SEPTEMBER 11TH LITIGATION ROBERT WATSON VCF 0104772 PERSONALLY AND A REPRESENTATIVE OF EVELYN WATSON VCF0225XX -Thank to the tutor @JDsimplified
@WhatWhat-ot5nr22 күн бұрын
SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND SERVICE OF PROCESS IS THE SAME THING?
@JDsimplified22 күн бұрын
@@WhatWhat-ot5nr Service of process is the legal procedure that involves delivering a summons and a copy of a complaint to a defendant, which are the documents that initiate a lawsuit. The summons informs the defendant of the case against them, and the complaint details the allegations of wrongdoing. The delivery of these documents is called service of process.
@qwilliams2488Ай бұрын
Is there anyway a plaintiff can remove a case from state court to federal court? Can a plaintiff use Derivative jurisdiction or joinder of federal law claims and state law claims? Great video by the way and thanks for sharing your knowledge!!
@DeAngeloDowning-rl3teАй бұрын
1:07
@JDsimplifiedАй бұрын
Thanks for reaching out. What did you mean by your comment: 1:07? thank you
@DeAngeloDowning-rl3teАй бұрын
moition filing mc 025
@cathyclark5102Ай бұрын
This is by far the BEST explanation of "claim preclusion" Very well articulated!
@JDsimplifiedАй бұрын
@@cathyclark5102 thank you!! I can never get enough of these comments. I'm so so glad it was helpful.
@mimis9179Ай бұрын
Has anyone found the second lesson? I can't find it for some reason.
In this lecture. You need to watch the whole thing; lol. I promise the lecture gets better.
@originalgangsta794Ай бұрын
Thanks I appreciate you being educational
@JDsimplifiedАй бұрын
@@originalgangsta794 you're very welcome. Happy it was educational and valuable.
@charliesvidsАй бұрын
Seriously a diamond in a sea of law videos
@JDsimplifiedАй бұрын
@@charliesvids I never get tired of these type of comments. So so glad this video was helpful. Thank you for the compliment.
@charliesvidsАй бұрын
You are absolutely incredible and are so passionate. Id love to chat do you have a method of contact?
@TheSaintloАй бұрын
You're simply an extremely smart woman with a beautiful voice.
@JDsimplifiedАй бұрын
@@TheSaintlo Awe! Thank you. I hope the lesson was valuable to your studies.
@SJ-lm7xz2 ай бұрын
THE STATE OF STATES are corporations. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Inc. Not the same as The State of Nevada or Nevada State.
@jaybou84122 ай бұрын
Thank you so so much
@JDsimplified2 ай бұрын
I'm so so glad it was valuable to you! You're so very welcome.
@WhatSayYouHmmm2 ай бұрын
I am not a lawyer and I have subscribed just because I think I’m a lawyer now after this detailed lesson 😂
@JDsimplified2 ай бұрын
😆😆😆
@ShirleyNichols-sn3xc3 ай бұрын
Hands down - THE BEST "SIMPLIFIED" VERSION of claim preclusion. Very easy to follow!
@JDsimplified3 ай бұрын
Thank you for the compliment! Glad it was helpful!
@MattSmith-ji6bj4 ай бұрын
way better than barbri
@JDsimplified2 ай бұрын
Awee! Thank you. So glad you found it helpful.
@MattSmith-ji6bj4 ай бұрын
Best video out there on this topic. Wish you had evidence too
@JDsimplified3 ай бұрын
I'm just now starting Evidence. More to come!
@seahlilynn4 ай бұрын
This is so so helpful. ☺️ always look forward to your videos
@JDsimplified4 ай бұрын
These comments make my day. I'm so glad the videos are helpful.
@JTH85994 ай бұрын
Like this if you’re just trying to pass
@thelsatgirl30324 ай бұрын
I’ve watched so many videos on this topic. This is the absolute most complete and detailed one.
@juansmith42175 ай бұрын
P r o m o S M
@csp84295 ай бұрын
So much easier to understand with the concert scenario. That Cheezy!
