Q&A With Book Conservator
2:25
4 ай бұрын
Tom's Coat
2:31
10 ай бұрын
Fossil Facts: Shark Teeth
0:50
10 ай бұрын
SCSM Artist Interviews: Blue Sky
3:16
SCSM Artist Interviews: Leo Twiggs
5:47
SCSM Artist Interviews: Sam Wang
3:56
Reimagine the Experience
1:35
10 ай бұрын
Пікірлер
@trebhum_
@trebhum_ 19 күн бұрын
Very informative video. Thank you for sharing!
@digitizedgoldminds7372
@digitizedgoldminds7372 22 күн бұрын
How are people so bored they just follow people around when we have this to learn?! Video killed the radio star.
@digitizedgoldminds7372
@digitizedgoldminds7372 22 күн бұрын
Thank you for keeping your day job so i can find out about these creatures!
@digitizedgoldminds7372
@digitizedgoldminds7372 22 күн бұрын
I see South Carolina, i click
@andrevdsandt8017
@andrevdsandt8017 28 күн бұрын
1. It's not 5us resolution. It's fkkin COMB FILTERING! 2. He got the cochlea back to front. sigh... there's so much else.
@leoempress
@leoempress Ай бұрын
❤❤❤
@markdavids2511
@markdavids2511 3 ай бұрын
It wouldn’t be surprising if these jugs were modelled on the Toby jugs used in the big house.
@stevendegiorgio3143
@stevendegiorgio3143 4 ай бұрын
Greenville South Carolina is going to experience an 84 percent moon coverage of the sun.We are further to the north and west.
@bleujai5011
@bleujai5011 4 ай бұрын
Why glasses when the sun gets covered. Can someone, Anyone, explain this with logic? Otherwise I'll look up again with no glasses like I have since a kid in the 70s. My eyes are just fine! How can the sun be so harmful yet beneficial for vit D. So confusing.
@MoreofMorell
@MoreofMorell 4 ай бұрын
It been my main question!!
@redgamer94
@redgamer94 4 ай бұрын
Great Video! this is exactly what I was looking for!
@tugbars4690
@tugbars4690 4 ай бұрын
What a charlatanry
@weylandemmett7808
@weylandemmett7808 5 ай бұрын
And many of us don't even know the grounds on which we sleep
@jsonharle
@jsonharle 7 ай бұрын
hi dzaddy
@candiem7663
@candiem7663 7 ай бұрын
Just found this account through looking for information on fossils, so greatful for Dave!
@kevanhubbard9673
@kevanhubbard9673 8 ай бұрын
A fine collection of brass telescopes.
@fredbogan3451
@fredbogan3451 9 ай бұрын
🍀 Promo_SM
@deanachavisbakerart
@deanachavisbakerart 9 ай бұрын
Excellent on all levels. So very meaningful and informative.
@phoenixrivenus9270
@phoenixrivenus9270 9 ай бұрын
Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman was kinder to South Carolina than he needed. Boohoo a third. Traitors... Columbia needs statues of Gen. William Tecumseh Sherman.
@stocktonrails9279
@stocktonrails9279 10 ай бұрын
I do have a question for you. I have what I believe to be an ammonite, first discovered by me between 1973 and 1975 in Germany while on field maneuvers in a U.S. military training area. It’s a circular spiraling shape about 5” in diameter and about 1” thick. It’s mostly light orange in color, though other parts of it are darker and look like pieces of shell. It is still intact exactly as I found it… never brushed, never cleaned, or exposed to water, etc. I would really appreciate your help in identifying what it really is, and approximately how old it might be. Thank you in advance… I can also send you pics of it if you like.
@FOBanimates
@FOBanimates 10 ай бұрын
I'm tired, I'm not wearing glasses, I look at the screen and I thought Gordon Ramsey was teaching me how to cook ammonites...
@pandemicphilly60
@pandemicphilly60 6 ай бұрын
Do you remember what he was saying?
@FOBanimates
@FOBanimates 6 ай бұрын
​@@pandemicphilly60I guess?
@digitizedgoldminds7372
@digitizedgoldminds7372 22 күн бұрын
I just took my glasses off and you’re not wrong 🤣😂🤣😂 also forgive me for any missspellings
@raiwismatara2398
@raiwismatara2398 11 ай бұрын
nautilus is the same as ammonite?
