GD&T isn’t right for everyone. A lot of industries use supply chains that are unfamiliar with the ASME or ISO standard and it can quickly result in confusion and increased cost. Dimensional tolerances are appropriate for many parts. Modern technology allows for overall tolerance and basic dimensioning to be inspected by optical comparators against the 3D geometry.
@jeffreyerwin3665Күн бұрын
Nonsense. Bernoulli applies to fluid flowing though a pipe of varying circumferences along its length. It does not apply to sails or wings. A sailboat's sail has exactly the same lenght on each side, but still produces lift. Many sailboats also have a hydofoil that is composed of a flat 1/4 inch metal plate. This foil also produces a lift vector which is necessary for a sailboat to sail upwind.
@Imagine_Beyond2 күн бұрын
This video reminded me of my first internship where I got to built a cubesat and really provides a basic overview about the main things about satellites. However, I would like to add one thing at 12:12 . When reaction wheels reach their saturation, it does not mean they cannot be used anymore. If they are played in a coil, their rotational energy can be converted into electrical energy which will slow the reaction wheels down, while also providing power to the satellite.
@marktinkler68972 күн бұрын
It's not so much that the air is glowing faster, it is the effect of the faster flow on the physical properties of the air at that time. The air molecules flowing over the wing have to spread out to reach the trailing edge at the same time as the air molecules flowing under the wing. Fewer molecules per square inch exerts less pressure per square inch. So during the time the wing is in contact with that "piece" of air there is greater pressure below than above. Faster moving air , more pressure/time, more "lift". A Cessna wing generated enough lift to fly the plane at 40mph, a Boeing 747, more like 160mph Big wings, fast speed, more lift force.
@alitahaakpnar28632 күн бұрын
Veryyy helpful! Especially when I have a Thermal Eng. exam in a couple of days. Thank you so much for these insightful videos.
@martinsokute98822 күн бұрын
Yall glaze tgis channel too hard, this is the most unnecessarily complex explanation of fem ive ever come across
@franxis_tvr2 күн бұрын
I didn't skip any advertisement in your videos, you deserve it man!!! amazing quality, straight to the point and very easy to understand engineering video. keep it up 👏👏👏
@tturi22 күн бұрын
so my Tresca stress calculation should give a higher stress for the same state as Von Mises?
@LightGesture2 күн бұрын
Really cheap... now they're $3 per bolt setup minimum. BBB
@tjsase2 күн бұрын
Mindblowing stuff! I just got my first CAD job, coming from an art and CS background, and this will help me look at the the assemblies in a whole new way!
@WouterWeggelaar2 күн бұрын
As CubeSat designer, this is a breeze to watch. Kudos for the details and getting all the animation details right including terminology, units and order of magnitude for numbers. Watched it on Nebula but they don't do comments so here it goes!
@afshinalihosseini52423 күн бұрын
Was very practical , understandable and complete information . Thanks a lot 🙏
@cookiemaria7803 күн бұрын
Something that has been confusing me for a long while, is the relationship between ductility and toughness. As far as I understand, ductility is a measure of the ability to plastically deform. I also understand that the plastic deformation is the main way that energy is absorbed by the material before fracture. This leads me to believe that materials with high ductility must have high toughness and vice versa, since toughness is the ability to absorb energy before fracture. However, i have seen some things online claiming that high ductility and high toughness do not always go together, and that even some ceramics are tough even though they are not ductile. Can someone please explain this to me? Like how can some ceramics be tough but then not plastically deform? How is the energy being absorbed in this “tough” ceramic? Are toughness and ductility not directly proportional? I need this info for university, would be really grateful for help. Incase anyone reading this is a German speaker, I have a further confusion, that I would love help with. As far as I understand, the translation for the German word ‘zähe’ is ‘tough’ and the translation for ‘duktil’ is ‘ductile’. In german ‘zähe’ seems to be used interchangeably for ‘duktil’, which in english would mean that toughness = ductility. But I can’t believe this is true. We can clearly see that ductility and toughness have different quantitative values. Are the terms used liberally in German? Was ist der Unterschied zwischen zähe und duktil? Bedeuten sie das gleiche auf deutsch? Was ist dann toughness auf Deutsch? Hilfe!