@JDsimplified5 ай бұрын
That Cheezy went off the rails when Kam divorced him 🤷🏻♀️🤷🏻♀️
@galenbodle37415 ай бұрын
😆 "Promosm"
@ToTuiiDro15 ай бұрын
Please post more of these. Incredibly helpful! Thnx
@JDsimplified5 ай бұрын
So glad it was helpful. These comments make my day! Trying to post more.
@andreavillanueva46905 ай бұрын
This is amazing! How can i access all the 1L courses?
@JDsimplified5 ай бұрын
Im so so glad you found it helpful. These videos are all I have for now. But soon I’ll be working on them on a full-time basis. So by the time you take the bar exam, shoot me an email and I’m happy to grant you access.
@aubeenlopez10516 ай бұрын
Thank you, I needed that visual interpretation of this lol. You don't know how much it helps lol.
@JDsimplified6 ай бұрын
I’m so so happy it brought you so much value. Totally makes my day every time I get one these comments!
@MattSmith-ji6bj6 ай бұрын
Pleasantly surprised. I wish I had started with this video.
@JDsimplified6 ай бұрын
So happy it was helpful. If you don’t mind me asking, did you begin with another one of my videos or a video from a different person/company? Nonetheless, thanks for the compliment.
@feyikemiadedayo-balogun29406 ай бұрын
being a foreign trained attorney, a grappled with these concepts until i watched your video which are very detailed, simplified and easy to grasp. Thank you
@JDsimplified6 ай бұрын
You are very welcome! I am so very glad you find it so helpful. Your comment absolutely made my day.
@kumbella37316 ай бұрын
Your videos are awesome. Probably the best ones I’ve watched in terms of conveying the information. Ty
@JDsimplified6 ай бұрын
So so glad they’re helpful! Thank you for the compliment. It means the world.
@jeromegarcia53966 ай бұрын
Very great information, thanks for your time 👍🏼
@prachitrivedi81846 ай бұрын
Hi! Can you share the outline mentioned in the video! Thanks
@chicblackgirl7187 ай бұрын
Does anyone know where I can get the outline she provides? Thank you!
@marioraimondi6707 ай бұрын
Great explanation
@JDsimplified7 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@vitaledistribucion28627 ай бұрын
Whoever recruited you to teach at their law school should get a pay raise
@JDsimplified7 ай бұрын
Haha! Not sure if you’re being sarcastic, but thank you! I do not teach at a law school. I tutor law school and bar prep. Thanks nonetheless for the huge compliment! Glad you found it valuable
@AkSnowflake7 ай бұрын
A State which is not a living breathing woman or man cannot be sovereign!! This is not correct....
@global_Jesus7 ай бұрын
❤ your great
@JDsimplified7 ай бұрын
Thank you. I’m so glad it brought you value.
@jeffh.25888 ай бұрын
what's up with Rule 18 and why is my professor obsessed with it?
@JDsimplified8 ай бұрын
Hi! Are you referring to Rule 18 of FRCP or Rule 18 of appellate procedure?
@jeffh.25888 ай бұрын
FRCP@@JDsimplified My professor wants us to discuss 10, 18, 13 (a,b,g) and 14 when it comes to joinder. Idk why 19 is missing.
@JDsimplified8 ай бұрын
@@jeffh.2588 ok. When is your exam? Monday?
@jeffh.25888 ай бұрын
He calls it the "piggy back rule"
@jeffh.25888 ай бұрын
@@JDsimplified yep!
@chadha14128 ай бұрын
Question..Why is it that some plaintiffs do not have the case in federal court in the beginning? What are the reason?
@JDsimplified8 ай бұрын
Hi! Plaintiffs, since they’re the ones bringing the action, have the initial choice of forum. That is, P has the choice of where to sue. There are many reasons for them to want to bring the action in state court; the court might be geographically closer, maybe it’s a state claim P thinks state court will be better suited to resolve, maybe P’s lawyer is better versed in state civil procedure, maybe P knows D wants to litigate in federal court so P sues in state court to be a brat about it, lol. If the lawsuit could’ve been filed in federal court from the start, Defendant can then use Removal to “remove” that lawsuit from state court into federal court. Hope this helps.