@karmatseringstar
@karmatseringstar Жыл бұрын
Hindu worship it as Shaligram. it is found in Nepal Gandaki river but Shaligram looks more like a stone.
@H0110W_
@H0110W_ Жыл бұрын
is it just me, or does anyone else hate to see fossils get broken chipped or anything of the sort happen, it just makes me stressed out to see ancient history just being lost. Also love the video, it taught me a lot.
@DreadEnder
@DreadEnder Жыл бұрын
Cool! I like when people make names out of elements! That’s why my handle looks so weird!
@Mike-xi4zt
@Mike-xi4zt Жыл бұрын
I found about a 6-in ammonite in Missouri limestone along with crinoids and all kinds of other bivalve sea life that used to live there before climate change evaporated the ocean that was in middle of America, and cause them to go extinct. If only Al Gore and AOC could have been there to save them with your tax dollars.
@jamespriddy8275
@jamespriddy8275 Жыл бұрын
Hmmmm… I read about Lots daughters getting him drunk, having sex with him, and one of the offspring was named Ammon. Those Ammonites were enemies of the Israelites. I’m not sure if they are extinct though.
@79kevnor
@79kevnor Жыл бұрын
She was my teacher at Ecorse High School in the 1970s.
@jeffandring3202
@jeffandring3202 Жыл бұрын
She was my teacher. I never knew.
@megak6839
@megak6839 Жыл бұрын
Miss G was a dear family friend and my favorite Thanksgiving memories are of Miss G regaling us with her latest adventure. What a gift to be able to hear her again!
@Ryan-mq2mi
@Ryan-mq2mi Жыл бұрын
Great job, thank you for this. I came here to learn more because the youtube algorithm has me seeing people crack open rocks to reveal these. one after another, average joes. Are these so abundant that they literally have no value? It's amazing that a fossil of a living thing 400 million years ago has no value.
@kylereed6548
@kylereed6548 Жыл бұрын
Found a decent ammonite here in north texas, only one I’ve ever seen but I guess they’re out there 🙌
@natureboy3785
@natureboy3785 Жыл бұрын
Legend
@dglorious1269
@dglorious1269 Жыл бұрын
Wow.
@Batmandabomb
@Batmandabomb Жыл бұрын
You killed it with the face diaper
@rnbvret
@rnbvret Жыл бұрын
Nicely done, good job!
@user-bg7df6zi8u
@user-bg7df6zi8u Жыл бұрын
Really great video' so much information. I would love for more videos like this on other fossils
@chrismosman3894
@chrismosman3894 Жыл бұрын
Do you ever see objects moving near or on the moon. Thanks
@5tarSailor
@5tarSailor Жыл бұрын
Hail Columbia happy land If we don't burn you I'll be damned
@ufoallgone
@ufoallgone Жыл бұрын
Thank you for a very informative presentation. I found a 12 cm ammonite several decades ago while walking through some woods near the DFW Airport. I would like to learn more about the animal that inhabited this shell and how I may clean and perhaps polish the shell. Any suggestions would be appreciated.
@psyborg06
@psyborg06 Жыл бұрын
It is a shame you are placing your university's name on this video and publication. I will be in contact with the Dean to ensure that you refrain from passing these "studies" in a field with which you have no qualifications and have taken abject measures to conjure explanations for your lay beliefs.
@diligentdavid
@diligentdavid Жыл бұрын
Have you even read his peer-reviewed studies on this subject?
@psyborg06
@psyborg06 Жыл бұрын
​@@diligentdavidHave you even heard of an ad hominem argument?
@sub-harmonik
@sub-harmonik Жыл бұрын
'no qualifications?' He's a physics professor with a Ph.D.. how are those not qualifications? what are your qualifications?
@psyborg06
@psyborg06 Жыл бұрын
@@sub-harmonik I have qualifications in basket weaving, does that make me qualified to write a paper on audio? Nope. Please read next time.
@sub-harmonik
@sub-harmonik Жыл бұрын
@@psyborg06 audio is physics at least. and physics is at least a hard science. Again, what are your qualifications? saying he has 'none' is disingenuous when he literally has a ph.d in physics afaict.
@jovelynaguilar300
@jovelynaguilar300 Жыл бұрын
How do you find the ammonite 👏
@Paka1918
@Paka1918 Жыл бұрын
Nice. I like ammonites, they have so different shapes of their shells, some looks like a paperclip. Some scientists believe, that some species survived the createcous age into the danian age.