@AlsatorNg65673 күн бұрын
Anyone also here to learn the basics of engineering to draw mechas?
@alikolaei20463 күн бұрын
Iran
@SuperAbcd3333 күн бұрын
good effort
@airborne19753 күн бұрын
great videos, which program do you use to create those animations if i may ask?
@DanielGupta-ww5wt3 күн бұрын
Wonderful Video! Thanks a Lot
@iZoomz3 күн бұрын
She torque on my wrench till I preload with nut force.
@krispoli223 күн бұрын
The nut factor 😅😅😂😂😂
@jhanks20123 күн бұрын
idk man, i just watched a Neil deGrasse Tyson video and he said the flaps go the opposite way during takeoff, and he's very knowledgeable on the subject of aviation 🤔🤔
@ulricklopez3 күн бұрын
POV had a class for this, why couldn’t this video come out last semester 😭😭
@HxTurtle3 күн бұрын
this might be the best video I saw so far on KZfaq!
@thoughts_of_mine_4 күн бұрын
Excellent work 🥵👍🏽 thank you to the team ❤️
@drj95064 күн бұрын
This is the biggest video yet, super impressed by everything here.
@rosemarybassey85454 күн бұрын
Thank you very much. This video was extremely helpful ❤
@dan93doang4 күн бұрын
I am sure that the satellite that are shown in your video is old technology it were used at 50 's or 70's .
@julianhomola39894 күн бұрын
buenisimo
@iordanispolatoglou81224 күн бұрын
Great videos! You explain very clearly and in simple terms engineering theories. So much better than expensive university courses.
@ralphbroeils17604 күн бұрын
Method of joints, method of sections, force pologon.....several ways to design or check a computer run. Secondary stresses easily checked for added bending tension or comp. between panel points (truss joints).
@prathameshmore47394 күн бұрын
As a Satellite Systems Engineer myself, I can confirm this is the best explaination one can have in 27 mins. KUDOS.
@mahmoudsamhoud69485 күн бұрын
Thank you for this masterpiece.
@abbadubenzwin51575 күн бұрын
القمر الصناعي يُعبّر عن أقصى تقنولوجيا وصل اليها الانسان
@QuyNguyen-kl2im5 күн бұрын
Tks a lot for this vid, love u.
@shehulsuratwala26845 күн бұрын
I work in the aerospace industry, and these models and animations are quite close to real components. Great job. Should've included phase array antenna for transmission system. They are amazing ..
@Ravi_18195 күн бұрын
how to decrease the pressure with constant velocity of water flow in water pipeline..? Is it possible to decrease the pressure without variation of velocity..?
@anthonymaione83075 күн бұрын
I would like to know the derivation of the equation VQ/IT. I am happy to just plug the values in but im really interested why the equation is setup in such a way. thank and your content is amazing
@kylekris1055 күн бұрын
This might be the most concise explanation of satellite design I've ever seen. I would like to add this to my "new hire guide" for employees who come help me build satellites.
@EhmedCousCous5 күн бұрын
The sound at 15:10 was so nice
@ahmedsaoudi23445 күн бұрын
Excellent video! Thank you for your time and effort. Bravo!
@10vogels6 күн бұрын
A perfect video.
@engineer01116 күн бұрын
Typical "explanation " for those who understand already everything . By the way: I didn't expect Paid-like comments here.😶
@unknownpotato64986 күн бұрын
Finally somebody that got this shit right
@herzogsbuick6 күн бұрын
"articulated solar arrays" -- how does that affect the attitude/orientation of the satellite? if the solar panels change position, that must have an effect on the satellite right? because if velocity is constant and it's at orbital velocity, there's nothing except that mass of the satellite for the motors orienting the panels to react against? i think?! i'd never thought about this till the video mentioned it
@vikasb86826 күн бұрын
Precision and quality of video is outstanding its similar to actual thing
@databaseerror-2236 күн бұрын
This is honestly one of the best videos ive ever seen
@Idea638416 күн бұрын
Thanks, this video was very helpful for building my own Fractional Orbital Bombardment System.
@infotration22256 күн бұрын
Never seen this kinda of video before. ❤❤❤ You from Pakistan