@bellamalik140738 ай бұрын
Did you ever make intestacy part 2? I can't find it
@JDsimplified8 ай бұрын
It’s in the hands of mi editor 😩 so it will be posted sometime in the next few weeks. A little too late…sigh.
@bellamalik140738 ай бұрын
@@JDsimplified Oh no! My exam is in 2 days so that's a wash for me :(. But regardless, thank you for this video!!! So helpful :)
@Dawglaw73623 ай бұрын
@@JDsimplified I'm keeping an eye out for it as well! Thanks for posting!!
@amalashinde45058 ай бұрын
This is great stuff
@JDsimplified8 ай бұрын
Thank you! These comments and emails make my day. I’m so glad it was helpful.
@courtneychappelear11428 ай бұрын
Prepping for a closed book final (didn't realize that wasn't the standard until this video) and feeling so thankful for this account! I wish there were more videos. You explain these complicated topics so clearly.
@JDsimplified8 ай бұрын
Thank you! So glad it was helpful! Please subscribe. I will be posting supplemental jurisdiction tonight or tomorrow.
@courtneychappelear11428 ай бұрын
@@JDsimplified If you have time tonight I would be so grateful!!! My exam is tomorrow night, yikes!
@toddhauser23778 ай бұрын
This is amazing content and explained in a very easy to understand way. Thanks for this.
@Angie-ko4tj9 ай бұрын
Your voice is so soothing. Thank you for the informative video!
@JDsimplified9 ай бұрын
Awe, thank you! My pleasure!
@Dr.HowieFeltersnatch9 ай бұрын
When you really think about it, how does the 2021 Ford case not overrule the precedent in WorldWide Volkswagon v. Woodson? They are pretty similar fact patterns with opposite holdings. I just don’t see how what Ford did was substantially more of a purposeful availment than what WorldWide Volkswagon did. Pretty subtle at best imho.
@JDsimplified9 ай бұрын
Hi! The Supreme Court actually relied on the Worldwide Volkswagen case to support its decision in Ford. You are right that these two are so similar, and both address purposeful availment. However, Ford conceded that it had contacts within Montana and Minnesota. The plaintiffs in Ford brought their vehicles to the forum, just like the Robinsons did in World-Wide Volkswagen, true. The difference in the Ford case is that Ford had substantial contacts within the forum, whereas VW did not have any contact with Oklahoma (the forum state in that case). Specifically, the Ford Court considered the billboards, commercials, advertisements, and direct mail which were seen or circulated within Minnesota and Montana. Also note that Ford didn’t consider the reasonableness factors. Hope this clarifies it! Thanks for watching!
@luisdiaz86049 ай бұрын
BETTER THAN BARBRI
@JDsimplified9 ай бұрын
Awe! 🥹 thank you! It means a lot! I’m going to post supplemental justification in the next few days.
@alanakarmiol57689 ай бұрын
The way you present the information is perfect. Thank you, thank you, thank you.
@JDsimplified9 ай бұрын
You're very welcome! ❤️🤓
@alanakarmiol57689 ай бұрын
THANK YOUUUU!! By far the best video on this topic. How do I access them all?
@JDsimplified9 ай бұрын
Glad it was helpful!
@yeahaight34959 ай бұрын
This is great 👍 reviewing Civ Pro as a 1L
@JDsimplified9 ай бұрын
Every time I get these comments, I smile for hours. So glad you find my vids to be a value-add to your learning experience.
@yeahaight34959 ай бұрын
@@JDsimplified Your videos will serve as the basis for my outline, and I’m going to share your channel with friends! Thank you so much for dedicating the time and effort it took to make these!
@yudiaguilar959710 ай бұрын
This was super helpful! Clear and understandable. I love it! Do you have part 2 ?