doesn't the diameter the pistons touch the wavy component provide leverage around the central drive shaft?

👍👍👍

The super charger you said was attached to the engine with Mazda is not super charger. It was air filter.

So its a two stoke…..

Changing the angle between the opposed swach plates will result in two issues: Imbalance & serious issue of reducing efficiency due to one piston with have the power stroke before reaching TDC.

There is nothing shocking here. People have been discovering the "barrel" engine for many years. Prior to world war II, the Air Force stopped testing the deluge of designs of this type. Check some of these old designs. The overall reason was that cooling is inadequate at reasonable power levels. Insist on an extended under load test run and watch the engine seize up due to uneven cooling. No reason to believe these claims.

Water = H² O. If I run it on H² O² (extra oxygen molecule) will it gain HP or get better economy? On a more serious note, This is a planet destroyer. Pandora's box, whatever. Bad JuJu.

The ending of this video is not accurate! automotive alternators actually Produce AC current on avg 120 amp AC, which the rectifier a component inside converts it into Steady DC current at different rpm remain 12v Dc regardless of how fast the alternator is spinning, theres so much extra AC current created not converted its mostly grounded out and released unused, This is why you can Drain on board capacitors in your vehicle by removing the battery entirely and connecting the battery posts only with a wire results in a grounding and the capacitors storing pesky check engine codes can be ereased because they must make a path to ground for the original additional ac current to ground to be discharged. Some alternators can output 150 amps AC 50/60hertz, This is equal to what is entering your home from the powerline going into your breaker box. Yes this is facts your car can produce as much electric as the power grid is lowering your entire home with or more if you remove the rectifier inside the alternator, witch is significantly more power youd ever need to electrolyze enough oxyhydrogen gas from water electrolysis bon board to power that vehicle. They Toyota can do this because there's Japan The US has a federal law that limits something's efficiencies and if it exceeds them they're deemed a threat to our national economy and immediately classified top secret why to keep us slaves to energy paying for it significantly. if driving a car becomes too cheap they banish it.

I wana say publicly.. Google you must of intentionally rigged search results and your language models to say that this broke the law of thermodynamics that you could not produce enough electricity on board to electrolize enough oxyhydrogen from water electrolysis disassociation to run a internal combustion engine..Lies!!! I knew it was possible all along Good for you Toyota!!

Byd has made a car with a range 2100km!

Oh I thought this was the MYT engine. But the guy that invented that probably died. But it was better.

Entrenched entrests prevent such an engine

Green light water

Highly efficient electrolysis has existed for welling over a decade; the green gas generator. It cuts steel using fuel generated from electrolysis on demand.

I had that idea 12 years ago, everyone I talked to said it wasn't possible. But now it is, go figure.

stanley meyers patents are all in the patent office. i downloaded them almost 20 years ago. and he had these patents or was in the process of having his patents in other countries. his work on this was an evolution from an earlier scientis andreas puharich or henry puharich. it's real. btw, both of these guys expired under suspicious conditions...just sayin...sadly i don't know if this work with toyota will be available in any meaningful way. something will come up and it will be 'delayed'. or it simply will be too expensive for anybody except the wealthy. making power from a FREE source like water is unacceptalbe. btw, i have puharich patents as well. and others. look them up.

Its 2xstroke as 2 pistons not si gle thumper

No industry disrupting tech will be allowed period.

someone took the AC compressor out of a car engine and turned it into IC! very interesting! but, it still will be a 2 stroke design with the inherent inefficiencies regardless of how the pistons are situated. I can see this working really nice for some backpack style power plant, scooter, small AC electricity generator for camping / RV type situations.. very cool

This is not one stroke, at least two: inlet / outlet and compression.

If it requires x2 strokes per combustion cycle, it’s a 2 stroke engine… You can’t change this fundamental fact…

WOW......I wonder if this was made as a joke? There is so much BS in this I can smell it through the screw.

Doesn't it take a lot of electricity to separate the H2 from the H2O?