@vgacoralreef
@vgacoralreef Жыл бұрын
I wish ammonites were still around
@Lupo32
@Lupo32 Жыл бұрын
Like a squid and a snail put together.
@thinkindia7054
@thinkindia7054 Жыл бұрын
Very informative video 👌📸
@k.jespersen6145
@k.jespersen6145 Жыл бұрын
Very interesting! Thank you for streaming!
@Lauren080508
@Lauren080508 Жыл бұрын
Wow, that was some grotesque jumps to conclusions from some questionable related facts, what are you getting at professor? do you want to become the champion of those companies who pray for old men with money and delusions of hearing prowess? I am seriously questioning your ethics right now. but if you want me to stand corrected, it is very simple and easy to do, save all the lectures, just shows us the results of your own double-blind test being able to tell the difference between cheap and expensive cables.
@mysock351C
@mysock351C Жыл бұрын
You really need to enlist the help of your colleagues who are familiar with the fields of acoustics and psychoacoustics as there are numerous errors in this video. An example is the cochlea, and referring to it as a "4000 frequency spectrum analyzer." It doesn't work quite like that as the basilar membrane's vibrations are what stimulates the cells, and both the membrane and cells have finite dimensions. As such, the resolution declines with rising frequency as each span of the membrane will respond to a progressively broader and broader range of frequencies. At low frequencies, the resolution is quite good, but becomes progressively poor as the frequency rises and this is why we have octaves in music, to reflect the fact that we perceive the scale of frequency logarithmically. Additionally, while a dynamic range of "120 dB" is quoted, with complex things such as music, the situation is considerably more nuanced as there are things such as masking and critical bands to consider that limit our ability to discern separate components in sounds we hear. While we can easily hear noise down around 0 dB absolute, we struggle to hear distortion products that are more than 35-40 dB below the threshold of the music we listen to as they are competing with the source material itself, and often fall within the masking range of the main spectral content. Also the notion of it being a spectrum analyzer is fine from a conceptual point of view, but the actual way we resolve sound is considerably more complex and nuanced.
@sub-harmonik
@sub-harmonik Жыл бұрын
the frequency resolution of the membrane declining with higher frequency wouldn't be that relevant, nor would it necessarily contradict '4000 frequency spectrum analyzer'. Also he's speaking generally, obviously he's not going into specifics on that one topic. (especially when the topic is time-domain perception, not frequency domain perception). Similarly he's not going to go into detail about the '120 db' thing and both of these things are odd things to nitpick about in the video. I will say that him saying the piano samples have the same spectrum is an odd way to make the point, but that's more a matter of miscommunication. And I'm not sure why you think he would disagree with 'the actual way we resolve sound is considerably more complex and nuanced' because that was his entire point, and he even had a slide dedicated to it.
@mysock351C
@mysock351C Жыл бұрын
@@sub-harmonik As an example, the "120 dB thing" is not a minor point, nor a nitpick. This stems from a misunderstanding of someone using 120 dB, the highest level sound that can be heard before true pain sets in, as the upper limit for the ears dynamic range, with 0 dB, the threshold of hearing, as the low range. This is completely wrong, and not how we hear. Due to effects such as masking and ERB, the actual dynamic range of the ear is about 35 dB in normal listening, and about 45 dB in critical listening situations. Anything that is below the main audio by about 50 dB is no longer able to be perceived, and this seems to hold fairly universally for people who have had a look. And even those figures are being quite generous. This is one reason why people find LPs, which can barely eek out 25 dB of dynamic range, acceptable. The only time this is violated is when the two sounds are very far apart, such as a low and a high frequency tone playing together. However, for spectrally complex things the above seems to hold, and I have yet to really see any contradictions to that. Its certainly not 120 dB, even with respect to noise when no sound is playing. That is probably about 90 dB in practice. I was being quite magnanimous with my comments. The truth is from reading his papers, he is a clear charlatan who either knows nothing, or is deliberately ignorant of how audio and psychoacoustics work.
@miriamalicia5496
@miriamalicia5496 Жыл бұрын
i love it
@jamesuk2
@jamesuk2 Жыл бұрын
See this video kzfaq.info/get/bejne/l5agZqeQrNyaeY0.html that debunks Kunchur's latest paper (boson.physics.sc.edu/~kunchur/papers/Interconnect-cable-measurements--Kunchur.pdf). And consider the results when you rate the value of the video presented here