During the Civil war , did the Confederate have rifleman with a button R And were they sharpshooters
@matthewbazil9476Күн бұрын
Just picked one up for $550 😁
@jensnimike176Күн бұрын
I would love to have a replica of this.
@briantheos36142 күн бұрын
Ask General Sedgwick....NOT used?
@quacked78913 күн бұрын
They had some experimental canteen pouches.
@mikelis1064 күн бұрын
None of them were semi automatic?
@tzenzhongguo6 күн бұрын
No dual tube PVS-5s? Also Soviet have night vision devices.
@yakamarezlife6 күн бұрын
Oh man those Ritchie boys where some hardcore dudes im sad they've let richie rot like it has but this presentation was awesome
@theblakex7 күн бұрын
The desert chocolate chip is my fav
@dddutuber17 күн бұрын
What about the Applegate “Smatchet”?
@tonybarde257210 күн бұрын
The rifle used by Travis Coates from Old Yeller (1957)
@stanleygurski773312 күн бұрын
Ukraine viewers watch and learn
@vincentmcalexander995613 күн бұрын
USN Mark 1 and the Quartermasters cartugas 225Q would be cool additions. the Mark 1 was basically the M3 of the Navy and the 225Q was utility for none frontline army troops.
@aaronmcneal169815 күн бұрын
I've got a Smith & Wesson victory at my great-grandfather brought back from World War II. It was nickel-plated and from what I was told by my grandfather, the officer that gave it to my great grandfather said that it was his dress uniforms pistol. I'm not even sure it's ever been fired as the bluing is still on the hammer and I've always wondered what the value in it would be
@erikhoff501015 күн бұрын
Why the Gorilla tape?
@justaguy590916 күн бұрын
I love my Saiga
@ぷらぐ17 күн бұрын
The switch from 6.5 to 7.7 was due to the power but it is really an odd choice. The 6.5 was under pressured compared to all other rifle cartridges of the era. There’s little known as to why. Many speculate it was the propellant type or the heat exposure. There’s not a lot of evidence or information.
@resolute12317 күн бұрын
So when the Rough Riders went to Cuba, was wearing a blue top the result of supply issues or to identify easier as American troopers or both?
@stanleygurski773319 күн бұрын
Threat was. the politically correct name for Soviet Union
@rafaellastracom641119 күн бұрын
¨Everybody has a plan until they get punched in the face¨. Mike Tyson
@Unit8Transhuman19 күн бұрын
What was the 3rd one's helmet cover camo called?
@scottdunkirk671020 күн бұрын
The rank is a TECHNICIAN 5TH GRADE.
@JimwombatLand20 күн бұрын
no camo in Army in 1962-3 ....
@CrazyFreak71420 күн бұрын
Diana : 47, focus on the targets you don't have time to dancing around and compromising the mission. 47 : understood, continuing the mission.
@kerimedley894520 күн бұрын
Mine folds down on the side
@noneofyourbusiness4321 күн бұрын
The sound doesn't seem to be working right
@cascadianrangers72821 күн бұрын
For everyone wondering why they didn't mention certain Soviet kit it's because it's a secret and America didn't actually know about this stuff at the time!
@cascadianrangers72821 күн бұрын
Really great production, well filmed, written, maybe not the best acted, but they're not filming actors
@AJPMUSIC_OFFICIAL23 күн бұрын
Interesting design, a single vehicle could either transport or support troops.
@citizen4power25 күн бұрын
That's not ERDL,that's what is referred to as Mitchell pattern.
@tristanholland644525 күн бұрын
But it's a public domain film why put water mark in the first place.
@justinriley865126 күн бұрын
good video. feel free to drop some more knowledge on us!
@joecameron367426 күн бұрын
From all that I have read, which has been extensive, I was under the impression the Liberator was made to air drop to villagers and others who had no guns to be a one-time use gun in case the enemy came into their village. That way they could kill an enemy soldier and acquire his much better gun. That was the reason for the stamped metal construction as they were not made to last past their one job. Love the videos!
@RHJNewcombe27 күн бұрын
SMLE stands for Short, Magazine Lee Enfield not short model lee Enfield Mk1 1904 Mk3 1907 Mk3* 1916 SMLE Mk2 and Mk 4 were conversions of the 1890s Lee Metford and Lee Enfield ( long lees)
@marcthompson309728 күн бұрын
Holy crap! Dude, keep your fricking fingers off the muzzle of the weapon! I can't even finish watching this.
@iaidagger827828 күн бұрын
Very nice bibliography on handguns, some of THE BEST authorities on the subject!! Thank you for sharing this compilation!!😊😊😊❤❤❤❤
@chrisrennirt846529 күн бұрын
Excellent reference examples for collectors here! I certainly learned a lot. Thanks again!
@michaelbenjmitchell129 күн бұрын
@History Collectors Forum Does anyone have any information of 1903 Springfield rifles with scrap bin barrels installed instead of a regular barrel?
@RockyLonda-ob5soАй бұрын
Wow so nice
@bonecollector8086Ай бұрын
Awesome job!
@user-jr7in1cl6tАй бұрын
My 1897 takedown was issued to the US Marshalls service, some time in the 1950s. When I was cleaning It I removed the butt plate and found an old onion skin paper letter, in an envelope dated dec 7 1961, with the department of justice letter head stamp. It has the heat shild and bayonet lug for the ww2 18" bayonets. And an origional leather millitary sling, which has got red leather rot, so I removed it, And replaced it with a new military leather sling but have kept the origional Anyone got any information on that?
@Oheng75Ай бұрын
Welp, looks like the T-62 is back in action... 60 years later lmfao
@OirseecirАй бұрын
They ever have these shows in MN
@chrisrennirt8465Ай бұрын
As usual here, an incredible amount of otherwise hard-to-find and valuable information about an interesting niche topic of militaria collecting. Thanks!
@haroldkelley6709Ай бұрын
Harold Kelley
@lynnkozak4522Ай бұрын
My father was a staff sergeant in the 1st Special Service Force. I still have his V-42 stiletto, uniform & other items from his time with this group. He passed away 09/07/2001. He was proud to have been a part of Force.
@hoffenwurdig1356Ай бұрын
6:55 In the context of scounting, it is extordinarily unlikely that the officer would know or be allowed to say or write the word “Spetsnaz.” At this point in history, the very EXISTENCE of Warsaw Pact special operators was highly classified, and their special operators were not allowed to wear anything like Western qualification badges. “Spetsnaz” is a very generic Russian-language acronym that simply means "special-purpose forces," conveying minimal information. This ambiguity means that the term can refer to various entities, ranging from military railway maintenance technicians to SWAT-like units, riot squads, and formations similar to the special response units and site security forces of US agencies such as the Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of State, Department of Homeland Security, Bureau of Prisons, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Marshals Service, Secret Service, Central Intelligence Agency, Drug Enforcement Administration, Department of Energy, National Security Agency, and others. For example, the special missions unit of the Russian tax police is considered a spetsnaz unit. Contrary to popular belief, the term is not limited to military commando formations and does not imply anything about the experience level of the operatives, nor the presence or absence of conscripts in the formation. Additionally, the term is often used for similar formations in former Soviet states. The use of the term does not indicate whether a unit is comparable to commando forces in the West and elsewhere - some are, while others are not.
@druzheorest8367Ай бұрын
Congratulations. On Soviet SKSs this guy guessed 10% of historical facts. 90% is made up horse crap.
@sethmcvicker6365Ай бұрын
I just stumbled across this video and I have a WW2 marine canteen that was marked up just like the canteen cup. Has the guys name, the ships he was on, the battles he was in, and a couple women's names.