It’s an opposed piston 2 stroke built on the bottom halves of 2 compressors. Sure it may have been scaled up but that’s what it is. It’s going to be expensive to manufacture and therefore more so to buy, and how you gonna put the power to a fly wheel? Gonna have 2 flywheels? Will that little connector shaft break under torque of a hard launch? I suspect it won’t make the power or it’ll self destruct under adverse driving conditions. If it was so great there would already be a production vehicle powered by it.

What sort of torque does it produce

why would i care about speed. if i want speed id get a jet pack. its the same bulshit they tell you about diesel engines.

Water is most needed basic needs for life we don't options to use water as fuel for cars 😢

Yep is is spectacularly unspectacular It is complex beyond need and the power specs are 10 years behind the times Take a look at the Crighton CR700W it generates 319 hp per litre and is normally aspirated.The only insane part to this article is the improper use of insane.

Internal combustion engines in almost every configuration have been around for 200 years now. This is not the f****** future, this is a company that's 70 years behind the times trying to scrape up investors for a lost cause just so they can stay afloat.

This is just a two stroke engine with a different Crank similar to a hydraulic motor or a refrigeration compressor.

They have a Super hi tec Brian Gifts from God brian8😊

Only single stroke motor is a turbine

Great video, I hope Optimus is ready to do advanced stuff and soon by this summer will be replenished in markets .

Skynet b like , "The robots will be powered by Biological material.... U !" 😮

Brah, how does this have so little views? Is skyney AI suppressing this until the rapture!?😆....😐seriously though , this is great content. I dont understand why theres not hundreds of thousands of views within a day or 2 ,unless this is a copied forwarded link or somethin. Holler 👊

They don't needs you anymore. They are manufaturing you...

you can shock your nonshocking shockcrab in your shockass.. ...there are one strokes over the whole world...called guns

Koenigsegg electric motor, 25Kg 1000hp! Why are we still trying to improve combustion engines? Makes more sense to invest is developing better and cleaner battery solutions.

So it is a special two stroke engine after all... How is it lubricated? By using mix-lubricating fuel (Fuel-Oil mixture) like a two stroke engine? That would contribute to air pollution.

I just wonder how many of the comments on this thread are made by qualified engineers?

Where this brilliant development becomes dominant; adding water exhaust to atmosphere, what is the impact to climate, more rain or humidity?

This would be an ideal generator in a hybrid car. Allowing in car charging while running the ICE.

this engine is fake, youre not gonna push the plate to move, everyone had learned physic will know its gonna break for sure, the plate kinetic energy only can be transfer to the piston shaft like ac compressor, not by reverse

It's still a reciprocating engine. Like all reciprocating engines, there are inertial effects because the pistons move up, reverse & down, reverse.

Calling this a single stroke engine is insulting to actual single stroke engine concepts. Not saying this is better but this is correct as a single stroke: kzfaq.info/get/bejne/aaiIac-CmJjPdJ8.html&ab_channel=KavehMad Not sure why the makers of INN engine are so adamant about calling this a one stroke. Just call it a 2 stroke and their company now gets to boast about how smart their engineers are. Choosing to lie and hope nobody notices isn't a good sign. I would not work with these people for that.

The visionery best engine is one which take water as input in a tank and delivery Oxygen in the exhaust. This should be developed asap

The bearings running off the piston rods that roll on the round cam looks that there would be a lot of premature wear.

I thought ive seen this years ago.

Here is a true single cylinder design. A floating piston In a single cylinder, ported on both ends like a two stroke. On start a magnet or an air compressor would pull the piston tight against one cylinder. Once ignition takes place the starter apparatus lets loose and 2 crank sensors pick up the pistons travel igniting the opposite side driving the piston the opposite way. Computer controls mixture to increase decrease compression. Power is harnessed through the exhaust. I came up with that in the amount of time it took to write this.

We believe it when we see the product. Japanese like US is getting shamelessly arrogant nowadays.